MICE RF System Review Closeout September 10, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE RF workshop 16t h February 2012 Daresbury Laboratory Response to RF review for the MICE RF system.
Advertisements

MICE RF Cavities and RFCC Module Update Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE RF Workshop Daresbury Laboratory, UK April 17, 2012 April 17,
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
Andrew Moss ASTeC MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011 MICE RF System.
Project Update for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (RAL) Mark Palmer Fermilab December 15, 2014.
BEPCII RF POWER SYSTEM RF group, IHEP Sep ~ April 1.The 1 st transmitter had finished installing,commissioning and SAT (Site Acceptance Test).
MICE Refurbishment of CERN RF equipment for MICE M. Vretenar, CERN AB/RF.
Collaboration meeting, RAL, 4 th – 7th November 2009 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, RAL, 10 th – 13 th november 2009 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
RF Measurement Plan Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 20, 2011 MICE Video Conference Meeting.
THE MICE RF SYSTEM J.F.Orrett* A.J.Moss, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, UK Accelerator Science and Technology Centre
MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module work group report Wing Lau – Oxford.
Global Magnet Systems including Field Mapping MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011 M Courthold – RAL R Preece - RAL.
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Requirements Management 6/ Requirements IEEE Standard Glossary A condition or capability needed by a user to solve.
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
RF Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Single-Cavity Module Installation at MuCool Test Area Yağmur Torun MICE Collaboration Meeting February 15, 2013.
Andrew Moss ASTeC 7 th December 2011 MICE RF System.
Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 h – 23 h October 2008 Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting, DL, 19 th – 23 th October 2008 MICE RF distribution system.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
1 MICE RF Daresbury Laboratory Support Joe Orrett - ASTeC.
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Stefan Simrock, DESY LLRF-ATCA Review, Dec. 3, 2007 Requirements for the ATCA based LLRF.
Andrew Moss ASTeC Collaboration meeting CM29 15 th - 18 th February 2011 MICE RF System.
The status of the construction of MICE Step IV K. Long, on behalf of the MICE collaboration.
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report February 2012 Chris White, STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting CM32,
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
MICE RF Cavities and RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello and Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM32 at RAL, UK February 9, 2012 February.
MICE Coupling Coil Testing at Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting Ruben Carcagno March 19, R. Carcagno - MICE CC Testing at Fermilab3/19/2012.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SCL Vacuum Control System Upgrade Derrick Williams
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
PASI OsC meeting 12th July 2012
1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM33 Glasgow University 25 th – 29 th June 2012 STFC Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors : Ian Mullacrane.
1 The ILC Control Work Packages. ILC Control System Work Packages GDE Oct Who We Are Collaboration loosely formed at Snowmass which included SLAC,
Krzysztof Czuba1 REFERENCE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR THE TESLA TECHNOLOGY BASED PROJECTS Krzysztof Czuba Matthias Felber.
MICE RF System Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Andrew Moss STFC Daresbury Laboratory MICE UK.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
OsC mtg 15/10/2014 MICE Step IV Alan Grant. Content Step IV – Construction Status – Finances – Schedule – Risks – Summary 2.
LHC machine protection close-out 1 Close-out. LHC machine protection close-out 2 Introduction The problem is obvious: –Magnetic field increase only a.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Wojciech Jalmuzna, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer.
MICE RF – Installation at RAL Tim Stanley RAL 7 November 2013.
Status of MICE RF for Step V’ (at LBNL) Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory December 6, 2014.
201 MHz Cavity Plans Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 11, 2011 MAP Friday Video Conference Meeting.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
Status of Vertical Test Stand at RRCAT P Shrivastava, P Mohania,D.Baxy, Vikas Rajput S C Joshi, S Raghavendra,S K Suhane RRCAT, Indore November 26, 2012.
US Construction Project: SSs, PRY, Cavities and test program MICE Project Board and RLSR – November 17, 2014 Alan Bross1.
RFCC Engineering Status and Plans Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Meeting March 6, 2012 March 6, 2012.
US Construction Project: SSs, PRY, Cavities and test program 1.
Schedule and Milestones Roy Preece STFC RAL FAC 17 th April 2015.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Steps towards beam commissioning: Low Level RF system group Thomas Schilcher :: Paul Scherrer Institut SwissFEL.
Reliability and Performance of the SNS Machine Protection System Doug Curry 2013.
Andrew Moss ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory October 2010 MICE RF Amplifier Status.
RF Systems and Controls for the LERF CM Tests
Completion of the MICE-US construction project
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
MICE RF System Power Supplies, Control and Monitoring Status report
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
RF operation of REX-ISOLDE
PSS verification and validation
Close-out.
Presentation transcript:

