September 2004Rudolf, Carlton1 802.21 and TGr Marian Rudolf, Alan Carlton - InterDigital doc: IEEE 802.11-04/1052r0.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IEEE Media Independent Handoff Overview of services and scenarios for 3GPP2 Stefano M. Faccin Liaison officer to 3GPP2.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1191r5 Submission November 2004 Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 AP Architecture Thoughts Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronics.
Doc.: IEEE frfh Submission July 2004 Jon Edney, NokiaSlide 1 What is an ESS? Jon Edney, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE xxx Submission May 10-14, 2004 Alan Carlton, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Defining Layer 2.5 Alan Carlton Interdigital Communications.
Extended Service Set (ESS) Mesh Network Daniela Maniezzo.
Doc.: IEEE /1191r4 Submission November 2004 Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 AP Architecture Thoughts Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1179r0 PAD for Soft AP Date: Authors: September 2013 HTC1.
Doc.: IEEE /0522r0 Submission July 2005 Mike Moreton, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 DS, ESS, Subnet and VLAN Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0035r0 Submission Jan 2005 Jon Edney InTalk2kSlide 1 Retiring the DS – a proposal Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0357r0 Submission March 2011 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 A focused path torwards TGai D1.0 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0598r0 Submission May 2012 Steve Grau, Juniper NetworksSlide 1 Layer 3 Setup with Dynamic VLAN Assignment Date: Authors:
Doc.: Handoff_WNG_Presentation r3 Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff Presentation to WNG David Johnston.
Inter-Subnet Mobile IP Handoffs in b Wireless LANs Albert Hasson.
WIRELESS NETWORKS - A.HARIKA Y5CSO28. INTRODUCTION It refer to a telecommunication networks whose interconnections between nodes is implemented without.
Doc.: IEEE /533r3 Submission July 2003 Clint Chaplin, Symbol TechnologiesSlide 1 Proposal for Fast Roam Fast Handoff Study Group Clint Chaplin,
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard
Doc.: IEEE /492r02 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1449r0 Decmeber 2012 Yan Zhuang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Virtual Wireless Port based Bridging Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0981r1 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations September 6, 2004 Tricci So & W. Steven Conner.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0589r2 July 2012 Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei R&D USASlide 1 General Links Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0866r1 Submission September 2005 Michael Montemurro, Chantry NetworksSlide 1 Mobility Domain Definition and Description Notice: This.
DCN: March 7, 2005 IETF 62 - Minneapolis, MN Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability Ajay Rajkumar Chair, IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /1468r0 Submission Dec 2008 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /033r2 Submission July 1999 Simon Baatz, University of BonnSlide 1 Integration of Bluetooth into LAN Environments Simon Baatz, Matthias.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0589r1 May 2012 Donald Eastlake 3rd, Huawei R&D USASlide 1 General Links Date: Authors:
Doc.: mes Submission 7 May 2004 Tricci SoSlide 1 Need Clarification on The Definition of ESS Mesh Prepared by Tricci So.
Doc.: IEEE /0850r4 Submission September, 2005 Yao Zhonghui, Huawei Slide u Proposal Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /433r1 Submission Richard van Nee, Sean Coffey July 2002 Slide 1 Short Slot Time Option for TGg Updated Version Richard van Nee, Woodside.
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Architecture_Elements_r2 Submission May David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 Architectural Elements of an 802 Handoff Solution David Johnston.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0319r0 Submission March 2004 W. Steven Conner, Intel Corporation Slide 1 Architectural Considerations and Requirements for ESS.
Doc.: IEEE /0351r0 Submission March 2004 Haixiang He, Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Fast Roaming Study Group: Proposal for Task Group.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chapter Ten Internetworking.
“Local Area Networks” - Gerd Keiser Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies srl Local Area Networks Gerd Keiser.
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
WLAN.
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /568r0 David Skellern, Cisco SystemsSlide 1Submission RRM Architectural Framework David Skellern Wireless Networking.
Doc.: IEEE /0971r0 Submission Sept 2005 Jon Edney, Stefano Faccin, NokiaSlide 1 Redefining the SSID Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /1143r0 Submission November 2009 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Potential confusion in D3.04 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0850r2 Submission September, 2005 Yao Zhonghui, Huawei Slide u Proposal Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 Simplified 11k Security Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications Corporation doc: IEEE /552r0May 2004.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE /0719r0 Submission July 2004 Marian Rudolf, Juan-Carlos Zuniga, InterDigitalSlide STA-driven / AP-assisted handover Marian.
Services Distribution Services (for APs) – Association – mobile stations connect themselves to base stations – Reassociation – a station may change.
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission Jan 09 Ashish Shukla, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 ERP Protection in IEEE s Mesh Network Date:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Proposed Presentation for 3GPP Date Submitted: September,
Wireless LAN Requirements (1) Same as any LAN – High capacity, short distances, full connectivity, broadcast capability Throughput: – efficient use wireless.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1162r0 September 2012 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide Q Bridge Baggy Pants Explanation Date: Authors:
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard
Introduction to “Tap – Dance ”. Company Proprietary Presentation Topics  Introduction  Handover scenarios  Inter-Network Handover consequences  Common.
Network Sharing Architecture
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN)
IEEE r: Fast BSS Transition TG
doc.: IEEE /xxx Jon Edney, Nokia
Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability
Resolutions to orphan comments
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
AP Architecture Thoughts
2/17/2019 Interpretations of the Distribution System Service Based on the Specification W. Steven Conner, Intel Corp. Tricci So, Nortel Networks.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
May 2004 doc.: IEEE /629r1 May 2004 The Nature of an ESS
May 2004 doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 May 2004 The Nature of an ESS
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Suggested Clarification of s ESS Mesh Terminology
Mobility Support in Wireless LAN
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Some open questions Date: Authors: January 2010
What is an ESS? Date: Authors: July 2009
Presentation transcript:

September 2004Rudolf, Carlton and TGr Marian Rudolf, Alan Carlton - InterDigital doc: IEEE /1052r0

September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 2 Summary and TGr seem to address complementary mobility scenarios – Across 802 networks and Inter-ESS mobility r – Intra-ESS mobility for But expect partial overlap between and TGr mobility solutions, ESS definition is too broad and unclear and does not allow to draw a clear boundary line between and TGr When addressing L2 mobility handling across different 802 technologies, will automatically come up with a solution that implies L2 mobility handling for the same 802 technology Two different mobility solutions for are not an attractive option, and TGr mobility solutions should, either be fully complementary or TGr solution should be forwards-compatible with future framework Many good reasons speak in favor of a quickly available TGr standards supplement, but need to anticipate on development

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 3 Introduction From and TGr PARs and requirements, TGr scope “… This PAR will apply only to the STA-AP state within the same ESS,…” scope “… extensible 802 media access independent mechanisms that enable the optimization of handover between heterogeneous 802 systems and may facilitate handover between 802 systems and cellular systems” draft requirements – Handover Scenarios IEEE 802 Family, … Handover between and networks Handover between and networks, across ESSs … Media-Independent Handover addresses 802.xx to 802.yy and inter-ESS mobility cases r Fast BSS Transition addresses intra-ESS mobility cases

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton ESS definition ESS definition in Clause 3.25 “A set of one or more interconnected basic service sets (BSSs) and integrated local area networks (LANs) that appears as a single BSS to the logical link control layer at any station associated with one of those BSSs.” ESS definition in Clause 5 “ The key concept is that the ESS network appears the same to an LLC layer as an IBSS network. Stations within an ESS may communicate and mobile stations may move from one BSS to another (within the same ESS) transparently to LLC.” Key points, L2 connectivity inside ESS SSID does not define the ESS STAs within ESS may communicate and move transparently to LLC

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton ESS – logical definition AP + DS + Portal AP Distribution System STA Portal network HOSTRouter Clause “The key concept is that the ESS network appears the same to an LLC layer as an IBSS network. Stations within an ESS may communicate and mobile stations may move from one BSS to another (within the same ESS) transparently to LLC.” Source: by Nortel, Airespace

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 6 WM Portal Integration Distribution System AP Device WM Portal Integration Distribution System AP Device ESS with a logical DS and Portal using a Router STA network HOSTRouter STA L2 Hub or Switch Portal L2 link L2 Hub or Switch Portal Distribution System ESS ESS definition / L2 connectivity with VLAN Source: by Nortel, Airespace

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 7 Scenario 1 – L3 versus L2 mobility Internet R1 AP4 R2 AP3 AP2 AP1 L2 link ESS1 L2 link ESS2 TGr L2 mobility L3 assisted mobility (Mobile IP) FA No L2 connectivity between two DS Clear separation between L2 and L3 mobility handling and r complementary

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 8 Scenario 2 – Complex network setups Internet R1 AP4 AP3 AP2 AP1 L2 link ESS TGr L2 mobility L3 assisted mobility (Mobile IP) FA R VLAN L2 connectivity with Router Both L3 and L2 mobility handling apply (L3 assisted) and r (L2) conflicting mobility handling procedures ?  Need to ensure some degree of cooperation between and TGr mobility solutions FA R2

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 9 Scenario 3 – In case and TGr don’t have the same understanding what an ESS is Internet R1 AP4 AP3 AP2 AP1 TGr L2 mobility FA R VLAN If don’t agree on “ESS” definition Both come up with a L2 mobility solution, but addressing the same scenario and r conflicting mobility handling procedures ?  Need to define mobility scenarios to avoid solving the same problem twice ESS L2 mobility perspective L2 link ESS1 L2 link ESS2 TGr perspective

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 10 Scenario 4 – L2 mobility part Internet R AP2 AP L2 mobility FA R VLAN L2 link ESS TGr L2 mobility handover scenario from to To be seamless, will need features such as pre- authentication and neighbor discovery – same functionality needed in TGr for ESS From perspective, the ports could be replaced by AP, it would very likely not change the L2 mobility procedure ! Both and r duplicate functionality to allow seamless handover ?

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 11 Scenario 4 – L2 mobility (cont’d) r Pre-authentication Network discovery Management information … In L2.5 Pre-authentication Network discovery Management information … In MAC

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 12 Conclusions Expect partial overlap between and TGr mobility solutions, ESS definition is too broad and unclear and does not allow to draw a clear boundary line between and TGr without agreeing on specific mobility scenarios When addressing L2 mobility handling across different 802 technologies, will automatically come up with a solution that implies L2 mobility handling for the same 802 technology Two different mobility solutions for are not an attractive option, and TGr mobility solutions should, either be fully complementary or TGr solution should be forwards-compatible with future framework

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 13 Conclusions (cont) We favor quickly available solutions that address mobility but recognize that evolution towards 802 inter- technology solutions (802.21) is of great importance

doc: IEEE /1052r0September 2004 Submission Rudolf, Carlton 14 Recommendations Harmonization Valuable worked conducted within the group shall provide solid ground for further development within (Forward Compatibility) Joined meeting slot with is required as soon as 11r starts proposal evaluation Existing ESS logical concept needs to be translated into tangible implementation scenarios Either define mobility scenarios or Bring the issue up to 802.1