Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) -Chicane & Absorber David Neuffer C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … January 31, 2012.
Advertisements

Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Solenoid Focus of Pions for Superbeams NUFACT06 Irvine, Ca. August 28, 2006.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
1 Muon Bunching for a Muon Collider David Neuffer FNAL August 3, 2010.
RF Bucket Area Introduction Intense muon beams have many potential applications, including neutrino factories and muon colliders. However, muons are produced.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Muons, Inc. 4.27/2010IDS Front End Meeting Cary Y. Yoshikawa 1 Status of the Quasi-Isochronous Helical Channel Cary Yoshikawa Chuck Ankenbrandt Rol Johnson.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Helical Cooling Channel Simulation with ICOOL and G4BL K. Yonehara Muon collider meeting, Miami Dec. 13, 2004 Slide 1.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Muons within Acceleration Acceptance Cuts at End of Transverse Cooling Channel TOWARDS A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE MUON ACCELERATOR FRONT END H. K. Sayed,
MOMENT Synergies with Other Projects Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS NuFact2015, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Aug , 2015.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
Low energy ν-beam for EUROSB Marcos Dracos, Nikos Vassilopoulos IPHC Strasbourg, IN2P3/CNRS.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
FRONTEND DESIGN & OPTIMIZATION STUDIES HISHAM KAMAL SAYED BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY June 26, 2014 Collaboration: J. S. Berg - X. Ding - V.B. Graves.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
Update on ILC Production and Capturing Studies Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim ILC e+ Collaboration Meeting IHEP Beijing Jan 31 – Feb 2, 2007.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Simulating the RFOFO Ring with Geant Amit Klier University of California, Riverside Muon Collaboration Meeting Riverside, January 2004.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
1 Muon Capture for a Muon Collider David Neuffer July 2009.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer December 4, 2014.
Neutrino Program in China Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS ICFA Neutrino Panel – Asian Community Meeting Nov.13, 2013, Kashiwa City, Chiba,
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Studies for MOMENT and EMuS Target Station
Update on MOMENT’s Target Station Studies
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Muon Front End Status Chris Rogers,
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015

particle production for Hg MOMENT – Hg, L =30 cm, R = 0.5 cm: current parameters σ b (mm)π+π+ π-π- μ+μ+ μ-μ- np+p x x E k = 1.5 GeV no field, tilt 10 6 p.o.t. -> stat. error <1% for π, n, p and 6, 15 % for μ +, μ - FLUKA 2015 nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro2

π + production and P T acceptance for adiabatic solenoids for adiabatic taper solenoid B 1 =14 T, r 1 = 20 cm P T1 = 420 MeV/c π + for ~ 300 ± 50% MeV ( ~ 57 % ) P T accepted r 1 = 7 cm, r 2 = 15 cm P T accepted r 1 = 14 cm, r 2 = 30 cm B 2 = 3 T, r 2 = 43 cm P T2 = 193 MeV/c _ FLUKA 2015 (1e6 p.o.t.) P T accepted r 1 = 20 cm, r 2 = 43 cm nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro3 _

Power on target P trg = 2.5 MW nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro4

optimization studies nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro5 figure of merit: π, μ, p yields, distributions downstream of: the Main Capture Solenoid (MSC) Adiabatic Transport Solenoid B z = 14 T -> 3 T ----->--->-->-> Main Capture Solenoid “idealized” field B = 14 T, L MCS = 32 cm, r MCS = 20 cm Main Capture Solenoid “idealized” field B = 14 T, L MCS = 32 cm, r MCS = 20 cm Adiabatic Transport Solenoid L = 5, 10, 15, 20, 35, 50 m r = 20 cm - > 43.2 cm B = 14 T -> 3 T MSC study tilts, lengths, radii, beam-sizes B z = 14 T --->--->---> Gaussian field approximation at MCS

target tilt studies L trg = 30 cm, r trg = 5 mm, σ b = 1 mm π after one helix might hit the target, target tilt needed, upstream edge downstream edge upstream edge downstream edge 40 mrad B z = 14 T ->->->-> 220 mrad B z = 14 T ->->->-> nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro6

particle yields at the edge of MCS for different tilts π+μ π + +μ + π - +μ - all momenta in black selection in red pions < P (GeV/c) < muons < P (GeV/c) < statistical error < 1 % write the % of pi & mu

π+μ 20, 100, 220 mrad momenta 20, 100, 220 mrad momenta p 100 mrad transverse mom. π(x 7) p π(x 3) p 100 mrad longitudinal mom. can be separated

beam tilt with respect to the target π+μ statistical error < 1 % B z = 14 T ->->->-> B z = 14 T ->->->-> B z = 14 T ->->->-> proton-tilt 14 mrad proton-tilt 10 mrad proton-tilt 0 mrad similar yields upstream edge downstream edge

particle yields at the edge of MCS for different target lengths tilt=100 mrad, r trg = 5 mm, σ b = 1 mm B z = 14 T ->->->-> for L=15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 cm π+μ λIλI 2λI2λI tilt 100 mrad B z = 14 T ->->->-> B z = 14 T ->->->-> p could do less or more if needed statistical error < 1 % nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro10

