Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Advertisements

DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Other Info on Making Arguments
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
The Conditional Syllogism otherwise knows as: The Hypothetical Syllogism “If I had a millions dollars, then I’d buy you a house” The Barenaked Ladies.
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Truth-Table Definition of Validity An argument is truth-table valid if it is impossible for the premises to all be True and the conclusion False. I.e.,
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Warm Up 1. How do I know the following must be false? Points P, Q, and R are coplanar. They lie on plane m. They also lie on another plane, plane n. 2.
FALSE PREMISE.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Logic in Everyday Life.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Critical Thinking (do quiz on page 21). Characteristics of a Good Critical Thinker (p. 23, 27) Truth Seeking Open Minded Analytic Systematic Persistent.
Approaches to Writing the Analysis/Evaluation Essay Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland
Logic and Reasoning Conditional Statements. Logic The use and study of valid reasoning. When studying mathematics it is important to have the ability.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically 1C Discussion Paragraph 1 web 88. State Politics 89. US Presidents 90. Web Venn Diagrams.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 1 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Deductive Reasoning. Process through which premises provide conclusive proof for the conclusion.
METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning
WOK : Reason.
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
FALSE PREMISE.
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
MAT 142 Lecture Video Series
2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
Validity and Soundness
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.
Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
To solve problems by looking for a pattern
Syllogisms.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 inductive reasoning: start with specific facts and then make a conclusion from those facts  the conclusion may be reliable or unreliable, not “true” or “false”

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 deductive reasoning: start with a general claim, apply it to specific instances or facts and then make a conclusion  the conclusion may be valid (but not necessarily true) if it follows from the premises; otherwise it’s invalid

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 syllogism: premise (general) +premise (specific) conclusion

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 All U.S. presidents have been male. Millard Fillmore was a U.S. president. Therefore, Millard Fillmore was male. valid, true

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 All U.S. presidents spoke English. Alvin Barkley spoke English. Therefore, Alvin Barkley was a U.S. president. invalid, false

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 All U.S. presidents have been sworn in in Washington, D.C. George Washington was a U.S. president. Therefore, George Washington was sworn in in Washington, D.C. valid, false

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing, Part 2 All U.S. presidents spoke English John F. Kennedy spoke English. Therefore, John F. Kennedy was a U.S. president. invalid, true