AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Advertisements

April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) & LOCAL CONTROL ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN (LCAP)
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Budget Study Session January 19, 2010 Revised January 20, 2010.
ADULT EDUCATION LEGISLATIVE UPDATE. Adult Ed Redesign & Reinvestment The League is tracking three key elements of the adult education reform work: AB.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
EADM 732 Maria E. Haigh Lupe Valdivia Marissa Fulache.
School Improvement: Tier I, Tier II, Tier II and More! Partnerships for Results: Strategies for Educational Improvement KU/KSDE Lawrence, Kansas June 11,
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Title I School Restructuring Meeting NH Department of Education April 14, :00am-12:00pm.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
SIP Training Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 29, 2012.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – Reviewed on 8-May-12. The content was not modified. Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Supporting the Improvement of Washington Districts and Schools.
Contra Costa County Office of Education Court & Community Schools Stakeholder Meetings Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) Local Control Accountability.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
November 21,  Ramona Coats:  Introduction  Bo Merritt:  GMS updates  Daniel Fryar  Allocation updates  Kay Townsend:  Fiscal report  Melissa.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Making Sense of the Federal Stimulus Package Andrea Ball,
Local Control Accountability Plan Forestville Union School District December 2013.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) & SFUSD Options. What is the School Improvement Grant (SIG) Program? The CA Dept. of Ed. was required to submit the list.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Nebraska Department of Education State of the Schools Report October 21, :00 a.m.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Legislative Update June 11, FY Budget  House Passes Budget (6/7/13) Base Student Cost of $2,101, up from current $2,012, below $2,771.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Legislative Update May 14, FY Budget  Senate Finance Committee finalized Budget (5/3/13) Budget to be debated in full Senate on 5/15/13.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Presentation transcript:

AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010

Persistently Low Achieving Schools As part of the regulations associated with the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA), School Improvement Grant (SIG), Race to the Top (RTTT), and Senate Bills X5.1and X5.4, California must identify the lowest achieving schools and implement a school intervention model to improve performance

Identification Criteria The State in accordance with Federal guidelines creates the methodology of selecting the schools. – AYP proficiency average for last 3 years – 50 points in API over last 5 years. – Below a 60% graduation rate. The lowest 5% of schools are identified in 3 tiers of identification.

Three Tiers of Identification Tier I Those schools receiving Title 1 monies who meet the guidelines. Tier II Those schools not receiving Title 1 monies who meet the guidelines. Tier III Those schools who are not in Tier I or II, but do not have a 60% graduation rate.

A. B. Miller High School AYP Proficiency average for last 3 years % API over last 5 years – : 0 – : -21 – : +19 – : 0 – : -6 – Total Growth: -8

What Does this Mean? We must adopt one of four models for school improvement.

School Intervention Models Turnaround: remove Principal and Staff, rehire no more than 50% of original staff, adopt a new governance structure, implement a research-based instructional program aligned to the State Standards, increase learning time Restart: school is closed and reopens as a charter school, operated by an approved State Charter Operator School Closure: school is closed and students enroll in a higher achieving FUSD school Transformation: remove Principal, improve teacher and school leader effectiveness, increase learning time, institute instructional reform, create a community- oriented school, provide operational flexibility

When Do We Have to Do This? If we adopt for the year we are eligible for between $50,000 and $2,000,000 in Federal funding each year for three years. If we adopt for the year we are not promised to receive any funding, but we still must restructure.

Next Steps We are researching all four options We are obtaining input from all stakeholders – Community, SSC, ELAC, Teachers, Staff, Parents, Students, Board Members, District personnel. Complete School Improvement Grant (SIG) We must obtain Board approval prior to submitting our application

Time Line February 25: from CDE that the PLAS list would be released in March March 3: FUSD notified by CDE March 5: Conference Call – Federal, State, County, District March 8: List Released to Public March 11: State Board Meeting – Criteria Approved March 16 & 17: CAHSEE Testing March 17: Conference Call – Federal, State, County, District …FUSD Board Presentation March 22-26: Spring Break April 6: District Receives Draft of Application April 7: Superintendent Begins Negotiations with FTA …Superintendent Address to Faculty and Staff April 8 & 9: Administration Intervention Training April 12 : SIG Team Meeting April 12 & 13: Community Meetings April 12-16: CST Testing April 21: Public Hearing, Board Presentation and Vote May 19: Application, MOU’s, and plan submitted for Board approval June 1: Application submitted to CDE August 1: Preliminary approval from CDE August 10: Key elements must be in place October 1: Revised plan submitted to State Fall 2010: Funding begins to arrive at District.

Questions and Comments