Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
Advertisements

Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.
The U.S. Mid-Atlantic Super-Region – Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable III Baltimore Metropolitan Council Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT)
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Introduction to Freight Transportation Unit 1: Defining the Freight System.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
Session C2: Promising Research Roundtable An Integrated Work-Zone Computer System For Capacity Estimation, Cost/Benefit Analysis, and Design Of Control.
You Are the Traffic Jam: Examination of Congestion Measures
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
TxDOT Project Developing Freight Highway Corridor Performance Measure Strategies in Texas.
The Freight Analysis Framework – Overview and Uses Bruce Lambert Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Freight Transportation System Performance and the Economy Identifying Economic Benefits Resulting from Freight Infrastructure Improvements FHWA Talking.
The Freight Village What it is What it does Feasibility in NYMTC region Howie Mann, Project Manager, NYMTC Presentation to December 15, 2010Talking Freight.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Bruce Warner, Director Oregon Department of Transportation A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned.
Motor Carrier Industry Overview April 2007 Tavio Headley Economist American Trucking Associations.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Talking Freight April 15, General Themes Seen in Reauthorization Proposals/Positions Defining a federal role in freight and goods movement given.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
USING DATA TO MAKE YOUR TRUCKING OR LOGISTICS COMPANY MORE EFFICIENT AND PROFITABLE FOR THE TRAFFIC CLUB OF MEMPHIS Dan Pallme, Director4/8/2014.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
1 Freight Performance Measurement Presented to Transportation Border Working Group on 7 June 2006.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
1 Freight Program Update Karin Foster June 5, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Oregon’s Work Zone Traffic Analysis Program FHWA Work Zone Rule Virtual Workshop November 6, 2008 Irene Toews, P.E. Oregon Department of Transportation.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
Praveen Pasumarthy, P.E., PTOE, CDM Smith Chris Edmonston, AICP, FDOT Paul Fang, FDOT INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY CONGESTED ROADWAYS AND BOTTLENECKS.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
Analyzing Changes to Truck Size and Weight Regulations Methods for States presented to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport presented by Donald Ludlow,
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Trucking Industry Perspectives on Transportation Funding Greg Owen Head Coach Ability/Tri-Modal Talking Freight – December 16, 2009.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Highways Agency’s Journey Time Reliability Target With Thanks to Paresh Tailor Business Planning & Performance.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Economic Dynamics of Freight & Modes. The Trucking Industry.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
A Bi-State Project: Lessons Learned
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Program Plan Development Roundtable December 13, 2016.
Ted Strickland, Governor James G. Beasley, P.E., P.S., Director
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Analysis of Freight Flows for Transportation Planning
Presentation transcript:

Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize methodologies to consider for this research. White, Karen and Lance R. Grenzeback. (2007) Understanding Freight Bottlenecks. Public Roads 70 (5) A follow-up to a 2005 study, An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways, this study analyzes bottlenecks on the basis of three characteristics: types of capacity constraint, type of roadway affected, and type of freight route. The truck volume at each site is determined using counts from Reebie’s TRANSEARCH database and GoogleEarth satellite imagery, and truck hours of delay are estimated. The research investigated conditions at major freight intersections country-wide, five of which were in Oregon, and the study found that these bottlenecks caused 243 million hours of annual delay. Using a delay cost f $32.15 per hour per truck (determined by FHWA’s Highway Economic Requirements System (HERS), the model found a direct user cost of $7.8 billion annually. Maring, Gary E., Richard Margiotta, Daniel Hodge, and Daniel Beagan. (2006) Ohio Freight Mobility, Access, and Safety Strategies – for the Ohio DOT Office of Research and Development This research used a similar methodology to the one outlined above, as well as incorporating a queuing-based model on a ramp-by-ramp basis using HERS equations. A regional model with a significantly smaller focus than the case above, the Ohio study estimated truck delay from actual counts at study bottlenecks. They used 18 count locations with ramp configuration and hourly traffic distributions from the Ohio DOT to determine weekday temporal distributions for ramp volumes. The relationship between regional economic development and congestion has been well-documented. FHWA’s Office of Freight Management and Operations (HOFM) conduced a Freight Analysis Framework (FAF), which states that trucks carry 60% volume and 67% value of all freight goods, not including intermodal trips. This research group also estimates that the share of freight vehicles will grow substantially from 30% in 2002 Congestion-related factors that impact regional economic growth or competitiveness by increasing the costs of freight shipping include:  Lack of reliability leads to increased cost of inventory management due to a need for increased inventory, additional vehicles and drivers, and other overhead costs  Increased fuel use affects both overhead and environmental impacts  Additional operating costs are often passed along to consumers, increasing the price of goods  More trucks on the road further exacerbates congestion, affecting non- freight automobile travel FHWA has estimated that these costs due to travel time increases will cost carriers and shippers an additional $25 to $200 per hour, depending on the product being transported. Travel unreliability will add 50% to 250% per hour to those totals. Conclusion This research is at the beginning stages. In the following months, additional data from a variety of sources will be collected and integrated into the model. The GIS Network Analyst tool will be useful for determining time costs of travel under varying levels of congestion and in various study-areas. Measurements of truck value of time, evaluations of environmental impacts of additional truck vehicle miles traveled, and the costs of decreased travel reliability will contribute to a calculation of the regional economic impacts of congestion. The study will look at these factors from both regional and local perspectives. This is a label for the image. This is a label for the image. Results These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are my results. These are Data LocationUrban Area Number of LanesAADT Daily Minutes of Delay per VehicleAADTT Percent of All Vehicles Annual Hours of Delay All TrucksAADTT Percent of All Trucks Annual Hours of Delay Large Trucks Annual Commodity Tons Large Trucks… Annual Commodity Value Large Trucks… Percent Trips Greater Than 500 Miles Annual Hours of Delay … Greater Than 500 Miles I - 5: Interstate Bridge and bridge influence areaPortland-Vancouver (OR-WA)4109, ,10011%644,2004,10034% 218,100 1,484,600$1,716,00033% 72,000 US-30 InterchangePortland-Vancouver (OR-WA)6184, ,0005%503,5003,40034% 170,900 1,231,200$1,423,00033% 56,400 Powell BlvdPortland-Vancouver (OR-WA)6175, ,5006%496,2003,50034% 164,700 1,267,400$1,465,00033% 54,400 Sunset Murray BlvdPortland-Vancouver (OR-WA)4125, ,0009%229,6003,70034% 77,000 1,339,800$1,549,00033% 25,400