Facilitator: Debbie Schraeder, ESU#3. Resources/ Recognition Nebraska Department of Education Nebraska Department of Education Pages, links, PPTs ESU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Advertisements

Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Pat Roschewski, Ph.D. Director of Statewide Assessment
 7:45-8:00/Enjoy juice, rolls and catching up with each other…  8:00-8:20/Introduction of Pat Lotspeich 1.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Language Arts Day! October 22, 2012 Language Arts teachers are invited to gather at these sessions to study NeSA-Reading and NeSA-Writing data and use.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
Twinkle, Twinkle, Little STAAR K-2 Connections
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.
A professional development seminar presented by: Michele Mailhot and Susan Smith March 21, 2012
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
HS-MASS 2 Project: Mathematics Overview of Sessions 1&2 for Teachers.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Common Core Update – Opening March 11, Common Core Standards  What are the Common Core Standards?  How do the Common Core Standards compare to.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.
Idaho State Department of Education Accessing Your ISAT by Smarter Balanced Data Using the Online Reporting System (ORS) Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment.
HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER 1. Early Connections Planning Phase 2. District Strategic Plan.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Kentucky’s Curriculum Documents A driving force behind education in Kentucky.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Language Arts Day! October 24, 2011 Language Arts teachers are invited to gather at these sessions to study NeSA-Reading and NeSA-Writing data and use.
Oregon’s Core Standards and Assessment Standards & Assessment Task Force March 20, 2008.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Math Math Communication January 21, 2010 ESU#3 Facilitated by: Pam Krambeck and Debbie Schraeder.
Language Arts Standards Revision ESU #3 Writing Extravaganza September 16 th, 2008.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
The Constructed Response Assessment The Journey Continues.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Math Curriculum Alignment Workshop Deb Romanek NDE – Math Specialist Carol Jessen and JaLena Slack ESU 8 March 16, 2010.
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
What is it with these two?
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Wayne Curriculum Conversations
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

Facilitator: Debbie Schraeder, ESU#3

Resources/ Recognition Nebraska Department of Education Nebraska Department of Education Pages, links, PPTs ESU 10/ Understanding NeSA Podcast ESU 6/Standards Format Explanation Jim Brink and Bill Menousek, ESU3tv

Agenda K-5: Facilitate Learning in Relation to: Standards Instructional Tool (SIT) - Math and Reading Glossaries Grades 2-5: Facilitate Learning in Relation to: Table of Specifications (TOS) Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs) Indicator Summary Reports Reference Sheets Practice Tests Grades K-1: Facilitate Learning in Relation to: Math Manipulative Ideas SMARTBoard Activities Guided Math

NUMBER SENSE CONCEPTS: Students will communicate number sense concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. GEOMETRIC CONCEPTS AND MEASUREMENT CONCEPTS: Students will communicate geometric concepts and measurement concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. ALGEBRAIC CONCEPTS: Students will communicate algebraic concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. DATA ANALYSIS/PROBABILITY CONCEPTS: Students will communicate data analysis/probability concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. Nebraska Mathematics Standards Nebraska Mathematics Standards 4

K-12 Comprehensive Content Standard in each section reflects the broad learning standards for students related to mathematics. K-12 Comprehensive Content Standard in each section reflects the broad learning standards for students related to mathematics. NUMBER SENSE CONCEPTS: Students will communicate number sense concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. GEOMETRIC/MEASUREMENT CONCEPTS: Students will communicate geometric concepts and measurement concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. ALGEBRAIC CONCEPTS: Students will communicate algebraic concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. DATA ANALYSIS/PROBABILITY CONCEPTS: Students will communicate data analysis/probability concepts using multiple representations to reason, solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. 5

Number Sense Concepts: -Number System -Operations -Computation -Estimation Geometric Concepts Measurement Concepts: -Characteristics -Coordinate Geometry -Transformations -Spatial Modeling -Measurement Algebraic Concepts: - Relationships -Modeling in Context -Procedures Data Analysis/Probability Concepts: -Display and Analysis -Predictions and Inferences -Probability Concept Organizers 6

 K-12 Comprehensive Content Standards Identify broad K-12 learning standards for students related to mathematics  Grade Level Standards Statements that identify what students know and be able to do by the end of each identified grade  Curricular Indicators Examples that further define what a student should learn at each specified grade level 7

8

K-12 Comprehensive Content Standards Grade Level Standards Curricular Indicators Local Curriculum Lesson Plans Classroom Instructional Strategies Specific Strategies for Individual Students Determined by Local School Districts/ Classroom Teachers Determined by State Board Guidance for Districts, Schools, and Teachers Determined by State Board Required for all Standards Curriculum Instruction 9

10

For your grade level: ◦ Think of vocabulary words with which your students struggle. ◦ Are they in the glossary? If so, does the definition match your understanding of the word? ◦ What is interesting? ◦ What do you have questions about?

Using NeSA Data

13

Nebraska schools should use NeSA data to... Provide feedback to students, parents and the community Inform instructional decisions. Inform curriculum development and revision. Measure program success and effectiveness. Promote accountability to meet state and federal requirements. 14

Understanding NeSA Data o What is NeSA? o How do we access and interpret NeSA data? o How do we use NeSA data? 15

What is NeSA?

