30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Robert L. Bertini and Huan Li Conference for the Australian Institutes of Transport Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Matt’s Schedule. Headway Variation Estimated Load vs. Passenger Movement.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
Abstract Travel time based performance measures are widely used for transportation systems and particularly freeways. However, it has become evident that.
PASSENGER O-D TRIP TABLE FROM FAREBOX RECEIPTS Kelly Chan 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, October 16, 2013.
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Kristin Tufte, Robert L. Bertini, and Soyoung Ahn Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
Experience Implementing PORTAL: Portland Transportation Archive Listing Andrew M. Byrd Andy Delcambre Steve Hansen Portland State University TransNow 2.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Implementing the ITS Archive Data User Service in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini Andrew M. Byrd Thareth Yin Portland State University IEEE 7 th Annual.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Improving Travel Time-Delay Functions for the Highway 217 Corridor Study Using a Regional ITS Data Archive Robert L. Bertini, Ph.D, P.E. Portland State.
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. A Web-based Tool for Visualization of Transit Modeling Results and Data Alireza Khani, Greg Abram, Natalia Ruiz Juri and.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
MOBILE APPS FOR MODERN COMMUTING Tim Kitchell Marketing & Education Specialist 36 Commuting Solutions February 22, 2012.
Abstract Raw ITS data is commonly aggregated to 20-30sec intervals for collection and communication, and further aggregated to 1-60min intervals for archiving.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Types & Sources Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
1 Combined Arterial Performance Status Report Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science Portland.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Envision Central Texas Presentation Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) by Richard Shultz Concerned Citizen March 24, 2008.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes modeling, calculation, and necessary.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
RURAL TRANSIT PLANNING Shilpa Panicker – ADOT Jorge Luna – MAG Deron Lozano – Valley Metro Scott Miller – HDR Engineering.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Robert L. Bertini Sirisha M. Kothuri Kristin A. Tufte Portland State University Soyoung Ahn Arizona State University 9th International IEEE Conference.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
1 Challenge the future Feed forward mechanisms in public transport Data driven optimisation dr. ir. N. van Oort Assistant professor public transport EMTA.
ITS Lab Members  Ph.D Student in Civil Engineering  Areas of Interest  Freeway Management and Operation  Transit Operation  Intelligent Transportation.
Validating Predicted Rural Corridor Travel Times from an Automated License Plate Recognition System: Oregon’s Frontier Project Presented by: Zachary Horowitz.
1 Arterial Performance Measurement Mathew Berkow, Michael Wolfe, Christopher Monsere and Robert L. Bertini Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Using Signal Systems Data and Buses as Probes to Create Arterial Performance Measures Mathew Berkow, Michael Wolfe, John Chee, Robert Bertini,
May 2009TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference 1 PATHBUILDER TESTS USING 2007 DALLAS ON-BOARD SURVEY Hua Yang, Arash Mirzaei, Kathleen.
1 Techniques for Validating an Automatic Bottleneck Detection Tool Using Archived Freeway Sensor Data Jerzy Wieczorek, Rafael J. Fernández-Moctezuma, and.
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Robert L. Bertini, Mathew Berkow, and Michael Wolfe Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
Bus Service Reliability Developing new performance measures Unreliability Vs. Bus Bunching Meead Saberi K.
1 Using Archived ITS Data to Automatically Identify Freeway Bottlenecks in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini, Rafael J. Fernández-Moctezuma, Jerzy Wieczorek,
TRANSMILENIO ENRIQUE LILLO EMME/2 UGM May Bogotá n 7 million people n Mean annual population growth of 4,5 % over the last 10 years n 25 % of Colombian.
Abstract The value of creating an ITS data archive is somewhat undisputed, and a number exist in states and major metropolitan regions in North America.
July 13, 2005ITE District 6 Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Making Headways Smart Card Fare Payment and Bus Dwell Time in Los Angeles Daniel Shockley Fehr & Peers Julia Salinas Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation.
Real-time Bus Information on Mobile Devices Stuart D. Maclean, Daniel J. Dailey ITS Research Program University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
1 TRB 88 th Annual Meeting January 12, 2009 – TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Mathew Berkow, Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe, Portland State.
1 Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems Robert L. Bertini, Rafael Fernández-Moctezuma, Huan Li, Jerzy Wieczorek, Portland.
2018/5/14 QUANTIFYING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY USING AN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL My topic today is---READ Question try to address is- READ I want to.
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: Nablus Case study
Analyzing Public Transit Data CEO, Moonshadow Mobile, Inc.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
Presentation transcript:

