Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Thoughts on 21 st Century Public Transit Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation
Adding Priced Capacity for Congestion Relief Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation
I-15 MANAGED LANES Building on Success Institute of Transportation Studies’ Center for Urban Infrastructure March 7, 2003.
January 31 st, 2012 North Coast Corridor A Better Environment for the Future.
How Politics Even Affect Good Pricing Projects Eric N. Schreffler, ESTC TRB Int’l Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, Florida November 21, 2003.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 San Diego’s.
February 26, 2012 Managed Lanes Overview Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation
1 Interstate 405 Update. 2 Presentation Overview  Share public perceptions and provide information  Answer frequently asked questions related to express.
GE541 Economic Geography of Transport October 30th.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Soup to Nuts: Changing Operating Parameters for HOV Facilities Sponsored by the HOV Pooled-Fund Study and the Federal Highway Administration.
Some things can’t wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project New Travel Choices Ahead.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Thoughts on Florida LRTPs
Presentation transcript:

Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates HOT / BRT: Better Together Managed and HOT Lanes Gaining Interest in U.S. Managed and HOT Lanes Gaining Interest in U.S.  SR 91 Express Lanes - Orange County  I-15 Managed Lanes - San Diego  I-10 (Katy Freeway) Managed Lanes - Houston  I-635 (LBJ Freeway) Managed Lanes - Dallas BRT Enjoying Resurgence BRT Enjoying Resurgence Today’s Presentation Looks at Examples of Potential New Synergies Between the Concepts Today’s Presentation Looks at Examples of Potential New Synergies Between the Concepts  A “highway” solution can also become a “transit” solution  Together they can provide a new framework for “High Quality Transportation”

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates A Look at the New I-10 (Katy Freeway) Project in Houston. A Look at the New I-10 (Katy Freeway) Project in Houston. A Look at I-15 in San Diego - Including Public Perceptions about Managed Lanes. A Look at I-15 in San Diego - Including Public Perceptions about Managed Lanes. The Potential for HOT / BRT Together. The Potential for HOT / BRT Together.  Hint: Think “Win - Win” Today’s Presentation

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Managed Lanes - The SR 91 Example

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates IH-10 Managed Lanes Houston Part of Major Katy Freeway Expansion Program. Part of Major Katy Freeway Expansion Program. Innovative Operational and Financing Solution to Difficult Congested Corridor. Innovative Operational and Financing Solution to Difficult Congested Corridor. Could be Important Model for Urban Freeway Expansion in the Future. Could be Important Model for Urban Freeway Expansion in the Future.

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Project Location Map

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Managed Lanes Access Configuration SH 6 BRT Park & Ride BRT Park & Ride Dairy Ashford Rd SH 8 Silber Rd BRT Park & Ride BRT Park & Ride N No Scale Dairy Ashford Rd Sam Houston Tollway Sillber Rd Post Oak Ln Bunker Hill Rd

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Current and Planned IH-10 Configurations Planned Expanded Configuration General Purpose Lanes Reversible Carpool Lane General Purpose Lanes Current Configuration General Purpose Lanes General Purpose Lanes Future Managed Lanes

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Groundbreaking Project Cooperative “Public-Public” Partnership. Cooperative “Public-Public” Partnership.  TexDOT – State Agency  HCTRA – County Toll Agency  METRO – Regional Transit Agency  FHWA and FTA Tolls Used to Finance a Portion of the Major Expansion of an Urban Interstate. Tolls Used to Finance a Portion of the Major Expansion of an Urban Interstate.  HCTRA will provide $250 million in revenue bonds toward overall project cost Managed Lanes Replace Single Reversible HOV Lane. Managed Lanes Replace Single Reversible HOV Lane. Incorporation of Bus Rapid Transit. Incorporation of Bus Rapid Transit. Fully Electronic Open Road Tolling. Fully Electronic Open Road Tolling. Variable Pricing to Maintain Free Flow for BRT, HOV and Toll Users. Variable Pricing to Maintain Free Flow for BRT, HOV and Toll Users.

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Unique Transit Provisions Four Managed Lanes Replace Single Reversible Lane. Four Managed Lanes Replace Single Reversible Lane. METRO Provided up to 25% of Peak Period Capacity in Peak Direction. METRO Provided up to 25% of Peak Period Capacity in Peak Direction.  Express Busses  Three person Carpools Pricing will be Set to Maintain Free Flow for Transit / HOV’s. Pricing will be Set to Maintain Free Flow for Transit / HOV’s. TexDOT Agrees to “Buy Out” Remaining Bonds if Rail Constructed in Corridor in Distant Future. TexDOT Agrees to “Buy Out” Remaining Bonds if Rail Constructed in Corridor in Distant Future.

