/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant Engineering Body of Knowledge: Tomorrow’s Engineer Indiana Society of Professional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Accreditation and Competence in the Context of World Wide Engineering Mobility- the International Engineering Alliance Experience Basil Wakelin.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
National Academic Reference Standards
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E., Ph.D., F.ASCE Chair, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison Preparing the Professional.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes Required for Practice as a Professional Engineer First Edition Craig N. Musselman, P.E.,
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
© American Bar Association Effective Strategic Planning Henry F. White, Jr. Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer American Bar Association 10 th.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Introduction to Engineering and Urban Planning How to be a Successful Engineer.
OBE Briefing.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Environmental Engineering Curriculum Evolution and Future Directions James Kilduff and Sim Komisar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colloquium.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Joint Engineers Conference 07 November 2014 Helena, MT Robert A. Green, P.E., F. NSPE President National Society.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
A Perspective on Globalization of Engineering C. (Ravi) Ravindran, FCAE, P.Eng President Canadian Academy of Engineering Future of Engineering Education.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
Technology Student Association (TSA)
/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant NSPE’s Pan – Engineering Body of Knowledge ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Indianapolis,
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
B - 1 October 2004 Eric Guilbeau, PhD  Department Chair, ASU, has overseen 4 visits to ASU (2 BME, 1 ChE, 1 Mat’ls Eng)  Lead 1 PEV visit (Bioengineering)
NSPE EBOK Competency Model Where Does It Fit? What Does It Take to Be an Engineer Paul Schmidt, P.E., F.NSPE Chair NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for.
NSPE in Action: Engineering the Future of the PE.
NSPE in Action: Engineering the Future of the PE.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Generic competencesDescription of the Competence Learning Competence The student  possesses the capability to evaluate and develop one’s own competences.
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
Presenters Only: Presentation Overview and Goals The following presentation provides sample slides and talking points for individuals to use as a guide.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
The Case Against “Master’s-or-Equivalent” Licensure Requirements INSERT NAME AND DATE HERE.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Slide 1 ANSI Annual Conference 2002 Breaking Down Border: Business, Standards and Trade Engineering Overview presented by William E. Kelly Professor Catholic.
With a focus on multidisciplinary collaboration and cross-cutting engineering approaches RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERING PRACTICE FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
SOA Strategic Plan Development Part II: Necessary Changes February 2015.
A K-12 Engineering Model Based Upon the Standards for Technological Literacy Kendall N. Starkweather, Ph.D. Executive Director/CEO International Technology.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
2012 Capstone Design Conference Amin Karim, DeVry University
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant Engineering Body of Knowledge: Tomorrow’s Engineer Indiana Society of Professional Engineers 77 th Annual Conference Indianapolis, IN, June

/ASEEBOK 2 Purpose Describe the EBOK and the process used to develop it Suggest ways you and your organization might use the EBOK

/ASEEBOK 3 NSPE’s Definition of BOK The depth and breadth of knowledge, skills, and attitudes appropriate to enter practice as a professional engineer in responsible charge of engineering activities that potentially impact public health, safety, and welfare

Respond to NAE “take charge” challenge to the engineering profession Support NSPE’s mission, vision, and values Build on discipline- specific BOK efforts Need for a pan-engineering BOK Why develop an EBOK? /ASEEBOK 4

5 Support NSPE’s vision, mission, and values Use values as an example: 1. Protection of the public welfare above all other considerations 2. Ethical and competent practice of engineering 3. Innovation through the creative application of math, science, and engineering

/ASEEBOK 6 4. The PE license as the highest standard of professionalism in engineering 5. Continuous learning for professional growth 6. Growth in the number of licensed Professional Engineers 7. Teamwork, unity, and fellowship of all PEs across all disciplines 8. Commitment to the future of the licensed Professional Engineer

/ASEEBOK 7 Respond to NAE’s “take charge” challenge “If the engineering profession is to take the initiative in defining its own future; it must: agree on an exciting vision; transform engineering education to help achieve the vision; build a clear image of the new roles for engineers…;

