Evolution of Atmospheric Aerosols Along Trajectories Crossing the Los Angeles Basin February 15, 2001 Lara H. Gertler (UC-Riverside) Jonathan O. Allen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Advertisements

MASS EMISSION RATES AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PM 2.5 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MOTORCYCLES Deniz Karman and Colin Welburn Department of Civil and Environmental.
Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
Emissions of Size-Segregated Aerosols from On-Road Vehicles in the Caldecott Tunnel Jonathan O. Allen SCOS97 -- NARSTO Data Analysis Conference15 February.
P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
A Project to Characterize The Effects of Transient Air Pollutants on the Health of African-Americans in Atlanta, Georgia John H. Hall Morehouse College.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Commentary on the Critical Review Public Health and Components of Particulate Matter: The Changing Assessment of Black Carbon Michael T. Kleinman Department.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
The semi-volatile nature of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area November 2, 2007 EAS Graduate Student Symposium Christopher.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
PM mapping in Scotland, 2007 Andrew Kent. What are we presenting today? 1) Context to the work 2) Modelling process 3) Model results 4) Future work possibilities.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
Clean air for London: ClearfLo David Green, King’s College London.
From Ammonia to PM 2.5 Brent Auvermann Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Amarillo, TX.
THE REGENTS PARK AND TOWER ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIMENT REPARTEE 2006 & 2007 Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham.
Comprehensive Isotopic Composition of Atmospheric Nitrate during CalNex Inferring Sinks and Sources of NO X from Nitrate Stable Isotope Ratios William.
October 17, 20065th Annual CMAS Conference1 Photochemical Modeling Investigation of an Extended Winter PM Episode in Central California 1. Air Resources.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Chemistry of Particles and Selected Trace Gases at Whistler, BC A.M. Macdonald, K.G. Anlauf and W.R. Leaitch.
Lindsey Kuettner and Dr. Patricia Cleary  Department of Chemistry  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Back Trajectory Analysis and Measurement of Ozone.
Source Signatures of Organic Compounds and Particle Growth in Bakersfield, CA Lars Ahlm 1, Shang Liu 1, Lynn M. Russell 1, Douglas A. Day 1,2, Robin Weber.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Is there need to collect routine ammonia/ammonium measurements in ambient air monitoring networks? Perspectives of a Data Analyst from a Small State Air.
Evaluation of Commercially available Passive Samplers for Pollutant Saturation Monitoring in Wilmington, CA Brooks Mason.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 15-17, Mohammed A Majeed 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Michael McDowell 1, Betsy Frey 1, Ali Mirzakhalili 1 1 Delaware.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Properties of Particulate Matter Physical, Chemical and Optical Properties Size Range of Particulate Matter Mass Distribution of PM vs. Size: PM10, PM2.5.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Particulate Matter (PM) Overview
Online measurements of chemical composition and size distribution of submicron aerosol particles in east Baltic region Inga Rimšelytė Institute of Physics.
Particulate Pollution: Overview of the Problem Alan C. Lloyd, Ph.D., Chairman California Air Resources Board COEH Spring Symposium -- April 7, 2000 Air.
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
Particles, your health & your lungs. Why care about air pollution? Sonoma County air is clean compared to other areas, but SF air blows here Sonoma County.
Why Ozone is Higher on Weekends in the South Coast Air Basin: a 20-Year Perspective Eric Fujita, William Stockwell, Robert Keislar, and Dave Campbell Division.
Public Meeting to Discuss “Weekend Effect” Research June 23, 1999.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Temporal variations of aerosol components in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Cal-Mex campaign S. Takahama, A. Johnson, J. Guzman Morales, L.M. Russell Scripps.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM1 Characterizing Ambient PM Concentrations and Processes What are the temporal, spatial, chemical,
Photolysis of Particulate Nitrate: a Daytime HONO Source and a Re-NOx-ification Pathway in the Troposphere (TROPospheic HONO: TROPHONO) A Component of.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Data Needs for Evaluation of Radical and.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Measurements of light absorption spectra of fine particle aqueous extracts during CalNex at the Pasadena ground site X. Zhang and R. J. Weber Georgia Institute.
Contributions of Organic Compound Pollutants to Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter in Mexicali, Mexico Jonathan O. Allen, Daniel A. Gonzales, Qinyue Sun.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Properties of Particulate Matter
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
Stephen Reid, Hilary Hafner, Yuan Du Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Aerosol chemistry studies at the SMEARIII station in Kumpula
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Impact of Land use on Air pollution in Austin
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
7th Annual CMAS Conference
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Time-Integrated Sampling
Challenges with Integrated Measurements of OC and BC (or EC)
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Presentation transcript:

Evolution of Atmospheric Aerosols Along Trajectories Crossing the Los Angeles Basin February 15, 2001 Lara H. Gertler (UC-Riverside) Jonathan O. Allen (Arizona State University) Sylvia H. Pastor (UC-Riverside) Glen R. Cass (Georgia Inst. of Technology) Kimberly A. Prather (UC-Riverside)

Problems Models used to predict particle population to aid design of effective control programs –Experimental data difficult to obtain: want size distribution of chemical composition and at single particle level within same air parcel over time to evaluate trajectory model for externally mixed aerosol

Research Objectives Acquire field experimental data documenting particle chemical evolution over time within individual air parcels –Data specifically for use in future air quality model evaluation studies

Approach to gathering trajectory-based size and chemical composition data: Choose air monitoring sites along a typical air parcel trajectory Pair conventional samplers with aerosol time- of-flight mass spectrometry (ATOFMS) instruments collecting single particle data After sampling, identify air parcel trajectories that successively passed over multiple sites Examine particle population changes during transport along these trajectories

