Texas Nodal © 2005 - 2006 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
RCWG Update to WMS April 9, VCMRR-VC for Cancellation of RUC Committed Resources Paragraph (3) of Nodal Protocol Section regarding Cancellation.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
RCWG Update to WMS July 8, VCMRR008 - Alignment with NPRR700, Utilizing Actual Fuel Cost in Startup Offer Caps NPRR700 approved at May 2015 WMS.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris August 5, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
1 Cutover Daily Call 4:30 PM November 23, :30.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
Settlement of Mothballed RMR Resources for System Capacity November 15, 2011 RDTF Meeting Ino González ERCOT November 14, 2011.
Guidelines for Verification of Resource Specific Fuel Adders RCWG Paul Vinson.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process TPTF Meeting Nov 28, 2007 Ino Gonzalez.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
STANDARD & GENERIC COSTS FOR WOOD FIRED BIOMASS PLANTS H.BASARAN/B.CHAKKA AUSTIN ENERGY RCWG MEETING SEPTEMBER 21,
RCWG Update to WMS May 6, Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off March 01, 2010.
1 Market Trials QSE Qualifications Weekly Update January 22, 2010.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Startup Eligibility Day-Ahead and RUC Make-Whole Settlements ERCOT Settlements & Billing.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Day-Ahead CRR Settlements Business Requirements TPTF Presentation ERCOT Settlements.
1 WMS Report To TAC May In Brief One Working Group Reports One Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One Staff report.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Unit-Specific Bid Limits based on Modified Generic Cost.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 6, 2010.
TPTF Verifiable Cost Sub-group Summary Final Report 3/xx/2008 Jim Galvin- TPTF VC Sub-group Chair.
NPRR 617 Overview and Justifications. Overview Current protocols place restrictions on Day-Ahead Three-Part Supply Offers – Part 1 (Startup Offer) – capped.
TPTF Verifiable Cost Sub-group Summary Report to TPTF 1/21/2008 Jim Galvin- TPTF VC Sub-group Chair.
Report to TAC July In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG DSWG MCWG MCWG MWG MWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Task Forces Task.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
March 13, 2007 – Slide 1 ERCOT Nodal 101 COPS Market Guide Commercial Operations Market Guide Section 5 a. Overview of ERCOT ERCOT Overview Market Overview.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
RUC Startup Discussion. Problem The RUC language in the Nodal Protocols allows little or no ability for a generator to recover risk associated with operating.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
1 Cutover Daily Call 10:30 AM November 23, :30.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 3, 2009.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
NPRR 649 Board Appeal Koch Ag & Energy Solutions February 9,
OOMC and Local RPRS Settlement Alignment January 2007 WMS Meeting Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
Utilization of Fuel Costs in Ercot Markets Ino González RCWG Meeting 2/24/2016.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
1 Market Trials Real-Time Market / LFC Weekly Update March 26, 2010.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Settlements Business Requirements.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) Cost Evaluation and Settlement Basis Ino González ERCOT RMR Workshop May 24, 2016.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Real Time Voltage Support Settlements Business Requirements.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Verifiable Cost Working Group (VCWG) Update
General Overview Of Resource Costs
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Presentation transcript:

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Lead, Settlements and Billing

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 Objectives 1.Define – Three-Part Offer 2.Verifiable Costs – Offer Caps - startup - minimum energy 3.Mitigated Offer Cap - O&M - incremental heat rate 4.Force Outage of a RUC-Committed Resource - verifiable actual costs 5.Verifiable Cost Time Line 6.Verifiable Costs Process – next steps

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 3 Part 1. Three-Part Supply Offer Consists of: Startup OfferMinimum-Energy OfferEnergy Offer Curve $ to Startup $/MWh to Operate at Low Sustained Limit $/MWh to Operate at Given MW Quantity Above Low Sustained Limit

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 4 Three-Part Supply Offer (continue) –The Startup Offer component represents all costs incurred by a Generation Resource in starting up and reaching breaker close. –The Minimum-Energy Offer component represents the costs incurred by a Resource in producing energy up to and including the Resource’s Low Sustained Limit (LSL) after breaker close. –The Energy Offer Curve represents an offer to sell energy at or above a certain price and at a certain quantity in the DAM or a willingness to dispatch a given unit in Real-Time. –Startup Offers, Minimum-Energy Offers, and Energy Offer Curves are capped.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Part 2. Verifiable Cost Process The process for determining the verifiable actual costs must be :  developed by ERCOT ( );  approved by the appropriate TAC subcommittee; and  posted to the MIS Secure Area within one Business Day after initial approval and after each approved change.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 Offer Caps Startup Offers and Minimum-Energy Offers are limited by caps. (PR 5.6.1(1)) The cap will be the Resource Category Generic Caps for startup and minimum-energy until ERCOT approves the Resource’s verifiable startup and minimum-energy costs. (PR 5.6.1(1)) Once approved, the cap will be the resource’s verifiable costs for startup and minimum-energy. (PR 5.6.1(1))