/ASEEBOK 8 Accommodate innovative developments from non-engineering fields; and find ways to focus the energies of the different disciplines of engineering toward common goals.” All benefit from a pan-engineering BOK

/ASEEBOK 9 Build on discipline-specific BOK efforts AAEES ASCE ASME ASQ IEEE SME

/ASEEBOK 10 Offset splintering

/ASEEBOK 11 The Process 2011Charge to NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for Practice Committee (LQPC) 2012Draft outline of EBOK approved by LQPC Comments invited/received from within NSPE Webinar conducted

/ASEEBOK 12 Comments invited from AAEES, ACEC, AIChE, ASABE, ASCE, ASHRAE, ASME, IEEE-USA Comments received from AIChE, ASCE, ASABE, and IEEE-USA 2013Draft report approved by LQPC Comments received from AIChE, ASABE, ASCE, Japan Society of Professional Engineers, IEEE-USA

/ASEEBOK 13 Final report approved by NSPE Board of Directors Report available as a free pdf NSPE welcomes continued input Second edition likely The process continues

/ASEEBOK 14 An early product of the process Guiding Principles that Will Shape the Future of Engineering The pace of technological innovation will continue to be rapid (most likely accelerating)

/ASEEBOK 15 The world in which technology will be deployed will be intensely globally interconnected The presence of technology in our everyday lives will be seamless, transparent, and more significant than ever The population of individuals who are involved with or affected by technology (e.g., designers, manufacturers, distributors, and government users) will be increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary

/ASEEBOK 16 Social, cultural, political, and economic forces will continue to shape and affect the success of technological innovation Engineering practice and professionalism will increasingly require the ability to draw upon a broad and comprehensive body of knowledge to make focused discretionary judgments about optimal solutions to unique, complex problems in the interest of enhancing public health, safety, and welfare

/ASEEBOK 17 Engineers from well-developed countries will increasingly be challenged to provide innovative, higher value- added services and products and to do so in a leading-edge manner As globalization of engineering practice expands, leadership in the ethical practice of engineering and the need to hold paramount public health, safety, and welfare will become more critical

/ASEEBOK 18 Through both education and training, engineers will need a broad background to understand and manage the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal (i.e., sustainable) context The increasing need to incorporate societal impact considerations in engineering decision-making will require better communication, management, leadership, and other professional practice skills on the part of engineers. Collaboration with non-engineers will be critical

/ASEEBOK 19 The rapid and accelerating pace of technological innovation will increase the need for continuing professional development and lifelong learning on the part of engineers Note: First five quoted from The Engineer of 2020

/ASEEBOK 20 Another product of the process Key Attributes of the Professional Engineer Analytical and practical Thorough and detail-oriented in design Creative and innovative Communicative

/ASEEBOK 21 Knowledgeable about the application of sciences and mathematics Thoroughly knowledgeable in a selected field of engineering and conversant in related technical fields Knowledgeable about and skillful in business and management Able to provide leadership – with ability to effect change in strategies, tactics, policies, and procedures in project and other roles

/ASEEBOK 22 Professional and positive in attitude Aware of societal and historical considerations in the global context Aware of and compliant with relevant laws, regulations, standards, and codes Licensed as a Professional Engineer and knowledgeable about engineering ethics and applicable codes of professional conduct Dedicated to lifelong learning

/ASEEBOK 23 EBOK Structure The EBOK KSAs are defined by 30 Capabilities Similar to the CEBOK’s outcomes Each capability is further defined with a list (not all inclusive) of representative specific Abilities Each ability begins with an active verb

/ASEEBOK 24 Example of capability-abilities format 5. Design Description Design, whether used as a verb to represent a process or interpreted as a noun to refer to the result of the process, is a core capability in engineering. As a process, design may be defined as…… The goal of design is quality; that is, meeting all requirements such as functional needs and staying within a budget. The ultimate result of the design process is an optimal solution consisting of a structure, facility, system, product, or process. More specifically, design leads to highly varied results such as automobiles, airports, chemical processes, computers and other electronic devices, nuclear power plants, prosthetic devices, skyscraper, ships, and spacecraft.

