Family Outcomes and SSIP State of North Carolina Infant Toddler Program Gary Harmon, PhD Part C Data Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.

Advertisements

Learning Together and Wellbeing. What is Learning Together? A program for families with children birth to three years A focus on early literacy development.

Annual Title I Program Overview at Williston Sherry Veasey, Principal September, 2011 Parent/Teacher Meeting.

P re-Referral and Referral Activities Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Module 3.

SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.

Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.

A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Child Maltreatment Rates: Evaluation Approaches for a Child Maltreatment Prevention Initiative.

Use of the NCSEAM Preschool and Part C Surveys to Address the SPP/APR Parent/Family Indicators Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. University of Miami National Center.

A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.

Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.

ECO Center Family Outcomes Community of Practice 11/10/2009 Angela Deal, DPH; Patrice Neal, FPG; Melanie Long, FSN Please do not copy or distribute without.

What Do Special Education Directors Say About RTI Margaret Gessler Werts, PhD Monica Lambert, EdD.

Teachers’ Understanding of and Preparedness to Implement Response to Intervention (RtI) Alyssa Kapfhamer, M.S.E. and Barbara Lozar, Ph.D. University of.

Determining if the Family Survey Response is Representative 1.

Family Outcome Principles and Measurement Approaches Melissa Raspa Don Bailey ECO at RTI International International Society on Early Intervention (ISEI)

Academic Work Environment Survey 2004 Barbara Silver, ADVANCE Program Director Presented at the ADVANCE National Conference, G-Tech, Atlanta, Georgia April.

TIP Webinar Targeted Improvement Planning. ILCD EDN Guidance Document First document to review in preparation for your TIP development. The questions.

What Are IGDIs and Why Use Them? Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of Kansas.

Chapter 13 Survey Designs

1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Needs Assessments to Identify and Evaluate Technical Assistance: Results of a National Survey about.

Introducing HealthStats Eleanor Howell, MS Manager, Data Dissemination Unit State Center for Health Statistics February 2, 2012.

Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.

Are your C4 data reflective of the families you serve? Joy Markowitz, Director Jean Dauphinee, TA Specialist Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference,

Community Input Discussions: Measuring the Progress of Young Children in Massachusetts August 2009.

Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.

Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.

NYC SCHOOL SURVEY 2015 SCHOOL LEADER TRAINING. Agenda 2 1.SURVEY AT-A-GLANCE 2.KEY DATES and LOGISTICS 3.ETHICS 4.TIPS to INCREASE RESPONSE RATE 5.SURVEY.

Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for a Local Early Intervention System Infant & Toddler.

Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.

SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.

1 What did Connecticut do?. 2 The Basics A group of people who hold stakes met to give the lead agency suggestions. We chose the NCSEAM survey and we.

What’s New?. Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/

David P. Lindeman, Ph.D., and Phoebe Rinkel, M.S. University of Kansas Guiding Documents  DEC Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood.

Barbara J. Smith, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver OSEP, July, 2014 Promoting Social Emotional Competence in All Young Children Through Collaboration.

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.

STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.

National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.

Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &

Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator Deborah Carroll, PhD, Branch.

Parent Involvement: Who’s Accountable? Who Benefits? Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. University of Miami Annual Meeting of The Family Cafe Orlando, FL June 3, 2006.

Family Outcomes Montana’s Method of Partnering with Families.

Maryland’s Result Area, Children Entering School Ready to Learn RBA Australia Summit, Sidney September 30, 2015.

Michigan’s Experience Preparing for OSEP Results Visit Lisa Wasacz – Part C Consultant Michigan Department of Education Michigan Office of Great Start.

Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.

Understanding and Using the Results from the NCSEAM Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. NCSEAM Measuring Child and Family Outcomes NECTAC National TA Meeting.

Carol M. Trivette, Ph.D. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute Asheville and Morganton, North Carolina Presentation prepared for Helping Extend Learning and.

SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.

Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Pam Roush, Director WV Birth to Three October 7, 2009.

Helping Local Programs Improve Outcomes Performance Using the DAC Data Analysis Framework Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator October 27,

MASSACHUSETTS STATE INFORMATION n Lead Agency Department of Public Health n Projected Cumulative Enrollment SFY ,251 n MA EI Budget (includes.

The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.

Together We Grow North Carolina Early Intervention Services EISAS Parent Survey: Assessment of Early Intervention Service Provider Quality Presenters:

Session 2: Overview of the COS Process Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module.

Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.

Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.

How to Examine Your State's Family Outcomes Data: Asking and Answering Critical Questions Melissa Raspa (ECTA) Gary Harmon (NC) Alice Ridgway (CT) Lisa.

Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.

What Is Child Find? IDEA requires that all children with disabilities (birth through twenty-one) residing in the state, including children with disabilities.

Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016

A Collaborative Approach to Early Care and Education BRAIDED FUNDING.

Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance

Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Cristina Mogro-Wilson, Ph.D.

Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator

Improving and Using Family Survey Data

Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator

Using Data You Can Trust, Improving Survey Response Rates

Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.

Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008

Presentation transcript:

Family Outcomes and SSIP State of North Carolina Infant Toddler Program Gary Harmon, PhD Part C Data Manager

Overview of Presentation Briefly describe the SSIP data analysis process for looking at Family Outcomes (Indicator 4) Examine issues of data quality Review Family Outcomes Data Next Steps/Discussion of Two Paths to Continue to Examine Family Outcomes

SSIP – Data Analysis Comprehensive analysis of NC Child and Family Outcomes Data Family Outcomes Analysis ▫Data quality ▫Results over time ▫Compared to other states ▫Compared to targets ▫By subgroup (Race, Gender, Language, Condition)

SSIP Questions – Family Outcomes Data quality vs. True Measurement of Outcomes? How do we separate data quality from performance on outcomes?

Family Outcomes Process North Carolina uses The NCSEAM Family Survey – Early Intervention Designed to yield reliable, valid and useful measures of families’ perceptions and involvement in early intervention. Survey results are summarized into: ▫Percent of families participating in Part C who report that early intervention services have helped the family:  A. Know their rights;  B. Effectively communicate their children's needs;  C. Help their children develop and learn. 5

Family Outcomes Process (cont.) Survey mailed to families with option of paper (postage paid envelope) or internet response (online survey program) Postcards sent prior to mailing to inform parents about survey Follow-up survey and reminder sent two weeks after initial survey 6

Family Outcomes Response Rates 8

Family Outcomes Respondents 2012/2013 9

Family Outcomes Know Your Rights 11

Family Outcomes Effectively Communicate 12

Family Outcomes Develop and Learn 13

Family Outcomes Sites Meeting Survey Targets 2012 Family OutcomeTarget Number (%) of Sites At or Above Target Number (%) of Sites Below Target LowHigh Know Their Rights90%2 (12.5%)14 (87.5%)61%93% Effectively Communicate 86%1 (6.25%)15 (93.75%)52%89% Develop and Learn91%2 (12.5%)14 (87.5%)71%96% 14 RANGE

How is NC Performing Compared to Other States? 15

Two Separate Paths Data Quality Administration of survey Survey instrument SSIP Infrastructure analysis to examine work with families Current initiatives focused on family involvement

Acknowledgements Deborah Carroll, PhD – Early Intervention Branch Head Sherry Franklin – Part C Coordinator Infant Toddler Program Data Team (Brian Deese and Barbara Simpson) Interagency Coordinating Council