LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Module Production and Performance Anthony Affolder University of Liverpool for the LHCb VELO group RD07 Conference June 27,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Technical Specifications Review General Properties Geometrical Specifications Technology Specifications –Mask –Test Structures –Mechanical –Electrical.
Advertisements

23-Aug-2005 VELO Production UCD VELO Module Production at Liverpool T. Bowcock.
LHCb Velo Construction Authorisation steps Tony Smith.
Detector module development for the CBM Silicon Tracking System Anton Lymanets for the CBM collaboration Universität Tübingen, Kiev Institute for Nuclear.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
1 Status of the CMS Pixel project Lorenzo Uplegger RD07 Florence 28 June 2007.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
For high fluence, good S/N ratio thanks to: Single strip leakage current I leak  95nA at T  -5C Interstrip capacitance  3pF SVX4 chip 10 modules fully.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
Introduction Silicon Tracker project: design production Tracking strategy and performance Design and performance of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Kim Vervink.
The AMS-02 detector is based on a large acceptance (~0.5 m²sr) and high sensitivity spectrometer composed by a super-conducting magnet (0.8 T), cooled.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
Sensors for CDF RunIIb silicon upgrade LayerR min (cm)1 MeV eq-n cm * * * * * *10.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6 14 th September Outline: Introduction to LHCb and VErtex LOcator (VELO) Status of VELO Beamtests Upgrades Summary LHCb.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Olaf Behrendt on behalf of the VELO group Novosibirsk,
Quality assurance related to system integration of the VELO detector. Jan Buytaert, CERN On behalf of the VELO collaboration. November 4, 2011 Workshop.
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
HPS Collaboration Meeting JLAB, May Tracker Design Status M.Oriunno, SLAC.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
Vertex ‘99, 6/21-25/1999 p. 1 CDF Run II SiliconAlan Sill, Texas Tech University CDF Run II Silicon Tracking Projects 8th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON VERTEX.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
VELO Decisions Thomas Ruf LHCb week February 2001 Interference with LHC machine   LEMIC, January 2001: Presentation of the VELO Vacuum Chamber design.
Vacuum Studies of LHCb Vertex Locator Sensors Gwenaëlle Lefeuvre, Ray Mountain, Marina Artuso Department of Physics, Syracuse University Abstract : The.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
PS Module Ron Lipton, Feb A bit of History During much of the conceptual design phase of the outer tracker we had focused on the “long barrel”
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
A.Cheremukhin (JINR, Dubna) CMS Preshower PRR, July 5-6, 2001, CERN1 Micro-module assembly -  -module elements - alignment of the silicon sensors to the.
The CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Carlo Civinini INFN-Firenze On behalf of the CMS Tracker Collaboration Sixth International "Hiroshima" Symposium on the Development.
R. Lipton Vertex ‘98 Santorini, Greece The D0 Silicon Microstrip Tracker (D0SMT) Outline  Design  Detector Studies Coupling capacitors Radiation Damage.
A novel approach to detector calibration parameter determination and detector monitoring Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb VELO Group CHEP 2010,
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
Commissioning the LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Mark Tobin University of Liverpool On behalf of the LHCb VELO group July 28, 2008Vertex 2008: 17th International.
ADC values Number of hits Silicon detectors1196  6.2 × 6.2 cm  4.2 × 6.2 cm  2.2 × 6.2 cm 2 52 sectors/modules896 ladders~100 r/o channels1.835.
LHCb Vertex Locator (VELO) Lars Eklund École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Liverpool University Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
12 th LECC, Valencia Sep 2006Aldo F. Saavedra 1 The Vertex Detector of LHCb - VeLo Aldo F. Saavedra Glasgow University On behalf of the VeLo group.
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Detector building Notes of our discussion
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool
LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Module Production and Performance
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Simulated vertex precision
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
FNAL Production Experience
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Setup for testing LHCb Inner Tracker Modules
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Module Production and Performance Anthony Affolder University of Liverpool for the LHCb VELO group RD07 Conference June 27, 2007

Slide 2 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Tracker Muons ECAL HCAL Magnet LHCb overview At LHC, bottom production is peaked at high rapidity with both quarks in the same direction LHCb built as forward spectrometer to optimize for the study of bottom quark decays The VErtex LOcator (VELO) is the silicon microstrip vertexer at the collision point  This talk focuses on the VELO module production & performance B B

Slide 3 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 VELO Design Requirements Vertexing  Need to separate (multiple) primary and secondary vertices (<100  m resolution ║ beams) –Close to LHC beam (8 mm) → Vacuum –Extreme radiation levels ~10 14 neq/cm 2 radius →n-strip silicon sensors –Prevent reverse annealing (<-5° C) → CO 2 cooling Tracking  Impact parameter ~40  m (40 fs time resolution) –Low mass ~15% X O Bespoke, severely constrained module design Trigger  Fast computation of primary vertices and impact parameter –R-phi sensor geometry –Tight mechanical tolerances (Limit: 40  m ┴ beams, 200  m ║ beams ) Beams  Injection Clearance O (30 mm) for each half –Moving detectors