Vehicle-Oriented Trajectory Study August, 1997 Focused on air parcels exposed to motor vehicle primary emissions

Nitrate-Oriented Trajectory Study September-November, 1997 Examined particulate ammonium nitrate formation with exposure to large NH 3 (g) source

Instrumentation Filter-based sampling –PM 10 (D a < 10  m) –Fine particulate matter (D a < 1.8  m) Electrical aerosol analyzer (EAA) Laser optical particle counter (OPC) Pair of micro-orifice impactors (MOI) Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ATOFMS) instrument

Vehicle-Oriented Trajectory August 27-28, /27 14:00-18:00 8/ :00-01:00 01:00-06:00 06:00-10:00

Fine PM Mass Balance Central Los Angeles Aug 27-28, 1997 Strong diurnal cycle, maximum during daylight Carbon dominates fine PM mass Concentration (  g m -3 ) 27-Aug28-Aug Central Los Angeles

Impactor Mass Balances Central Los Angeles Aug 28, :00-10:00 PDT14:00-18:00 PDT Elemental carbon peaks during morning traffic Decrease in fine carbon particles later in day Shift in carbon peak NO 3 - mainly present >1.0  m, as NaNO 3

Fine PM Mass Balance Along Trajectory Local quarry source in Azusa Increase in EC, org. matter with rush hour Little change in other species Concentration (  g m -3 ) 21-Aug22-Aug Los Angeles Azusa

Nitrogen Balance Along Trajectory Little ammonium nitrate formation NO, NO 2 increase with morning rush hour

Single-Particle Evolution Along Trajectory 1.8 – 3.5  m Azusa before 06:00 very similar to Central LA Increase in carbon-containing particles, “complex” particles with rush hour Central LA 8/21 14:00-18:00 PDT Azusa 8/22 06:00-10:00 PDT

Single-Particle Evolution Along Trajectory 1.0 – 1.8  m Azusa dust presence from local quarry source Increased ammonium presence Central LA 8/21 14:00-18:00 PDT Azusa 8/22 06:00-10:00 PDT

Single-Particle Evolution Along Trajectory 0.56 – 1.8  m Higher presence of “carbon-only” particles in Central LA during evening rush hour More “complex” carbon particles in Azusa Central LA 8/21 14:00-18:00 PDT Azusa 8/22 06:00-10:00 PDT

Nitrate-Oriented Trajectory Study Diamond Bar - Mira Loma October 31-November /31 06:00-10:00 10/31-11/1 18:00-01:00

Fine PM Mass Balance Diamond Bar Oct 31-Nov 1, 1997 EC peak weekday rush hour, not weekend Air sampled in minimum spent 1-2 fewer days over land

Impactor Mass Balances Diamond Bar Oct 31, :00-14:00 PST 14:00-18:00 PDT Aerosol NH 4 NO 3 in particles > 0.3  m Morning: NH 4 NO 3 production, air stagnated northeast Afternoon: relatively clean, air stagnated west

Nitrogen Balance Along Trajectory Ammonium nitrate HNO 3 -limited in Diamond Bar Gas-phase ammonia concentration increases  Concentration (  g N m -3 ) 31-Oct01-Nov Diamond Bar Mira Loma

Fine PM Mass Balance Along Trajectory Note Federal Ambient Air Quality Standard: 65  g m Concentration (  g m -3 ) 31-Oct01-Nov Diamond Bar Mira Loma

11/1 01:00-06:00 10/31 01:00-06:00 Nitrate-Oriented Trajectory Study Mira Loma - Riverside October 31-November 1, 1997

Nitrogen Balance Along Trajectory Air parcel over land ~3 days before Mira Loma NH 3 concentration decrease with distance from dairy “point source” Concentration (  g N m -3 ) 31-Oct01-Nov Mira Loma Riverside

Fine PM Mass Balance Along Trajectory Ammonium and nitrate concentrations similar Concentration (  g m -3 ) 31-Oct01-Nov Mira Loma Riverside

Change in Particle Population with Wind Shift 1.8 – 3.5  m Number of fine particles decreases by 86% After shift, population dominated by dust and “uncomplex” particles Riverside 11/1 01:00-06:00 PST Wind from West Riverside 11/1 10:00-14:00 PST Wind from North

Further Work Trajectory-based data on particle evolution designed for use in air quality model evaluation –Impactor data along Sept 24-25,1996 Long Beach - Fullerton - Riverside trajectory already utilized this way –Next use impactor data from Vehicle- and Nitrate-Oriented Trajectory studies

Simultaneous operation of impactors and ATOFMS instruments allows calculation of ATOFMS counting efficiencies and ion sensitivities –Counting efficiencies and NO 3 - and NH 4 + ion sensitivities determined for 1996 data –Further counting efficiency and ion sensitivity investigation using 1997 data –Investigation of “matrix effects”

Thanks for funding from: California Air Resources Board Coordinating Research Council, Inc. U.S. DOE Office of Heavy Vehicle Technologies Thanks for assistance and contributions from: Dr. Kimberly Prather’s UC-Riverside research group Dr. Mike Kleeman (UC-Davis) Lynn Salmon (Caltech) Dr. Michael Ames (MIT) Nehzat Motallebi (CARB) Joe Cassmassi (SCAQMD) Rudy Eden (SCAQMD) Kevin Durkee (SCAQMD) Leon Dolislager (CARB) Clinton Taylor (CARB)