MICE RF System Review Closeout September 10, 2015

Committee Terry Anderson, FNAL Jean-Pierre Delahaye, SLAC/CERN Mark Keelan, RAL Mark Palmer, FNAL (chair) Ralph Pasquinelli, FNAL Robert Rimmer, JLAB Yagmur Torun, IIT (remotely joining)

Findings The re-baselined MICE RF system is much simpler with only 2 cavities and greatly reduced RF distribution system. This improves the chances that the systems can be delivered and commissioned on the tight schedule. The desired RF gradient has been demonstrated in the MTA with similar (but not identical), magnetic field. This is very encouraging. A revised version of the RF couplers should improve reliability and the critical RF window structure will be protected by the PRY magnetic shield. The pulse length in the MTA was significantly shorter than that needed for MICE so this needs to be demonstrated, however a somewhat reduced pulse length or lower gradient could be tolerated at the expense of statistics in the experiment. Only two RF stations are now needed. One has been commissioned and met spec but has been disassembled and mostly returned to Daresbury. The second one is in progress but appears to be going very slowly due to other resource priorities. There are two spare TH116 tubes in addition to the two new or fairly new tubes to be installed. This should be adequate for the experimental run.

Findings Although the energy loss in the channel is reduced to 5%, the reduced RF will not completely compensate the energy loss through the absorbers. The effect of energy compensation (or deceleration in the opposing phase) however will be big enough to measure with acceptable accuracy to validate simulations, and the technical goals of running the RF in the magnetic field and in close proximity to absorbers and sensitive instrumentation can be demonstrated. A draft list of RF system interlock signals is being developed by the collaboration. The definition of the hardware to implement the RF system interlocks is not yet clear. The interface to vacuum and personnel safety systems must also be well-defined.

Findings Both a precision water temperature control loop and a mechanical tuner system are being developed. The water system is based on proven hardware at DL and the mechanical tuner with air actuators was demonstrated at MTA. An improved version of the air actuator is being developed at LBNL for higher reliability. These two systems provide some duplication of function on similar time scales. On the plus side this could provide redundancy, but the feedback systems could also interact The LLRF system for MICE is in the conceptual stage. It is planned to use the proven LLRF4 board for the RF control part and develop a new labview based module, drawing on similar software used in the MTA test program, for the signal analysis and monitoring. The tuner control was shown as a separate function but might be also integrated into one or the other of these functional blocks. Loss of key personnel is a concern in this area and rebuilding this capability is urgent. Commissioning of the RF modules off-line is very important to identify any problems before installation into the cooling channel. At least one fully operational RF system (including controls and interlocks) will be required to support this. Neither the cavities nor the new couplers will have been pre-commissioned so the first time they will see RF power will be in the hall. There are plenty of spare cavities and two spare couplers will be built, but once installed in MICE it will be very difficult to access to make any repairs.

