Using SPOT-LANDSAT images for mapping, inventory and monitoring of reefs - Serge Andréfouët - Remote Sensing/ Biological Oceanography University of South.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

Pecomine s PECOMINES Project - Second Steering Committee Meeting, Orta, 26 May 2002 Use of Remote Sensing in the PECOMINES Inventory and Impact Assessment.
Monitoring long term changes in coral and fish communities in the central South Pacific CRIOBE (Centre de Recherches Insulaires.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
August 5 – 7, 2008NASA Habitats Workshop Optical Properties and Quantitative Remote Sensing of Kelp Forest and Seagrass Habitats Richard C. Zimmerman -
Estimating forest structure in wetlands using multitemporal SAR by Philip A. Townsend Neal Simpson ES 5053 Final Project.
CORAL REEF MAPPING IN THE RED SEA (HURGHADA, EGYPT) BASED ON REMOTE SENSING Presented by: Justin Prosper s
Indicators for policy support of atmosphere related environmental problems Robert Koelemeijer National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
1 Malcolm Thomson International Centre for Island Technology Heriot Watt University(Orkney Campus) Old Academy Stromness Orkney Scotland, UK SUMARE Workshop:
Introduction, Satellite Imaging. Platforms Used to Acquire Remote Sensing Data Aircraft Low, medium & high altitude Higher level of spatial detail Satellite.
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Abbie Harris - NOAA Ocean Acidification Think Tank #5 Current and Future Research at the Institute for Marine Remote Sensing Abbie Rae Harris Institute.
Using NASA capabilities for biodiversity assessment and ecological forecasting in coral reef environments Frank Muller-Karger, Christopher Moses Serge.
Operational Radar and Optical MApping Partners The OROMA team consists of 7 developers and 4 end users from coastal management: Overview Beach nourishment.
Centre for Geo-information Fieldwork: the role of validation in geo- information science RS&GIS Integration Course (GRS ) Lammert Kooistra Contact:
TARGETED LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION by: Shraddha R. Asati Guided by: Prof. P R.Pardhi.
Space photographs as remote sensing data for reef environments Julie A. Robinson Office of Earth Sciences, NASA Johnson Space Center Lockheed Martin Space.
Remote Sensing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. 1. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing ► Collects image data in many narrow contiguous spectral bands through the.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
1 Using Multi-temporal MODIS 250 m Data to Calibrate and Validate a Sediment Transport Model for Environmental Monitoring of Coastal Waters.
Liane Guild, Brad Lobitz, Randy Berthold, Jeremy Kerr Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, CA Roy Armstrong, James Goodman University.
Acoustic Ground Discrimination Systems (AGDS) Fast mapping of sublittoral habitats without limitations due to turbidity based on the Procedural Guideline.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Liane Guild, Brad Lobitz, Randy Berthold, Jeremy Kerr Biospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, CA Roy Armstrong, James Goodman, Yasmine Detres,
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of Northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement-classification method and spectral mixture analysis J.Théau, D.R.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Multispectral Remote Sensing of Benthic Environments Christopher Moses, Ph.D. Jacobs Technology.
Chuvieco and Huete (2009): Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, Taylor and Francis Emilio Chuvieco and Alfredo Huete Fundamentals of Satellite Remote.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Aseri Baleilevuka OCEANS & ISLANDS PROGRAM SOPAC-SPC Benthic Habitat Mapping Lifuka Island.
Considerations for future remote sensing activities Edward D. Santoro, M.S. Monitoring Coordinator Delaware River Basin Commission
Accomplishments Conclusions Dyctiota (macroalgae), Diploria clivosa and the gorgonians show similar reflectance curves due to the zooxanthellae (unicellular.
1 Exploiting Multisensor Spectral Data to Improve Crop Residue Cover Estimates for Management of Agricultural Water Quality Magda S. Galloza 1, Melba M.
Image Classification 영상분류
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
1 Enviromatics Environmental sampling Environmental sampling Вонр. проф. д-р Александар Маркоски Технички факултет – Битола 2008 год.
Accuracy Assessment Having produced a map with classification is only 50% of the work, we need to quantify how good the map is. This step is called the.
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Scaling Up Carbon and Carbonate Production to Regional Scales with Landsat 7 ETM+ Christopher S. Moses (USF) Serge Andréfouët (IRD) Frank Muller-Karger.
What is an image? What is an image and which image bands are “best” for visual interpretation?
Honeysuckle in the Taconics
Kelley Bostrom University of Connecticut NASA OCRT Meeting May 12, 2010.
Dave Siegel, Kyle Cavanaugh, Brian Kinlan, Dan Reed, Phaedon
A Comparative Analysis of Satellite-based Approaches for Aboveground Biomass Estimation in the Brazilian Amazon Dengsheng Lu: Indiana University.
Science Questions Societal Relevance Observational Requirements Observational Strategies Satellite Missions Scientific Basis for NASA OBB Mission Planning.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Food Systems in the Coastal Zone: A LOICZ Perspective L. Talaue-McManus Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science University of Miami.
Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in.
Sub pixelclassification
Using NASA capabilities for biodiversity assessment and ecological forecasting in coral reef environments Christopher Moses, Frank Müller-Karger, and Serge.
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Nearfield Hard-bottom Benthic Communities Barbara Hecker Hecker Environmental September 23, 1999.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
Landsat Satellite Data. 1 LSOS (1-ha) 9 Intensive Study Areas (1km x 1km) 3 Meso-cell Study Areas (25km x 25km) 1 Small Regional Study Area (1.5 o x 2.5.
EEMB 595P Winter 2011 SBC LTER Research Seminar Instructor: S. Holbrook Time :Wednesdays noon-1 pm Room: MSRB auditorium 5-JanOrganizational meeting SBC.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Mapping of Coastal Wetlands via Hyperspectral AVIRIS Data
Deliberative control for satellite-guided water quality monitoring
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
USGS contribution to assessing mangrove conditions using a multidisciplinary approach Elitsa Peneva-Reed 24 October, 2017.
Supervised Classification
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
Presentation transcript:

Using SPOT-LANDSAT images for mapping, inventory and monitoring of reefs - Serge Andréfouët - Remote Sensing/ Biological Oceanography University of South Florida, St Petersburg, USA Laboratoire de Géosciences Marines et Télédétection Université Française du Pacifique, Tahiti

Lagoon Anaa Atoll (French Polynesia) SPOT XS-3,2,1 Ocean Rim 5 km

Marquesas Key (Florida, USA) LANDSAT 5 TM-3,2,1 5 km

20/30 meters

40/60 meters

300 meters

1500 meters Lagoon Ocean Atoll Lagoon

XS3 XS1 XS2 XS3 XS2 XS1 SPOT IMAGES XS3 XS2 XS1 Pixel P P Spectral space

Remotely sensed information Lw XS i = Lw XS b + Lw XS w (+ Lw a ) SPOT: XS1, XS2 LANDSAT: TM1, TM2, TM3 Lw XS b related to the “bottom” features Lw XS w related to the water column features

Spectral discrimination of organisms Lwb

Spectral discrimination Sensitivity TM1Sensitivity XS2Sensitivity XS1

Spectral discrimination 0 meters depth

Under-water Spectral discrimination 5 meters depth

Under-water Spectral discrimination 20 meters depth

Minimum Discernable Unit (MDU) Size_MDU = PixelSize.(1+2.ErrorLocation) if ErrorLocation= 1 pixel (pretty good!!) SPOT MDU= 60 m x 60 m LANDSAT MDU = 90 m x 90 m

Minimum Discernable Unit (MDU) CASI image: PixelSize= 1 meter 2 x 2 m : not enough 4 x 4 m : ok for training

Minimum Discernable Unit (MDU) MDU= 3 x 3 mMDU= 60 x 60 m

Remotely sensed information Lw i = Lw b + Lw w (+ Lw a ) 2 or 3 known measurements: XS1 and XS2 TM1, TM2 and TM3 2 unknown variables Lw b and Lw w

Haraiki atoll (French Polynesia)

Bathymetric modeling (Lw w ) Computed depthReal depth Depth 8km

Image of the bottom Scale “Radiance” scale

“Bottom” reconnaissance (Lw b )

Architecture (forms and dimensions) Source: Veron (1986) Massive Columnar Free-living Foliaceous Encrusting Branching Laminar

Hierarchical clustering of the stations Similarity field stations Pure Sand Sand/Rubble with Isolated-Patches Reef Soft Bottom Hard bottom Dead Living Pure Rubble Living coral

What type of habitat can you map with SPOT with a good accuracy (70%) ? Depth < 7-8 meters Definition: coarse Minimum Discernable Unit= 60 meters x meters Boundary analyses

Transition Abrupt boundaries Gradient Patches Fragmented Spatial structure of a reef system

