Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance Strategic Plan 2009-2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

Evidence-based Practice in Juvenile Justice
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
Bullying, Victimization & School Engagement: Creating Governance for Success Based on Research Supported by Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency.
Social Workers in Schools (SWiS) Expansion of services.
Dallas County Juvenile Probation Department Dr. Terry S. Smith, Executive Director 1.
Disproportionality and the Family-School Connection Barbara Leach, Family Support Network of North Carolina Teresa Dais, Ph.D., NC Department of Public.
 Provide overview of the block grant statute requiring planning councils  Provide overview of statutory responsibilities of planning councils  Describe.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Mission The mission of the Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance is to reduce the number of children and youth entering the juvenile and criminal justice.
Our Mission Community Outreach for Youth & Family Services, Inc. is dedicated to improving the quality of life for both the youth and adult population.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
8 Minute AM Show Alex R. Piquero, PhD. The growth and decline in violent crime by juveniles between are documented by both victim reports and.
Cancer Education and Cultural Awareness Project (CECAP)
CHILDREN & FAMILIES IN NEED OF SERVICES Amy Howell Southern Juvenile Defender Center Emory University School of Law.
Trends in Juvenile Justice State Legislation Meeting of OJJDP's Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice October 19, 2012 Sarah Alice Brown Director,
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Mental Health Training Curriculum for Juvenile Justice Module 2: The Interface between the Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Systems 2-1.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
2006 System of Care Start-up Webinar Series1 System of Care: From Vision to Infrastructure Sandy Keenan, Education Resource Specialist, Technical Assistance.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Reflecting on 20 Years of Advocacy. The Parent Support Network Is Formed In 1989, both the federal and state government put their money on the table and.
Onondaga County DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Center for Community Alternatives Emily NaPier Juanita Gamble Co-Coordinators.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Justice Grantmaking  Background and History  The MacArthur Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
1 Joyce James, LMSW-AP Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner Overview of the Texas Model for Eliminating Disproportionality and Disparities Center for.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Ojjdp.gov Raise The Age Presented by Toni Walker.
Early Help Strategy Achieving better outcomes for children, young people and families, by developing family resilience and intervening early when help.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2008 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2008.
Community Employment Alliance An advocacy organization, with a statewide membership network of employment service providers and businesses. 1.
Guideposts for Success Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice (FACJJ) 2009 Annual Request for Information (ARI) Presented by CSR, Incorporated August 2009.
Why Raise the Age? Keeping kids in the juvenile system prevents crime Lower recidivism vs. peers in adult system Juvenile system often holds kids more.
Abby Anderson, Executive Director Lara Herscovitch, Sr. Policy Analyst 6 th Annual Connecticut Data Showcase Conference April 27, 2011.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Boys and Girls Clubs of South Puget Sound STRATEGIC PLAN 2005 ONE CAMPAIGN.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Section I: Bringing The Community Together Center for Community Outreach Key Components of Afterschool Programs.
Community Level Team Community Level Teams. “No one can do it alone. Improving the quality of life and the education of children with disabilities and.
Fostering Local and National Collaboration to Support Continuous Quality Improvement Angela Sheehan, ORC Macro Beth Dague, Project Director, Project Tapestry.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Children & Youth Conference The American Legion Covering Kids & Families Promising practices from the nation’s single largest effort to insure eligible.
Children’s Policy Conference Keeping Kids Closer to Home Peter Selby, PhD -- February 24, 2016.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
A multi-partisan collaboration of Minnesota Alliance With Youth, Office of the Governor, & Minnesota Department of Education.
Preventing Hate Crimes
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
School Justice Partnership Project
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
Reducing the School-to- Prison Pipeline A Strategy to Serve High-Risk Youth Juvenile Justice Summit, April 25, 2017 Both Introduce Ourselves LINDA BARTON,
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance Strategic Plan

CTJJA Strategic Plan CTJJA Vision CTJJA envisions a Connecticut where: (A) Children and youth remain and find all needed supports in their home community, (B) Juvenile justice is rehabilitative and provides the children and youth that do come in contact with the system the supports they need to successfully re- integrate back into their home community, and (C) Families, schools, communities, and government work together to meet the social, emotional, physical and intellectual needs of children and youth.

CTJJA Strategic Plan What We Do The mission of the Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance is to: Reduce the number of children and youth entering the juvenile and criminal justice system, and advocate a safe, effective and fair system for those involved.

CTJJA Strategic Plan Why We Do Our Work (values) CTJJA believes that: All children deserve support to reach their full potential. Prevention is primary. A strengths-based, rehabilitative, community-based system is more effective than a merely punitive, institutionally-based system. Parent and family involvement is critical. The racial and ethnic inequities of the system must end Collaboration produces better results. Public awareness and involvement, including youth input, is a critical part of producing a better system. The juvenile justice system should be of the highest possible quality but should not substitute for quality children’s mental health and education.