π+μ particle yields at the edge of MCS for different radii tilt=100 mrad, L trg =30 cm, σ b = 1 mm p could do more in radius if needed statistical error < 1 % nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro11

from ideal to Gaussian field for MCS Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro12 +λI+λI gaussian -0.3 m < z < 0.3 m 7% reduction reduction within ±λ I field as used in MOMENT studies, 0.8 % reduction within ±λ I particle yields at the edge of MCS for different target parameters fixed parameters : tilt=100 mrad or L trg =30 cm or r trg = 5 mm -λI-λI L = 5 m L = 50 m

13 tilt radii length similar results to the ideal field B 0 = 14 T all momenta in black selection in red pions < P (GeV/c) < muons < P (GeV/c) < statistical error < 1 % π+μ

target displacement at MCS nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro14 target-center displaced by λ I /2,λ I with respect to B 0 r MCS : 20 cm target-center displaced by λ I /2,λ I with respect to B 0 r MCS : 20 cm target-center at B 0 target-center displaced by λ I /4 target center displaced by λ/2 similar yields

MCS radius L hg =30 cm, r hg = 0.5 cm, tilt hg = 100 mrad L MCS =32 cm, r MCS = 7, 14, 30 cm, B 0 =14 T, gaussian σ= 45 cm nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro15 r MCS = 7, 14, 17, 20 cm best r MCS = cm P T acceptance shapes the momenta low radii not useful for MOMENT no downstream acceleration

conclusions for the MCS at MCS edge: target-tilt could be more than100 mrad target-length, yield is maximal at 2 interaction lengths or slightly less target-radius could be increased more than 5 mm for σ b =0.1cm yield remains similar when proton beam-axis tilted with respect to the target- axis -> to be studied with higher angles between the two high energy protons could be separated (see Cai’s talk) MCS radii should be ~ cm tilt 100 mrad B 0 = 14 T nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro16

adiabatic transport solenoids L = 5 m steepest decrease of the Bz slower decrease nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro17 1) K. Paul and C. Johnstone, Optimizing the Pion Capture and Decay Channel, MUC0289 (9 Feb. 2004) 2) Analytic Forms for an Adiabatic Tapered Solenoid Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton (January 25, 2010)

adiabatic inverse taper – 1 st degree (ideal field, steeper field-decrease response) field approximation implemented in FLUKA: 5 m L = 5, 10, 15, 20, 50 m nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro18

@ z 1 = 0 m r 1 = 20 cm, B 1 =14 z 2 = 5 -> 50 m r 2 = 43.2 cm, B 2 = 3 T z 1 = 0 m tilt 100 mrad nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro19 B z = 14 T ->->->-> ideal MCS +

yields at the end of the adiabatic section vs length π+μ all momenta in black selection in red pions < P (GeV/c) < muons < P (GeV/c) < statistical error < 1 % geometry approximation systematic error 20 μπ

muon yields for inverse taper L = 50 m vs different target-tilts, radii μ μ target-tilt target-radii tilt: plateau after 100 mrad radii: could do more statistical error < 1 % nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro21

particle yields for L taper =5 m, E k = 1.5, 2.5 GeV 22 π+μ tilt lengthradii GeV 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 1.5 GeV nufact15

particle yields for L taper = 50 m, E k = 1.5, 2.5 GeV 23 μ μ μ tilt lengthradii GeV 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 1.5 GeV

nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro24 pp proton yields for different target-tilts and tapers all momenta in black selection in red proton < P (GeV/c) < statistical error < 1 % there is a reduction of higher momentum protons with the tilt L taper = 5 m L taper = 50 m

conclusion/further studies for 5, 50 m gaussian + 1 st degree inverse adiabatic solenoid: target-tilt 100 mrad or more target-length 25 cm or more target-radius 5 mm or more higher momentum protons yields decreases with larger target-tilts proton E k = 2.5 GeV doubles the yields next : test the cubic field “slower decrease of the field” (similar results expected) test with a different MC (geant4, MARS) to compare the yield patterns and their absolute values Thanks nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro25

Power on target P trg = 2.5 MW nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro mrad tilt

π+μ particle yields at the edge of MCS for different beam sizes tilt=100 mrad, L trg =30 cm, r trg = 5 mm p statistical error < 1 % similar, could do less in beam size nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro27

p μ+μ+ momenta L = 5, 10, 15, 20, 50 m transverse momenta μ momenta distributions (to be updated) momenta

nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro29 + L = 5 m L = 50 m

nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro30

spatial distribution and transverse emittance L = 5 m L = 50 m

p target-radiitarget-tilt p proton yields for inverse taper L = 50 m vs different target-tilts, radii statistical error < 1 % nufact15Target Studies - Rio de Janeiro32