Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Considerations about luminosity measurement and IR layout Mogens Dam, Alain Blondel and many others. Nicola Bacchetta, Helmut Burkhardt and Manuela Boscolo.
Advertisements

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Beam pipes M. Sullivan 1 Detector Beam Pipe Diameter Discussion M. Sullivan Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Dec 11, 2008S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. Muon Collider Design Workshop.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
Turtle ray interactions with the EMC Tim West University of Manchester.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad m 3.67 mrad 60 m m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e GeV p.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M Sullivan SuperB Workshop Elba, Italy May 31 - Jun 3, 2008
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
Interaction Region and Detector
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
The Interaction Region
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
SR Update for JLEIC June 8, 2017
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
SR Background Update for JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015

Outline Brief Introduction Synchrotron Radiation backgrounds Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung Luminosity backgrounds Wake-field and Higher-Order-Mode Power Summary Conclusion MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Electron IR Parameters Electron beam – Energy range 3-10 GeV – Current (5/10 GeV) 3/0.7 A – Beam-stay-clear 12 beam sigmas – Emittance (  x /  y ) (5 GeV) (14/2.8) nm-rad – Emittance (  x /  y ) (10 GeV) (56/11) nm-rad – Betas  x * = 10 cm  x max = 300 m  y * = 2 cm  y max = 325 m Final focus magnets – NameZ of face L (m) k G (10 GeV-T/m) – QFF – QFF – QFFL MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Ion IR Parameters Proton/ion beam – Energy range GeV – Beam-stay-clear 12 beam sigmas – Emittance (  x /  y ) (60 GeV) (5.5/1.1) nm-rad – Betas  x * = 10 cm  x max = 2195 m  y * = 2 cm  y max = 2580 m Final focus magnets – NameZ of face L (m) k G (60 GeV) – QFF – QFF – QFFL MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

IR Layout MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct EM Calorimeter Hadron Calorimeter Muon Detector EM Calorimeter Solenoid yoke + Hadronic Calorimeter Solenoid yoke + Muon Detector HTCC RICH Tracking 5 m solenoid IP Ultra forward hadron detection dipole Low-Q 2 electron detection Large aperture electron quads Small diameter electron quads ion quads Small angle hadron detection dipole Central detector with endcaps ~50 mrad crossing Courtesy Pawel Nadel-Tournski and Alex Bogacz

SR backgrounds We need to check background rates for various electron machine designs The 5 GeV e- design has the highest beam current The 10 GeV design has the highest photon energies and largest beam emittance MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

SR for 5 GeV (3 A) MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct Photons/crossing >10 keV

SR for 10 GeV (0.7 A) MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct Numbers are Watts Photons/crossing >10 keV Beam pipe design fits 10  beam envelope. Prefer larger.

10 GeV (0.7 A) with tighter mask MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct Photons >10 keV/crossing Numbers are Watts

SR results Difficult to get an IR beam pipe much smaller than a 3cm radius in X. Y is better. – Need to see how many photons penetrate the beam pipe and make a hit in the first inner detector Need to know how long the central pipe needs to be – Shorter pipes are easier to shield For the 10 GeV case the masking is tight – This is probably a problem for BGB backgrounds (next topic) MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

BGB, Coulomb, etc. There are several processes that enter here: – Electron – gas molecule inelastic collision (BGB) – Electron – gas molecule elastic collision (Coulomb) – Ion – gas molecule nuclear collision (Inelastic) – Ion – gas molecule elastic collision (Coulomb) The elastic collisions tend to produce a halo (or tail) distribution around the beam – Need to track these collisions around a much larger part of the ring (perhaps the entire ring) MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Electron – gas molecule MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct BGB – Electron-gas inelastic collision Result is a high energy gamma and a very off- energy electron beam particle Coulomb – Electron-gas elastic collision Result is an on-energy electron beam particle but with a large scattering angle

Ion – gas molecule MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct Ion-gas nuclear collision Result is a mess with probably all particles lost locally Ion-gas elastic collision Result is an on-energy ion beam particle but with a large scattering angle

More on BGB, etc. I think the nuclear collisions between ion and gas molecule will vanish from the machine close to the location of the collision point The elastic ion – molecule collision will probably also produce a halo around the ion beam but this we should be able to collimate away MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Program Decay Turtle This program can be used to track the off-energy beam particles and the produced gammas from BGB as well as the Coulomb scattered beam particles – I have an old FORTRAN version Uses an input deck with as much of the beam line as you want to install Collimators are essential but collimating much closer than about 7  will probably start to lower the electron beam lifetime – If a collimator starts to affect the beam lifetime then that collimator becomes a big source of local backgrounds MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Luminosity backgrounds Luminosity backgrounds include: – eP bremsstrahlung (also lumi signal and low Q 2 data) – Off-energy electron beam particles from above (also low Q 2 data) > MHz data rate – eP  eeeP (two photon electron pair production) The very low energy e+e- pair curl up in the detector field and make multiple hits in the vertex tracker These will need to be checked to make sure they are under control or are not an issue MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Wake-fields and HOMs HOM power and wake fields mostly come from the electron beam and travel up (and down) the electron beam pipe and the proton beam pipe – It comes from the shared IP beam pipe The proton beam does not generate nearly as much HOM power as the electron beam mainly because of the low gamma – Still needs to be checked for beam pipes that have cavities. Low power can still melt vacuum elements. MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

We estimate that a few Watts did this MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct This RF seal was suppose to seal off HOM power from getting between two vacuum flanges that had some amount of internal flex 3/8” SS washer melted The seal frame was SS and was bolted to water cooled Cu Vaporized and melted Cu RF seal Cu melts at 1357 Vaporizes at 2840 Fe melts at 1808 HER beam A

Wake field simulation With permission from Sasha Novokhatski, I have the following slide show of what the fields of a beam bunch do as the bunch travels through the PEP-II IR shared beam pipe MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

PEP-II IR MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

2001 Calculations

Summary There are several background sources that need to be studied We need to make sure all of the sources are under control Backgrounds can change as the IR design evolves We need to continue to check the background sources MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct

Conclusions SR looks under control but needs further study BGB backgrounds need to be checked Luminosity backgrounds should be calculated HOM effects will need to be estimated Lots to do… MEIC Collaboration meeting Oct