A reef is a complex object, but any part of the reef has a membership degrees in each of the classes This membership belongs to [0...1] Mapping of membership degrees: fuzzy classification

Is this membership degree useful? Mapping Habitats boundary analyses Acanthaster planci outbreaks

Tiahura Ocean Land

Motu Ocean Fuzzy classification One map for each class of bottom. Mapping of the degree of membership. Coral Heterogeneous Dead structures 1010 Membership degree:

Tiahura Ocean Land

Motu Ocean Fuzzy classification One map for each class of bottom. Mapping of the degree of membership. Coral Heterogeneous Dead structures 1010 Membership degree:

Tiahura Ocean Land

Motu Ocean Fuzzy classification One map for each class of bottom. Mapping of the degree of membership. Coral Heterogeneous Dead structures 1010 Membership degree:

Is this membership degree useful? Mapping Habitats boundary analyses Acanthaster planci outbreaks

Tiahura 2.5 km

Coral Isolated Patches Sand Transitions between bottom types Land 1010 Possibility measurement Land

Is this membership degree useful? Mapping Habitats boundary analyses Monitoring and sampling designs ( Acanthaster planci outbreaks )

Location of A. planci infestations in the 80’s (Faure, 1989) Land Ocean

0 meters depth What about change detection ?

Histograms of bottom-types in XS1 after bathymetric corrections for 2 atolls

What about change detection ? Problems in calibration and correction of the images: not enough accurate Benthos: Shifts in living communities : ?????? Change in sediment cover (hurricanes) : ok

Work in the field Moorea: 20 transects (60m x~1km) for training and control, 6 days, 2 investigators (Yannick Chancerelle, CRIOBE, Moorea), Semi-quantitative (5%, 15%, 25%, >50%) rapid assessment for 4 variables Atolls: 20 transects, 2 days, 2 investigators Caveat: Only assessment of the coarse level of habitat without hierarchical sampling (if not, time x 10) !!!

Work in the image processing lab Bathymetric correction Fuzzy classification to output membership degrees Mapping of the membership degrees 3days - 1week Conditions: - user-friendly software does exist - good control of the software - good quality of the data (image and field data) - skilled analyst (if not, time x 10)

Water parameters Few direct observations. Potentially interesting for atoll lagoons (phytoplanctonic biomass or suspended matter) Many indirect observations (the water body is not the target) rivers run-off, pollution, boundary characterization and residence time

Spatial structure of a reef system and fluxes Reka-Reka Tepoto Sud Tekokota Boundary conditions controls: Nutrients limitations Residence time of lagoon waters Recruitment Community structure

Atoll rims typology aperture 33 % Wave Exposure Hydrodynamic aperture South aperture > 70 % Structure

H_Topex (m) Flows (m 2 /s) Empirical relationships between flows of oceanic water and wave height for each type of rim

Residence time in atoll lagoons

Distribution of coral reefs Estimated km 2 (Spalding & Grenfell, 1997) Global scale

Similarity field stations Pure Sand Sand/Rubble with Isolated-Patches Reef Soft Bottom Hard bottom Dead Living Pure Rubble Living coral

Global Coverage: NASA plans to collect ~200 LANDSAT 7 images per day worldwide: Long-Term Acquisition Plan (LTAP)

Present coverage of reefs by LTAP Expected: one cloud-free image per year

Present coverage of prioritized reefs by LTAP (research activities) Expected: 4-6 cloud-free images per year

Global coverage Estimation of global distribution of reefs, without ground-truth, 2 classes (soft and hard-bottom), 80% accuracy A basis for extension of monitoring worldwide, 6 classes (gradient of soft and hard-bottom), with ground-truth, 70% accuracy Interface with monitoring organizations is required to get training data for image processing

Conclusions Using SPOT-LANDSAT images for mapping, inventory and monitoring of reefs? Pragmatic point of view Mapping: Yes: - Coarse habitats with ground truth Bathymetric and atmospheric corrections required - Soft/hard bottoms without ground-truth and corrections - Boundary analyses Inventory: Yes % of soft/hard bottoms: global scale (LTAP): % of coarse habitats: reef-scale

Conclusions Using SPOT-LANDSAT images for mapping, inventory and monitoring of reefs? Monitoring: Not directly Change detection generally not possible Coarse-habitats level not generally a relevant parameter Water quality generally not directly available But provide: Geophysical parameters ( exposure, bathymetry, residence time, geomorphology ) Habitat mapping to stratify monitoring and establish new sites Generalize species indicator at reef scale Timing: once or variable (catastrophic event)