On the Ground... In the Water... Practical Lessons learned David Heintzman PGE Hydro Licensing NWHA February 20, 2008 NWHA February 20, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Advertisements

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting. NEPA Update Deconstruction Plans Hydraulic Modeling Next Steps Agenda.
Upstream and Downstream Passage of American Eels at the Medway Project, Penobscot River, Maine Scott Hall ————————————— PPL Maine, LLC Milford, Maine Steve.
Ted Craddock, DWR 2014 NWHA Conference Oroville Facilities FERC Project No
University of Iowa Indoor Practice Facility Outside-the-box HVAC Lincoln Pearce, PE – KJWW Engineering David Hahn – University of Iowa Chilled Water Plant.
FLOW 2008 Oct. 7-9, 2008 San Antonio, TX Housatonic River Case Study Robert Gates FirstLight Power Resources Services.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Pond and Wetland BMPs, Retrofitting Detention Basins.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Deployment and Testing of the Alden Fish-Friendly Turbine by EPRI, Alden Research.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
Conowingo Hydroelectric Power Station and Muddy Run Pump Storage Facility Welcomes the Citizens Advisory Committee.
Bryan Nordlund, P.E. National Marine Fisheries Service Lacey, Washington Note: this presentation represents the views of the presenter, and in most cases,
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
Hydropower 1700 ’ s ~ Early 1800 ’ s Bernard Forest de B é lidor, Architecture Hydraulique,
Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty Cedar River Sockeye Hatchery Proposed Adaptive Management Plan.
Intro to Micro-Hydro Power Gary Flomenhoft, BSME, MPP,CEE Lecturer/Research Associate Community and International Development, CDAE Gund Institute, University.
Decommissioning and Site Restoration of Non-Federal Hydroelectric Projects John A. Schnagl Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (202)
PQRS 2013.
1 Building and Maintaining Information Systems. 2 Opening Case: Yahoo! Store Allows small businesses to create their own online store – No programming.
Inside Passage Electric Cooperative, Inc February 20, 2014 FERC P Hoonah, Alaska.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Greenup Locks and Dam, Ohio River.
Claytor Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study Mark Hutchins, Project Manager January 25, 2007.
Design and Performance of the River Mill Surface Collector
NORTH FORK SKOKOMISH POWERHOUSE & FISH FACILITIES 2014 NWHA Generation on the Upgrade Matthew Wilson, P.E.
Types of Positive Barrier Screens  Rotary Drum  Fixed Vertical Plate  Vertical Traveling – belt and panel  Non-Vertical Fixed Plate  Horizontal Fixed.
October 29, 2009 Scope Creep… Or Is it? David Heintzman PGE – Hydro Licensing NWHA/NHA Regional Forum October 28, 2009.
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
October 17, 2015 Scope Creep in FERC License Implementation Joint NWHA and NHA Northwest Regional Meeting Panelist: Stephanie Burchfield.
1 Potential Project Betterments to be studied further during Relicensing June 20, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project.
New Technologies: Fish & Wildlife Permitting Issues Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP NWHA Annual Conference – February 20, 2008.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Visit by Government Officials from Mozambique COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM BRIEFING III U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division North Pacific Water.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
SCOPE CREEP IN LICENSE IMPLEMENTATION  Root Causes Ambiguous license terms/plans Ambiguous license terms/plans Changing social values Changing social.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Percheron Power, LLC’s Proof of Power Project on Potholes East Canal (POP ‐ PEC) 2011 Water Power project.
Head works.
LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix NOAA Biological Goals: 1) Allow fish the opportunity to exit the ladder without stalling or excessive up/down.
In-Delta Fish Screen Facilities Delta Wetlands Proposed Facilities and Basis for Re-Engineered Facilities.
Martin Rule Curve Study Ashley McVicar, APC Maurice James, Water Resources Consulting LLC.
Pool and Chute Fishways
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
NORTH FORK SKOKOMISH POWERHOUSE & FISH FACILITIES 2013 NORTHWEST HYDRO OPERATORS FORUM STEVEN FISCHER, P.E.
Implementing Wave Energy Process and Permitting Issues Presented by Therese Hampton February 20, 2008.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
A New Spin on Energy. What is hydroelectric Power? A way to use the force of falling water to create electrical energy At its base is the conservation.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Public Meeting May 15, 2007, 6-9 pm Millville Grange Palo Cedro, CA.
October 28, 2015 Yuba River Development Project Slide 1 Licensee Response to Relicensing Participant Tunnel Closure Proposal Yuba County Water Agency Yuba.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Fish Passage Lessons Learned on the Hudson River Hudson Valley Restoration Coordination Meeting Columbia Greene CC, Hudson, NY, Oct. 15, 2015 Curtis Orvis,
Species Main focus for NMFS is ESA listed salmonids, Main focus for NMFS is ESA listed salmonids, Equal focus for NMFS is to protect essential fish habitat.
Should Fish PM&E Compliance = Success?. Skagit Project History  Relicensed 1995  18 Years of PM&E Implementation  30 Year License remains in effect.
USFWS Perspectives on Hydro ESA Consultation Strategies for Effective, Timely Section 7 Consultation Doug Young Energy Program Manager, FWS, Oregon.
Pam Jeane Deputy Chief Engineer- Operations Sonoma County Water Agency Habitat Enhancement and Water Delivery.
Touchet Consolidation Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Wanapum Dam Total Dissolved Gas Characterization Evaluation of the Wanapum Dam Fish Bypass (WFB) 2008.
Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Information Presentation to YBFEPT July.
1 Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Report Yolo Bypass Fisheries Enhancement.
Biological Opinions and ESA Consultations Ritchie Graves NMFS-NWR Hydropower Division Portland, Oregon February 19, 2013.
What is OneWater? “One Water is an integrated planning and implementation approach to managing finite water resources for long-term resiliency and reliability,
Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing
Improving Fish Passage on the River Almond
McNary Juvenile Fish Emergency Bypass System
Low Impact Hydro Evaluation Snohomish PUD
North Augusta High School – Phase 2A and 2B
ENERGY AND WATER Experiences with recommendations (1).
Pacific Northwest Fish Screening and Passage Workshop 2013
Plenary
Presentation transcript:

On the Ground... In the Water... Practical Lessons learned David Heintzman PGE Hydro Licensing NWHA February 20, 2008 NWHA February 20, 2008

“Practical” Lesson Flavors Painful Surprising Anticipated Fortuitous Unfortunate Insightful NWHA February 20, 2008

The Project Willamette Falls Hydroelectric Project –Located at Natural Water Falls/Barrier –Highly modified over prior 150 years, Physical development (other industry) Fish resources (State fish ladder, hatchery ops) End of prior 50-year license –Totally different landscape Resource management Relicensing process and expectations NWHA February 20, 2008

Challenge(s) »Fish »Fish & »Lamprey Fish Provide safer downstream passage of juvenile salmonids past the Project (i.e., through the Powerhouse AND over the Falls.) NWHA February 20, 2008

Challenges Find alternative to Criteria Screening of Powerhouse intake of 7,000cfs and large forebay elevation changes. “Modified” flow around Falls leading to responsibility of fish over Falls. Survival standard goal (99.5%) vs. Actionable survival standard (>98%). NWHA February 20, 2008

Implemented Actions Alternate Powerhouse Bypass systems –Improved Forebay hydraulics –New Fish Bypass Route (2 total) –Test to prove performance Safer passage over Falls during the adverse conditions –Flow Control Structure to focus low flows. –Test “passed” fish to prove performance NWHA February 20, 2008

New and extended guidewall Paved forebay floor Curved rack entrance New Bypass System chute Existing bypass outfall link chute

Flow Control Structure (FCS) Three 50’ wide flow bays (inflatable bladder gates) NWHA February 20, 2008 Natural chute into deep pool

Lessons Learned Engaging participants responsible for the resource to help protect the resource works...but it takes time and effort. Testing performance of alternate structures is time consuming and expensive. Things change, but frequent stakeholder site visits and conversation during construction makes field changes easier and acceptable. Settlement vs. FERC license: How to satisfy both as well as parties. NWHA February 20, 2008

Other Lessons Learned  Lamprey (the ‘other’ fish) proved difficult to manage...not well understood, not listed.  Older Project details not well documented  Field fit -> performance->more testing  “Make it happen” construction needs restraint (air-raid horns at ‘oh-dark-thirty’ not good!)  Be open to, and watch for, gifts (ingenuity, agency ideas, secondary benefits, etc.)  Settlement vs. FERC License....longer term!?!? NWHA February 20, 2008