Public Facilities Application Basics CDBG Field Services Representatives  12/3/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cuyahoga County Department of Development 2010 Municipal Grant Seminar June 4, 2009 Middleburg Heights Community Center.
Advertisements

Wastewater Collection Options for Lakota Beach Area Sub-Basin Special Meeting June 27, 2001 John Bowman Lakehaven Utility District (253)
Department Of Public Works Environmental Engineering Section Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Demonstration Project Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lining 1 City of.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Important Reminders for 2011.
2010 DCA CDBG Applicants’ Workshop New for 2010 & Important Reminders.
0 Scoring Community Development Block (CDBG)Grants Water/Sewer Apps April 8, 2013 SEIRPC CDBG Scoring Committee.
MRWA 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM.
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) How to Apply – Technical Assistance Sessions March 18 & 19, 2010.
Downtown Revitalization Overview OBJECTIVES Provide for investments in Nebraska communities that will contribute to the revitalization or redevelopment.
Grant Proposal Writing© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
1 CDBG Income Survey Requirements For Grant Administrators.
Non Powell Bill Street Repair & Maintenance Strategies October 8, 2012.
Welcome to the Business and Operational Planning for School-Based Health Centers RFP Workshop April 12, 2010.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
December 4, 2014 Macon, Georgia Georgia Mountains Regional Commission.
3 CDBG Workshop Tuesday, November 26, Planning Grants $1.3 million available Awarded monthly 1 Original and 1 Copy Letters of Intent Projects/applications.
Holden Heights Community Improvement Project Update Orange County Board of County Commissioners December 17, 2013.
Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc. Low Pressure Sewer System Prepared by Dungan Engineering, P.A.
Developing a Dynamic Business Plan. David Renz, Director Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership Henry W. Bloch School of Management University of Missouri.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Documenting the National Objective.
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
CDBG Overview. History of CDBG  Created in 1974-as part of the Housing & Community Development Act  Consolidation of seven different community development.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Training
New Zealand Building Code What is it?. The New Zealand Building Code is the first schedule to the Building Regulations All building work must comply.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program Information Workshop Monday, February 1, 2010.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
2011 DCA CDBG/CHIP Applicants’ Workshop Public Facilities Application Basics.
Public Facilities Application Basics Brent Allen, Cindy Alligood, Robert Compton  12/4/2014.
Response to Comments Workshop Presented by: Eric Beck, P.E. RIDEM July 24, 2003 Developed by: Laura Stephenson, Greg Goblick, Margarita Chatterton.
CDBG Projects July 13, CDBG Primary Objectives  The development of viable urban communities, principally for households earning low- and moderate-incomes.
Alachua County Community Development Block Grant Application for Funding 1 st Public Hearing June 28, 2011.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Gaining a Competitive Advantage.
Methods of Documenting Need and Proposed Solutions 2015 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 3-5, 2014.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Workshop Overview & Introduction to Georgia’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
Personal Budgets. Introduction Name Andrea Woodier Organisation Leicestershire County Council Telephone number address
Building Permits for Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems Ted Van Vliet Toronto Building October 1 st, 2008 Presented at Solar Neighbourhoods Contractor Workshop.
CDBG-CHIP Beginning to Write Your Application. Mission and Vision Statement Vision—every Georgia community offers a quality of life where people and businesses.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  To design the interior of the building in conjunction with codes, standards and federal regulations required in.
Methods for Documenting National Objective Compliance Michael Casper, Compliance Manager  December 3, 2014.
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) 2004 Renewal Competition.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Public Facilities Application Basics.
Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014.
2009 DCA CDBG/CHIP Applicants’ Workshop Introduction to CDBG/CHIP Boot Camp.
Apply for Soroptimist Club Grant Soroptimists strive to improve the lives of women and girls in their community and throughout the world.
GRANT AMENDMENTS Processes and Procedures Robert Compton- Field Services Representative  9/10/2015.
Financial Management and Budgeting The Details. What Is a Budget? A useful tool for keeping track of funds. A useful tool for keeping track of funds.
CITY OF IVEY CRITICAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS DCA APPLICANTS’ WORKSHOP LODGE AT CALLAWAY GARDENS DECEMBER 3, 2015 PRESENTED BY JONATHON CONNELL.
1 1 City Commission Workshop for the DRAFT Basis of Design Report December 14, 2015 CRAVEN THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop 2014 Applicants’ Workshop Overview & Introduction to Georgia’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Workshop Overview & Introduction to Georgia’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
COSCDA Annual Conference PROGRAM PURPOSE Goal: To encourage communities to focus on workforce development as a long-term economic development strategy.
Methods of Documenting Need and Proposed Solutions 2016 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 2-4, 2015.
Immediate Threat and Danger Program Pam Truitt  September 10, 2015.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Rating and Selection: How the panels score Feasibility, Strategy, Impact, and Bonus Points.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  Concentrates on the code process as a whole.  Different type of code officials  Various steps that are taken.
Income Surveys 101 Madison County Community Development Frank Miles, MPA, Administrator.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Community Development Block Grant
Community Facilities and Water & Wastewater
Community Development Block Grant
City of Roundup, Montana
House Construction Budget Plan
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
The Community Development Block Grant Program
Presentation transcript:

