ARRA Design-Build in Minnesota Jay Hietpas - Mn/DOT
Signed by President Obama on Feb 17, 2009 Goals Create new jobs and save existing ones Spur economic activity and invest in long-term growth Foster unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency in government spending American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
$288 Billion in tax cuts and benefits for working families and businesses $224 Billion for education, health care and entitlement programs (e.g. unemployment) $275 Billion in federal contracts, loans and grants American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
$48.1 Billion for Highways includes: – $27.5 for Highways ($26.6 Apportioned) – $8.4 Transit – $8.0 High Speed Rail – $1.3 Amtrack – $1.5 Discretionary (TIGER) – $1.4 Other ARRA Transportation $
Legislation Requirements 50% of funds needed to be authorized within 120 days of enactment Authorization for traditional projects: 100% Plan Sets Authorization for Design-Build projects: Issue Request for Proposals – 30% Plan Set American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Minnesota ARRA Funds – $92 Million – Transit – $23.2 Million – Aviation – $502 Million – Highway and Bridge $150 Million for Local Projects Metro District 50% Out-State Districts 50%
ARRA – $502 Million for Transportation – 93 Design-Bid-Build (MnDOT) – 5 Design-Build Projects – 19% of Total ARRA Funds – 5% of Projects Overall Mn/DOT Program 1% of projects let 10 % of program value
Mn/DOT ARRA Goals – Delivery Projects Quickly – Advance Un-Funded Projects – Project Diversity Grading, Bridges, Signing, Paving – Regional Diversity Spread work to contractors available throughout state
Mn/DOT ARRA Goals (continued) – Consultants Integral part of industry – Disadvantage Business (DBE) Increase participation – Minimize Cost Overruns Mn/DOT at Risk for Overruns
Challenges – Grading/Bridge Projects Minimal Design Completed (almost 30%) Environmental Documents “almost complete” No permits obtained Small window for funding – National - Use it or lose it – Mn/DOT – first come-first serve
Challenges (continued) – Major increase to normal program – Short Construction Window April through early November – Panic!!!! How are we going to deliver all of these projects? I don’t want to lose my funding!!
Solution: – If we can let the 35W bridge in 2 months: Let’s Use Design-Build!
Hold-on: – Design-Build is politically sensitive First procurement since 35W – Districts have limited staff with DB experience – Limitations on the industry Companies with no DB experience need training Companies with DB experience have limited staff
Delivery Challenges Current staff structure 4 RFPs in 3 months Available experienced staff FHWA Authorization Amber Blanchard DB Program Mgr
District Responsibilities – Define Project Scope – Obtain Permits / Env Approvals – Obtain Municipal Consent – Write Book 2 of the RFP – Manage contractor interaction during procurement – Participate in Short-Listing and Technical Scoring – Administer Contract
Central Office Responsibilities – Manage Procurement Write RFQ Oversee Short-Listing Process Develop Scoring Criteria Oversee Technical Proposal Process Oversee ATC Process Approve RFP’s and Addendums
– ROC 52 (Rochester) $232 M – Interstate 494 (West Metro) $135 M – TH 212 (Southwest Metro) $238 M – TH 10/32 Interchange (Hawley) $ 9M – Oronoco 52 (Oronoco) $ 37M – D4 Signs $ 1 M – I-35W Bridge $234 M – TOTAL $886 Million Design-Build (2001 to 2009)
Five Projects TH 2 Box Culvert $ 2.2M Bridges of Mower County $12.8 M TH 169 Saint Peter $16.5M TH 610 $47.8M TH 13/101 (Savage) ~$15M (Letting in 2010) TOTAL $94.3 M ARRA Projects
TH 2 Replace bridges with a box culvert Issue RFP – May 7 Letting – June 19 Open to Traffic – Sept 30 Cost Growth = < 1% Two-bids (Low-Bid, no short-list)
TH 2 Delivery RFP Preparation Proposal Evaluation Design Oversight Construction Oversight
Bridges of Mower County Replace 4 bridges on I-90 near Austin Three Bidders – Best-Value Issue RFP – May 8 Letting – June 17 Completion – Sep 1, 2010 Cost Growth = < 1% Three Bids – Best-Value
Bridges of Mower County RFP Preparation Proposal Evaluation Design Oversight Construction Oversight
Saint Peter Reconstruction of TH 169 through Historic Saint Peter Business Impacts Issue RFP – April 8 Letting – May 11 Open to Traffic – Nov 16 Five Bids (Best-Value)
Saint Peter RFP Preparation Proposal Evaluation Design Oversight Construction Oversight
TH 610 Un-funded Project with regional significance New Construction from TH 169 to CSAH 81 Six New Bridges Issue RFP – May 15 Letting – August 14 Open to Traffic – July 2011 Bid was 35% below Mn/DOT Estimate Three Bids – Best Value
TH 610 Contractor Innovations Profile Adjustments Reduced Bridge Widths Roundabouts Eliminated Retaining Walls Reduced storm sewers Innovative Staging
TH 610 RFP Preparation Proposal Evaluation Design Oversight Construction Oversight
TH 13/101 Accelerated due to low bid on TH 610 Intersection Reconstruction Estimate - $15 to $20 M Issue RFP – Summer, 2010 Letting – Fall, 2010 Open to Traffic – 2011
Procurement Cost Results ProjectMn/DOT EstimateAwarded Contract $ Saint Peter$15,500,000$16,535,000 Bridges of Mower County $12,660,000$12,824,526 TH 2$2,535,050$2,233,460 TH 610$73,300,000$47, All Projects anticipated to have less than 1% cost growth
Upcoming Design-Build Projects in Minnesota
Hastings Bridge Project Risk Management – PAE process Letting June 4, 2010 Open to traffic no later than October 1, 2013 Increase capacity, replace aging structure $220 M Arch or cable stay RFP Issued January 13, 2010
New interchange; developer access $35 - $40 M RFP issue – April 29, 2010 Letting July 30, 2010 Open to traffic – Fall 2012 Elk Run Interchange
Convert signalized highway to freeway Long time DB project $120 - $160 M RFP issue – June/July 2010 Letting – Fall 2010 Open to traffic – Fall /494 Interchange
Potential Projects I-90 Dresbach Bridge (2011 or 2012) TH 36 St. Croix River Crossing (2013) TH 72 Baudette Bridge (2018)
Thank You