Quantifying the Value of Research in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research and Development Division AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 29, 2015 Portland, Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asset Liability Management is a procedure which allows us to gain an understanding whether the companys assets would be sufficient to meet the companys.
Advertisements

DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Senior Fiscal Officer Meeting Thursday, November 17, 2011.
B280F Introduction to Financial Management
CAPITAL BUDGETING CHAPTER 11 Decision Rules Reinvestment Rate Assumptions Sensitivity Analysis.
1 Chapter 10: The Basics of Capital Budgeting: Evaluating Cash Flows Overview and “vocabulary” Methods Payback, discounted payback NPV IRR, MIRR Profitability.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
Benefit-Cost in Practice: Implementing the Efficiency Standard.
Paul A. Weghorst Executive Director of Water Policy
Moving from Analysis to Design
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Investment Decision Rules 2/07/06. Investment decision revisited Acceptable projects are those that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Investment Decision Rules 10/20/05. Investment decision revisited Acceptable projects are those that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 17 Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Valuation of Benefits.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
PROJECT EVALUATION. Introduction Evaluation  comparing a proposed project with alternatives and deciding whether to proceed with it Normally carried.
Strengthening Public Finance Management Through Computerization of Procurement Management System High Level Forum on Procurement Reforms in Africa Tunisia.
Your Chance to Go Green How can you save money by going green?
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Evaluation of LIPA’s Efficiency Long Island & Renewable Technology Programs Presented to: LIPA Board of Trustees By: Bill Norton Chief.
System Benefits Charge in New York: Technology & Market Development Program 2012 – 2016.
Introduction ► This slide deck provides a suggested framework for the financial evaluation of an investment project. When evaluating any such project,
Central New Mexico Community College Economic Impact Study – Summer 2012.
Navigating the Maze How to sell to the public sector Adrian Farley Chief Deputy CIO State of California
Business F723 Fixed Income Analysis Week 5 Liability Funding and Immunization.
Financial Stewardship For Organizations: An Overview.
Intro to Financial Management Cash Flow and Risk in Capital Budgeting.
DEFRA 1 st IMPACT Workshop - 16/17 May 2002 How does this research fit within the UK? Dr Mervyn Bramley Flood Defence Development Manager, Environment.
Determining and Setting Public Utility Rates Bill Wilks, Senior Project Manager November 19, 2014 AGFOA Fall Conference.
1 Chapter 12 Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework of Benefit- Cost Analysis Evaluation of Benefits and Costs Benefit-Cost Ratios.
Chapter Outline 12.1Risk Identification and Evaluation Identifying Exposures Property Loss Exposures Liability Losses Losses to Human Capital Losses from.
Normative Criteria for Decision Making Applying the Concepts
1 DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW MODELS (MIS-45&46) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
RISK MANAGEMENT BASICS Presented by John Chino, ARM PE, CSRM Arthur J
Surviving Your First Audit AASBO Winter Conference Breakout Session III Nate Bowler, Buckeye Elementary.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
43 rd Annual Western States Highway Equipment Managers Association Conference Washington State Department of Transportation Presentation August 29, 2011.
1 CS-18: Risk Metrics Fred Tavan, FSA FCIA Assistant Vice President, Canada Life ERM Symposium, Washington DC July 29, 2003.
Air Resources Board Research Division Economic Valuation of Air Quality Benefits Bart Croes, Chief Research Division.
Financial evaluation 9 March Financial Feasibility Assess the ability of the utility or developer to meet the financial obligations associated with.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Introduction to the Cooperative Agreements.
20-1 HANSEN & MOWEN Cost Management ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Introduction to Risk Management.
Chapter Outline 12.1Risk Identification and Evaluation Identifying Exposures Property Loss Exposures Liability Losses Losses to Human Capital Losses from.
Software Project Management
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Enterprise Risk Management An Introduction Frank Reynolds, Reynolds, Thorvardson, Ltd.
Creating Dynamic Value: Program Marketing and Two-Tiered Solicitation and Selection TRB Representatives / Annual RAC Meeting July 22-26, 2012.
TEL2813/IS2820 Security Management Cost-Benefit Analysis Net Present Value Model, Internal Rate of Return Model Return on Investment (Based on Book by.
Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Benefit/Cost Analysis.
Portland Public Schools Proposed Budget
The Income Capitalization Approach
BUSINESS CONTINUITY BY HUI ZHENG.
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
The Income Capitalization Approach
Return on Investment of Education
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
ACEC Bobby Lewis August 2017.
Capital Improvement Plans
Texas Woman's University
Community Benefit Activities
Presentation transcript:

Quantifying the Value of Research in Indiana Tommy Nantung INDOT Research and Development Division AASHTO RAC Annual Meeting July 29, 2015 Portland, Oregon

INDOT/JTRP Research Program Three primary responsibilities: Conduct, oversee, implement and partner in effective research that benefits our customers (currently 92 active research projects and 185 implementation projects, monitored through SmartSheet). Conduct and oversee specialized testing programs for INDOT (e.g. Skid Accident Reduction Program, Deflection Program, Accelerated Testing Program). Assist in technology development, identification and transfer (emerging technology with a 10-year future perspective).

Quantifiable savings Projects selected where costs and benefits can be reasonably quantified Individual projects selected represent different research areas Analysis based on Engineering economic theory Methodology 3% inflation and 5% discount rates used Benefit/Cost Ratio Methodology 3

Calculation of Benefits

Benefits Calculation

Pavement B/C Example Cost of research (Present Value) = $88,942 Yearly use of Reclaimed Asphalt = 3.5 Million Tons Savings = $0.13/ton/1% re-use (based on contract price) Usage for Asphalt base = 20% Savings per year (Annual) = $9.1M B/C = $113.4M/88,942 = 1,275 : 1

In 2003 show benefit-cost (based on projects, ratios ranging from as high as 220 to 3 to 1. Previous B/C in 1999 and 2001 yielded ratios of 35 to 1 and 53 to 1, respectively. The B/C is based on either a direct replacement cost that was developed or costs and benefits that are expected during the life of a material, component, or system. Benefit/Cost Analysis Summary 7

Other Benefits Improved specifications and testing procedures Better methods resulting in improved material performance Cost-effective policy and procedures Safer highways and work zones New technologies and processes that improve productivity Environmentally-friendly solutions to Indiana’s waste problems 8

Spreadsheet Program created by INDOT Central Office (no hand calculations) Calculate the value of return on investment in research and development. Investment are calculated by the schedule and amount of free cash returned to investor. Costs to conduct R&D are all inclusive and comprise direct expenditures as well as indirect costs. Modified Rates-of-Return (MIRR)

Benefits can inure to INDOT in the form of: Improved business practices Reduce labor, provide savings in costs of material or other supplies and expenses, or reduce the time to develop and construct a project. Other "soft" benefits can be realized by reducing INDOT's exposure to potential liabilities, improving safety, or complying with new laws and regulations. Care must be exercised when attempting to place a value on these soft benefits.

Modified Rates-of-Return (MIRR) Methodology Evaluation period is to begin at the start of the project and extend 10 years from the date of the findings are implemented INDOT’s Hurdle Rate represents the risk premium it assigns to capital investments The MIRR represents the internal rate of return for a series of periodic cash flows, considering The cost of funds used to invest in the project The interest which could be earned on re-investment of free cash generated. Viable investment is if the MIRR exceeds the Hurdle Rate

Modified Rates-of-Return (MIRR)

Demonstrating implementation & return on investment is good, but demonstrating IMPACT is even more important IMPACT can be measured in multiple different ways Having a diverse portfolio of IMPACT messages is important It is important to have a variety of traditional and nontraditional media to communicate IMPACT New Way to Show Benefits

One size does not fit all Metrics include: Mapping into Executive Staff priorities Saving Dollars Prioritizing Capital Program Safety Outcome Assessment Extending Infrastructure Life Leveraging University Resources Environmental impact National Recognition of Impact Measuring IMPACT

Technical Reports Electronic repository (e ‐ Pubs) Print on Demand e ‐ Books Posters Pocket Portfolios Electronic Media: Website, Twitter and Flickr, Newsletters Video Abstracts Conferences, Presentations and Workshops Communicating and Dissemination

Governor’s Award

Conclusions Message is very important Show case past efforts Implement new communication initiatives to support engagement Implement series of case studies illustrating blended communications tools Maintain dialog