Public Facilities Application Basics CDBG Field Services Representatives  12/3/2015

Public Facilities Projects Public Facilities Application Basics Meeting the needs of low and moderate income people in the community, using bricks & mortar, concrete & paving and piping and plumbing.

ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES Public Facilities Application Basics  Water & Sewer  Streets & Drainage  Health Care Facilities  Senior Centers

ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES Public Facilities Application Basics  Battered Women’s Shelters  Mental/Physical Health Departments  Head Start Program Facilities  Boys & Girls Clubs  Acquisition for Public Facilities

PROHIBITED!!  “...the renovation or construction of new space where the primary purpose is the provision of general purpose local government” Public Facilities Application Basics

COMMUNITY NEED  The Community must decide what are the most severe needs for their particular community!  City Council or County Commission will decide which project to pursue. Public Facilities Application Basics

Identify Key Players Public Facilities Application Basics Once a project has been identified, pull together the key players – quickly!  Grant writer  Administrator* (may also be your Grant Writer)  Architect / Engineer * Funding for Administration must be included in the budget, or an experienced Administrator must be identified.

FIRST, DECIDE… How will Administration & Architect/Engineer fees be paid?  Local Funds?  CDBG Funds? Public Facilities Application Basics

Procurement - CDBG Funds Public Facilities Application Basics  Must use formal procurement procedure outlined in manual (Does not apply to RC’s for administration.)  Limits: 12% for Engineer; 10% for Architect (percent of CDBG construction, not grant amount). Break out CDBG amount from local funds on DCA- 8.  Admin. Limit: 6% of grant amount for public facilities, 7% for multi-activity or housing.

PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS CDBG Funds Public Facilities Application Basics  Common rule  Maximum Competition  Advertise in local paper. Allow 30 days response time  RFP: Send to 7 known providers for Administration; 10 for Architect/Engineers

PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS CDBG Funds Public Facilities Application Basics  Written method of selection (score sheet based on criteria listed in RFP)  Use Pre-selection to avoid headaches  Use Conditional Contract - if grant awarded, contract extended

Procurement - Local Funds Public Facilities Application Basics  Use local procurement policy.  Engineer/Architect fees may be used as cash match or leverage.  Administration fees can be used as cash match, may also be used as leverage.

Sample Budget – CDBG Funds Public Facilities Application Basics  Acquisition: $5,000  Administration (6%): $30,000  Engineering / Architect (12% / 10%): $42,000  Construction: $423,000  Total: $500,000 CDBG

Determine The Budget Public Facilities Application Basics  Figure out what the project is going to cost.  Line items:  Administration fee  Architect/Engineering fee  Construction estimate  Acquisition

Budget - Revenue Public Facilities Application Basics  Sources of income:  CDBG Grant - $500,000  Local Matching funds - $10,000  Local Leverage funds - ?  Other Funding Agencies (USDA, etc…)

Cash Match  Must be Cash!  Calculate at 5% of Grant Amount above $300,000, 10% above $500,000.  A $500,000 Grant will have a $10,000 Cash Match requirement. An $800,000 will have a $40,000 Cash Match. Public Facilities Application Basics

Leverage = Bonus Points! Public Facilities Application Basics  Additional funds, land and NEW materials above the required Cash Match are counted.  Operating budgets & salaries, already owned furnishings & equipment DO NOT count.  Leverage will be monitored – must be realistic and achievable, or the local government will have to pay the difference.

Construction Costs Public Facilities Application Basics  Your Architect or Engineer will give you the construction cost estimates.  The Preliminary Architectural/ Engineering Report is vital to the success of your application. More on this later.

Determine Size of Project Public Facilities Application Basics  Will your budget cover the cost of the project?  Do you need to scale back, or can you increase the scope of the project (# of streets, size of building, etc…)  Finalize your project.

Determine the Beneficiaries Public Facilities Application Basics  For Infrastructure – survey as Area Benefit.  Conduct door-to-door survey to count the number of people benefiting, and their low-mod status.  Surveys must be 90%, or a statistically valid random sample.

Determine the Beneficiaries Public Facilities Application Basics  For a Building – survey using Limited Clientele benefit.  Seniors at a Senior Center are categorically low-mod.  Nursing home residents are NOT categorically low-mod.  Who is going to use the building? Survey the user groups.