CTJJA Strategic Plan How We Do Our Work CTJJA achieves its mission for, and with, children, youth and families, through: –Legislative education and advocacy –Strategic communications –Community organizing –National, state and local partnerships

CTJJA Strategic Plan Program Goal 1: CT youth under the age of 18 will be processed and treated through the juvenile justice system instead of the adult criminal justice system. Objectives through 12/31/13: Raise the Age Sufficient funding will be appropriated to state agencies for “Raise the Age”-related programs and services. 16 and 17 year-olds will begin statutorily-mandated integration into the juvenile justice system beginning January 1, New “Raise the Age” system reform, processes, and related programs and services will be transparently monitored and evaluated to ensure desired outcomes are achieved (i.e., Alliance watchdog role). Results of monitoring and evaluation will be utilized to continuously improve system, processes, programs and services to address the needs of youth / families. Transfer / Waiver The mandatory transfer of all B felons age 14 and older will be eliminated. Key stakeholders will begin to consider changing the statute to allow discretionary rather than mandatory transfer of all A felons age 14 and older. Key stakeholders will begin to consider judicial rather than prosecutorial discretion in transfer/waiver situations. Rationale: Legislation was passed in 2007 but is not yet implemented nor funded. Within the political climate, there is philosophical buy-in and momentum for these reforms. The Alliance’s credibility is on the line to see this legislation through to its completion and positively affect 10,000 youth per year. The Alliance receives significant funding and technical assistance around this issue.

CTJJA Strategic Plan Program Goal 2: Status offenders will be kept out of the court system and fewer will escalate into delinquency. Objectives through 12/31/13: Legislatively mandated statewide system of Family Support Centers will be fully funded and implemented. Family Support Centers will collaborate with community services such as Systems of Care, Juvenile Review Boards and YSBs. Proven truancy reduction initiatives will be funded and implemented in those areas with the highest number of truancy referrals to court (as in Goal 3). The 2007 FWSN system reforms, processes and related programs and services will be monitored and evaluated to ensure desired outcomes are achieved (i.e., Alliance watchdog role). Results of monitoring and evaluation will be utilized to continuously improve system, processes, programs and services to address status offender / families’ needs. Rationale: Legislation was passed in 2007 but is not yet fully implemented nor funded. Within the political climate, there is philosophical buy-in and momentum for these reforms. The Alliance’s credibility is on the line to see this legislation through to its completion and positively affect up to 3,500 youth per year. In order to shrink the FWSN system, truancy referrals (which are ½ of the referrals to FWSN) have to be reduced.

CTJJA Strategic Plan Program Goal 3: Fewer kids will enter the juvenile justice system through schools. Objectives through 12/31/13: Key stakeholders will have an increased awareness, knowledge, and understanding of the connection between truancy, suspension, expulsion and delinquency, as well as an increased awareness about options to effectively address these issues. Districts with the highest rates of school-based arrests will recognize those rates as a serious problem and take steps to reduce them (e.g. SRO outreach, Positive School Culture-related programs, mediation, mentors, after-school programs, etc.). Proven truancy reduction initiatives will be funded with local, state and/or federal dollars and implemented in those areas with the highest number of truancy referrals to court (as in Goal 2). Rationale: Schools represent one of the largest sources of referrals into the JJ system, affecting thousands of children each year. CTJJA stakeholders and partners statewide and nationally are greatly concerned about this issue.

CTJJA Strategic Plan Program Goal 4: The rate of Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut will decrease. Objectives through 12/31/13: Legislation will be passed to mandate DMC-related data collection on an annual basis (for Relative Rate Index calculation). Key stakeholders (including schools) will have an increased awareness, knowledge, and understanding of (A) the connection between DMC and delinquency, especially at problematic decision-making points (see 2008 JJAC research findings) and (B) promising practices to reduce DMC. Key stakeholders will have increased buy-in re: the importance of / need for meaningful DMC reduction initiatives / direct action. Rationale: New JJAC and national research as well as partner concern indicates DMC to be an important issue in Connecticut and nationwide, and one that affects the ability to reduce the size of the JJ system overall.

CTJJA Strategic Plan Program Goal 5: Emergent mission-critical priorities will be addressed as they arise. Objectives through 12/31/13: Actors within the system will take advantage of unforeseen opportunities to address emerging issues and create further reform. New understandings of problems within the system will be acknowledged and addressed proactively, quickly, and effectively. The current system reform gains and conditions will be maintained (i.e., no backsliding). Rationale: It is important that the Alliance strategic plan recognize the ever-changing external circumstances and environment in which we work. As has happened in the past, events might occur that we cannot foresee today, which in turn would require us to act either offensively or defensively. We will, in the coming five years, witness new positive opportunities to tackle problems, or need to defend against proposed negative changes to the JJ system.