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 7 When Are The Caps Used? ERCOT will use the Caps to limit the startup and minimum- energy offers as they are submitted. The Day-Ahead Make-Whole Payment will use the startup and minimum-energy offer that has been limited by the cap. (PR (2)) RUC settlement will use the startup and minimum-energy offer to calculate the RUC Guarantee. If no offer exists, RUC settlement will use the verifiable costs or generic cap. RUC settlement calculations which utilize the cap are: –RUC Make-Whole Payment (PR 5.7.1(3)) –RUC Clawback Charge (PR 5.7.2(5)) –RUC Decommitment Payment (PR 5.7.3(3))

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Part 3. Mitigated Offer Cap Energy Offer Curves may be subject to mitigation in Real- Time Operations under Section , Security Constrained Economic Dispatch, using a Mitigated Offer Cap. ( ) ERCOT shall construct an incremental Mitigated Offer Cap curve such that each point on the Mitigated Offer Cap is the greater of : ( ,(a) – (c) ) 1. a specified heat rate times FIP (or FOP) 2. resource’s verifiable incremental heat rate (IHR) for the output level multiplied by FIP or FOP, plus the O&M times a multiplier IHR = 3ax 2 +2bx+c; where a, b and c are known coefficients

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Mitigated Offer Cap – When are the Caps Used? to project energy output for each hour the resource was RUC’d. ( (4) ) Each Energy Offer Curve must be capped at the greater of the Reference LMP (from Step 1 of SCED) at the Resource Node or the appropriate Mitigated Offer Cap. ( (5)(b) )

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Part 4. Force Outage Verifiable Costs If a RUC-committed Resource, that experiences startup failure that creates a Forced Outage before breaker close, ERCOT shall include the Resource’s verifiable actual costs in the Resource’s RUC Guarantee, limited to the lesser of: ( (2 )) (a) costs that qualify as normal startup expenses, including fuel and operation and maintenance expenses, incurred before the event that caused the Forced Outage; or (b)resource’s Startup Offer in the RUC.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 11 Part 5. QSE Verifiable Costs Submittal Timeline The most recent ERCOT-approved verifiable costs must be used going forward. (PR 5.6.1(1)) This means that once verifiable costs are approved, they will continue to be used for each Operating Day after the approval until updated verifiable costs are submitted and approved. This also means that the (zonal) option of submitting verifiable costs for a Resource after the Operating Day has executed through the dispute process for use in settlement of that Operating Day is no longer available to the QSE. The cap, either generic or verifiable, that was in effect while executing the Day- Ahead and Real-Time activities for an Operating Day, will be used in the settlement of that Operating Day. A QSE may file verifiable costs for a Resource at any time. (PR 5.6.1(1)) This includes prior to a Resource receiving its first Commitment, either DAM or RUC.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 12 QSE Verifiable Costs Submittal Timeline 30 days after the first time the Resource receives a RUC Commitment. (PR 5.6.1(1)) received more than 50 RUC Commitments (PR 5.6.1(5)) five years have passed since ERCOT previously approved verifiable cost data for that Resource if the Resource that has received at least one RUC instruction in the past. (PR 5.6.1(6))

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 13 QSE Verifiable Costs Submittal Timeline Within 30 days after receiving an update notice from ERCOT to update verifiable costs for a Resource, a QSE must submit verifiable cost data for the Resource. (PR 5.6.1(7)) If the QSE does not submit verifiable cost data within 30 days after receiving an update notice, then, until updated verifiable costs are approved, ERCOT shall determine payment using the lower of: (a)Resource Category Startup Generic and Resource Category Minimum-Energy Generic Caps; and (b)Current ERCOT-approved verifiable startup and minimum-energy costs.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 14 PART 6. Verifiable Costs Process – next steps Must address submittal time line for: a. Start up b. Minimum energy c. Incremental heat rate d. O&M e. Force outage actual costs

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 15 Verifiable Costs Process – next steps Must address verifiable costs for: a. Jointly-Owned resources b. Combined-Cycle configurations c. Identical generic price for CC units e. Any protocol changes

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Verifiable Costs Process – next steps Startup Offer and Minimum-Energy Offer Generic Caps (1)The Resource Category Startup Offer Generic Cap, by applicable Resource category, is determined by the following O&M costs by Resource category: Resource CategoryO&M Costs ($) Nuclear, Coal, Lignite, Hydro, Renewable7,200 Combined Cycle greater than 90 MW with 5+ HRS off line 6,810 Combined Cycle greater than 90 MW with less than 5 HRS off line 5,310 Combined Cycle less than or equal to 90 MW with 5+ HRS off line 6,810 Combined Cycle less than or equal to 90 MW with less than 5 HRS off line 5,310 Gas steam supercritical boiler4,800 Gas steam reheat boiler3,000 Gas steam non-reheat or boiler w/o air-preheater2,310 Simple cycle greater than 90 MW5,000 Simple cycle less than or equal to 90 MW2,300 Diesel1 Hot, cold and intermediate start up

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 17 Questions ?