Determine the Beneficiaries Public Facilities Application Basics  If your low-mod percentage of residents is not at least 70%, STOP! Going any further is a waste of time!  Can you reconfigure the project area to get above the 70% threshold?

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics  DCA-4 Description of Need.  Describe the problem and how it affects the PEOPLE.  Keep the focus on the needs of the residents.

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics State how the identified need impacts LMI persons  If a community has cracked sewer lines, and the treatment plant is over capacity due to infiltration, how does this affect the residents? CDBG grants are to solve people problems, not municipal problems.

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics Quantify your need to the greatest extent possible “There are 46 households in the target area who are not served by City sewer and whose septic tanks are malfunctioning because of poor soil conditions and small lot sizes”

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics “According to the local Health Department the coliform counts in these wells has measured X which is a definite indication of contamination.”

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics “...the average income of these households is X and the high cost of drilling a deep well precludes these people from correcting the problem themselves. In addition, the lot sizes are so small that even if there were funds available to replace the septic tanks, that they would not work anyway.”

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics ALWAYS DOCUMENT YOUR NEED  Letters from residents  Letter from the Fire Chief  Letter from the Health Dept.  Know the difference between letters of documentation and letters of support

Tell the Story – Sell the Story Public Facilities Application Basics  Photos – quality photos are your best seller!  Identify location of photos (address, map)  News Reports  Mental Health Directors  AAA Directors  Building Inspectors  Reports and/or Consent orders from EPD

Tell the Story – Sell the Story  Keep the focus on people Public Facilities Application Basics

Tell the Story – Sell the Story  Make sure that your project proposal addresses the need identified! Public Facilities Application Basics

Tell the Story – Sell the Story  If the main problem is low water pressure, but resident letters also complain about quality, does the solution cover both problems? Public Facilities Application Basics

Tell the Story – Sell the Story  Avoid political pitfalls!  If the project overlaps jurisdictions, all sides must agree in writing to the application. Public Facilities Application Basics

Your Action Plan Public Facilities Application Basics  DCA-5 Description of Activities  Project Overview  A detailed description of each activity  Evidence of conformance with Comprehensive Plan & Service Delivery Strategy  Copy of Service Delivery Strategy map

Action Plan – Be sure to cover: Public Facilities Application Basics  ACQUISITION  PERMITS  TAP-ONS AND TAP-ON FEES  UTILITY RELOCATION  MAINTENANCE AND/OR OPERATION  CAPACITY  SITE  IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE  SECTION 3 and Other Applicable Laws

Action Plan – Be sure to cover: Public Facilities Application Basics  Need for household plumbing  Abandonment of well and/or septic tanks  Design configuration must make sense  Drainage projects - downstream discharge area has sufficient capacity

Action Plan Public Facilities Application Basics  Identify design standards and justify their usage. 25 YEARS IS THE NORM. YOU MUST THOROUGHLY JUSTIFY ANYTHING ELSE!  Try to avoid low density population target areas.  Problems created by developers will not be viewed as a high severity of need.

Action Plan – Project Impact Public Facilities Application Basics  The impact the project will have on the problem.  Most importantly, the impact the project will have on the lives of the residents.

Financial Statements Public Facilities Application Basics  Document your sources for cash match and leverage with signed, original commitment letters.  For a new program, document sources of operational funding (staff salaries, equipment, etc.) LIKE A BUSINESS PLAN

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT Public Facilities Application Basics  Amount of detail depends on complexity  Professional cost estimates required  Design Standard (25 or 50 year storm)  Unusual site conditions / higher costs

Public Facilities Application Basics  Engineer/Architect signature and stamp required.  Does Eng. Report agree with rest of application?  Viable alternatives - “No alternative” is not a good answer. Go into more detail. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT

MAPS Public Facilities Application Basics  Scale, north arrow, legend  Proposed and existing activity location  Concentrations of minorities (numbers and percentages)  Concentrations of substandard housing (housing deficiencies)  Concentrations of low-mod persons

MAPS Public Facilities Application Basics  Identify all houses in project area - all applications, not just Housing Applications  Location of photos  Existing infrastructure (water lines, sewer)  All street names - correct and legible  Include a street address in the target area that can be located on a GPS.

