3/21/06G060121-00-D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G Z S3/S4 Calibration A cast of thousands… including Peter Fritschel, Gabriela González, Corey Gray, Mike Landry, Greg Mendell, Brian O’Reilly,
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Crab pulsar Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LIGO.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,
2/2/05lecture031 Deadlines! Kick-off task for today! You work at a private weather company. For the last 3 (three) months, you have been working on a task.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Noise Floor Non-stationarity Monitor Roberto Grosso*, Soma Mukherjee + + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernburg, Germany Detector.
Calibration Accuracy of LIGO Interferometers Brian O’Reilly LIGO Livingston Observatory Rana Adikhari (MIT), Peter Fritschel (MIT), Gabriela Gonzalez(LSU),
9/23/08G Z Status of the S5 calibration Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee LSC September 2008 Michael Landry For the Calibration Committee.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Time-Domain Calibration Update Xavier Siemens, Mike Landry, Gaby Gonzalez, Brian O’Reilly, Martin Hewitson, Bruce Allen, Jolien Creighton.
8/18/06Gxxxxxx Introduction to Calibration Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006 Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
3/19/08G D S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2008 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
ALICE Condition DataBase Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP Alice Offline week May 31 st 2005.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
LIGO- G Z August 16, 2006August 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 Spectral Line Working Group Report Keith Thorne, Chair.
G Z 1 New Glitches seen/studied in Block-Normal Shantanu Desai Pennsylvania State University for Glitch Working Group and many others Detchar.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 22 January 2008 Trine Hansen.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.
LIGO- G D E7: An Instrument-builder’s Perspective Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting Upper Limits Plenary Session 22 May 2002 LIGO Livingston.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
Marking and Feedback CPD Action research – Concluding Session.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
Steering Committee Report May 28 th 2009 Houston.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Periodic Sources Session M. Alessandra Papa - Albert Einstein Institute - Golm, Germany The LSC UL group is using all (and only) of the codes that we (GEO)
1 Review of the n-H analysis Zelimir Djurcic (ANL) Pau Novella (APC/CNRS)
G Z August 17, 2004 S2/S3 Calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University For the Calibration Team ( cast of thousands!) LIGO Science.
ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 Welcome to the Hannover L-V Meeting Status of the LSC Dave Reitze University of Florida.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Summary of LSC Data Analysis Activities: Alan Wiseman G Z.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G E Data Simulation for the DMT John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
CW Search Group Status Summary: August 2005 M.Alessandra Papa for the CW group G05yyxx-00-Z.
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Crab pulsar search - Preliminary S2 analysis
Reviewer Comments on the S3/S4/S5 TDS Neutron Star Searches
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
Session 2 – Planning & Research
Hardware Injections in S4
Line tracking methods used in LineMon
h(t): are you experienced?
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Presentation transcript:

3/21/06G D S4/S5 Calibration Status Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006 Brian O’Reilly For the Calibration Committee LSC March 2006

3/21/06G D Calibration Committee  “The Calibration Committee is responsible for organizing, delivering, and documenting the calibration information for the detectors in the Collaboration”:  Frequency Domain  Time Domain  High Frequency  Photon Calibrator  Regular bi-weekly meetings.  A. Dietz, S. Giampanis, G. González, E. Hirose, P. Kalmus, B. O’Reilly, M. Landry, R. Savage, M. Sung, X. Siemens.  Contributions from J. Garofoli, H. Radkins, L. Matone and many others.  Minutes etc. at this page is “lsc cheerleader™” protected.  “The Calibration Committee is responsible for organizing, delivering, and documenting the calibration information for the detectors in the Collaboration”:  Frequency Domain  Time Domain  High Frequency  Photon Calibrator  Regular bi-weekly meetings.  A. Dietz, S. Giampanis, G. González, E. Hirose, P. Kalmus, B. O’Reilly, M. Landry, R. Savage, M. Sung, X. Siemens.  Contributions from J. Garofoli, H. Radkins, L. Matone and many others.  Minutes etc. at this page is “lsc cheerleader™” protected.

3/21/06G D S4 Status  Final S4 Calibration released 12/18/05  V4 had some significant differences from V3.  Search groups are approaching this in different ways.  Final S4 uncertainties released 3/13/06.  Uncertainties in response function both as a function of frequency and “recommended” frequency independent values.  S4 Calibration document T being finalized. A draft version exists.  Final S4 Calibration released 12/18/05  V4 had some significant differences from V3.  Search groups are approaching this in different ways.  Final S4 uncertainties released 3/13/06.  Uncertainties in response function both as a function of frequency and “recommended” frequency independent values.  S4 Calibration document T being finalized. A draft version exists.

3/21/06G D H2: 8% in Magnitude, 4° in phase

3/21/06G D H1: 8% in Magnitude, 3° in phase

3/21/06G D L1: 5% in Magnitude, 2° in phase

3/21/06G D S4 Status  There was a problem with the S4 V4 Calibration which only affected the calibration frame files.   and  were switched  Improved validation procedures to avoid problems like this in the future.  Calibration review committee:  Albert Lazzarini(chair), Dennis Coyne, Vuk Mandic, John Zweizig.  Will read final document and decide if additional review meeting(s?) are warranted.  There was a problem with the S4 V4 Calibration which only affected the calibration frame files.   and  were switched  Improved validation procedures to avoid problems like this in the future.  Calibration review committee:  Albert Lazzarini(chair), Dennis Coyne, Vuk Mandic, John Zweizig.  Will read final document and decide if additional review meeting(s?) are warranted.

