The 2002 Healthcare Conference Surviving or Thriving ? 29 September-1 October 2002 Scarman House, The University of Warwick, Coventry
Session A1 : Trends in CI - Cancer nTrends in incidence and mortality rates nWorking Party / Research Sub-party Progress Report nNeil Robjohns & Richard Morris
Critical Illness Trends Research Group Our Aims : n To examine underlying trends in the factors influencing UK Insured Critical Illness claim rates, and from these, to assess : nThe historic trend in incidence and death rates for the major CI’s nAny pointers for future trends in Standalone CI, Mortality and hence Accelerated CI. n Formed in March 2001
Cancer Sub-Group Members n Actuaries Azim Dinani Richard Morris Neil Robjohns n Medical Experts Professor Rubens - Consultant Oncologist
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates, All Ages
Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates, "Key Insurance Ages"
Possible Reasons Behind Observed Trends n Issues with Data Recording n Cancer Screening Initiatives n Behavioural changes n Treatment nof Cancer nof other illnesses n Awareness n Other ?
Breast Cancer Changes in Incidence Rates, by age band, over
Prostate Cancer Changes in Incidence Rates, by age band, over
Lung Cancer Changes in Incidence Rates, by age band, over
Malignant Melanoma Changes in Incidence Rates for Males, by age band, over
Breast Cancer Changes in Mortality Rates, by age band, over
Stomach Cancer Changes in Incidence Rates for Males, by age band, over
Testicular Cancer Changes in Incidence Rates, by age band, over
Cancer Incidence Rates by Site of Cancer Females, 1997
Cancer Incidence Rates by Site of Cancer Males, 1997
Summary of Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality Average Change % pa, for Females, aged , over Size of Balls Indicates Relative Importance of Cancer Site, measured by Incidence Rates in 1997.
Summary of Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality Average Change % pa, for Males, aged , over Size of Balls Indicates Relative Importance of Cancer Site, measured by Incidence Rates in 1997.
Some Thoughts Looking Forwards n Tentative Initial Views : n Cancer Mortality : n “Good News” ? n “Continuing Reductions, at least for ages below 65” ? n Cancer Incidence : n “Bad News” ? n “Underlying, steady increase, plus jumps up” ? !
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
Variation by deprivation category n Scottish data n Carstairs & Morris deprivation categories: nPostcode based n Categories 1-7 (1=“affluent”; 7=“deprived”) n Classes 1-3 = Insured class? n Key Sites (data limited)
Split of Scottish Population by Deprivation Category 1991 Data
Link with deprivation category Inception Rates Mortality Rates
Link with deprivation code: Lung Cancer n Mortality & Incidence: Positive correlation nLagged link to smoker prevalence n Causes? nSmoking nAir pollution? n Cohort effect (e.g. cigarette smoking) n Temporal effect (e.g. air pollution, cigarette composition (tar content), new treatment) n Sharp fall in mortality over next 5-10 years?
Smoker Prevalence : Females England & Wales: General Household Survey 2000
Smoker Prevalence : Males England & Wales: General Household Survey 2000
Annualised change in inception rate: : Lung Cancer - Males Ages:40-59
Annualised change in inception rate: : Lung Cancer - Females Ages:40-59
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Link with deprivation code: Breast Cancer n Incidence: negative correlation nScreening related difference? n Social / environmental differences n Reproductive history n Mortality: link inconclusive n Differences in treatment? n Differences in stage of presentation?
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Link with deprivation code: Prostate Cancer n Incidence & mortality: negative correlation nScreening related? nHormonal factors? nDiet?
Annualised change in inception rate: : Prostate Cancer - Males Ages:40-59
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Link with deprivation code: Cervical Cancer n Incidence & mortality: Positive correlation n Causes? n Sexual activity n Smoking n Parity
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Rates per 10,000
Scottish Population Data : Trends by Deprivation Category, Index (1982 = 100)
Link with deprivation code: Colo-rectal Cancer n Incidence & mortality: No clear link n Causes? n High-fat diet n Low physical activity n Reproductive history
Cancer by Deprivation Code: Trends n Lung cancer nSmoker-related trend to emerge? n Breast cancer n No identifiable difference in trend n Prostate cancer n Reflection of trend in screening? n Cervical cancer n No identifiable difference in trend n Colo-rectal cancer n Inconclusive link to deprivation code
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
International Comparisons All Cancers ; All Ages
International Comparisons All Cancers ; Ages
International Comparisons Lung Cancer ; Ages
International Comparisons Prostate Cancer ; All Ages
Prostate Cancer “Screening”
International Comparisons Breast Cancer ; All Ages
International Comparisons Malignant Melanoma ; All Ages
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
Ratio of Mortality Rate to Incidence Rate Males ; England & Wales ; 1998
Ratio of Mortality Rate to Incidence Rate Females ; England & Wales ; 1998
Ratio of Mortality Rate to Incidence Rate Males ; Ages ; 1998
Ratio of Mortality Rate to Incidence Rate Females ; Ages ; 1998
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
Observed Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates England & Wales
Trend in Smoker Proportions in England And Wales All Adult Ages
Trend in Smoker Proportions in England And Wales By Age Group
Modelling the Impact of Smoking n Build model to simulate population distribution by smoking habit, over time n Use Doll & Peto style formula n Adjust parameters to seek a good fit against observed lung cancer rates over time nFor Males, England & Wales, n Then project forward by making assumptions on trend in smoking habits
Modelling the Impact of Smoking n Doll & Peto n Studied mortality / morbidity effects of cigarette smoking by following a cohort of British Doctors n Modelled relationship between lung cancer incidence and level and duration of smoking habit n 1951 – 1971 n Rate = * 10 –12 (dose + 6) 2 * (age – 22.5) 4.5
Fit of Model against Actual
Fit of Actual Rates against Model
Model Projection to 2010 Assuming current rates of change in smoker status remain constant
The next challenge !!
Cancer Trends n England & Wales population trends - recap n Variation by deprivation category n International comparisons n Incidence versus mortality n Lung cancer / modelling impact of smoking n Future trends
Future Cancer Trends Impact of Medical Advances : n Prevention nReduce Smoking ; Dietary Advice ; Protect from UV light nOverall, effect positive but likely to be relatively small n Detection nRapid advance in screening / tests nQuestionable value for widespread screening nBut tests likely to be commercially available nPotential for significant step-increases in “incidence” n Treatment nExpect reductions in morbidity, plus slow gains on mortality
Session A1 : Trends in CI - Cancer nTrends in incidence and mortality rates nWorking Party / Research Sub-party Progress Report nNeil Robjohns & Richard Morris