Telemetry Constraints during Early Operations The STEREO telemetry rate is restricted during the phasing orbits due to S/C RF interference with each other,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superior Solar Conjunction Planning May 8, 2014 Dan Ossing STEREO Mission Operations Manager (240)
Advertisements

Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation STEREO and SECCHI Status Consortium Meeting, Abingdon July 2001 Russ Howard.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phase E Kickoff Meeting February 23, 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectManager’s Face to Face - ISOC, 17 March GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Manager’s Face.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
IMPACT Report SSMO Receiving Review– January 23, 2007.
SECCHI – Sun-Earth Connections Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation SECCHI Synoptic and Special Observing Programs Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Lead.
2007 March 61 The SECCHI Campaign Jean-Pierre Wuelser SECCHI Consortium Meeting Orsay.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 3 LOF Operations Concept 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 SEP and LET GSE Software Presenter: Andrew Davis Contact:
EMC Quiet Planning During Science Operations Andrew Walsh & Chris Watson Solar Orbiter SOC, ESAC, Madrid EMC Working Group #12, Imperial College,
STEREO Science Center SWG – Dec 2004 William Thompson NASA Goddard SFC Code Greenbelt, MD
STEREO Science Center William Thompson NASA Goddard SFC Code Greenbelt, MD
7/12/20011 Observing Sequences in View of the SECCHI Science Goals From the EUVI Perspective J-P. Wülser.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
Mars Odyssey PSG Mission Status Gaylon W. McSmith Robert A. Mase June 9, 2003.
“Joint planning” session Preliminary instrument operation & science plans of SOT/XRT/EIS for several months after the launch. Instrument checkout and Performance.
Van Allen Probes Spacecraft Operations July 29, 2015 Kristin Fretz
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO STEREO Science Team Meeting May 2, 2005 Presented by Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project.
Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.
Spacecraft and Ground Segments Status March 21, 2014 Dan Ossing STEREO Mission Operations Manager (240)
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG April 2008 Meudon, France.
Space Operations as a Guide for a Real-World Scheduling Competition Eduardo Romero Marcelo Oglietti
Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.
May 17, 2004SSWG - PFIS Shared Risk1 PFIS Commissioning, Shared Risk, and Transition to Operations.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
William Thompson L-3 Communications NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STERE The STEREO Science Center.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission SECCHI Calibration Activities Simon Plunkett SECCHI Operations Scientist Naval Research Laboratory.
Mission Operations –Launch February 15, 2000 at 22:02:15 UTC = 14:02:15 PST –41 Days IOC and antenna deployment period –2 year science mission operations.
1/15/02Bowman/Harch1 CONTOUR Science Ops Update Ann Harch Cornell University (607) Alice Bowman Applied Physics.
Michael L. Kaiser STEREO Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO May 2, 2008 STEREO at 1.25 years.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG November 2007 Pasadena, California.
GIST th -29 th Apr B.Stewart RAL In-orbit Mirror Performance.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
SECCHI Status Russell A. Howard & The SECCHI Team March 2010 STEREO SWG – Trinity College, Dublin.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
SSC Support for Sim #3 Archived MOC Data Products, and distributed via web. –Level-0 telemetry files organized by year and month –SPICE orbit and attitude.
NMP / EO-1 NMP EO-1 LE&O HANDBOOK September 24-26, 2000 Section 1 Master Timeline (Day 1-10)
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Action Items 1 November Action Items - I Assess frequency coverage at 22 GHz vs. science goals, and decide whether lower frequency should be changed—Murata,
Jan 2008 LMSSC - 1 SWEA Plume Impingements Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission.
STIS STATUS Charles Proffitt TIPs May 21, STIS Status - Status of Repair Results of FT Amp B Bias Anomaly Changes to SMOV Plan.
Near-term schedule Scott Horner. Background MCCS software engineering build #3 was delivered in June and tested by the SIL team in early July A number.
IMPACT Conjunction and Sidelobe Operations Janet Luhmann, Dave Curtis, Peter Schroeder, Dick Mewaldt and the IMPACT Team July 2, 2014.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
SSC Preflight Status Tested during Sim #3: –Telemetry ingest –Beacon processing –Science planning –Archiving of MOC data products, including level-0 telemetry.
06/28/10UVIS TEAM MEETING OPERATIONS UPDATE UVIS TEAM MEETING OPERATIONS UPDATE 1.
Double Star Active Archive - STAFF-DWP Data errors and reprocessing Keith Yearby and Hugo Alleyne University of Sheffield Nicole Cornilleau-Wehrlin LPP.
EIS Operation Planning H. Hara (NAOJ) 2007 Dec 10.
PLASTIC Post Launch Data Flow Lynn Kistler & Lorna Ellis May 2006.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS MEP iPSR SOC Marc Pulupa April 10, 2017
SEP and LET GSE Software Presenter: Andrew Davis caltech
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Current SOC-Ground System Integration Schedule (Jan )
LRO Mission Operations Concept
Customer Research BCE.
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Requirements Engineering Introduction
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
The STEREO Space Weather Broadcast
LAT Operations Scenario Subsystem Meetings
MDP / DHU - DR Usage vs downlinks -
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Presentation transcript:

Telemetry Constraints during Early Operations The STEREO telemetry rate is restricted during the phasing orbits due to S/C RF interference with each other, and RF power flux density limitations on terrestrial XB systems. During this period, instrument commissioning and science activities are strongly desired, but secondary to S/C checkout and observatory formation activities. Information on instrument telemetry rates are needed by Sept. 3 rd, 2004 for SIM #2.

STEREO DSN Track Coverage – First Three Weeks = Continuous track coverage = 8 hour track/day = 3 hour track/day November 2005 MonTueWedThrFriSatSun Dec Dec Dec Dec Week 1: 30 kbps, 24 hrs, 21 kbps available Week 2: 30 kbps, 8 hrs, 9 kbps available R/T, 220 Mbits/day. Week 3: 96 kbps, 3 hrs, 30 kbps available R/T, 220 Mbits/day (to 1 st lunar swingby). Data rates include both R/T and SSR. These must be balanced together.

Early Operations Considerations The constraints on telemetry are: power (during Δv burns), 1553 bus schedule, DSN schedule, EA mode checkouts (instruments must be off), and increased HK (+etc.) telemetry as each instrument is turned on. No instrument commissioning activities will be conducted ± 18 hours of a maneuver. The telemetry rates can be changed by modifying the Downlink Format Descriptors (DFD). However, this is not a simple process, and APL needs to know the desired rates well in advance to construct a valid DFD. For each phasing orbit track, the MOC needs to know the rates by Sept. 3 rd, 2004.

Possible Scenarios for Early Operations 1.Data is taken at a constant rate for both R/T and out-of-contact periods. Most of the downlink capabilities during the R/T passes are devoted to dumping data from the SSR. 2.Data is taken at a reduced rate during the out-of-contact periods, and at a much higher rate during the R/T passes. Most of the data rate is used for commissioning activities, and the rest for dumping the SSR. 3.Same as #2, except that the SSR is dumped first, and then all of the downlink is opened for R/T use. The data rate is higher, but the time for commissioning is reduced. 4.Different instruments might be given higher R/T telemetry allocations on a day-by-day basis.

Questions Which of the previous scenarios (1-3) is preferred? Should some instruments have priority on specific days? How much telemetry is needed during the out-of-contact periods? How much telemetry is needed during the R/T passes? Does this vary on a day-by-day basis? Propose that each instrument provide a draft telemetry budget by Jan 30 th, to get the process started. Each instrument team should designate a contact person for working out these issues.

Answers so far - IMPACT Needs 108 bps for housekeeping and beacon telemetry. Wants nominal rate of 3200 bps during R/T passes. May be able to reduce to ~2000 bps before SEP power-on (week 3), but planned to use that telemetry for boom suite diagnostics. Anticipates that instrument puts out normal bitrate, and S/C decides what to record based on APID. Would like priority when boom is deployed (week 2) Cases: Minimum:108bps+1 20 Mbits/day Week 1:24 bps276 Mbits/day Week 2:108bps+8 Mbits/day Week 3:108bps+3 44 Mbits/day

Answers so far - SECCHI Most commissioning activities after heliocentric orbit insertion. Need reduced HK (~26-35 Mbits/day) when powered on, plus: 1 partial-field image/day from each telescope (26 Mbits/day) 1-sec averages of guide telescope data (16.6 Mbits/day) 10 sec of guide telescope data at 50 kHz (32 Mbits/day) Total of Mbits/day. Can reduce to 80 Mbits/day by doing activities once every two days. All commissioning activities carried out in real time. Need to see response in R/T before continuing. Prefer scenario #2. Instruments should be given priority according to the scheduled activities. SECCHI would like priority during mechanism functional testing.