NeSA is... A criterion-referenced summative test. A measurement of the revised Nebraska Math Standards. A tool including 48 to 60 multiple-choice items. A test administered to students online OR paper/pencil. 17

 Four concepts measured: number sense geometric/measurement algebraic data analysis/probability  Grades 3 through 8, 11  Two sessions  Results will be made public 18

19

NeSA is... Administered during the spring of the year. Based on Tables of Specification and Performance Level Descriptors. Built upon the best thinking of Nebraska educators, national experts, and a worthy partner – Data Recognition Corporation. 20

21

Level 1Recall Level 1Recall Level 2Skill/Concept Level 2Skill/Concept Level 3Strategic Thinking Level 3Strategic Thinking Level 4EXTENDED THINKING Level 4EXTENDED THINKING 22

23 Depth of Knowledge Focuses on content standard in order to successfully complete an assessment/standard task. Descriptive, not a taxonomy Not the same as difficulty

24 Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that standard matches the assessment items (required under NCLB) Provides cognitive processing ceiling (highest level students can be assessed) for item development Why Depth of Knowledge?

The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb, but the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required. 25

Same verb—three DOK levels DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it) DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types) DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (simple recall) 26

Remember… Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is a scale of cognitive demand. DOK requires looking at the assessment item/standard-not student work-in order to determine the level. DOK is about the item/standard-not the student. The context of the assessment item/standard must be considered to determine the DOK-not just a look at what verb was chosen. 27

28 Depth of Knowledge Grade Level Practice

Performance Level Descriptors What are... 29

30 Goals for Instruction

Accommodation Guides What are... 31

Where do we find the content components of NeSA? Tables of Specification Performance Level Descriptors Accommodations Guides Webb’s DOK documents 32

33

~NeSA Terminology~ PERFORMANCE LEVELS - three possible categories of student performance on NeSA NeSA Performance Levels Exceeds the Standards Meets the Standards Below the Standards 34

35 Cut score processes: Contrasting Group Method – 400+ teachers Bookmark Method – 100+ teachers State Board of Education Reviewed  Examined results of both processes  Examined NAEP and ACT results for Nebraska  Made decisions within recommended range at public meeting How are performance levels determined?

NeSA (CRT) vs. NRT ? 36 --Differences-- Purposes: NeSA is intended to match and measure identified standards and instruction. NRT is not intended to measure any state’s standards. The intention is to compare students to each other. Item Development: NeSA items with exact match to the standards – NDE had to prove the match with an independent alignment study NRT – No standards to match – matches inherent and previous knowledge, enriched homes, pre-skills.

NeSA (CRT) vs. NRT ? 37 --Similarities— All the psychometric steps – standard setting (Bookmark, Angoff, Contrasting Group) Reliabilities – KR / Inter-rater Reliabilities Descriptive Statistics (Item P-values, Dif-analysis) Administration: Both standardized – are generally administered the same way.

NeSA REPORTS Individual Student Report School Student Roster School Indicator Summary School Performance Level Summary District Reading Indicator Summary District Performance Level Summary District Report of School Performance 38

Questions for Consideration What can we learn from this report? Do we have other data to support these results? What are the implications of this report? 39

Individual Student Report 40

School Student Roster 41

School Indicator Summary 42

School Performance Level Summary 43

District Reading Indicator Summary 44

District Performance Level Summary 45

District Report of School Performance 46

How do we use NeSA data?

o Curriculum alignment process: Are the tested indicators in our curriculum? -- Where? When are they taught? How are they instructed? At what DOK (Depth of Knowledge) level? By whom? 48

Test preparation processes. Examine PLDs and Tables of Specification. Do our students have opportunity to learn the tested indicators? How are they performing on the indicators on a day-to-day basis? Are we assessing them locally? 49

What’s on the test? Find out! What math content is being assessed? How much of the test is comprised of computation, word problems, and open- response? Look at copies of released items to get an understanding of what is needed to be successful. Share them with your students so that they can get a sense of the time constraint. Final Tip: 50

 Practice Tests Practice Tests  Have our students used practice tests?  Are our students familiar with the testing tools? Reference sheets?  Are we familiar with appropriate accommodations? 51

52 January 23 - February 10, NeSA Writing Testing Window March 26-May 4, NeSA Mathematics, Reading and Science Testing Window Dates to Keep in Mind

NeSA results ARE an important data source! When combined with other information, these data can support curricular, instructional, and learning support decision making. --It’s all about the Continuous Improvement Process! 53

Commit to data analysis as a continuous process, not an event. (Reeves, 2009)

55 Data Sources EXPLORE/PLAN/ACTAIMSweb DIBELSGates MacGinitie Reading Theme TestsChapter Tests Measures of Academic ProgressDevelopmental Reading Assessments (DRAs) Curriculum-Based MeasurementTeacher Observation Running Reading RecordsStudent Projects Nebraska schools have many sources of data: Each assessment tool has a purpose and a role in the big picture of Continuous Improvement! Commit to data analysis as a continuous process, not an event. (Reeves, 2009)

56 Purposes and Roles of Assessment (1) Diagnostic (2) Inform Instruction (3) Inform Stakeholder Groups (4) Comparison of Students Commit to data analysis as a continuous process, not an event. (Reeves, 2009)

 Mathematics Curriculum Mathematics Curriculum  NeSA-M NeSA-M  Mathematics Standards Mathematics Standards   Debbie Schraeder, ESU#