Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Advertisements

Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Intro to Spectral Analysis and Matlab. Time domain Seismogram - particle position over time Time Amplitude.
Houston, TX | May 2, 2012 Finding blind faults using ground roll reflection Craig Hyslop Robert Stewart.
Attenuating the ice flexural wave on arctic seismic data David C. Henley.
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley University of Utah.
Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Every Bounce in a Multiple G. Schuster, J. Yu, R. He U of Utah.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
Projectiles Horizontal Projection Horizontally: Vertically: Vertical acceleration g  9.8 To investigate the motion of a projectile, its horizontal and.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Fourier and Wavelet Transformations Michael J. Watts
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Computing Attributers on Depth-Migrated Data Name : Tengfei Lin Major : Geophysics Advisor : Kurt J. Marfurt AASPI,The University of Oklahoma 1.
Reverse Time Migration of Prism Waves for Salt Flank Delineation
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Benefits & Limitations of Least Squares Migration W.Dai,D.Zhang,X.Wang,GTSKAUST RTM Least Squares RTM GOM RTM GOM LSRTM.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Fourier and Wavelet Transformations
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
A pseudo-unitary implementation of the radial trace transform
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Least-squares Reverse Time Migration with Frequency-selection Encoding for Marine Data Wei Dai, WesternGeco Yunsong Huang and Gerard T. Schuster, King.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah

Problem: Ground Roll Degrades Signal Offset (ft) Time (sec) Reflections GroundRoll

Problem: PS Waves Degrade Signal Time (sec) Reflections Converted S Waves

Time (sec) 4.0 Reflections Converted S Waves 3100 Depth (ft) Time(s) 0.14 Problem: Tubes Waves Obscure PP Reflections Aliased tube waves

Problem: Dune Waves Obscure PP Dune Waves

Coherent Filtering Methods Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion and Discussion Outline

F-K Dip Filtering F-K Dip Filtering Filtering in  - p domain Filtering in  - p domain linear  - p linear  - p parabolic  - p parabolic  - p hyperbolic  - p hyperbolic  - p Least Squares Migration Filter Least Squares Migration Filter Traditional Filtering Methods

Distance Time NOISE SIGNAL Wavenumber Frequency Separation Principle: Exploit Differences in Separation Principle: Exploit Differences in Moveout & Part. Velocity Directions SIGNAL NOISE Transform Overlap Signal & Noise

Distance Time P Tau Transform Sum Tau-P Transform Tau-P Transform

Distance Time Transform P Tau

Distance Time Transform P Tau Mute Noise

Tau Distance Time Transform Problem: Indistinct Problem: Indistinct Separation Signal/Noise P Tau-P Transform Tau-P Transform

Tau Distance Time Transform P Hyperbolic Transform Hyperbolic Transform Distinct Separation Distinct Separation Signal/Noise Signal/Noise

Distance Time Breakdown of Hyperbolic Assumptionvvvvvvvvv * A B Irregular Moveout

Distance Time A B p Time Filtering by Parabolic  - p Signal/NoiseOverlap

Distance Time PP Filtering by LSMF PS d = L m pp d = L m + L m ss sP-reflectivity KirchhoffModeler Invert for m & m p s

Distance Time PS PP Filtering by LSMF M1M1M1M1 M2M2M2M2 Z X Lp Ls

Distance Time PS PP Z ss d = L m + L m pp x ss M1M1M1M1 M2M2M2M2 X pp z

Summary Traditional coherent filtering based on Traditional coherent filtering based on approximate moveout approximate moveout LSMF filtering operators based on LSMF filtering operators based on actual physics separating signal & noise actual physics separating signal & noise Better physics --> Better focusing, more $$$ Better physics --> Better focusing, more $$$

Outline Coherent Filtering Methods Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Surface Wave Data ARCO Surface Wave Data Multicomponent Data Example Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion and Discussion

ARCO Field Data Offset (ft) Time (sec)

LSM Filtered Data (V. Const.) Offset (ft) Time (sec) ARCO Field Data

F-K Filtered Data (13333ft/s) Offset (ft) Time (sec) LSM Filtered Data (V. Const.)

F-X Spectrum of ARCO Data Offset (ft) Frequency (Hz) S. of LSM Filtered Data (V. Const) S. of F-K Filtered Data (13333ft/s)

Coherent Filtering Methods Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Graben Example Mahogony Example Mahogony Example Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion and Discussion Outline

Graben Velocity Model Depth (m) X (m) V1=2000 m/s V2=2700 m/s V3=3800 m/s V4=4000 m/s V5=4500 m/s

Synthetic Data Time (s) 0 Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 Horizontal Component Vertical Component PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4

LSMF Separation Time (s) 0 Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

True P-P and P-SV Reflection Time (s) 0 Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

F-K Filtering Separation Time (s) 0 Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 Horizontal Component Vertical Component PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4

Coherent Filtering Methods Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Multicomponent Data Example Graben Example Graben Example Mahogony Field Data Mahogony Field Data Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion and Discussion Outline

CRG1 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG1 Data after Using F-K Filtering

CRG1 Raw Data CRG1 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4

CRG1 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG1 Data after Using LSMF

CRG2 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG2 Data after Using F-K Filtering (vertical component)

CRG2 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG2 Raw Data (vertical component)

CRG2 (Vertical component) Time (s) 0 4 CRG2 Data after Using LSMF (vertical component)

Coherent Filtering Methods Coherent Filtering Methods ARCO Field Data Results ARCO Field Data Results Multicomponent Data Example Multicomponent Data Example Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion and Discussion Outline

Filtering signal/noise using: moveout Filtering signal/noise using: moveout difference & particle velocity direction difference & particle velocity direction - Traditional filtering $ vs $$$$ LSMF LSMF computes moveout and particle LSMF computes moveout and particle velocity direction based on true physics. velocity direction based on true physics. Conclusions