Optimal continuous natural resource extraction with increasing risk in prices and stock dynamics Professor Dr Peter Lohmander

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finance 30210: Managerial Economics Optimization.
Advertisements

A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a mickey mouse monopoly
 Introduction  Simple Framework: The Margin Rule  Model with Product Differentiation, Variable Proportions and Bypass  Model with multiple inputs.
1 Optimal CCS, Carbon Capture and Storage, Under Risk International Seminars in Life Sciences Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Thursday Updated.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.
Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Chapter 5 Dr.Hayk Melikyan/ Department of Mathematics and CS/ Linear Programming in two dimensions:
Chapter 5 Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Section 3 Linear Programming in Two Dimensions: A Geometric Approach.
 Econometrics and Programming approaches › Historically these approaches have been at odds, but recent advances have started to close this gap  Advantages.
Visual Recognition Tutorial
Tools for optimal coordination of CCS, power industry capacity expansion and bio energy raw material production and harvesting Peter Lohmander Prof. Dr.
1 Dynamic Economical Optimization of Sustainable Forest Harvesting in Russia with Consideration of Energy, other Forest Products and Recreation Peter Lohmander.
ABSTRACT Sequential bidding by suppliers on complex engineering/manufacturing contracts has become pervasive in many manufacturing industries. In maturing.
Finance 30210: Managerial Economics Optimization.
Sensitivity analysis BSAD 30 Dave Novak
OPTIMAL PRESENT RESOURCE EXTRACTION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FUTURE RISK Professor Dr Peter Lohmander SLU, Sweden,
Optimization using Calculus
Lecture 38 Constrained Optimization
Finance 510: Microeconomic Analysis
Inventory Models  3 Models with Deterministic Demand Model 1: Regular EOQ Model Model 2: EOQ with Backorder Model 3: EPQ with Production  2 Models with.
Economics 214 Lecture 39 Constrained Optimization.
Further Optimization of Economic Functions
Nonlinear Filtering of Stochastic Volatility Aleksandar Zatezalo, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Philosophy in Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
Finding a free maximum Derivatives and extreme points Using second derivatives to identify a maximum/minimum.
Chapter 13 Stochastic Optimal Control The state of the system is represented by a controlled stochastic process. Section 13.2 formulates a stochastic optimal.
Pricing Examples. Bundling In marketing, product bundling offers several products for sale as one combined product. This is common in the software business.
11. Cost minimization Econ 494 Spring 2013.
1 A Stochastic Differential (Difference) Game Model With an LP Subroutine for Mixed and Pure Strategy Optimization INFORMS International Meeting 2007,
Global Bioenergy, Economy and Policy Track 1 BITs 2nd Annual World Congress of Bioenergy Xi’an, China April 25-28, 2012.
Optimal continuous cover forest management: - Economic and environmental effects and legal considerations Professor Dr Peter Lohmander
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 12 Financial and Cost- Volume-Profit Models.
Managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving
Economics of exhaustible resources Economics 331b Spring
Linear Programming An Example. Problem The dairy "Fior di Latte" produces two types of cheese: cheese A and B. The dairy company must decide how many.
1 CM Optimal Resource Control Model & General continuous time optimal control model of a forest resource, comparative dynamics and CO2 storage consideration.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
1 Optimal Forest Management Under Risk International Seminars in Life Sciences Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Thursday Peter Lohmander.
Market power1 ECON 4925 Autumn 2006 Resource Economics Market power Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Nonlinear Programming Models
1 Optimal dynamic control of the forest resource with changing energy demand functions and valuation of CO2 storage Presentation at the Conference: The.
1 The Dual in Linear Programming In LP the solution for the profit- maximizing combination of outputs automatically determines the input amounts that must.
Lecture 7 and 8 The efficient and optimal use of natural resources.
Faculty of Economics Optimization Lecture 3 Marco Haan February 28, 2005.
Comparative statics Single variable unconstrained optimization Multiple parameters Econ 494 Spring 2013.
VOLTAGE CONSTRAINTS AND POWER NOMOGRAMS © 2002 Fernando L. Alvarado May 28, 2002.
1 Optimal activities over time in a typical forest industry company in the presence of stochastic markets - A flexible approach and possible extensions!
1 Introduction Optimization: Produce best quality of life with the available resources Engineering design optimization: Find the best system that satisfies.
Optimal adaptive stochastic control of large scale energy production under the influence of market risk Version Peter Lohmander Professor Dr., Optimal.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the monopoly model (I): standard pricing ………….1optimal production ………….2 optimal.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 dynamic pricing (II) ………….1integrated market ………….2 uniform pricing: no capacity.
Optimization of adaptive control functions in multidimensional forest management via stochastic simulation and grid search Version Peter Lohmander.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics
OPTIMAL STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC CONTROL OF SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED INTERDEPENDENT PRODUCTION UNITS Version Peter Lohmander Professor Dr., Optimal Solutions.
Keynote presentation at:
Fundamental Principles of Optimal Continuous Cover Forestry Linnaeus University Research Seminar (RESEM) Tuesday , , Lecture Hall:
Stochastic dynamic programming with Markov chains
A general dynamic function for the basal area of individual trees derived from a production theoretically motivated autonomous differential equation Version.
Chapter 5 Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming
Linear Programming Dr. T. T. Kachwala.
An International Project of the Future
Forest management optimization - considering biodiversity, global warming and economics goals Workshop at: Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences.
Chapter 2: Cost Concepts and Design Economics
13.3 day 2 Higher- Order Partial Derivatives
13.3 day 2 Higher- Order Partial Derivatives
Chapter 2: Cost Concepts and Design Economics
Chapter 2: Cost Concepts and Design Economics
Optimal stochastic control in continuous time with Wiener processes: - General results and applications to optimal wildlife management KEYNOTE Version.
Chapter 2: Cost Concepts and Design Economics
Chapter 2: Cost Concepts and Design Economics
Lecture 38 Constrained Optimization
Presentation transcript:

Optimal continuous natural resource extraction with increasing risk in prices and stock dynamics Professor Dr Peter Lohmander BIT's 5 th Annual World Congress of Bioenergy 2015 (WCBE 2015) Theme: “Boosting the development of green bioenergy" September 24-26, 2015 Venue: Xi'an, China 1

Lohmander, P., Optimal continuous natural resource extraction with increasing risk in prices and stock dynamics, WCBE 2015 Abstract Bioenergy is based on the dynamic utilization of natural resources. The dynamic supply of such energy resources is of fundamental importance to the success of bioenergy. This analysis concerns the optimal present extraction of a natural resouce and how this is affected by different kinds of future risk. The objective function is the expected present value of all operations over time. The analysis is performed via general function multi dimensional analyical optimization and comparative dynamics analysis in discrete time. First, the price and/or cost risk in the next period increases. The direction of optimal adjustment of the present extraction level is found to be a function of the third order derivatives of the profit functions in later time periods with respect to the extraction levels. In the second section, the optimal present extraction level is studied under the influence of increasing risk in the growth process. Again, the direction of optimal adjustment of the present extraction is found to be a function of the third order derivatives of the profit functions in later time periods with respect to the extraction levels. In the third section, the resource contains different species, growing together. Furthermore, the total harvest in each period is constrained. The directions of adjustments of the present extraction levels are functions of the third order derivatives, if the price or cost risk of one of the species increases. 2

Case: We control a natural resource. We want to maximize the expected present value of all activites over time. Questions: What is the optimal present extraction level? How is the optimal present extraction level affected by different kinds of future risk? 3

4 Source:

5 Source:

6 Source:

7 Probability density

In the following analyses, we study the solutions to maximization problems. The objective functions are the total expected present values. In particular, we study how the optimal decisions at different points in time are affected by stochastic variables, increasing risk and optimal adaptive future decisions. In all derivations in this document, continuously differentiable functions are assumed. In the optimizations and comparative statics calculations, local optima and small moves of these optima under the influence of parameter changes, are studied. For these reasons, derivatives of order four and higher are not considered. Derivatives of order three and lower can however not be neglected. We should be aware that functions that are not everywhere continuously differentiable may be relevant in several cases. 8