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Robert L. Bertini and Huan Li Conference for the Australian Institutes of Transport Research University of Western Australia December 11, 2008 Exploiting High Resolution Archived Transit Data for Improved Planning and Operations: A Portland, Oregon Case Study

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Portland Founded ,000 in city 2 million people in metro area 145 mi ft above sea level 78 miles to Pacific Ocean 65 miles to Palmer Glacier on Mt. Hood 36 in annual rainfall Largest wheat export port in U.S. 38 breweries inside metro area No sales tax No self-serve gas Distance between Perth and Portland: 9,231 miles (14,854 km)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Portland Founded ,000 in city 2 million people in metro area 145 mi ft above sea level 78 miles to Pacific Ocean 65 miles to Palmer Glacier on Mt. Hood 36 in annual rainfall Largest wheat export port in U.S. 38 breweries inside metro area No sales tax No self-serve gas Distance between Perth and Portland: 9,231 miles (14,854 km)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Portland Founded ,000 in city 2 million people in metro area 145 mi ft above sea level 78 miles to Pacific Ocean 65 miles to Palmer Glacier on Mt. Hood 36 in annual rainfall Largest wheat export port in U.S. 38 breweries inside metro area No sales tax No self-serve gas Distance between Perth and Portland: 9,231 miles (14,854 km)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 About TriMet Serves 1.2 M population 575 mi M annual bus trips 207,700 daily bus boardings 95 bus routes 655 buses 8100 bus stops Also LRT, Commuter Rail, Streetcar & Paratransit

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 TriMet’s Bus Dispatch System On- Board Computer Radio Doors Lift APC (Automatic Passenger Counter) Overhead Signs Odometer Signal Priority Emitters Stop Annunciation Memory Card Radio System Garage PC’s Radio Antenna GPS Antenna Navstar GPS Satellites Control Head

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 TriMet’s Bus Dispatch System Schedule deviation Control Head PCMIA Card Infrared APC Operator Input Dispatching Arrival Prediction

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Stop Data TIME LINE DWELL TIME DOOR OPEN DOOR CLOSE ARRIVE TIME LEAVE TIME REWRITTEN ARRIVE TIME (IF DOOR OPENS) STOP LOCATION 15 METERS 30 METERS

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 TriMet’s Bus Dispatch System

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Stop Data  Route Number  Vehicle Number  Service Date  Actual Leave Time  Scheduled Stop Time  Actual Arrive Time  Operator ID  Direction  Trip Number  Bus Stop Location  Dwell Time  Door Opened  Lift Usage  Ons & Offs (APCs)  Passenger Load  Maximum Speed on Previous Link  Distance  Longitude  Latitude

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 PORTAL Database Loop Detector Data 20 s count, lane occupancy, speed from 500 detectors (1.2 mi spacing) since 2004 Incident Data 140,000 since 1999 Weather Data Hourly since 2004 VMS Data 19 VMS since 1999 Bus Data 1 year stop level data ,000,000 rows Web Interface portal.its.pdx.edu

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, AM Boardings

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Passenger Movement

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Fare Evasion

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Background on Stop Location Challenges in delivering reliable and timely bus service Financial constraints Public transit operational issues Transit service generally favors bus stop accessibility Sometimes based on past history and tradition rather than rigorous ongoing analysis at the stop level

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Stop Spacing Service Standards TriMet Portland  >80 units/acre: ft  units/acre: ft  4-22 units/acre: ft  <4 units/acre: as needed  Inner Portland has 200 ft blocks (264 ft street spacing)  Route 19 mean stop spacing is 942 ft (3 blocks)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Concept Derivation Trade off: person’s time in parallel access vs. another person’s time in riding. Minimize access cost: favors small s Minimize riding cost: favors large s

