Extrasensory Perception (ESP) Lecture 7 Parapsychology Paul Staples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 The Process of Experimentation
Advertisements

Telepathy And Clairvoyance: Testing Against Chance
Parapsychology Practical Class Aims 1. To learn a little about testing claims of psychic ability 2. To learn how to test against chance (µ) Objectives.
Binomial Example: Testing Psychic Abilities Using statistics
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
What is research? Lecture 2 INFO61003 Harold Somers.
Is There Extrasensory Perception? Hockenbury 3 rd edition pg Myers Psychology 6 th edition pg
Thursday:ESP Myth Monday:Review Notebook Preparation Sheet Papers Returned Wednesday:Test – Myths 1 – 3/Mythbusting/Love Notebook DUE Personality Quizzes.
Punishing Unacceptable Behavior Janhavi Nilekani and Sarah Ong.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Basic Business Statistics.
Scientific method - 1 Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and.
Extrasensory perception: Does Psi Exist?. Psi: “Anomalous processes of information or energy transfer, processes such a telepathy or other forms of extrasensory.
Chapter 7 Correlational Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Parapsychology “Most sciences try to explain observable phenomena. Parapsychologists try to observe unexplainable phenomena.” By: Ashley Durkee and Jason.
What Psychology is not! Psychics Mentalist Tarot Readers Astrologer.
Chapter 5For Explaining Psychological Statistics, 4th ed. by B. Cohen 1 Suppose we wish to know whether children who grow up in homes without access to.
Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data Lock 5 Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses STAT 101 Dr. Kari Lock Morgan SECTION 4.1 Statistical test Null and alternative.
Statistics 11 Hypothesis Testing Discover the relationships that exist between events/things Accomplished by: Asking questions Getting answers In accord.
Perception- Part 2.
Virginia Standard of Learning BIO.1a-m
CHAPTER 10: Hypothesis Testing, One Population Mean or Proportion
Statistical Techniques I
Chapter 8 Hypothesis testing 1. ▪Along with estimation, hypothesis testing is one of the major fields of statistical inference ▪In estimation, we: –don’t.
Research and Statistics AP Psychology. Questions: ► Why do scientists conduct research?  answer answer.
The problem of sampling error It is often the case—especially when making point predictions—that what we observe differs from what our theory predicts.
KEY KNOWLEDGEKEY SKILLS  The principles and processes of learning as applied to the cognitive, associative and autonomous stages, including the role feedback.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
User Study Evaluation Human-Computer Interaction.
Psy B07 Chapter 4Slide 1 SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING.
10.2 Tests of Significance Use confidence intervals when the goal is to estimate the population parameter If the goal is to.
Research Methods: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science.
Testing Theories: The Problem of Sampling Error. The problem of sampling error It is often the case—especially when making point predictions—that what.
What is Science? Review This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite.
Hypothesis Testing. The 2 nd type of formal statistical inference Our goal is to assess the evidence provided by data from a sample about some claim concerning.
The Scientific Method.
Statistical Inference Statistical Inference involves estimating a population parameter (mean) from a sample that is taken from the population. Inference.
The Cognitive Perspective Computers vs. Humans. Starter (10 mins) Name the 5 perspectives in Psychology. Name the 5 perspectives in Psychology. Name 3.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 1 1 Overview of Course Lecturers Dr Peter Bibby Prof Eamonn Ferguson Course Part I - Anova and related methods (Semester.
Is There Extrasensory Perception?
Parapsychology “Most sciences try to explain observable phenomena. Parapsychologists try to observe unexplainable phenomena.” Modified from the work of.
Nancy Sloan PSY 1010 Mr. Reed E.S.P. Extra Sensory Perception-refers to the ability to gain insight on a subject without using the physical senses. This.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
What is Science? This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite correct.
PUTTING TO A BIGGER HOLE: GOLF PERFORMANCE RELATES TO PERCEIVED SIZE Erika Larose CLPS 1500 Jessica Witt, 2008.
Anomalistic Psychology
Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis test is a statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis.
The Process of Forming Perceptions SHMD219. Perception The ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the senses. Perception is a series.
Anomalistic Psychology Lesson 1. Do you have any paranormal beliefs? Are you a believer or a sceptic? Find out, using the ‘Paranormal Beliefs Questionnaire’
Scientific Methodology Vodcast 1.1 Unit 1: Introduction to Biology.
Tests of Significance We use test to determine whether a “prediction” is “true” or “false”. More precisely, a test of significance gets at the question.
Ganzfeld experiment Methodological issues related to the study of ESP.
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY ISSUES OF PSEUDOSCIENCE AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD.
Statistical Experiments What is Experimental Design.
Methodological issues in the study of esp. Ganzfeld 0 Sensory deprivation of a participant (the receiver) via headphones and white noise, translucent.
Is It Easy To Use Clairvoyant Powers?
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. CHAPTER 10: Hypothesis Testing, One Population Mean or Proportion to accompany Introduction.
Randomization Tests PSU /2/14.
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY
Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals (Part 1): Using the Standard Normal Lecture 8 Justin Kern October 10 and 12, 2017.
Is There Extrasensory Perception?
WHAT IS IT THAT MAKES PSYCHOLOGY A SCIENCE?
Inferential Statistics
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Is There Extrasensory Perception?
Put phone away & take out unit pkt
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s S. M
Presentation transcript:

Extrasensory Perception (ESP) Lecture 7 Parapsychology Paul Staples

Overview What is ESP? Telepathy Clairvoyance Precognition and Retrocognition Experimental evidence Restricted-choice experiments Free-response experiments The process approach Summary

Learning Objectives This session will enable you to Give a reasonable definition of ESP Categorise the various types of ESP Understand the nature of the experimental evidence available Appreciate the criticisms and counter-criticisms of some of the findings Appreciate the difference between resticted-choice and free-response scenarios Recognise that there are other considerations, such as those suggested by the process approach

What is ESP? Extrasensory perception (ESP) is perception that occurs independently of the main physical senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell or, indeed, perceptual processes such as proprioception) In some ways the term is vague but it is generally used to imply a source of information that is unknown to modern science ESP can be divided into a number of sub- categories

Telepathy For telepathy the source of information is another person’s mind The principle requirement of telepathic transmission is that the information transfer cannot be explained by any known physical process Often the demonstration involves information transfer over large distances Unlike physical information transfer, telepathy is not subject to the weakening of the signal the further you move away from the source

Clairvoyance Clairvoyance is similar to telepathy except that the source of the information is an object or event rather than another mind As well as clairvoyance, we can propose clairaudience where the source of information is auditory rather than visual Clairaudience is an alleged psychic ability to hear things that are beyond the range of the ordinary power of hearing, such as voices or messages from the dead

Precognition and retrocognition If the clairvoyance or clairaudience concerns things in the future or the past the these are referred to as precognition and retrocognition respectively Dreams have sometimes been related to precognition and characters like Nostradamus are famous for their precognitive visions Retrocognitions can be about recent events (e.g. the perpetrator of a recent murder) or distant events (e.g. historic events) Retrocognition is different from past life regression

Experimental evidence ESP experiments fall into two broad categories Restricted-choice experiments The receiver must make a decision about what is being transmitted from a small set of known possibilities Zener cards are an example of restricted choice stimuli Free-response experiments Here the sender will choose an item from a large but finite set of possible stimuli The receiver is not told anything about the nature of the chosen stimulus The remote viewing you participated in was a free-response set up.

