SPI Data Analysis A. Strong MPE Moriond, Les Arcs 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR Mallorca,
Advertisements

GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Overview of Analyzing GLAST Data David Band (GLAST SSC—GSFC/UMBC)
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data James Chiang (GLAST SSC – SLAC)
X-Ray Spectroscopy Workshop Cambridge, MA Matthew Carpenter, UCB SSL 7/11/2007, Comparison of Observed and Theoretical Fe L Emission from CIE Plasmas Matthew.
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
The all-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission Kn ö dlseder, J., Jean, P., Lonjou, V., et al. 2005, A&A, 441, 513.
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
Simulating the Gamma Ray Sky Andrew McLeod SASS August 12, 2009.
Slews: Fast and Slow. Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 Revs , 5180 detections,
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 Suppression of the low-energy noise Suppression of the low-energy noise: an improved approach.
Deterministic Modeling of the MOS Background Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting Mallorca 1-3 February.
C&A 10April06 1 Point Source Detection and Localization Using the UW HealPixel database Toby Burnett University of Washington.
1 TEV PA Meeting July 2009 Preliminary Fermi-LAT Limits on High Energy Gamma Lines from WIMP Annihilation Yvonne Edmonds representing the Fermi-LAT Collaboration.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Correcting spatial inhomogeneities of the absolute energy scale K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Correcting spatial inhomogeneities.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
GLAST Science Support Center June 29, 2005Data Challenge II Software Workshop GRB Analysis David Band GSFC/UMBC.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) Expected Performance of FMOS ~ Estimation with Spectrum Simulator ~ Introduction of simulators  Examples of calculations.
1 The Fundamental Plane Relationship of Astrophysical Black Holes Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking University Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
The Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope Mission
Subaru HDS Transmission Spectroscopy of the Transiting Extrasolar Planet HD b The University of Tokyo Norio Narita collaborators Yasushi Suto, Joshua.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Christopher CantalupoUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 CTP Working Group Presented by Christopher Cantalupo.
Anisotropy Studies in the Pierre Auger Observatory Beatriz Blanco Siffert for the Auger Collaboration Instituto de Física - Universidade Federal do Rio.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
Source flux accuracy from BLC analysis A. Strong MPE June 2002.
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting Demonstration of GRB Spectral Analysis with the SAE David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC)
Extreme soft X-ray emission from the broad-line quasar REJ R.L.C. Starling 1*, E.M. Puchnarewicz 1, K.O. Mason 1 & E. Romero- Colmenero 2 1 Mullard.
Source catalog generation Aim: Build the LAT source catalog (1, 3, 5 years) Jean Ballet, CEA SaclayGSFC, 29 June 2005 Four main functions: Find unknown.
Development of a Gamma-Ray Beam Profile Monitor for the High-Intensity Gamma-Ray Source Thomas Regier, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University.
Fermi LAT Monash University Nov 21, 2009 R.DuboisFermi LAT Science Analysis Tutorial1 Issues in a Nutshell LS5039 Low stats: 4k photons in 1 yr Strong.
Monitor of all-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) was designed to be capable of monitoring variability of a medium-sized sample of active galactic nuclei. As of November.
Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy AMiBA SZ Science AMiBA Team NTU Physics Figure 4. Simulated AMiBA deep surveys of a 1deg 2 field (no primary.
Herschel Open Time Cycle 1 DP workshop ESAC, March page 1 Spurs in HIFI data Colin Borys.
COSIRES 2004 © Matej Mayer Bayesian Reconstruction of Surface Roughness and Depth Profiles M. Mayer 1, R. Fischer 1, S. Lindig 1, U. von Toussaint 1, R.
Analysis methods for Milky Way dark matter halo detection Aaron Sander 1, Larry Wai 2, Brian Winer 1, Richard Hughes 1, and Igor Moskalenko 2 1 Department.
Prof. Steven Boggs UCB Space Sciences Laboratory SPI Instrument Team Activities Prof. Steven Boggs (PI) Dr. Cornelia Wunderer (SPI CoI) Dr. Emrah Kalemci.
Antimatter in our Galaxy unveiled by INTEGRAL
Shock-cloud interaction in the Vela SNR: the XMM-Newton view M. Miceli 1, F. Bocchino 2, A. Maggio 2, F. Reale 1 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche ed Astronomiche,
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
NHSC HIFI DP workshop Caltech, 7-9 February page 1 Spurs in HIFI data.
BLC Analysis using the ISDC System A. Strong MPE Dec 2001 This presentation can be obtained from
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
The Radio Properties of Type II Quasars PLAN Type II quasars Motivations Our sample Radio observations Basic radio properties Compare our results with.
Proposed Laboratory Simulation of Galactic Positron In-Flight Annihilation in Atomic Hydrogen Benjamin Brown, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
2011, 10th AprilIII Fermi symposium , 10th AprilIII Fermi symposium2.
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
32 nd ICRC –Beijing – August 11-18, 2011 Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Observation of MGRO J with.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
GLAST Science Support Center November 8, 2005 GUC Action Item #15 AI#15: Pre-Launch GI Proposal Tools David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC)
Status of ULE-HPGe Experiment for WIMP Search in YangYang
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
The X-ray Universe 2008 Granada, 29 May 2008
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
The Heidelberg Dark Matter Search Experiment
Jean Ballet, CEA Saclay GSFC, 31 May 2006 All-sky source search
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Galactic Diffuse Emission for DC2
ESA’s INTEGRAL Mission
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
The spectral evolution of impulsive solar X-ray flares
10th ASTRI GENERAL MEETING
The University of Tokyo Norio Narita
Presentation transcript:

SPI Data Analysis A. Strong MPE Moriond, Les Arcs 2002

SPI Data Analysis Data & response Analysis methods Examples from * calibration * simulations

Raw events Corrected events Binned events spihist Teleme try Sources detection spectra Images spiros xspec Spectral model fits spiskymax Exposure Pointing Respo nse SPI Data Analysis User analysis In-flight energy calibration Image model fits spidiffit C 

SPI Response (B. Teegarden et al. GSFC) IRF = Instrument Response Function f(  detector, E  , E'  ) based on extensive GEANT simulations using SPI mass model IRF factorized into components to make tractable: mask * interaction * energy response Also for given direction: energy response f(detector, E  , E'  ) (e.g. for use in xspec). Large datasets, available at ISDC. Access software interpolates in IRF to obtain response for any angle, detector, energy.

Corrected events Binned event spectra Singles Det Multiples Det. >18 `pseudo-detectors' handled in same way as singles, response available. Standard case: 85 pseudodetectors Pointing1 Counts spectra Detector Pointing spihist Event binning Pointing 

General principle of SPI observing Multiple pointings/observation: ->covers mask pattern = better coding ->determination of background Sample different parts of mask pattern Pointing 1 Pointing 2 2o2o Standard 25 pointing scheme Ge

Analysis methods use forward-folding data = image * response + background Iterative methods: comparing predicted with observed data. Correlation used only for fast initial source search in spiros. Cf IBIS, JEM-X which use correlation only!

Background treatment 19 detectors, or 85 pseudo detectors each with its own background. Have to solve for these along with sources/image! Multiples: lower background, mult~single at high E Series of pointings: background ~ constant while source mask pattern moves around -> can solve for background If background time-dependent, need template of time-dependence to fit to data: use spiback. Both spiros and spiskymax methods solve for background including time- dependent template. [However if background steady, all the better]. Time-dependence: can be based on e.g. anticoincidence shield rates. Hard to test before real data available !

SPI in-orbit background estimate (P.Jean) Used for observation simulations non-localized multiples Backgound reduction by PSD >200 keV localized with 511 keV signature

spiros SPI Iterative Removal of Sources (Paul Connell, U. Birmingam, UK) Finds and locates sources, generates spectra Constrained linear method using likelihood function (+ initial rough seach using correlation). 1. correlation search to find sources, with iterative removal 2. simultaneous fitting to find source positions 3. spectral fitting for all sources 4. also features imaging via splines, temporal variations Output (counts/source) can also be input to xspec for spectral model fitting.

