Dias 1 Department of Science Education Our common knowledge Peer supervision

Dias 2 Department of Science Education Example Focus p: I’ve got a problem with a PhD student. The student does not get any results. I suggested another method which I know will get results. But the student wants to keep going with her method and try and modify it. Now I have doubts. Should I insist that she changes her method or should I support her in her project with the risk that she doesn’t get any useful results? Supervisor:How long has she been going? Focus p: One year. Supervisor: But she’s got to get some results. You’ve got to tell her that if she doesn’t get any results and get them published soon, she won’t have a PhD at all in two years. Focus p:No. I’ve problably got to tell her that.

Dias 3 The dialogue: Structure and progression Department of Science Education Mind model Revealing of problem situation Own suggestions for solution with justifications Alternative ways of understan- ding the problem solutions Attempt at solving problem Extension, transfer to other situations Application in a dialogue Supervision dialogue

Dias 4 Department of Science Education Practise triangle – our teacher P3P3 P2P2 P1P1 VALUE BASIS Ethical, political JUSTIFICATION Experiential, theoretical ACTION Thinks student should have responsibility for own project Wants students to get results Suggests alternative method

Dias 5 Supervisor’s toolbox Enhedens navn Sted og dato Dias 5 Approaches / styles Meta-communication Perspectives Caps Themes and progression Feedback and Assessment

Dias 6 Department of Science Education Peer Supervision - Oslo model Three phases in supervision: Pre-supervision with groundwork paper Observation of teaching Post-supervision Observation of the supervision dialogue Three persons involved: Focus person, supervisor, observer

Dias 7 Problem-focused peer supervision in groups Department of Science Education

Dias 8 Pre-supervision exercise Department of Science Education