3/21/06G D S5 Frequency Domain  We started S5 with a calibration which we feel is already quite accurate, similar to final S4 errors for L1.  All three IFOs used the same technique and obtained similar accuracy.  Calibration coefficients are being generated in close to real-time. However, we have only released non-unity coefficients up to Jan  We are still validating the later values (see G. González’s talk later in this session).  We started S5 with a calibration which we feel is already quite accurate, similar to final S4 errors for L1.  All three IFOs used the same technique and obtained similar accuracy.  Calibration coefficients are being generated in close to real-time. However, we have only released non-unity coefficients up to Jan  We are still validating the later values (see G. González’s talk later in this session).

3/21/06G D S5 Frequency Domain  We have once again had to change how we store the data, filenames etc.  Specification document T has been updated to reflect changes.  ASCII file names: “H-H1_CAL_REF_RESPONSE_DARM_ERR_S5_V txt”  More closely matches naming convention for frames.  The “V” now has a different meaning. The highest “V” number will now contain the latest calibration for all times during S5.  This means some duplication, but greater simplicity for searches.  Frame files being rewritten to accommodate different epochs (J. Creighton).  We have once again had to change how we store the data, filenames etc.  Specification document T has been updated to reflect changes.  ASCII file names: “H-H1_CAL_REF_RESPONSE_DARM_ERR_S5_V txt”  More closely matches naming convention for frames.  The “V” now has a different meaning. The highest “V” number will now contain the latest calibration for all times during S5.  This means some duplication, but greater simplicity for searches.  Frame files being rewritten to accommodate different epochs (J. Creighton).

3/21/06G D S5 Frequency Domain  We are already at V2 for S5, thanks to the commissioning break at LHO.  Period of instability, mainly affecting H2, which might necessitate some smaller epochs later on.  The V1 and V2 calibrations are the same for L1, changes during commissioning were minor.  Expect V3 calibration after LLO break.  We are already at V2 for S5, thanks to the commissioning break at LHO.  Period of instability, mainly affecting H2, which might necessitate some smaller epochs later on.  The V1 and V2 calibrations are the same for L1, changes during commissioning were minor.  Expect V3 calibration after LLO break.

3/21/06G D S5 Time Domain  Now generating h(t) using only DARM_ERR (not DARM_CTRL)  Have switched to all FIR method (simplifies book-keeping immensely)  Have final S4 v4 h(t)  Systematic differences with 40Hz-5000Hz  in amplitude < 3%  in phase < 3 o  In use by CW Group and Philip Charlton (maybe others?)  For S5 have been generating h(t) on-line (same systematic differences as with S4)  Now generating h(t) using only DARM_ERR (not DARM_CTRL)  Have switched to all FIR method (simplifies book-keeping immensely)  Have final S4 v4 h(t)  Systematic differences with 40Hz-5000Hz  in amplitude < 3%  in phase < 3 o  In use by CW Group and Philip Charlton (maybe others?)  For S5 have been generating h(t) on-line (same systematic differences as with S4)

3/21/06G D S5 Time Domain  To do list:  Have whitened DARM_CTRL which we can use to get back to systematic differences in amplitude < 1%, in phase < 1 o  Finish catching up with 1 st month of S5, L1 done, H1 H2 in a couple more days  Performing a validation suggested by S. Klimenko, involving inverse calibrating a signal in the frequency domain adding it to real detector noise and forward calibrating in time domain  More validations would be nice, ideas?  To do list:  Have whitened DARM_CTRL which we can use to get back to systematic differences in amplitude < 1%, in phase < 1 o  Finish catching up with 1 st month of S5, L1 done, H1 H2 in a couple more days  Performing a validation suggested by S. Klimenko, involving inverse calibrating a signal in the frequency domain adding it to real detector noise and forward calibrating in time domain  More validations would be nice, ideas?

3/21/06G D S5 Time Domain  The pulsar group has used both h(f) and h(t) calibrations in preliminary analyses of S5 data.  h(f) has been used for the time domain search  h(t) has been used for F-stat (frequency domain search)  Results are consistent to within the calibration uncertainties.  It is important for other groups to start using h(t), it is probably the main means by which we will share data with VIRGO.  The pulsar group has used both h(f) and h(t) calibrations in preliminary analyses of S5 data.  h(f) has been used for the time domain search  h(t) has been used for F-stat (frequency domain search)  Results are consistent to within the calibration uncertainties.  It is important for other groups to start using h(t), it is probably the main means by which we will share data with VIRGO.

3/21/06G D Other Activities  Photon Calibrator (P. Kalmus):  Draft document in the works.  Has written a DMT monitor, which is running on Fortress at present.  High Frequency Calibration (R. Savage, S. Giampanis):  See next talk.  Review issues:  Approval of S5 numbers  Validating calibrations from other detectors  h(t)  We also have in mind to publish a technical paper on the S5 calibration.  Photon Calibrator (P. Kalmus):  Draft document in the works.  Has written a DMT monitor, which is running on Fortress at present.  High Frequency Calibration (R. Savage, S. Giampanis):  See next talk.  Review issues:  Approval of S5 numbers  Validating calibrations from other detectors  h(t)  We also have in mind to publish a technical paper on the S5 calibration.