Slide 4 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 VELO Modules All 42 installed modules on base  Delivery finished Feb Installation at pit late summer 2007 Data taking starts spring 2008 Consists of:  Carbon fibre clad TPG hybrid core  Laminated with flex hybrids  2 sensors (R & phi geometry)  Carbon-fibre paddle  Precision base  Kapton cables  Silver-plated ground straps R sensor 300 um Phi sensor 300 um Kapton hybrids ~200um Carbon fiber 2x200 um TPG 500 um Carbon fibre base Carbon fibre paddle Invar feet

Slide 5 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Sensors n strip sensor technology (Micron)  n bulk-46 modules (43 installed)  p bulk-2 modules (1 installed) Double metal for signal routing Closest active strip 8.2 mm from beam R sensors  4 quadrants  Pitch from 40  m to 101  m Phi sensor  Divided into inner/outer sensor  Pitch from 35  m to 96  m  Stereo angle –-20° inner, 10° outer 0.3% faulty strips in production sensors Phi R

Slide 6 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Radiation Hardness n strip sensors inherently radiation hard  Collecting electrons increases trapping times/mean free path  With p-spray, isolated even when partially depleted After 3-4 years (6-8 fb -1 ), the inner region of the sensor cannot be fully depleted  Dose estimates –1.3 * neq/cm 2 /year at R = 8 mm –5 * neq/cm 2 /year at R = 42 mm Running partially depleted, the estimated lifetime is ~16 fb -1 Type- inverted Not type–inverted R(cm) V dep After 1 year irradiation J. Libby, et. al. NIMA 494 (2002)

Slide 7 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Hybrid Substrates TPG (Thermal Pyrolitic Graphite) core  4x more thermally conductive than copper  Removes 24 W of heat with a designed  T of 20° C between coolant and sensors –~8° C coolant-hybrid, –~8° C within hybrid –~4° C hybrid-to-sensor Clad in woven Carbon fibre for rigidity -30° C cooling -10° C sensor

Slide 8 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Hybrids 4 layer flex Kapton hybrid (Stevenage)  Laminated under vacuum to prevent trapped air  Double-sided to balance stresses due to “bi-metallic” effects  Flatness extremely difficult to achieve over 12.1 x 17.5 cm –20% rejection of bare hybrids Beetle readout ASICs and Kapton pitch adapters (CERN) attached by hand  Pitch adaptors extremely fine pitch –Inner bond pad 40  m  Not flat → difficult to glue –5% loss due to ASIC and pitch adapter gluing  2 Beetle wafers worth of chips had edge cracks due to dicing –Had to replace 4 modules worth of chips

Slide 9 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Wirebonding Extremely difficult wire bonding Double-sided hybrid with cylindrical geometry  Complex bonding jig 4 row wire bonding  Kapton can shrink/stretch during manufacturing –Each FE and sensor bond had to be re- positioned by hand  Wire bonds per module –2320 Back-end –4096 Front-end and sensor

Slide 10 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Wirebonding Results Problems encountered  Hybrid movement during bonding- took 1 year to remove  Vibration due to nearby construction (pile-driving) –H & K 710 wire bonder severely sensitive to motion Weak wire bonds –Purchased seismometer (Apple Power Book) to monitor motion  Smallest bonding pads on Kapton pitch adaptor over-etched to  m Average time for bonding of 3 man-days per module  But no module failures due to bonding and only 0.3% extra faulty channels introduced Pull strengths Bad period Strip #

Slide 11 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Sensor gluing Sensor attached using custom flip-jig  Align sensors to better than 50  m in translation, 1 mrad in rotation –  x=0.2±6  m –  y=2±11  m –  =-0.041±0.034 mrad  Tricky to glue such large surfaces –Flatness, material & glue thickness –6% lost to gluing errors x y z

Slide 12 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Electrical Testing After each bonding step, the hybrids are electrically tested  Pedestal, noise, and laser (with sensors) Opens and shorts easily found  But pinholes impossible to see –Full laser signal with only 20% increase in noise when inducing a bias current of 5 mA with light –Beetle chip could probably be used with DC coupled sensors Found 3 sensors (6% of modules) with problems with p-spray isolation  Was not possible to test for during probing with current sensor design Noise

Slide 13 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Pedestals Hybrids mounted to VELO base on carbon-fibre pedestals  ~ 0 CTE  Manufactured in-house to avoid air volumes Hybrid glued to pedestal with Smartscope system  For trigger, R sensor aligned to 40  m translation, 1 mrad rotation relative to pedestal base pin

Slide 14 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Mechanical Precision Each module measured on assembly, on cable attachment, and after vacuum testing on CMM  R-sensor (in trigger): –  x=-0.4±9  m,  y=3±13  m  =-0.072±0.131 mrad  Phi-sensor: –  x=-2±8  m,  y=5±18  m  =-0.067±0.141 mrad  But translation along beam difficult (44% outside of ±200  m specification) Added constraint system to hold hybrids at proper location along beam

