RIPE-501bis Merike Kaeo Sander Steffann Jan Žorž.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Why do current IP semantics cause scaling issues? −Today, “addressing follows topology,” which limits route aggregation compactness −Overloaded IP address.

Advertisements

Jan Žorž Story about RIPE-501 and RIPE-554 1

IPv4 to IPv6 Migration strategies. What is IPv4  Second revision in development of internet protocol  First version to be widely implied.  Connection.

IPV4 TO IPV6 By Justin Bode for CPE UNR. Introduction  Why do we need a new version of IP?  What does IPv6 look like?  New features of IPv6 

 Reference:  Vehicle has 2 MANET routers, interconnected via Ethernet  Vehicle has access to 3 wireless networks  Applications on MANET Routers use.

1 Requirements Catalog Scott A. Moseley Farbum Scotus.

Jan Žorž Rome Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment (and other stuff...) Sander Steffann, Jan Žorž 1 RIPE61, November.

IPv6: The Next Generation Internet Dipen Chauhan.

Network Layer Packet Forwarding IS250 Spring 2010

1 Version 3.0 Module 8 Virtual LANs. 2 Version 3.0.

Chapter 6 Network Address Translation (NAT). Network Address Translation  Modification of source or destination IP address  Needed by networks using.

NEtwork MObility By: Kristin Belanger. Contents Introduction Introduction Mobile Devices Mobile Devices Objectives Objectives Security Security Solution.

IP Address Classes How large is the network part in an IP address? Today we use network masks to tell Originally, IP had address classes with fixed numbers.

Mobility Complexity IP4 and IP6. IP4 Mobility Static device talks to home agent Bidirectional tunnel to mobile device –Else ingress filtering problem.

© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 OSI Network Layer Network Fundamentals – Chapter 5 Sandra Coleman, CCNA, CCAI.

IPv6 Site Renumbering Gap Analysis draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-02 draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-02 Bing Liu (speaker), Sheng Jiang, Brian.E.Carpenter,

DS-Lite for Point-to- Point Access Network IETF 78 Maastricht 2010 July 30.

And how they are used. Hubs send data to all of the devices that are plugged into them. They have no ability to send packets to the correct ports. Cost~$35.

2002 년 2 학기이동인터넷프로토콜 1 Mobile IP:Overview 년 2 학기이동인터넷프로토콜 2 Mobile IP overview Is Mobile IP an official standard? What problems does Mobile IP solve?

2002/3/18 Min. Req. for IPv6 LCNA 1 Minimum Requirement of IPv6 for Low Cost Network Appliance draft-okabe-ipv6-lcna-minreq-01.txt Minimum Requirement.

Network Administration. What is a Systems Administrator?  Person responsible for:  Setting up servers  Configuring the environment for web and other.

TCP/IP History 1970 – ARPANET started using Network Control Protocol 1972 – Telnet was implemented 1973 – FTP was introduced 1974 – TCP was specified 1981.

10 Semester 1 JEOPARDY Frank Mann LayersPathsPathsSubnetsSubnetsClassesClassesReservedReserved

ISP Edge NAT 10/8 “Home” Network Upstreams and Peers /32

1 IETF 78: NETEXT Working Group IPSec/IKEv2 Access Link Support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 IPSec/IKEv2-based Access Link Support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Sri Gundavelli.

Wes George, Chris Donley, Christopher Liljenstolpe, Lee Howard.

COMPUTER NETWORKING.  Definition  Need & advantages  Types of network  Basics of network architecture  LAN Topologies  Network models  Network.

Device Reset Characterization draft-ietf-bmwg-reset-02 Rajiv Asati Carlos Pignataro Fernando Calabria Cesar Olvera Presented by Andrew.

IETF 81: V6OPS Working Group – Proxy Mobile IPv6 – Address Reservations 1 Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Sri Gundavelli (Cisco)

6to4 Historic A review of the history of the discussion, in part in response to Keith Moore’s appeal.

IPv6 Site-Local Discussion Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman IETF 56 San Francisco March 2003.

Jan Žorž RIPE 63, Vienna RIPE-501 replacement document 1 Vienna, 2011.

1 Requirements for Internet Routers (Gateways) and Hosts Relates to Lab 3. (Supplement) Covers the compliance requirements of Internet routers and hosts.

V6OPS WG – IETF #85 IPv6 for 3GPP Cellular Hosts draft-korhonen-v6ops-rfc3316bis-00 Jouni Korhonen, Jari Arkko, Teemu Savolainen, Suresh Krishnan.

Mobile IP 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 VoIP 특론 순천향대학교 정보기술공학부 이 상 정 2 References  Tutorial: Mobile IP

1 12-Jan-16 OSI network layer CCNA Exploration Semester 1 Chapter 5.

