CALSIM II - San Joaquin River Basin Refinements and Results Presentation by Dan Steiner On behalf of the San Joaquin River Group Authority March 14, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basics of Reservoir Operations Computer Aided Negotiations Fall 2008 Megan Wiley Rivera.
Advertisements

1 San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority WEF- Central Valley Tour April 23, 2014 Mission Statement : To effectively protect the Exchange.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Climate Change and Water Resources Challenge in California Francis I Chung, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Water Resources.
Sediment Removal as a Water Management Strategy 2014 Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June 13, 2014.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Stanislaus River An overview…. History and Background One of largest tributaries to San Joaquin River Development of Basin began during the Gold Rush.
Groundwater as a Statewide Resource Professor Richard E. Howitt Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Davis Professor Jay R. Lund Civil & Environmental.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
San Joaquin River Restoration Program State of the Rivers Symposium San Joaquin County Ms. Alicia Forsythe May 2, 2011.
Hydrologic Cycle and Watersheds. Hydrologic Cycle Components Precipitation Infiltration Percolation Runoff Evapotranspiration.
Effective Policy Based on Sparse Data TMDLs in the San Joaquin River Basin, California Leslie F. Grober.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
How bad is climate change going to impact water delivery? Kevin Richards and K.T.Shum, EBMUD - California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
1 Regional Report San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region.
The Upper Rio Grande. Multi-objective River and Reservoir System Modeling Flood Control Water Supply Navigation Aquatic/Riparian Habitat Recreational.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
SWRCB Periodic Review Topic #8  Part A – Concerns with 1999 SWRCB EIR analysis.  Part B – Concerns with San Joaquin River Base-flow Construct.  Part.
Return Flows Discussion Continued ESHMC Meeting 6 May 2008 Stacey Taylor.
Alan F. Hamlet Andrew W. Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental.
44 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2011 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 26-28, 2011.
46 th Annual Mid-Pacific Region 2013 Water Users Conference Water Supply Outlook Reno, Nevada January 23-25, 2013.
Draft Recommendations of the San Joaquin Water Quality Management Group Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron and DO Objectives Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Repairing the long-term salinity projection model for the Colorado River basin April 25-27, 2005 International Salinity Forum Riverside, California.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
Cost Allocation Studies for the MP Region Bureau of Reclamation April 29, 2008 Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study Update Public Meeting March.
Modes of Sustainability Definition  In text  In aquifer-storage terms  In water-budget terms  In physical changes at the river (natural side)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
Species or RunONDJFMAMJJAS Fall Chinook Late fall Chinook Winter Chinook Spring Chinook Steelhead Delta smelt Figure 1. Comparison of the timing of life.
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
Assign Annual Demand for a Purpose CALSIM Simulation Compare the Long-term Average Annual Friant Unit Delivery to Benchmark Study CALSIM Simulation Completed.
Water Resources Development Commission (HB 2661) Water Supply & Demand Working Group – Water Supply Sub Committee Major Existing Supply Data and Studies.
Linkage Between StreamStats and Water-Use Database SWUDS Water-Use Database (UNIX/ Ingres) Data Ware- house (Windows/ Access) StreamStats Output Web service.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
Kenneth D. Schmidt Principal Kenneth D. Schmidt & Associates.
OCAP/SDIP Public Information Meeting Chet Bowling - Intro Ann Lubas-Williams – OCAP Andy Chu – SDIP Jerry Johns – EWA Ron Ott – Other CALFED Activities.
Applying WARMF to the SJR Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Offers expanded model domain, including tributaries.
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation State.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Model Overview Application of CALSIM II to Friant System.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
Team  Spatially distributed deterministic models  Many hydrological phenomena vary spatially and temporally in accordance with the conservation.
Introduction Joint Presentation of State Water Contractors and San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
AQUASTAT FAO’s global information system on water and agriculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
A Mass Balance Approach to Evaluate Salinity Sources in the Turlock Groundwater Sub-basin Presentation to Technical Advisory Committee, Central Valley.
2016 Water Inventory and Analysis Report Highlights on Land Use, Water Supply, and Water Budgets Christina Buck, PhD Water Resources Scientist Board of.
Colorado Public Meeting
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
CWEMF Annual Meeting March 2005
The Future of the Colorado River – Business as Usual or ???
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration
Presented by Bryan Kimball
Drought in Upper Colorado Basin
San Joaquin River At Crows Landing 30 June 2010.
Don Pedro Project Relicensing
Tami Thompson - MBK Engineers
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
C2VSimFG State of the IDC Calibration Dominick Amador Woodard & Curran
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
James Gilbert, PhD Nancy Parker
State of Calibration for California Central Valley Groundwater-Surface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) CWEMF 2019 Annual Meeting Folsom, CA Presenter:
Presentation transcript:

CALSIM II - San Joaquin River Basin Refinements and Results Presentation by Dan Steiner On behalf of the San Joaquin River Group Authority March 14, 2005

Calaveras Newman Geographic Scope New Melones New Don Pedro New Exchequer Buchanan Hidden Millerton New Hogan River Stanislaus River Tuolumne River Merced River Stevinson Lander Maze Vernalis Ripon Modesto Chowchilla River Fresno River San Joaquin River San Joaquin River Mendota Pool Delta-Mendota Canal California Aqueduct Delta-Mendota Canal California Aqueduct San Luis Reservoir

CALSIM II San Joaquin River Basin Enhancements Revised hydrology Land use based demands for Eastside water districts and adjacent areas Improved system operating rules Revised mapping of Westside and Eastside connectivity Refinement / Addition of Friant and Calaveras systems New formulation for calculation of water quality at Vernalis

Revised Hydrology Stream Accretions Mass balance approach using long-term gages Accounts for water entering and leaving stream reaches + Downstream Gage - Upstream Gage + Diversions - Return Flows + Runoff Adjustment Resultant Value Represents Precipitation runoff Historical stream-groundwater interaction Gage errors

Representation of Land-use Based Demands Water Use Areas

Representation of Land Use Based Demands Land Use

Conceptual Area Water Balance Based on Land Use Demands CUAW from CU model Non-recoverable losses Deep percolation GW pumping SW Boundary Returns to system

Water Budgets and Representation of System Operations Use historical land use to estimate consumptive use Use historical operations data to perform water budgets Results of water budgets are used to develop Stream diversion requirements Groundwater use parameters District Operations Approach varies depending on available data Validation of system operations Ensure model simulation depicts recent operations

Representation of System Operations Illustrative Example

Validation of System Operations New Don Pedro Operations

Comprehensive San Joaquin River Basin Model Calaveras River Stanislaus River Tuolumne River Merced River Chowchilla River Fresno River San Joaquin River Vernalis Maze Newman Lander Mendota Pool San Joaquin River

Comprehensive San Joaquin River Basin Model Simple Version Including Water Quality

CALSIM II Current Conditions Test Simulation CALSIM II fully integrated model logic, last modifications through January Logic and results are currently under review with Reclamation Represents current basin operations Decision 1641 Decision 1422 New Melones Interim Operations Plan San Joaquin River Agreement

CALSIM II Current Conditions Test Simulation First, results are presented for “Maze”, the San Joaquin River upstream of the Stanislaus confluence Captures the effects of upstream operations of the Merced River and Tuolumne River, and the occasional flow from the upper San Joaquin River and Kings River Water quality estimated with new CALSIM II mass balance approach Results are then presented for “Vernalis”, as the conditions are affected by the Stanislaus River and the operation of New Melones Captures the effects of New Melones operating to the Interim Plan of Operation, sometimes specifically for Vernalis flow and quality objectives

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Maze

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Maze Comparison to Previous Modeling

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Vernalis Stanislaus River Interim Plan of Operations

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Vernalis Vernalis Objectives The current water quality objective at Vernalis is a running 30-day average of 700 uS/cm for April 1 through August 31, and 1000 uS/cm for September 1 through March 31. For the February through June non-pulse period (cfs): October objectives

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Vernalis New Melones Operations and Vernalis

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Vernalis Vernalis Water Quality Compliance

Simulation of San Joaquin River at Vernalis Vernalis Flow Compliance