Slide 15 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Thermal Test All modules tested in vacuum tank with near final CO 2 cooling system and DAQ  ~1x10 -3 mbar with coolant at -30° C Electrical tests confirmed previous faulty channel lists Thermal performance as expected   T=-22.8° C between coolant and sensor –Should be 2-3° C less with cold neighbours  2 modules had anomalous cooling performance and were rejected (4%)

Slide 16 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Every module visually re-inspected on arrival at CERN  3 hrs per module Module Burn-in  Electrical tests in vacuum (10 -6 mbar) –Noise, pedestals, bias currents  Thermal stressing –4 cycles between -30° C and 30° C  Electronics burn-in –>16 hrs at 30° C vacuum chiller vessel Repeater boards

Slide 17 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Reception/Burn-in Results Found damage to bias return wire bonds  Required emergency epoxy fix on first few modules Great stability of module performance  No additional opens/shorts  No ASICs failures  Only 1 sensor showed significant bias current increase during burn-in –Stable for over 3 days HV return line problem Jig pushing bonds at feet R sensor Phi sensor Module #  I/I

Slide 18 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Test of Final Electronic Chain Pack/Visual Inspection Front-end Wirebond Electrical Test Sensor Attachment Quality Assurance 6 Visual Inspections, 6 Metrologies, 7 Electrical Tests, 4 Vacuum Tests Hybrid Electrical TestHybrid Metrology Hybrid Cleaning/Visual Inspection Visual Inspection PA/Chip Attachment Electrical Test Back-end Wirebond Sensor IV Sensor-Sensor Metrology Laser TestSensor Wirebonding Visual Inspection Module Metrology Pedestal Attachment Module Metrology Cable Attachment Module Metrology Vacuum Test Visual Inspection Ship to CERN Visual Inspection Module Burn-in Electrical Test Assemble onto VELO half Thermflow Cooling Vacuum Test Electrical Test VELO Metrology Install in Pit Vacuum Test

Slide 19 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Final Production Numbers 42 installed modules produced over 10 months  63% yield of hybrids  87% yield of sensors 0.6% bad channels per module ~100 man-hours per module Complete VELO

Slide 20 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Radiation Thickness Total radiation thickness of system 18.5% X 0  Largest single source of material is the RF Foil (7.1% X 0 ) –Effort to reduce/remove foil in upgrades  Modules 8.1% X 0 –Sensor 4.7% X 0 –Hybrid 2.6% X 0 –Paddles 0.8% X 0

Slide 21 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 CERN Test Beam z y x A production VELO half with 10 module installed was brought to the CERN muon test beam Nov Targets were added in order to test tracking and vertexing algorithm Enough cooling and DAQ present to operate 6 full modules at a time

Slide 22 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Module Performance Robust signal-to-noise  Average signal (ADC): 52 R, 52 phi  Noise varies within sensor due to changing capacitance – ADC R – ADC phi  Signal-to-noise ~20-27 R, ~24-31 phi p bulk detector module shows expected performance under-depleted  n bulk sensors after inversion will behave similarly R  p bulk n bulk Efficiency Bias Voltage (V) (Very) preliminary results of test beam M29  ADC

Slide 23 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Conclusions VELO module production completed in February 2007  Some of the most complicated silicon strip detectors ever built  Mechanical and electrical performance as expected Commissioning starting now in the pit with data-taking in 2008 In near future, we hope to build a complete spare VELO made with p bulk sensors  Quick replacement in case of beam accident  Hopefully guarantees full functionality until end of LHC run

Slide 24 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 raw noise common mode corrected noise raw noise common mode corrected noise increasing strip length inner strips outer strips PHI SENSOR R SENSOR Noise Performance

Slide 25 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Noise Performance long without overlaid routing line short long with overlaid routing line

Slide 26 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Component Testing All components are tested on arrival from vendors  Sensors –Probe station measurements of IV, CV, strip capacitance –Smartscope measurement of size  Pitch Adaptors –Probe station measurement of strip capacitance  Cables –Resistances, opens, shorts  Hybrids (bare & with surface mounts) –Connectivity, shorts, temperature sensors

Slide 27 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Module Materials Detailed assay of all materials in module made –Module mass: g –With cables: g  Heavy elements are a concern for activation  Activation under study –May impact repair strategy

Slide 28 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Bad Channels 23.5 faulty channels (0.57%) on average  Improving throughout the production 1% total bad channels

Slide 29 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 LHCb VELO Collaboration École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Slide 30 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Wire Bonding Quality Production wire bonding performed by K&S 8090 and 2 H&K 710  Low re-bond rates –Back-end: 0.6% –Front-end: 0.6% –Sensor-end: 0.7%  Extremely low failure rates –Front-end: 0.01% –Sensor-end: 0.002%  Good pull strengths –8090: 10.0±1.5 g –710A: 9.4±1.5 g –710B: 8.9±1.9 g Back-end Bonds Front-end Bonds

Slide 31 LHCb VELO Module Production and Performance -Anthony Affolder RD07, Firenze, June 27, 2007 Front-end chip LHCb: 160x25ns deep, read out in 900 ns => SCTA not OK Design a new chip => the Beetle: 0.25 um CMOS ASIC Used in LHCb by VELO, Pile-Up system, Silicon tracker