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Assumptions Origins & destinations distributed along route in one dimension (ignore perpendicular access)… Average access distance (parallel only) = s /4 Assume number of passengers boarding or alighting at a stop to be ~Poisson distributed

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Access Cost Value of Passenger Travel Distance p = density of trip origins plus density of trip destinations for passengers who board or alight the same vehicle (units: number/distance) s /4= average access distance (unit: distance)  = passenger access speed (unit: distance/time)  a = average cost per unit time per person for access (unit: cost/time) in interval of length s C a = [avg. no. of pax] [avg. dist traveled] [cost/unit dist]

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Riding and Stopping Cost Value of in-vehicle passenger lost time due to boardings and alightings N = expected number of passengers on vehicle V = vehicle cruise speed  = time lost in stopping to serve passengers P r =1-e -p s = probability that vehicle actually stops (from Poisson for number of ons and offs)  r = average cost per unit time per person for riding in interval length s C r = [avg. no. of pax] [riding time + lost time] [cost/unit time]

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 [ ] / s Average Cost Per Unit Length Given that [access]  Average cost per unit length + [riding] + [stopping] Average cost per unit length = Independent of s ! Choice of s is independent of V, depends solely on     ps e )1( 

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Objective Function Coverage for  >2 If β > 2:

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 p s = expected number of passengers to board or alight per stop

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Case Study: Inbound Route 19 All Day 370 days (2/20/07 - 1/5/08) 19,344 trips 33.2 ons and offs/trip: Average passenger load/stop: 7.9 Route 19 Glisan to Portland Route Length: 9.27 mi Number of stops: 52 Mean delay due to stopping: 33.6 s Use 4ft/s walking speed

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Route 19 Inbound Spacing Status

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Optimized Spacing Calculation No. of passengers on vehicle N = 7.9 pax/stop Passenger ons and offs p s = 33.2 pax/trip Lost time  =33.6sec

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, Time Space Passenger Load Plot Route 19 Time (hour) Distance (mi)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, ,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5, N (number of passengers on bus) Stop Spacing (ft) Route 19 Inbound Optimized Spacing Optimal February 20, 2007–January 5, 2008 For n = 790,392,  = 33.6 sec,  = 22.8 sec (range 1-100) Mean ons/offs = 33.2 Also shown are spacing plots for 20, 40 and 60 ons/offs Step function based on 20 blocks/mile 20 ons/offs 60 ons/offs 40 ons/offs 20 blocks/mile 33.2 ons/offs

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Sensitivity Analysis 1/21/31/4 Optimized Spacing (ft) Access Cost Value of access time ($/hr)$ 16/hr$ 18/hr$ 20/hr Before optimized (passenger $/unit length)$ 0.64$ 0.72$ 0.80 After optimized (passenger $/unit length)$ 1.18$ 1.08$ 1.04 Change (passenger $/unit length) Riding Cost Value of riding time ($/hr)$ 8/hr$ 6/hr$ 5/hr Before optimized (passenger $/unit length)$ 2.30$ 1.72$ 1.44 After optimized (passenger $/unit length)$ 1.83$ 1.50$ 1.32 Change (passenger $/unit length)

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Conclusions 12 stops are recommended for consolidation The trip time would be reduced by 3.4 min/trip The total savings due to consolidation could be up to 3.7 hours of service time per day Allow the addition of approximately 7.6 additional trips per weekday Mean weekday headway would drop from 18.0 min to 16.1 min Total of 17,076 inbound trips, the time saved would be 977 hours during the year Assuming $60/hr operating cost, about $60,000 could be saved by TriMet

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Next Steps Route 19 AM Peak Inbound (TRB 2009), PM Peak Outbound Automate process for all routes Produce quarterly reports for TriMet Verify “real” cost savings Consider “real” relationship to demand and equity Connect to scheduing

30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Acknowledgements Huan Li, Ph.D. Student David Crout of TriMet for providing the rich data set that facilitated this analysis Gordon Newell Prof. Michael Cassidy, University of California at Berkeley, for his assistance in developing the analytical framework for this paper