The profit functions used in the analyses are functions of the revenue and cost functions. The continuous profit functions may be interpreted as approximations of profit functions with penalty functions representing capacity constraints. The analysis will show that the third order derivatives of these functions determine the optimal present extraction response to increasing future risk. 9

Optimization in multi period problems 10

11

12

Three free decision variables and three first order optimum conditions 13

14

15 : Let us differentiate the first order optimum conditions with respect to the decision variables and the risk parameters:

16

17

18

19 Simplification gives: A unique maximum is assumed.

20 Observation: We assume decreasing marginal profits in all periods.

21 The following results follow from optimization:

22

23 The results may also be summarized this way :

24 The expected future marginal resource value decreases from increasing price risk and we should increase present extraction.

25 The expected future marginal resource value increases from increasing price risk and we should decrease present extraction.

Some results of increasing risk in the price process: If the future risk in the price process increases, we should increase the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly negative. If the future risk in the price process increases, we should not change the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are zero. If the future risk in the price process increases, we should decrease the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly positive. 26

27 The effects of increasing future risk in the volume process: Now, we will investigate how the optimal values of the decision variables change if g increases. We recall these first order derivatives:

The details of these derivations can be found in the mathematical appendix. 28

29 The expected future marginal resource value decreases from increasing risk in the volume process (growth) and we should increase present extraction.

30 The expected future marginal resource value increases from increasing risk in the volume process (growth) and we should decrease present extraction.

Some results of increasing risk in the volume process (growth process): If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should increase the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly negative. If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should not change the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are zero. If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should decrease the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly positive. 31

The mixed species case: A complete dynamic analysis of optimal natural resource management with several species should include decisions concerning total stock levels and interspecies competition. In the following analysis, we study a case with two species, where the growth of a species is assumed to be a function of the total stock level and the stock level of the individual species. The total stock level has however already indirectly been determined via binding constraints on total harvesting in periods 1 and 2. We start with a deterministic version of the problem and later move to the stochastic counterpart. 32

33

34 Period 1 Period 2 Period 3

The details of these derivations can be found in the mathematical appendix. 35

Some multi species results: With multiple species and total harvest volume constraints: Case 1: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should now harvest less of this species (A) and more of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is greater than the corresponding derivative of the other species. Case 3: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should not change the present harvest of this species (A) and not change the harvest of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is equal to the corresponding derivative of the other species. Case 5: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should now harvest more of this species (A) and less of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is less than the corresponding derivative of the other species. 36

The properties of the revenue and cost functions, including capacity constraints with penalty functions, determine the optimal present response to risk. Conclusive and general results have been derived and reported for the following cases: Increasing risk in the price and cost functions. Increasing risk in the dynamics of the physical processes. 37 CONCLUSIONS:

Optimal continuous natural resource extraction with increasing risk in prices and stock dynamics Professor Dr Peter Lohmander BIT's 5 th Annual World Congress of Bioenergy 2015 (WCBE 2015) Theme: “Boosting the development of green bioenergy" September 24-26, 2015 Venue: Xi'an, China 38

Mathematical Appendix presented at: The 8th International Conference of Iranian Operations Research Society Department of Mathematics Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran May

OPTIMAL PRESENT RESOURCE EXTRACTION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FUTURE RISK Professor Dr Peter Lohmander SLU, Sweden, The 8th International Conference of Iranian Operations Research Society Department of Mathematics Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran May

41

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 42

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 43

In the following analyses, we study the solutions to maximization problems. The objective functions are the total expected present values. In particular, we study how the optimal decisions at different points in time are affected by stochastic variables, increasing risk and optimal adaptive future decisions. In all derivations in this document, continuously differentiable functions are assumed. In the optimizations and comparative statics calculations, local optima and small moves of these optima under the influence of parameter changes, are studied. For these reasons, derivatives of order four and higher are not considered. Derivatives of order three and lower can however not be neglected. We should be aware that functions that are not everywhere continuously differentiable may be relevant in several cases. 44

Introduction with a simplified problem 45

46

47

48

49

Probabilities and outcomes: 50

Increasing risk: 51

52 Probability density

53

54

55

56 The sign of this third order derivative determines the optimal direction of change of our present extraction level under the influence of increasing risk in the future.