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Key Provision for Transit. Key Provision for Transit. HCTRA Agrees to Always Price the Managed Lanes to Assure 55 MPH Operating Speed - Even in Peak Hours. HCTRA Agrees to Always Price the Managed Lanes to Assure 55 MPH Operating Speed - Even in Peak Hours. Busses Have Free Usage - Plus Direct Access To/From BRT Center Park and Rides. Busses Have Free Usage - Plus Direct Access To/From BRT Center Park and Rides. Essentially a Four Lane, Two Directional Free-Flowing “Busway”. Essentially a Four Lane, Two Directional Free-Flowing “Busway”.  Shared with, and paid for by, toll paying vehicles (managed through pricing) Using Price to Manage Demand

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Typical Managed Lanes Access Peak Period Managed Lane CURRENT TOLL To Dairy Ashford $0.50 Free 1 or 2 Occupants HOV 3+ To $2.50 Free 610 To Bunker Hill $1.00 Free

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Typical Tolling Zones Police Car Guide Posts

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Toll Rate / Operations Profile Westbound P.M. Peak REVENUE REVENUE, $/TRAVEL PERIOD THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) M/L VMT Total HOV3 LOV VMT, VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED/PERIOD THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) SPEED General Purpose Lanes Managed Lanes SPEED (MPH) THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) SPEED General Purpose Lanes Managed Lanes SPEED (MPH) THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) REVENUE REVENUE, $/TRAVEL PERIOD THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) M/L VMT THROUGH TRIP TOLL RATE ($) Total HOV3 LOV VMT, VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED/PERIOD Optimum Toll Rate

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Through Trip Toll Rates AM Peak AM Shoulder Mid-Day PM Shoulder PM Peak $ $ $ AM Peak AM Shoulder Mid-Day PM Shoulder PM Peak $ $ $ Eastbound Westbound

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Peak Hour Traffic Distribution* LOV HOV-3+ CV Total 11, ,500 8, ,100 2, ,100 Eastbound - AM Peak Westbound - PM Peak 20.0% 88.9% 24.8% LOV HOV-3+ CV Total 11, ,500 9, ,800 2, , % 87.5% 21.6% Total Demand General Purpose Lanes Manual Lanes Managed Lanes Share * 2003 Levels at East Toll plaza

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Broad Support for the I-15 Managed Lanes Project Stakeholders Stakeholders  Elected Officials support the project  Technical stakeholders look to repeat previous success Focus Groups Focus Groups  Broad support for project, especially Bus Rapid Transit  Current FasTrak customers showed strongest support Intercept Surveys (50 carpoolers/50 transit riders along I-15 Corridor) Intercept Surveys (50 carpoolers/50 transit riders along I-15 Corridor)  92% of carpoolers thought FasTrak lanes were “fair to them”  94% of transit riders thought FasTrak lanes were “fair to them”

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Good Idea to Have Time Saving Option on I-15 Don’t Know 2% Strongly Disagree 3% Somewhat Disagree 4% Somewhat Agree 21% Strongly Agree 70%

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Approval of FasTrak Program on I-15 Approve 88% Don’t Know 1% Disapprove 11% Don’t Know 6% Disapprove 28% FasTrak Customer Other I-15 Users Approve 66%

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates FasTrak Program Reduces Congestion on I-15 Strongly Agree 65% Somewhat Agree 25% Somewhat Disagree 5% Strongly Disagree 5% Strongly Agree 42% Somewhat Agree 31% Somewhat Disagree 11% Strongly Disagree 14% Don’t Know 2% FasTrak Customer Other I-15 Users

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Don’t Know 5% Extend Express Lanes 37% Add Regular Lanes 26% Build Other Roads 21% Add Transit 11% FasTrak Customer Other I-15 Users Single Most Effective Way to Reduce Congestion on I-15 Extend Express Lanes 49% Add Regular Lanes 24% Build Other Roads 13% Add Transit 10% Don’t Know 4%

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates HOT/BRT: Better Together Win - Win Scenario. Win - Win Scenario.  Highway Side  Transit Side Innovative Integrated Finance Opportunity. Innovative Integrated Finance Opportunity. Potential Integrated “High Quality” Transportation Solution. Potential Integrated “High Quality” Transportation Solution.

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Key Ingredient: Value Pricing Manages Demand to Keep Lanes Flowing - Preserves Critical Time Savings Advantage. Manages Demand to Keep Lanes Flowing - Preserves Critical Time Savings Advantage.  For toll paying vehicles  For BRT (“Virtual” Busway) Generates Revenue. Generates Revenue.  For capital cost to get lanes built - (I-10 example)  For transit operating subsidies where HOV lanes exist (I-15 example) Highway / Transit Cross Subsidy Not Really an Issue. Highway / Transit Cross Subsidy Not Really an Issue.  Motorists are voluntarily paying a toll for time savings benefits they receive  Not simply a toll for the benefit of a mode they are not using Pricing Provides a “Built-In” Incentive to Shift to Transit Pricing Provides a “Built-In” Incentive to Shift to Transit

ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Bottom Line: Managed Lanes / BRT Together Can… Increase Efficiency of Existing HOV Lanes. Increase Efficiency of Existing HOV Lanes. Enhance Park & Ride Programs and Transit Services. Enhance Park & Ride Programs and Transit Services. Merge Roadway and Transit Systems, Making Most Efficient Use of Each. Merge Roadway and Transit Systems, Making Most Efficient Use of Each. Manage Demand Through Value Pricing. Manage Demand Through Value Pricing. Provide a Badly Needed New Source of Revenue. Provide a Badly Needed New Source of Revenue. Generate Strong Public Support - A True “Win - Win” Scenario Generate Strong Public Support - A True “Win - Win” Scenario