1 ipv6-node-02.PPT/ 18 November 2002 / John Loughney IETF 55 IPv6 Working Group IPv6 Node Requirements draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-02.txt John Loughney.

1 IEX8175 RF Electronics Avo Ots telekommunikatsiooni õppetool, TTÜ raadio- ja sidetehnika inst.

Balanced Security for IPv6 CPE draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security-01 IETF89 London M. Gysi, G. Leclanche, E. Vyncke, R. Anfinsen.

1 Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks K. Chittimaneni, E. Vyncke, M. Kaeo RIPE65, September 27, 2012 Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Problem Statement: IP Address Configuration for IPDVB draft-stiemerling-ipdvb-config-02.txt M. Stiemerling (Ed.), G. Gardikis, H. Asgari, D. Negru, T.

1 ipv6-node-02.PPT/ 18 November 2002 / John Loughney IETF 55 IPv6 Working Group IPv6 Node Requirements draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-02.txt John Loughney.

Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia July 2009 Dual-stack Lite Mobility Solutions IETF-75

IETF IPv6 Activities Update Thomas Narten ARIN XVI October 26, 2005.

.  Hubs send data from one computer to all other computers on the network. They are low-cost and low-function and typically operate at Layer 1 of the.

Multicast Routing Optimization Juan-Carlos Zúñiga Luis M. Contreras Carlos J. Bernardos Seil Jeon Younghan Kim MULTIMOB WG, July

IETF-53-IPv6 WG- Cellular host draft 1 Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host Jari Arkko Peter Hedman Gerben Kuijpers Hesham Soliman John Loughney.

GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.

NETWORKING COMPONENTS Jeffery Rice LTEC Assignment 3.

Service Flows Distribution and Handoff Technique based on MIPv6 draft-liu-dmm-flows-distribution-and-handoff-00

Original author of previous version of this presentation: Jordi Palet

IETF 55 IPv6 Working Group IPv6 Node Requirements

Best Current Operational Practice for operators: IPv6 Prefix Assignment for end-customers – persistent vs non-persistent and what size to choose …known.

Chapter 10: DHCP Routing & Switching Chapter 10: DHCP

Cisco Want to Pass CCNA Cisco Certified Network Associate Exam

Routing and Switching Essentials v6.0

Unit – 2 TCP.

Carles Gomez, S. M. Darroudi

Minimum Requirement of IPv6 for Low Cost Network Appliance

Networking Essentials

Network Hardware and Protocols

IETF-100, MPTCP WG, November 2017

Mobile IP Outline Homework #4 Solutions Intro to mobile IP Operation

Wi-Fi/wireless router

IPv6 Addresses Hwajung Lee Key Reference:

SAVI Requirements and Solutions for IPv4/IPv6 Transition

Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)

Requirements for IPv6 Routers draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-02

Presentation transcript:

RIPE-501bis Merike Kaeo Sander Steffann Jan Žorž

RIPE 501 We now have requirements for: – hosts – consumer grade layer 2 switch – enterprise/ISP grade layer 2 switch – router or layer 3 switch – network security equipment – IPv6 support in software

Room for improvement RFC 2460, RFC 4291, RFC 3484(bis), RFC 4193, RFC 4443, RFC 3315, RFC 4862, RFC 1981, RFC 4861, RFC 4213, RFC 6214, RFC 3596, RFC 2671, RFC 3226, RFC 4605, RFC 2401, RFC 2406, RFC 2402, RFC 4306, RFC 4718, RFC 2407, RFC 2408, RFC 2409, RFC 3775, RFC 5555, RFC 4877, RFC 5095, RFC 4884, RFC 3971, RFC 4941, RFC 3736, RFC 2474, RFC 3140, RFC 3972, RFC 4301, RFC 4303, RFC 4302, RFC 3411, RFC 3412, RFC 3413, RFC 3414, RFC 3810, RFC 4821

Room for improvement We also need requirements for: – CPEs – Mobile nodes

Way forward 1.Change RIPE 501? 2.New document with supporting notes? We chose option 2

What’s in the new document? General information how to use RIPE-501 document Definitions (wording what exactly is it) – Host – Switch – Router – Security – CPE device – Mobile node

What’s in the new document? CPE requirements – Mandatory RFC s – Optional RFC s Mobile node requirements – Mandatory RFC s – Optional RFC s

What’s in the new document? Discussing the mandatory and optional RFCs in this room will not be very useful… We will post a draft to the mailing list

Remaining questions Other feedback on RIPE 501? Have we addressed all concerns?

Remaining questions Document structure: – One document – Split: CPE and Mobile node requirements Supporting notes