/ASEEBOK 25 Example abilities As examples of design capability, an engineer entering practice at the professional level should be able to: Identify, or work collaboratively to identify, the pertinent technical, environmental, economic, regulatory, and other project requirements and constraints; Contribute to the development of alternatives and prepare design details for complex projects; Analyze the pros and cons of some alternative design options and assist in the selection of an optimized design alternative; Etc.

/ASEEBOK 26 3 categories of capabilities Basic or Foundational (3) Technical (16) Professional Practice (11)

/ASEEBOK 27 Basic or foundational 1. Mathematics 2. Natural Sciences 3. Humanities and Social Sciences Technical 4. Manuf./Const.12. Risk, Reliab., Uncert. 5. Design13. Safety 6. Engr. Econ.14. Societal Impact 7. Engr. Science15. Systems Engr. 8. Engr. Tools16. Oper. & Maint. 9. Experiments17. Sustain. & Environ. Impact 10. Prob. Recog. & Solving18. Tech. Breadth 11. QCQA19. Tech. Depth Just the names— see report for detailed description

/ASEEBOK 28 Professional practice 20. Business Aspect of Engr. 21. Communication 22. Ethical Responsibility 23. Global Knowledge & Awareness 24. Leadership 25. Legal Aspects of Engr. 26. Lifelong Learning 27. Professional Attitudes 28. Project Management 29. Public Policy & Engr. 30. Teamwork

/ASEEBOK 29 So, what is the EBOK used for ?

Prospective engineering students Parents Teachers/ advisors General public Engineering and other faculty/ administrators Current engineering students Accreditation leaders Employers Engineer interns Mentors and supervisors Licensing boards Certification boards Engineering society members EBOK /ASEEBOK 30

/ASEEBOK 31 Use of the EBOK Stimulate future-oriented thinking and possible action

/ASEEBOK 32 “The best way to predict the future is to create it.” (Peter Drucker, consultant) Get more specific

/ASEEBOK 33 Stakeholders Prospective engineering students, parents, teachers, advisors, general public Possible Uses Understand importance of engineering Appreciate range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes Engineering and other faculty and administrators Design curricula/programs Create/improve courses

/ASEEBOK 34 Current engineering students Provide context for their education Accreditation leadersRevise criteria EmployersPartner with personnel Engineer InternsDirect their experience Mentors and supervisorsAssist interns

/ASEEBOK 35 Licensing boardsSet expectations for licensure Certification boardsDefine desired mastery level Engineering society members Use as resource for committee, subcommittee, and task force work

/ASEEBOK 36 NSPE is sharing the EBOK As of end of June 2014: 5 presentations at state and national conferences 4 planned presentations at state, national, and international conferences 5 articles/papers published 70 executive directors/presidents of professional societies notified and referred to the complimentary pdf Engineering Body of Knowledge report

/ASEEBOK 37 Want to help? Read Engineering Body of Knowledge (free pdf at Speak and write about the EBOK (Sample abstracts, articles, PowerPoints are available. Contact Stu Walesh at Suggest improvements to the EBOK (send to Art Schwartz, NSPE, Use the EBOK in your organization/work

/ASEEBOK 38 KEY IDEAS Needed a pan-engineering BOK Defined EBOK as KSA’s needed to practice as a professional engineer Used an inclusive-transparent process

/ASEEBOK 39 Developed a non-prescriptive capabilities-abilities structure Arranged 30 capabilities in 3 categories –Basic or foundational –Technical –Professional practice

/ASEEBOK 40 Designed the EBOK to serve many and varied stakeholders

/ASEEBOK 41 Expect EBOK2 Get involved! –Read it –Use it –Critique it –Speak and write about it

/ASEEBOK 42