57

58

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 59

60 Expected marginal resource value In period t+1 Marginal resource value In period t

61 Marginal resource value In period t

62 Marginal resource value In period t

63 Probability density

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 64

Optimization in multi period problems 65 One index corrected

66

67

Three free decision variables and three first order optimum conditions 68

69

70 : Let us differentiate the first order optimum conditions with respect to the decision variables and the risk parameters:

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 71

72

73

74

75 Simplification gives: A unique maximum is assumed.

76 Observation: We assume decreasing marginal profits in all periods.

77 The following results follow from optimization:

78

79 The results may also be summarized this way :

80 The expected future marginal resource value decreases from increasing price risk and we should increase present extraction.

81 The expected future marginal resource value increases from increasing price risk and we should decrease present extraction.

Some results of increasing risk in the price process: If the future risk in the price process increases, we should increase the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly negative. If the future risk in the price process increases, we should not change the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are zero. If the future risk in the price process increases, we should decrease the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly positive. 82

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 83

84 The effects of increasing future risk in the volume process: Now, we will investigate how the optimal values of the decision variables change if g increases. We recall these first order derivatives:

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95 The expected future marginal resource value decreases from increasing risk in the volume process (growth) and we should increase present extraction.

96 The expected future marginal resource value increases from increasing risk in the volume process (growth) and we should decrease present extraction.

Some results of increasing risk in the volume process (growth process): If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should increase the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly negative. If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should not change the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are zero. If the future risk in the volume process increases, we should decrease the present extraction level in case the third order derivatives of profit with respect to volume are strictly positive. 97

Contents: 1. Introduction via one dimensional optimization in dynamic problems, comparative statics analysis, probabilities, increasing risk and the importance of third order derivatives. 2. Explicit multi period analysis, stationarity and corner solutions. 3. Multi period problems and model structure with sequential adaptive decisions and risk. 4. Optimal decisions under future price risk. 5. Optimal decisions under future risk in the volume process (growth risk). 6. Optimal decisions under future price risk with mixed species. 98

The mixed species case: A complete dynamic analysis of optimal natural resource management with several species should include decisions concerning total stock levels and interspecies competition. In the following analysis, we study a case with two species, where the growth of a species is assumed to be a function of the total stock level and the stock level of the individual species. The total stock level has however already indirectly been determined via binding constraints on total harvesting in periods 1 and 2. We start with a deterministic version of the problem and later move to the stochastic counterpart. 99

100

101 Period 1 Period 2 Period 3

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

Now, there are three free decision variables and three first order optimum conditions: 110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

Some multi species results: With multiple species and total harvest volume constraints: Case 1: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should now harvest less of this species (A) and more of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is greater than the corresponding derivative of the other species. Case 3: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should not change the present harvest of this species (A) and not change the harvest of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is equal to the corresponding derivative of the other species. Case 5: If the future price risk of one species, A, increases, we should now harvest more of this species (A) and less of the other species, in case the third order derivative of the profit function of species A with respect to harvest volume is less than the corresponding derivative of the other species. 119

Related analyses, via stochastic dynamic programmin g, are found here: 120

121 Many more references, including this presentation, are found here:

122

OPTIMAL PRESENT RESOURCE EXTRACTION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FUTURE RISK Professor Dr Peter Lohmander SLU, Sweden, The 8th International Conference of Iranian Operations Research Society Department of Mathematics Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran May