conflicts of interest to report. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Amanda F. Khan, MSc. Medical Biophysics Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. I have no conflict of interests to report.
Ventricle Sub-Region Segmentation Utilizing MRI as a Structural Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease Amanda F. Khan Department of Medical Biophysics Imaging Research Laboratories Robarts Research Institute The University of Western Ontario Supervisors: Dr. Michael Borrie, Dr. Robert Bartha Alzheimer’s Disease International – March 28th, 2011
The Ventricular System Lateral ventricles structures containing CSF in the midbrain atrophy of surrounding tissues leads to increase in CSF volume increase in CSF = increase in lateral ventricles (surrogate measure) capture this increase on MRI, sometimes years before cognitive decline can be measured 3D image adapted from: The Biodidac
Atrophy as Captured on MRI Normal AD Images adapted from: The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Florida
NIH: AD Biomarker Criteria Development of Specific AD Treatment Strategies Requires Ventricular Enlargement as a Biomarker 1 Dx in early stages when intervention is most effective Can detect very early brain atrophy before cognitive decline can be measured 2 Treatment efficacy can be monitored Serial MRI can measure atrophy (or lack thereof) over time in clinical trials in a way cognitive tests cannot Source: NIH -Ways Towards an Early Diagnosis in Alzheimer’s Disease
Hypothesis That sub-region ventricular volume expansion, particularly that of the temporal horns, may be a more sensitive biomarker of disease progression than total ventricular volume Normal Elderly Control AD Patient
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ADNI 6 year multi-site study of NEC, MCI & AD 55 participating sites imaging, clinical + cognitive measures, biological samples MRI 1.5T (T1 –weighted) MP-RAGE pulse sequence Source of Map: The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Methods Baseline Month 12 Month 24 97 subjects total blinded segmentation lateral ventricle volumes extracted with software NEC n=26 MCI n=42 AD n=29
Brain Ventricle Quantification (BVQ)
Ventricle Sub-Regions Left and Right Hemispheres Ventricle Sub-Region Lateral Ventricle lateral anterior (LA) lateral middle (LM) lateral posterior (LP) Temporal Horn anterior horn (AH) posterior horn (PH)
Preliminary Statistical Analysis Procedure Data Used Evaluate Repeated-measures ANOVA Conducted on each sub-region over the 3 time periods Sub-region volume longitudinal significance Paired t-tests Post-hoc analysis to ANOVAs Pair-wise significance between any two time points
Normal Elderly Controls (NEC) Temporal Horn Sub-Region Significant? Type of Pairwise Significance LPH YES Baseline and M24 Superior view of lateral (shades of red) and temporal horn (green) regions
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Temporal Horn Sub-Region Significant? Type of Pairwise Significance LAH, RAH, LPH, RPH YES Baseline and M24 Superior view of lateral (shades of red) and temporal horn (green) regions
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) Temporal Horn Sub-Region Significant? Type of Pairwise Significance LAH, RAH, LPH, RPH YES Baseline and M24 Superior view of lateral (shades of red) and temporal horn (green) regions
Total Ventricle vs. Horn Volume Normal controls: NO significant temporal horn enlargement
Calculated Sample Sizes Estimated sample size required to detect a 25% reduction in the mean annual rate of atrophy in a two-sided test with α=0.05 for a two-arm study over one year Measure Patient Classification Calculated n Number Temporal Horn Only AD 284 Total Ventricle 226 MCI 1547 420 ADAS-cog 3237 2066 Equation source: The ADNI Biostatistics Core
Summary NEC AD more sub-regions show significant growth in more pair-wise comparisons MCI & AD significant enlargement in temporal horns, NEC do not Temporal horn: discriminate patients based on normal age-related atrophy and AD Smaller sample sizes for total ventricle than horn volumes but significantly smaller for both measures compared to ADAS-cog
Acknowledgements Supervisors: Sources of Funding and Collaboration: Dr. Robert Bartha Dr. Michael Borrie Collaborators: Matthew Smith Yun-Hee Choi Support: Michael Marynowski Henry Betta Vaishali Karnik Sources of Funding and Collaboration: