1 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC Spring 2013 Update What if integration came standard?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IBM WebSphere Everyplace Access for Multiplatforms Managing the e-business Customer Experience.
Advertisements

Presentation Title | Date | Page 1 Extracting Value from SOA.
Eclipse, M2M and the Internet of Things
Eclipse, M2M and the Internet of Things
Supporting New Business Imperatives Creating a Framework for Interoperable Media Services (FIMS)
Life Science Services and Solutions
ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace Evaluation of Software Providers for Midsize Institutions Bill Reed Director, Special Projects Northern.
Registered charity number Guidance to Clients on Best Practice in Procuring and Delivering Construction Projects Presentation to Netlipse Presented.
HP Quality Center Overview.
OSLC ALM-PLM interoperability Workgroup1 OSLC PLM workgroup 2012 Kick off meeting For discussion.
September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.
© 2013 OSLC Steering Committee1 What if integration came standard? OSLC to be standardized at OASIS Analyst Community Call: 10 AM EDT, 30 May 2013 Open.
© 2013 OSLC Steering Committee1 All hands on deck! Help OSLC standardize at OASIS OSLC Member Section kickoff: 10 AM EDT, 27 June 2013 Open Services for.
This presentation is property of CREATE-NET and is protected by Copyright © Best practices – Semantic interoperability Collaborative Open Market to Place.
© 2006 IBM Corporation IBM Software Group Relevance of Service Orientated Architecture to an Academic Infrastructure Gareth Greenwood, e-learning Evangelist,
1 Corporate Capabilities. Adayana was founded in 2001 to improve human capital performance Our clients come to Adayana to help improve their people’s.
Copyrights 2002 Introduction to SAP Enterprise Portals September SAP Enterprise Portal 101 Naeem Hashmi Chief Technology Officer Information Frameworks.
1 © NOKIA Nokia-W3C-Opening.PPT/ / Ari Jaaksi Nokia and W3C Ari Jaaksi Art Barstow.
Web Content Management – easier way to manage wild web Dong Chen, Lead Web Developer Office of the Chief Information Officer I.T.S / Web Development Bowling.
Driving Productivity with Microsoft Dynamics CRM Presenter Name Presenter Title Presenter Date.
Jj/mm/yyyy An introduction to NESSI Frédéric Gittler HP Labs NESSI Steering Committee Vice-Chairman.
Learning: Re-Imagined Getting Learning to Your Learners with OLSA
Accelerating Product and Service Innovation © 2013 IBM Corporation IBM Integrated Solution for System z Development (ISDz) Henk van der Wijk 23 Januari.
© 2013 IBM Corporation Steve Speicher OSLC Core Lead W3C Linked Data Platform Workgroup IBM Leveraging W3C Linked Data, OSLC, and Open.
Introduction to XBRL Consortium Newcomers Session Presenter: Grant Boyd - Chair XBRL-Marcomm. General Manager - Corporate Services - Institute of Chartered.
Roles and Responsibilities
1. 2 IT innovations in specialized areas where competitors will have difficulty copying Excellence in design of processes and activities and how they.
9/11/ SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER DoD CIO 1 Sample Template Community of Interest (COI) Steering Committee Kick-off Date: POC: V1.0.
The rSmart Group Kuali Days Successful Financial System Implementation Indianapolis April 11,
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
1 © 2012 IBM Corporation Eclipse Lyo Update
- 1 - Roadmap to Re-aligning the Customer Master with Oracle's TCA Northern California OAUG March 7, 2005.
April, 2008 Better Together! Integrated GP & CRM AN INDEPENDENT MEMBER OF BAKER TILLY INTERNATIONAL 505 AFFILIATE OFFICES WORLDWIDE.
EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.
Copyright © 2004 by The Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I). All Rights Reserved 1 Interoperability: Ensuring the Success of Web Services.
NIEM Domain Awareness June 2011 Establishing a Domain within NIEM.
Promoting Web Services Interoperability Across Platforms, Applications and Programming Languages Basic Profile 1.0 August 12, 2003 Copyright © 2003 by.
© 2013 OSLC Steering Committee1 Proposal to Create OSLC Affiliated Technical Committees OSLC Steering Committee Meeting: 1 PM EDT, 8 July 2013 Open Services.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
© 2011 IBM Corporation OSLC Communications Workgroup 21 March 2012.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
Updated September 30, 2010 Open Health Tools (OHT) Strategic Plan.
© 2013 IBM Corporation OSLC WG Transition **DRAFT** Plan 8 April 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR MANAGEMENT. Agenda Information system project Organization analysis.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Title of presentation ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking CRYSTAL ARTEMIS-JU project Seamless Life-Cycle Collaboration for Safety-Critical Systems Engineering Dr.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
History Initial eclipse.org Board of Stewards: Borland IBM Red Hat SuSE MERANT QNX Software Systems Rational Software TogetherSoft Webgain.
The Integration Problem Point-to-point integrations don’t scale Vendor-specific integrations lock you in Over time, the costs of the current set of integrations.
OSLC RM 22 nd June 2009 Workgroup meeting
ELECTRONIC SERVICES & TOOLS Strategic Plan
Introduction to XBRL Consortium Newcomers Session Presenter: Grant Boyd - Vice Chair XBRL-Marcomm. General Manager - Corporate Services - Institute of.
Promoting Web services interoperability across platforms, applications and programming languages Overview Presentation September, 2003.
© 2013 OSLC User Group for Communications OSLC Member Section at OASIS present state and outlook, 6 September 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration.
Annual State Of The Chapter PMI Orange County Chapter June 11, 2013 Tariq Shaikh, PMP – President Greg Scott, PMP – Past President 1.
Canadian SNOMED CT Strategy October 2012 Draft. Content 1 Background Approach Current State Future State Considerations Action Plan.
De Rigueur - Adding Process to Your Business Analytics Environment Diane Hatcher, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC Falko Schulz, SAS Institute Australia., Brisbane,
© 2013 IBM Corporation IBM Rational Solution for Systems and Software Engineering SSE Integrations.
SysML v2 Model Interoperability & Standard API Requirements Axel Reichwein Consultant, Koneksys December 10, 2015.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
WS ►I Promoting Web services interoperability across platforms, applications and programming languages October, 2002.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
ABOUT COMPANY Janbask is one among the fastest growing IT Services and consulting company. We provide various solutions for strategy, consulting and implement.
Open Platform 3.0™ Overview – 3rd August 2016 Dr Christopher J Harding
Roles and Responsibilities
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Open Technology for an Open Lifecycle Sean Kennedy, OSLC Community Development Leader @seanpk8 A look at the challenges facing today’s organizations.
Web Services Interoperability Organization
MAZARS’ CONSULTING PRACTICE
Presentation transcript:

1 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC Spring 2013 Update What if integration came standard?

2 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 THE BACKGROUND OSLC Why, What, How, and Where

3 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 More limited ability to respond to change Constrained by exhausted IT budget and lower productivity More limited ability to respond to change Constrained by exhausted IT budget and lower productivity Integrations consume more of the IT budget: integration failures are the top 2 causes of software project delays* Integrations consume more of the IT budget: integration failures are the top 2 causes of software project delays* The Integration Problem Point-to-point Integrations don’t scale Monocultures lock you in Maintenance, management, and change costs go up over time Creating new integrations is unpredictable Ongoing and unexpected costs drain resources Past choices restrict present action and future vision End-user productivity suffers: Either stuck with the wrong tool, stuck doing manual integration; often stuck doing both End-user productivity suffers: Either stuck with the wrong tool, stuck doing manual integration; often stuck doing both * Commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of IBM.

4 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 The Basics: What is OSLC, and why should I care? OSLC is an open community building practical specifications for integrating software Tool Maker create software using reusable and open assets that will interoperate with other tools both inside and outside your influence providing time and cost savings Tool Manager reduce the complexity and risk of increasingly complex software infrastructures, and improve the value of software across a broader set of internal and external stakeholders Tool User choose the best tools for your job and have them interact seamlessly to achieve traceability and visibility with the rest of your organization Systems Integrator focus energy and resources on higher-value customizations, deliver more business value to your clients, and increase client satisfaction OSLC is beneficial to many stakeholders Contributing Organizations:

5 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 The Executive Summary: OSLC’s Simple Solution Automation Monitoring Increased traceability Architecture of the Web Linked Data Increased reuse Standard Interfaces Better visibility “Just Enough” integration Decreased maintenance costs Users can work seamlessly across their tools (complex and fragile synchronization schemes not required) OSLC is an open and scalable approach to lifecycle integration. It simplifies key integration scenarios across heterogeneous tools

6 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC: Standardizing how tools share lifecycle data Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web Linked Data Platform Working Group Inspired by the web Proven Free to use and share Open Changing the industry Innovative OSLC: Generally applicable: specs available for many domains covering ALM, DevOps, ISM, and PLM Leading choice for strategic integration technology Scenario-driven & Solution-oriented OSLC Member Section The Resource for OSLC Implementers Based on and Shaping the Future of Internet Architecture Open and Independent Governance and Leadership

7 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 THE NEWS Past, Present, and Future 7

8 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC Establishes Itself at OASIS December 2012 OSLC Steering Committee approves plan to standardize OSLC domain specs at OASIS May 2013 OASIS Board unanimously approves creation of the OSLC Member Section co- founded by 22 organizations June 2013 First OSLC Member Section Steering Committee meeting Election announced to fill remaining Steering Committee seat 3Q 2013 OSLC Core 3.0 spec to be contributed to OASIS to launch the OSLC Core Technical Committee 4Q 2013 – 2014 OSLC 3.0 domain specs are contributed to OASIS as they reach finalization OSLC Member Section Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web To be refined with input from the OSLC Member Section participants.

9 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 Broad Support: OSLC Member Section Co-Founders Accenture Bank of America Boeing Creative Intellect EADS Eclipse Foundation EricssonFujitsuIBM JPMorgan Chase Kovair Software KTH Royal Institute of Technology Mentor Graphics National Instruments Persistent Red HatSiemensSodiusSoftware AGTasktop Universidad Politécnica de Madrid WSO2

10 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC Specification Highlights OSLC Performance Monitoring OSLC Reconciliation OSLC Configuration Management New Workgroups OSLC Tracked Resource Set (defines what a service must provide to enable indexing)OSLC Tracked Resource Set OSLC Partial Update (guidance on using HTTP PATCH)OSLC Partial Update New Contributions OSLC Asset Management V2 OSLC Automation V2 OSLC Reconciliation V2 OSLC Performance Monitoring V2 Finalized Specifications OSLC Core and many domain specs working towards V3 W3C Linked Data Platform 2 nd Editor’s Draft published Ongoing Specification Work

11 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 OSLC User Groups Launched  Primary goal: To make it easier for you to make non-technical contributions to OSLC  Examples:  Describing and defining the key integration scenarios for your organization  And even driving those scenarios into future OSLC standards  Collaborating on experience reports, best practice white papers, and other assets  Leading and participating in community marketing, promotion, recruiting, and more  3 User Groups exist already … YOU can join them, or propose new ones  Communications Communications  To discuss, plan and execute communications about the work of the OSLC community.  Embedded Systems Embedded Systems  To explore issues in embedded systems across a broad variety of application domains.embedded systems  Mobile Mobile  To explore and understand the integration scenarios that make Mobile painful for organizations, and to drive these scenarios into OSLC standards.

There are more than enough hurdles to achieving enterprise mobility … What if integration came standard? OSLC User Group for Mobile It all starts with scenarios.

Rocket science is hard enough … Shouldn’t integration come standard? OSLC User Group for Embedded Systems It all starts with scenarios.

14 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 Eclipse Lyo:  Eclipse project created with the goal of providing tools to enable adoption of OSLC specifications.  Content includes  Code libraries (Java, Perl, others under development)  Give developers tools to ease OSLC implementations  Reference implementations of specifications  Provide a starting point for new integrations  Test suites and test reporting. Covers OSLC Core, CM, QM, RM and Asset today.  Accelerate and assess development  Samples, tutorials and documentation  Working samples of OSLC integrations with Bugzilla, Excel, Jazz tools and more. .NET developers, see also the OSLC4Net project on CodePlex 

15 OSLC User Group for Communications, 2013 Approved Standard The Vision for OSLC OASIS OSLC Member Section Steering Committee Technical Committees open-services.net Forums ~~~ ~~..~~ Forums ~~~ ~~..~~ Implementer’s Expo News Resources and Tutorials Eclipse Lyo OSLC4Net LibrariesTest Suites Samples and Examples Reference Implementations W3C LDP WG Use what you need, share what you can. User Groups Subcommittees