The epiphytes of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) in Irish plantation forests Linda Coote, Daniel L. Kelly, Paul Dowding BIOFOREST project, Department of Botany, Trinity College Dublin.
CONTEXT Forest cover in Rep. of Ireland 10% Aim to increase to 17% by 2030 Plantations of exotic conifers – Sitka spruce 50% of estate Little information on Irish plantation forest biodiversity BIOFOREST project – 5 year Impact of afforestation and forest operations on flora and fauna
Epiphytes Component part of BIOFOREST project Epiphytes of mature and over-mature Sitka spruce and larch (Larix spp.) Main epiphyte groups - lichens, mosses and liverworts Important part of native woodland diversity Little published information © Sylvia Sharnoff
AIMS To assess the diversity of epiphytes in Irish Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) plantations To examine the effects of open spaces within these forestry plantations on this diversity
SW Cluster E Cluster SITES KNOC CLEA REAN MEEN GLAN CARR CURA MUCK STOE BMUT ATHN LUGG SITES
METHODOLOGY 12 mature Sitka spruce sites 1 open space per site - 9 glades - 2 roads - 1 ride N side (S-facing) of open space 1 tree at edge, 1 in forest interior – 24 total
L: 130cm B: 25cm M: 1/3 height of tree U: 2/3 height of tree 25cm x 50cm plots on N & S aspect 20 plots per tree Total: 478 plots 4 branches
RESULTS 1. Geographical clusters – SW vs. E of Ireland 2. Effect of open space - Edge vs. Interior trees 3. Aspect - N and S side of tree 4. Vertical distribution – B to U trunk 5. Horizontal distribution – inner to outer branch
1. Geographical clusters
Species richness (91)(51)(72)
Species richness Total 91 species 26 found in only 1 of 478 plots 35 found on only 1 of 24 trees Only 17 species in more than 5% of plots
Species richness Significant difference in bryophyte spp. richness (p = 0.009) and total spp. richness (p = 0.002) between SW and E
Percentage cover Significant difference in average bryophyte cover (p = 0.033)
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) Ordination
2. Effect of open spaces
Species richness No significant differences in species richness between edge and interior trees
Percentage Cover No significant differences in average percentage cover between edge and interior trees
NMS Ordination
3. Aspect
Species richness No significant differences in species richness between N & S side of trees
Percentage cover Significant difference in average lichen cover (p = 0.005) and total cover (p = 0.023)
4. Vertical distribution Factors which change with height - Decrease in humidity Increase in light levels Decrease in age/time for colonisation
Bryophytes on trunk
Lichens on trunk
Bryophytes vs. lichens Most bryophytes restricted to or mainly occurring on trunks Exceptions Ulota crispa Frullania dilatata Colura calyptrifolia
Bryophytes vs. lichens Most lichens found only or more frequently on branches Trunk only- Graphis scripta, Cladonia spp. More frequent on trunk- Dimerella lutea Lecanora pulicaris Lepraria incana Parmelia sulcata
Kindbergia praelonga
Hypnum jutlandicum
Metzgeria temperata
Ulota crispa
Hypotrachyna revoluta
Dimerella lutea
5. Horizontal Distribution Factors which change with distance from trunk: Decrease in humidity Increase in light levels Decrease in age/time for colonisation
Bryophytes on branches
Lichens on branches
Hypnum jutlandicum
Metzgeria temperata
Ulota crispa
Dimerella lutea
Fuscidea lightfootii
SUMMARY Significantly greater total spp. richness, bryophyte spp. richness & average bryophyte % cover in SW compared to E Separation of SW and E sites in NMS suggests differences in spp. composition No significant differences in spp. richness and % cover between Edge and Interior trees Some separation of Edge and Interior trees in NMS suggests differences in spp. composition
SUMMARY 2 No significant difference in species richness between N and S side of tree but significantly greater average lichen cover and total cover on S Difference in vertical distribution of bryophytes and lichens with overall bryophyte cover decreasing with height and overall lichen cover increasing Bryophytes more common on trunk and lichens more common on branches with some exceptions
SUMMARY 3 Differences in Vertical distribution of individual species on trunk and Horizontal distribution on branches, probably related to microhabitat requirements
Acknowledgements Dr Daniel L. Kelly, Dr Paul Dowding, Dr George F. Smith, BIOFOREST project, Department of Botany, Trinity College Dublin COFORD (National Council for Forest Research & Development) EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)