Findings Installation will require opening the insulating vacuum in the hall. A portable clean room and procedures such as used in the MTA will be used to minimize particulate intrusion into the vacuum space, which is connected to the cavities. The other beam line spaces and components must likewise be kept clean and treated in a similar manner. A slow pump down protocol may be needed to minimize the risk of particulate migration within the module due to turbulent flow. The TH116 power tube has a known good lifetime approaching 15,000 hours at ISIS. With four tubes in inventory, this should be adequate for the life of the program. If there is no hot spare RF system, a full list of repair parts should be on site at RAL to allow repair of a broken RF system Rotatable flanges on the RF rigid coax should be employed at all critical connections. As described, the only “flexible” sections are one-meter long heliax, which is not that flexible. The RF controls will be based on Labview and will require an interface to the MICE EPICs control system. It may not be compatible with the operations of ISIS and that could be an issue if the ISIS operations crew is expected to monitor MICE on off shifts 24/7. Software for a control system is also not trivial and could require significant investment of software professionals. The construction of a second RF amplifier chain that is identical to the prototype is projected to be 6 months. This seems excessive unless the time is due to lack of resources.

Comments If further run time beyond that presently scheduled were to be forthcoming it would be nice to see a configuration in which the absorber loss and RF gain were balanced. It might be useful to add a “tune mode” state to the state machine in which RF is enabled and tune up can be performed but power is limited to a safe value. A local phase detector between cavities with remote readback of error voltage could be a beneficial set point of the system and is totally passive. The LLRF will use FPGAs and the programming of such will require an expert. This resource is currently being added to the collaboration.

Comments If possible, when testing the RF cavities outside the beam line, they should be accessible from all sides. Because a clean room is also planned, moving the test site away from the existing magnet lattice would allow space to install the clean room. It is essential to calibrate all couplers and cables. This should be very easy as the distance between input and output ports are all well within reach of calibration cables within the hall. The LLRF should consider the implementation of a self-excited frequency loop, i.e. the frequency of the cavity is tracked by the LLRF to allow quicker tuning to a fixed frequency. Both cavities must be run at the determined frequency and waiting for thermal equilibrium may be reached more quickly with such a loop. The pulse width at MTA was limited by the RF system and well below the 1 ms pulse width required by MICE. It is a well-known fact that spark rate increases exponentially with pulse width. Understanding the effect of taking data based on a reduced pulse length to limit sparking should be examined. This can only be accomplished in timely fashion as part of the offline testing of the cavities in the MICE Hall.

Recommendations The RF system interlocks should be formalized as early as possible to allow the development of the state machine and interlock hardware configuration. Mechanical and thermal tuning loops should be modeled and, if necessary, the systems could be programmed to respond on different time scales, one reacting to long term drifts, the other to short term fluctuations. Transfer functions of both thermal and mechanical tuning are known from the MTA tests.

Recommendations Close collaboration with the ISIS LINAC RF team is required. Fortunately collaboration between DL and RAL was started before the key DL personnel left. MICE Management should pursue strengthening this relationship further. Direct involvement of the ISIS RF experts at an early stage and during commissioning is highly desirable. Support from the ISIS RF team will be essential during the experimental running when the initial commissioning team may not be on hand. We note that the ISIS LINAC section is also small and highly committed so the possibility of a joint hire(s) should be considered. The RF distribution system, as currently designed, should be mocked up as soon as possible. Specifically the ability to safely connect the Heliax sections should be verified.

Recommendations The interlock system must consist of dedicated analog and digital hardware with no computer in the series link other than a processor for reporting status. Latching is essential for diagnosing intermittent faults. This is an extensive system that will not only monitor the RF, but also vacuum, water, controls, beam permit, etc. Not a trivial task and will require significant effort to implement.

Recommendations The tasks at hand are considerable and it is not clear the existing staff is adequate to bring the project to a successful result within the allotted time frame. The committee is concerned that the required resources are significantly underestimated and recommends that a re-evaluation of the required resources and potential sources of electrical and RF expertise be prepared. – In addition, most of the collaboration is not based at RAL, so a dedicated on site staff must be made available for the duration of the experiment to implement repairs and modifications. Delays for repairs and control interfaces must be avoided and can only be satisfied with an on-site team.