Restricted-choice experiments In the 1930s one of the most prominent places for ESP research was the Rhine laboratory in America established by J B Rhine A typical study from that era is the Pearce- Pratt experiment Typical card-guessing experiment – using zener decks (25 cards, 5 target alternatives, MCE = 5) 74 runs conducted over 37 sessions Sender and receiver (Pratt and Pearce) in separate buildings (100 or 250 yards apart)

Restricted-choice experiments Watches synchronised so that when Pratt turned over a card, Pearce made a guess Both recorded their sequences Hits counted independently by Rhine Rhine present with Pratt during last few sessions Mean hits per run was significant at p < No likelihood that results were due to chance

Restricted-choice experiments Hansel (1961) criticised the study by suggesting that as no-one was with Pearce during the sessions, he could have gone out of his room and looked through a window at Pratt’s cards. This could not be shown to be wrong until 1967 when Stevenson was able to locate the original blueprints However, on scrutinising the official and unofficial reports of the experiments there are inconsistencies in the number of hits recorded

Restricted-choice experiments Pratt-Woodruff experiment (1939) 2,400 runs across 32 volunteers Mean hit rate was 5.21, p < However, the result attributable to only 5 of the 32 volunteers Pavel Stepanek Library clerk from Czechoslovakia Took part in 27 studies across 18 investigators Was discovered through his ability to state whether the white or dark side of a thin piece of cardboard was face up inside an opaque envelope Performance level at around 57% correct, p<10 -6

Restricted-choice experiments Bill Delmore Yale law student in the early 1970s Unusual in that he had vivid visual imagery, frequent lucid dreams (knowing you are dreaming) and a high degree of confidence in his psi abilities 520 playing cards mixed and placed in desk drawers Experimenter picked a card and without looking at it placed it in an opaque folder 46 runs of 52 trials each (2392 trials) Delmore had an excess of exact hits! For exact hits p < Delmore was also successful on other tasks

Free-response experiments Remote viewing (RV) experiments Puthoff and Targ were the first to do this in the late 1970s They worked with Uri Geller whom most parapsychologists quickly became suspicious of Their first work was with Pat Price, a Californian police commissioner Target location chosen from a pool of 100 Target observed for 30 minutes Price asked to verbally describe and to draw the location Nine trials Independent judge taken to each site and then asked to rank the drawings from 1 to 9 according to their similarity to the site Seven were ranked first at the correct site (p < )

Free-response experiments Critics of these experiments are Marks and Kammann (1980) They suggested that there were biasing clues in the transcripts of the verbal descriptions Now some of the judges failed to correctly identify matches Also, only the most successful trials were chosen for publication and this falsely increased the statistical result However, there have been a number of successful RV experiments reported in the literature

Free-response experiments Ganzfeld Experiments We have already talked about the Ganzfeld procedure It has become a popular method of testing ESP Honorton (1978) claimed that 23 out of 42 ganzfeld experiments had yielded statistically significant results Successful results came from 9 independent labs Taken as a collection of results the evidence seems quite impressive

Free-response experiments In the 1980s, Hyman criticised the findings on several grounds Experiments had small numbers of participants and may only have been submitted for publication if the data were significant Scoring procedures varied widely across the studies In experiments using multiple conditions only one had to be successful for a positive claim to be made One-tailed tests were used even though psi-missing outcomes (the other tail) were considered as successes (i.e. a success was recorded for a score significantly different from chance whether it be better or worse than chance)

Free-response experiments Honorton countered these criticisms by recalculating the results in line with the criticisms The level of success was not compromised even though the success rates reported had been too high Other criticisms, such as one concerning the quality of the randomisation process, were conceded by Honorton

Free-response experiments Overall, it would seem that the studies have been fairly rigorous even though improvements could have been made However, this is no more true here than it is in all other areas of human research Whilst the apparent ESP demonstrated so far may not compel one to accept ESP, the evidence does point to there being something worth further investigation

The process approach All of the research considered so far is concerned with trying to establish proof of the existence of ESP Other research tries to increase our understanding of psi anomalies Some may consider this approach premature until the proof has been verified

The process approach The process approach looks at the following aspects that need to be considered Cognitive processes – right hemisphere, cognitive capacity. Belief in ESP – sheep and goats Personality traits – extraversion/ESP correlation The experimenter effect – experimenters get significant results in psi experiments because of…experimenter error, psychology and psi hypotheses. It attempts to explore the degree to which these factors interact with ESP There is not time to explore these aspects further here

Summary We have seen that there is some convincing data concerning the possible existence of ESP The data are not yet at the stage where they provide unequivocal proof of the existence of ESP