Maps Public Facilities Application Basics  Be sure to include a copy of your Service Delivery Strategy map, if possible.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings Public Facilities Application Basics  PAR did not include the proposed floor plan.  Application states 100% low-mod, but programs & classes listed are not limited to low-mod clients.  Costs for other alternatives not included.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings Public Facilities Application Basics  Letters from kids and parents talk about how much they like the program, but they don't discuss deficiencies with the building.  The topo map shows the new Head Start building will be about 1/2 mile from the Industrial Waste Pond. Is this a good idea?  The square footage of the building is not listed. We could not figure out cost per foot.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings Public Facilities Application Basics  No commitment letter to maintain building.  DCA-4 narrative describes issues with mold and drainage, but photos don't document this. It also mentions roof problems, but we don't see any evidence in the photos.  Letter from Health Dept. director doesn’t state how they determined the low-mod %.  Beneficiary numbers don't agree between DCA-1, 2 & 6.

Public Facilities Application Basics  Application doesn’t contain any photos of clients or any client letters. The one letter included is from staff. No photos of any crowding. The changes in the building floor plan appear to benefit the staff.  NPDES not addressed - it appears they will be disturbing more than an acre.  PAR not included. MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings

Public Facilities Application Basics  This appears to be a city-wide program (community service center) but they only surveyed 10% of the city.  Cash Match not included, and no identified program or funding for operation.  No alternatives addressed.  Maintenance & operation not addressed.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings Public Facilities Application Basics  No topo map included. The maps don't really support the project.  We are not sure what they are going to do in this building, since no programs are offered.  No photos are included at all.  No resident letters or 3 rd Party letters are included.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR - Buildings Public Facilities Application Basics  PAR cost estimate doesn’t break down the construction line items, such as foundation, framing, HVAC, plumbing, etc. Cost per sq. ft. for the new construction is $170 which appears to be very high.  Panel has a hard time seeing how this program would benefit low-mods on a day to day basis.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  App. includes letters and narrative describing the problem, but no photos to document the claims - no photos of surging manholes, or surging clean-outs in yards, or in homes.  Water quality is reported to be poor, with odor & color, but no photos of water discoloration are included. No photos of stained clothes or fixtures are included.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  Health Department letter talks about abandoning 13 septic tanks, but residents are on sewer already.  Resident letters mainly talk about drainage problems, with yards flooding, but this isn't being addressed by the application.  No existing or proposed work map included in the PER.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  DCA-8 lists 88 service lines to be connected but the PER only lists 60 clean outs.  Dashboard rates appear to be low. It looks like the County could raise rates to help pay for needed improvements.  Photos didn't show any backup in homes. No contamination was documented.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  App. includes abandoning 5 septic tanks. The PER states the drainage fields are not working properly but there were no photos or letters to document this.  The application indicates 3 separate areas. Target area three - ______ Road does not meet LMI threshold.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  Panel could not determine if there would be any utility relocation needed.  There was no photo key map included.  The LMI % is 74. They only surveyed 58% of the households and it was not a random survey.  No pressure tests were provided. No service calls documented.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  No photos showing back-up into homes. No evidence of damage to homes. No dates were included on photos of back-ups in yards. Panel could not determine how often back ups are occurring.  Panel could not determine if the residents on septic tanks are having problems. No comments were included from residents with septic tanks.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Water, Sewer Public Facilities Application Basics  PER Proposed Work map shows work being done outside the TA and shows many uncounted houses that appear to benefit from the proposed work.  App. did not indicate or provide funding for meters at non-LMI residences. The City match is being devoted to Engineering.  No pressure tests were provided. No service calls documented.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Streets, Drainage Public Facilities Application Basics  App. proposes to install curb & gutter throughout target area. Most photos show paved streets in very good condition with side ditches.  We don't see significant street flooding and erosion, or deep ruts.  No identified need for the sidewalks.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Streets, Drainage Public Facilities Application Basics  Several of the photos, some showing the worst conditions, are outside the target area.  The application claims yard, street and home flooding, but has very poor documentation of any real need.  The resident letters do not contain addresses, we can't determine where they are.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Streets, Drainage Public Facilities Application Basics  App. includes letters from a family stating they were flooded & had $3,000 worth of damage, but the address of the home is not included, no photos are included.  While the resident letters describe very bad roads with deep ruts, potholes and wash boarding, we just don't see this in the pictures.  Map does not identify where target area is in the county.  Most of the photos don't show any rain or water.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Streets, Drainage Public Facilities Application Basics  App. details the utility relocation required and states the utility owners will be responsible for the work. No agreement from the EMC or water & sewer authority to do so.  Cost per person is the highest, double the average cost per person, and does not document an extremely high need.  We don't see significant street flooding and no yard flooding. We don't see any damage to homes.

MISTAKES FROM LAST YEAR – Streets, Drainage Public Facilities Application Basics  The are no photos showing the conditions on ___ Road, and for a large section of ___ Road - we have no idea what conditions are like on these sections, but the project calls for paving them all. This is probably over 50% of the project.  Application proposes $55,000 in sidewalks with no documented need.

Public Facilities Application Basics