1 WSPP EC 3-9-07 SLIDES FOR AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 WSPP SERVICE SCHEDULE C WSPP Service Schedule C includes a provision allowing interruption “to meet Seller’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
Contingency Reserve Standard Drafting Team Presentation before the WECC Board Technical Conference David Lemmons Standard Drafting Team Chair December.
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
© 2013 Rockwell Publishing Washington Real Estate Practices Lesson 8: Contingent Transactions.
Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
Reaching Agreement: The Process of Contract Formation C. LIMITING THE OFFERORS POWER TO REVOKE: THE EFFECT OF PRE-ACCEPTANCE RELIANCE 1.Under the common.
ISTISNA’.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, February 25, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EST.
ISDA ® The New CDS Landscape Auction Settlement International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA ® Copyright © 2009 International Swaps and Derivatives.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Large Generator Interconnection Order on Rehearing (Order No A) RM March 3, 2004.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
This basic tutorial will take vendors step by step through the RFQ process. The tutorial will also point out many of the exciting new.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Public Exchange Clarification Briefing June 2009.
MEETINGS OF SHARE HOLDERS. NEED FOR MEETING TO RATIFY TO EXPRESS THEIR DISAPPROVAL OF, THE DIRECTOR’S PAST CONDUCT. TO CONSIDER THEIR FUTURE PLANS. TO.
Load Shed Service for Import Information Session Market Services April 17, 2014.
What’s New in Southern Companies’ OATT Southern Company Transmission 2008 Customer Forum.
2000 U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations 15 CFR Part 30 **** U.S. Principal Party in Interest and Forwarding Agent Responsibilities,
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Network Economy System Overview and Demonstration May 3, 2007 Raj Hundal.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
WSPP REC Webinar Discussion Outline September 7, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
DRAFT Request for Initiation of a NAESB Standard NAESB OS Oct 23-24, 2013 Richmond, VA.
Charter Review Recommendations - 1 Presentation Title Subtitle (optional) Date Vancouver City Council Workshop/Public Hearing Staff, Title Charter Review.
Arnold Podgorsky Wright & Talisman PC February 3, 2011.
WSPP Operating Committee Spring 2008 LEGAL UPDATE Arnie Podgorsky Wright & Talisman, PC This educational presentation states no legal opinion of WSPP or.
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Updated (corrected) Version 9/5/2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel.
FIRMA NATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING CONFERENCE BDIA HOT TOPICS APRIL 29, :15 AM – 10:15 AM.
WINDPOWER 2003 Austin, TX May 18-21, 2003 Session 4A: Regulatory Issues Monday May 19, :40-5:00 pm Wind Generation Interconnection to Transmission.
WSPP Contract Subcommittee February 3, 2011 Meeting Notes These notes are to facilitate discussions of a WSPP REC Service Schedule, are subject to revision,
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
1 Bilateral Interconnection Agreement Model Presented to HAPUA Working Group 5 (ESI Services), Project 6 By Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
“FERC-LITE,” WHOLESALE REFUND AUTHORITY, AND RELATED PROVISIONS NOVEMBER 10, 2005 ROBERT R. NORDHAUS VAN NESS FELDMAN WASHINGTON, DC (202)
1 Interconnection Update Jay Zimmerman Manager, Transmission Policy Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
WSPP Reserves Issue Educational Webinar February 26, 2008.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Wednesday, January 28, :00 to 3:00 p.m. ET.
NAESB Update Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting.
WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC May 6, 2004.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Economic analysis of variations between the VUoSA and the MUoSA Toby Stevenson, Nives Matosin, Joanna Smith, Stuart Shepherd March 2014.
Explanation of Revised Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
Scheduling of Collective Transactions Through Power Exchange
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Agenda Summary of Revisions to 10/1/16 Rollout
Transmitted by the expert
BPM Change Management Meeting
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and WEQ OASIS/BPS Subcommittees
Presentation transcript:

1 WSPP EC SLIDES FOR AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 WSPP SERVICE SCHEDULE C WSPP Service Schedule C includes a provision allowing interruption “to meet Seller’s public utility or statutory obligations to its customers.” Intent of this provision was to allow interruption if the power is necessary to serve native load. Provision has been in Service Schedule C since it became effective in 1991.

2 ORDER 890 FERC first found that the damages provision in Service Schedule C does not disqualify the transaction from being eligible to be considered as a designated network resource. FERC, however, found that the language “to meet Seller’s public utility or statutory obligations” may allow interruptions for reasons other than reliability. FERC stated that the language would need to be revised “to explicitly prohibit interruptions for reasons other than reliability of service to native load” to allow Service Schedule C to be eligible for treatment as designated network resource. FERC held that sellers will be allowed to undesignate network resources for specified time periods in order to sell firm power from those resources to others. FERC, however, stated that the notice of undesignation must be submitted by 10 a.m. the day before the transaction. FERC stated that non-firm sales may be made from designated network resources without requiring undesignation.

3 EFFECT OF ORDER 890 With the exception of existing transactions, unless Service Schedule C is modified, effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, WSPP members will not be able to have Service Schedule C transactions designated as network resources. Designation as network resources allows firm transmission to be used to move power from the designated network resource to a network customer’s load without an increased payment for network transmission service (depending upon the tariff some other charges such as losses or congestion may be impacted). If the transaction is not a network resource, then the transmission to a network customer would be considered as non-firm (unless firm point to point transmission is purchased).

4 MEMBER CONCERNS Some members have indicated that the clarification proposed by FERC needs to be incorporated into Service Schedule C or there will be a disruption to the firm markets. Other members have raised a separate issue relating to FERC’s requirement that undesignations of network resources occur by 10 a.m. on the day before. These members have raised a concern that this requirement would disrupt the short term or real time firm market.

5 PROPOSAL FOR ADDRESSING BOTH CONCERNS Clarification 1.Agree to and file with FERC as soon as possible the minor (but important) clarification to Service Schedule C. 2.This clarification carries out the longstanding intent of the WSPP Agreement and addresses FERC’s concerns. 3.The added language is the language from FERC’s Order Intent is to keep this filing separate and simple so that we can obtain quick approval from FERC and to obtain approval around the time that Order 890 would take effect. Also would seek an effective date which would match the Order 890 effective date. 5.Once approved by FERC, then aside from the hourly market, this should allow WSPP members purchasing a Service Schedule C product to elect to designate it as a network resource.

6 Request for Rehearing and Further WSPP Process Relating To Real-Time Firm 1.The issue is principally a FERC issue. As a result, the EC could consider authorizing the WSPP to file a request for rehearing at FERC addressing the real-time firm issue. Attached is a brief outline. This rehearing request is due on March 19, Given the level of interest on this issue, the EC also can direct the Contract Committee or the Operating Committee to see what if any changes to the WSPP Agreement can be made which would help to alleviate the harm from Order 890 to real-time firm markets. The EC may if it chooses set a deadline for a proposal to come back to it. Unlike the clarification which is straightforward, how the WSPP addresses the real-time firm issue will require substantial thought and discussion. 3.This issue is separate from the clarification issue and can move forward on a separate track.

7 BENEFIT FROM PROPOSAL Addresses all member concerns. Fixes what can be fixed quickly to prevent a disruption to the non-hourly firm markets. Provides for a request for rehearing to be filed by the WSPP to address the hourly firm market disruption. Provides for a process with a specified time deadline to develop additional WSPP modifications.