spiskymax Maximum Entropy Imaging method: Bayesian parameter estimation parameters = image pixels + background application: extended emission, but also sources output: skymaps, profiles, source fluxes with error estimates

spidiffit diffuse lines, continuum INTEGRAL large-scale surveys, Core Program GCDE + GPS [+ commission phase + all public data] typically few 1000 pointings. skymaps generated in line energy, continuum bands by spiskymax but for spectra and quantitive analysis best to use model-fitting since fewer parameters cf skymapping and specific questions addressed eg 26 Al fit to free-free 90 Ghz map continuum fit to HI+CO+inverse Compton+unresolved sources spidiffit Bayesian method parameters probability distributions flexible : error estimates on function of parameters

SPI Calibration Bruyeres-le-Chatel, April 2001 Spectral and imaging properties of SPI Comparison of response with model. Imaging: sources at 125m distance (`parallel beam')

Latest Simulation Results - 60 Co, 8 Meters,no mask Singles+PSDMultiples All • 3% dead time applied to simulations ____ BLC Data ____ MGEANT Simulations

Latest Simulation Results Cs, 8.3 m, ISDC Processing, Mask Doubles + Triples ____ BLC Data ____ MGEANT Simulation

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 1173 keV 125m on-axis spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: Singles+PSD + doubles +triples 60 Co 125m 11 pointings spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: doubles + triples ONLY 60 Co 125m 1 pointing, on-axis, BLC run 31 spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 2 o 5 pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 4o4o Shows how dithering improves imaging by sampling full source pattern Higher iteration

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 1 o 5 effective pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 2o2o 4545

Singles+doubles+triples BLC run Na 2754 keV 125m 0 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 60 Co 125m using new GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred Obs Central obscurer well modelled Singles (inc PSD) doubles triples BLC Run 31 on-axis, spihist multiples livetime factor 0.98 for consistency with singles GOOD FIT !

Calibration 60 Co spiros 3 keV FHWM

ESTEC Reference Orbit Test 22 Na, 137 Cs 4 science windows spiros

SPI Test Setup: C. Wunderer, MPE. Accelerator U. Stuttgart Maximum Entropy Images

SPITS at IfS Detector without D18 Detector with D18 19 F (p,  ) 16 O – Spectra from 2 Detector positions 6.13 MeV SE DE 6.13 MeV SE DE

Spiros

3C273, 10 6 sec 11*11 pointing pattern spiros keV -5 o +5 o keV

GCDE Galactic centre region, SIGMA sources keV spiros, source mode

GCDE Galactic centre region, SIGMA sources keV spiros, imaging mode

spiros simulation of 4 sources 10 6 sec

10 6 sec, standard pointing pattern 5x5x2 o 3C273 -like flux, spectrum. Singles + multiples. Realistic background estimate keV spiskymax

10 6 sec, standard pointing pattern 5x5x2 o 2 sources with 3C273 -like flux, spectrum. Singles+multiples. Realistic background estimate keV spiskymax

10 6 sec, standard pointing pattern 5x5x2 o 4 sources with 3C273 -like flux, spectrum. Singles+multiples. Realistic background estimate keV spiskymax

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 1 o 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Synthetic pointing Pointings 4545 Continuum keV GCDE 1 year singles+multiples Singles only Model spiskymax

GCDE 1 st year : 2 cycles sec gcde keV line singles only model based on Kinzer et al. (2001); background: P. Jean spiskymax image model

1809 keV 2.4 keV FWHM 240  m model scaled to COMPTEL maps spidiffit, singles only GCDE 1 year gcde.20 gcde.19

1809 keV 240  m model scaled to COMPTEL maps spidiffit, singles only GCDE 1 year Narrow line Broad line

Line keV , GCDE 5 years : 10 cycles sec gcde keV line, 2.4 keV FWHM. 2 keV bins singles only model based on 240  m emission, scaled to COMPTEL map. Background: P.Jean model spiskymax image

Cas A 44 Ti 1157 keV line 10 6 s spiskymax Narrow line 10 keV linewidth 1300 km s keV linewidth 5200 km s keV linewidth 2600 km s -1

Young SNR, 26 Al 1809 keV line 5 keV linewidth 10 6 s spiskymax