Supreme Court Cases    .

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Marbury v Madison Description (Key Question) –Who has the power to decide what is Constitutional? Decision –Established.
Advertisements

 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  John Marshall used the case to establish Judicial Review which allows the court to declare.
Supreme Court Cases. What you need to know to present your case: The background of the case – What happened? – What were both sides of the argument? Constitutional.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Unit 4 Citizenship Individuals can demonstrate national identity by fulfilling duties and responsibilities.
Supreme Court Cases. U. S. v. Nixon Background: Background: Watergate Hotel; burglars break into Democratic Party headquarters. White House staff are.
IMPORTANT US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
8 Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Decisions. GIBBONS V. OGDEN MIRANDA V. ARIZONA FURMAN V. GEORGIA GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT TINKER V. DES MOINES U.S. V. NIXON NY TIMES V. U.S.
Jeopardy!!! 1st Amendment At School Equal Protection Rights of the Accused Potpourri \
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison, 1803 Midnight Appointments – Court Appointments by John Adams Established the power of Judicial Review.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
2.05 Starter Why were the Civil War amendments so important? Explain the 14 th amendment in your own words. Which amendment was repealed (done away with)?
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury vs. Madison 1803  Established the power of Judicial Review  Declared part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional,
IMPORTANT US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS. Marbury v. Madison (1803) federal powers Checks and Balances Judiciary Act of 1789 part of the act was unconstitutional.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
The Supreme Court.
Important Supreme Court Decisions. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review (the right to determine the constitutionality.
SUPREME COURT CASES CASES EVERY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Jefferson ordered that the papers not be delivered and gave the job to someone else. Marbury sued asking.
Supreme Court Cases EOC Review Becky Griffith. Marbury v. Madison, 1803 Judicial Review.
U.S. Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison 1803 Established judicial review— allowing for the court to rule on whether or not a law is allowed by the.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison 1803 DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Courts right of Judicial Review (right to determine the constitutionality.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v Madison This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Constitutional basis: supremacy clause What.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Question – Does the Supreme Court have the authority to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme.
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison Does the Judiciary Act of 1789 allow Marbury to take his case directly to the Supreme Court? Does the.
Do-Now Make sure your case books are ready to turn in—they should have a name, situation, key phrase, and picture on every page! Study study study!
The Supreme Court! Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval!
SUPREME COURT CASES Other Cases Civil Rights (1) Student Rights Civil Rights (2) th, 5 th, 6 th Amendments Federal Government.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: American History. Marbury v. Madison Essentials: Essentials: Established JUDICIAL REVIEW Established JUDICIAL REVIEW 1803.
Supreme Court Cases. Warm Up 1. How does a case reach the Supreme Court? 2. What is the cartoon below implying?
4.04: Creation and Defense of Individual Rights Supreme Court Cases.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval! ► “Equal Justice.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison Issue: Should the Constitution be very strictly interpreted or is there room for interpretation? If there.
Major Supreme Court Cases 2.05 & Analyze court cases that illustrate that the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land & how the Bill of.
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Court Cases. Court Case Assignment In groups you will research the major landmark court cases relative to this unit. The cases will be randomly selected.
Supreme Court Cases continued…
Court Cases that Protect the Individual Citizen
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury v. Madison (1803)
The Judicial Branch of Government
Review the Constitution—Judicial Branch Look at Landmark Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme Court cases
AP Gov Review: Unit #6 in 10 minutes
Important Supreme Court Cases
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
Gov Review Video #50: Important Supreme Court Cases To Know
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
10 Court Cases in American History
C3.2(2) LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Unit 4: The Government Part 2
Historic Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Landmark Supreme court cases
Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Cases    

Court Case Baseball Cards Front 1pt Case Name 1pt Case Date (year) 1pt Illustration 1pt Color Back 2pts Court Decision 2pts Impact of the decision Total= 8pts X 25 Cases = 200pts  

Marbury v. Madison (1803) - The Supreme Court ruled that it has the power to decide the Constitutionality of all actions of Congress, Presidency and the States. - This leads to JUDICIAL REVIEW- determines if a law is unconstitutional    

Gibbons v. Ogden(1824) The Case: Ogden was a licensed ferry operator between NY and NJ. He sues Gibbons, who has no license because it is hurting his business. The Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that on the Federal government could regulate interstate trade.

McCulloch v. Maryland(1819) • Case? – State of MD wanted to tax Federal bank – Federal gov’t said they couldn’t • Decision? – Federal gov’t is supreme over state gov’t. Impact? -  Reinforced the Supremacy Clause. Fed > State

Schenck v. The United States (1919) During WWI he wrote pamphlets telling men to resist the draft (refuse to fight). – Was arrested Espionage Act. • Decision? – Court said: free speech is more limited during wartime. – Pamphlets presented “clear and present danger.” – If men didn’t fight during war, country would   be in danger. LIMITED YOUR RIGHTS

Schenck Cont. Lasting result? – “Clear and present danger” test was applied to see if speech could be LEGALLY restricted. – Later changed to “imminent lawless action” test. – If speech intends to cause or encourage a violation of the law, it CAN be   limited.

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) •Case? –Students wore black arm bands protesting Vietnam war. –School told them they couldn’t. –They sued. •Decision?  - Court ruled in their favor.  - Symbolic speech is protected in schools if it isn’t disruptive. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Bethel School District v. Frasier (1986) •Case? –Student made a speech with sexual innuendos –Was suspended, not allowed to speak at graduation. –He sued. •Decision?  - Court sided with the school.  - Vulgar speech is not protected LIMITED YOUR RIGHTS

Texas v. Johnson (1989) •Case? –Man burned an American flag in protest. –There were laws against doing that, so he was arrested. –He appealed •Decision?  - Court upheld his free speech rights  - Burning a flag is protected free speech. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) The Case: - Students print a newspaper with a sexually explicit story. -The principal refuses to allow the story to be printed. The Decision: The Court rules that freedom of speech does not apply equally in school. Limits your Rights

Engle v. Vitale (1962) The Case: A school in New York required students to say a prayer at the beginning of each school day thanking “Almighty God.” Jewish families objected saying it violated their freedom of religion. The Decision: Schools cannot force you to pray. There can be no official endorsement of religion. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Miranda v. Arizona(1956) •Ernesto Miranda, convicted of rape. •He confessed, but wasn’t told his rights •5th Amendment (no self-incrimination) •6th Amendment (right to attorney) •Police read you “Miranda Rights” EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Gideon v. Wainright(1963) •Clarence Gideon was arrested for robbing a pool hall. •He wasn’t given a lawyer because it wasn’t a major crime. He defended himself, and lost. •6th Amendment (right to an attorney) •You have the right to a court appointed attorney even in lesser crimes. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

TLO v. New Jersey(1985) TLO (No name because she was under age) is caught smoking in the bathroom. The principal searches her purse and finds a bag of marijuana. She is arrested. The Supreme Court upholds the arrest because “evidence in plain sight” is probable cause. LIMITED YOUR RIGHTS- if there is probable cause the police have the right to search you.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961) •Dollree Mapp. Police thought she was hiding a fugitive. •They searched Mapp’s home without a warrant, found illegal documents, and charged her. She claimed it was illegal because they had no warrant. •4th Amendment  protects you from unreasonable searches or seizures •Exclusionary rule. Evidence is excluded from court if it was found illegally. EXTENDS YOUR RIGHTS

In re Gault (1967) •Gerald Gault, age 15. •Arrested for juvenile delinquency. Wasn’t told his rights, or formally charged. •The police violated his 5th Amendment (due process, right to confront accuser) and 6th Amendment (attorney) rights. •Juveniles have same due process rights as adults. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Furman v. Georgia(1972) •Furman shot and killed a man that he was robbing Georgia was not using the death penalty consistently –Temporarily stopped the death penalty. –Ruled it was being applied unfairly, and so was unconstitutional. EXTENDS YOUR RIGHTS

Gregg v. Georgia –Death penalty okay again. –Set up guidelines for states to follow to make it consistent. LIMITS YOUR RIGHTS

Dred Scot Vs Sanford(1857) Case: Slave’s Master dies while they are visiting a free state.  Slave sues for freedom Decision:  Slaves are considered property and therefore do not have the right to sue. Limits Rights

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) The Case  Homer Plessy refused to leave the “whites-  only” train car, and was arrested. He   appealed to Supreme Court. The Decision:  Whites-only = okay. Established “separate   but equal” doctrine. Impact:  Jim Crow laws and segregation. Separate   schools, bathrooms, hotels, etc.

Brown v. The Board of Education (1954) The Case: Black parents sued because the black   schools were inferior. Wanted integration. Ruling:  Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson. Separate   but equal can never be really equal. Schools had to integrate.

Swann v. CMS (1971) The Case: Court ruled that busing could be used to   integrate schools. The Decision: CMS forced to begin busing, schools were    successfully integrated. Lasted until 2002.

The Leandro Case (1997) The Case: sound basic education A student in a poor rural community sues because his school does not offer the same classes as wealthy schools. The Decision: (By the NC Supreme Court) All students are entitled to an EQUAL education. State must spend same amount on all students.

Definition of a Sound Basic Education (1) Sufficient ability to read, write and speak the English language and sufficient knowledge of fundamental mathematics and physical science to enable the student to function in a complex and rapidly changing society; (2) sufficient fundamental knowledge of geography, history and basic economic and political systems to enable the student to make informed choices with regard to issues that affect the student personally or affect the student’s community, state, and nation; (3) sufficient academic and vocational skills to enable the student to successfully engage in post-secondary education or vocational training; (4) sufficient academic and vocational skills to enable the student to compete on an equal basis with others in further formal education or gainful employment in contemporary society.

The Regents of U of Cal. v. Bakke (1978) Case: A white student sues UCAL over Affirmative action. Affirmative Action = All else equal, accept minority students. Ruling: To get diversity? Yes. Quotas? No. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Korematsu v. The United States (1944) The Case: Asian Americans are put into internment camps during WWII on suspicion they are spies for the Japanese. The Decision: Your civil liberties may be limited during times of war. LIMITED YOUR RIGHTS

Heart of Atlanta Hotel v. US (1964) The Case: The Heart of Atlanta hotel refused to serve minority customers. It argued that because it was a private establishment it could choose who to serve. The Decision: The Supreme Court ruled that businesses CAN NOT descriminate against customers based on protected status. EXTENDED YOUR RIGHTS

Roe v. Wade (1973) The Case: A woman seeks an early term abortion. Is arrested for manslaughter. The Decision: Women can make medical decisions about their own body, including the termination of pregnancy, under certain circumstances.