INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alan Watson, Birmingham University Lake Louise Winter Institute, Feb 2002 ATLAS Physics in Year 1  Detector and Machine Schedule  Standard Model.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at DØ Michele Petteni Imperial College London On behalf of the DØ Collaboration Michele Petteni Imperial College.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Fabiola Gianotti, Physics at LHC, Pisa, April 2002 PART 2.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Gregorio Bernardi / LPNHE-Paris April 2005, Gregorio Bernardi, Paris/FNAL CDF and DØ Collaborations Results Tevatron/ Luminosity b-tagging.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
17 April. 2005,APS meeting, Tampa,FloridaS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya Beyond Standard Model Higgs Search at LHC.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Higgs Searches at Tevatron Makoto Tomoto 戸本 誠 Fermilab/Nagoya University On behalf of the DØ & CDF Collaborations Tsukuba, April 21 st, 2006.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Moriond QCD 2001Enrico Piotto EP division CERN SM Higgs Search at LEP in Channels other than 4 Jets Enrico Piotto EP Division, CERN SM Higgs Search at.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 SM Higgs Searches in CMS The LHC Early Phase for the ILC FNAL April Albert De Roeck CERN and University of Antwerp and the IPPP Durham.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Hiroshima Higgs Workshop 2006, Jan. 17 – 19, 2006 Higgs Searches at the Tevatron Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Osaka City University) for the CDF Collaboration 1.Tevatron.
Puu Oo Cone, Hawaii Gordon Watts University of Washington For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
LCWS06, Bangalore, March 2006, Marcel DemarteauSlide 1 Higgs Searches at DØ LCWS06, Bangalore, India March 9-13, 2006 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab For the.
Higgs Physics in ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin US ATLAS Software Meeting BNL, August
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
Particle Physics II Chris Parkes Top Quark Discovery Decay Higgs Searches Indirect mW and mt Direct LEP & LHC searches 2 nd Handout.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
29 August, 2007 Ashfaq Ahmad, Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC 1 Search for Charged Higgs at the LHC Ashfaq Ahmad (Stony Brook)
Search for the Standard Model Higgs in  and  lepton final states P. Grannis, ICHEP 2012 for the DØ Collaboration Tevatron, pp √s = 1.96 TeV -
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Search for the SM Higgs Boson in H->ZZ* and H->WW* at the LHC Sinjini Sengupta University of Minnesota CMS Collaboration The 16 th International conference.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Outline I. Introduction II. Experimental requirements III. Analysis strategies and results IV. Conclusions 1 SM H→  discovery potential with ATLAS Yaquan.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
LHC Prospects on Standard Model Higgs Riccardo Ranieri INFN and Università degli Studi di Firenze on behalf of ATLAS and CMS Collaborations ICHEP’04 32.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)

THE HIGGS BOSON AT THE LHC PRODUCTION This talk is based on the results of the ATLAS CSC NOTE: update on the analysis techniques and discovery potentials. Almost ready for publication. DECAY gg fusion process is the more abundant, followed by the Vector Boson Fusion process. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul2

Important channel in the low mass region. It gives the best mass resolution thanks to excellent electromagnetic energy resolution H0H0   Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul3 H→ 

ATLAS preliminary p T (Gev/c)  ATLAS preliminary p T (Gev/c)  Trigger efficiency for single photonsSELECTION Trigger: at least 2 isolated photons, with p T >20 GeV/c each   (respect to offline) = (93.6 ± 0.4)% Identification cut exploiting the shower shape. Fiducial cut: 0< |  | < 1.37 & 1.52 < |  | < Isolation cut:  p T < 4 GeV/c, considering all tracks with p T >1GeV/c in a  R=0.3 cone around the electromagnetic cluster. Momentum cut: p T >25GeV/c and p T >40GeV/c for the two most energetic photons. Selection efficiency:  = 36.0 % ( 32.2% with pileup cm -2 s -1 ) Within a mass window M H +/- 1.4GeV: Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul4

The primary vertex identification is crucial for a precise measurement of M(  ). Tracker and calorimeter informations are combined: The calorimeter measure the  flight direction using longitudinal segmentation and pre-shower strips → vertex position accuracy is 19mm (17mm when using conversions). Combining with the tracker information we get ~0.1 mm Z 1 Z true O Z 2 Strips Middle Photon 1 Photon 2 PRIMARY VERTEX RECONSTRUCTION preliminary Calorimeter only Calorimeter and tracker z rec -z true (mm) Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul5

Converted photons are an important issue: ~50% of the events have at least one converted photon! energy reconstruction is degraded: ad hoc calibration required. conversion vertex can be used to compute the direction Even conversions with only one reconstructed track are taken into account. CONVERSIONS preliminary ATLAS Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul6 With pileup!

Background is evaluated with NLO simulations. It will be measured from data sidebands. Example: NLO  -jet processesBACKGROUNDS Within a mass window M H +/- 1.4GeV: Strategy for jet rejection: Longitudinal segmentation of the calorimeter. Fine segmentation of the first layer (  -strips) => good  0 rejection. Isolation of the electromagnetic cluster. Isolation based on tracks reconstructed by the inner detector. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul7

INVARIANT MASSES DISTRIBUTIONS From associated production, high levels of purity for signal achieved thanks to additional requirements. ATLAS preliminary WH → lv  ZH→ ll  H+1jet H+2jet Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul8 ATLAS preliminary

Fit and likelihood ratio are used for setting discovery potential and handle systematics. Different fit based approaches for the evaluation of the significance: 1- fit only the mass distribution; 2- simultaneous fit to the mass, P T (  ) and cos  * distributions The two approaches are performed also in the Higgs mass floating configuration. Use of categories with different resolutions based on , jet multiplicity and presence of conversion improves the significance.SIGNIFICANCE Higgs   ** In Higgs rest frame P T (  )  it has softer spectrum and less pronounced rise at low values for background respect to the signal. cos  *  the photon decay angle in the H rest frame with respect to the H flight direction in the lab rest frame has an enhanced distribution for the background for collinear photons while is flat for the signal. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul9 ATLAS preliminary

H → ZZ(*) → 4l It is the “golden channel”! Observation of a clear peak on top of a smooth background! Clear signature Wide range of masses explored Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul10

muons EVENTS SELECTION Trigger efficiency Trigger: - single isolated  (e) with p T >20 (25) GeV/c; - two  (e) with p T >10 (15) GeV/c. Kinematic: - 2 pairs of same flavor opposite charge lept. - calorimeter identification - |M ll1 -M Z | M 34 Fiducial cut: 0< |  | < 1.37 & 1.52 < |  | < Isolation cut: - Calorimeter:  E T /p T < tracker:  p T /p T < 0.15 Vertexing cut on maximum lepton impact parameter: d 0 /  d0 <3.5 (6.0 ) for  (e) electrons ATLAS preliminary ATLAS preliminary Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul11

Backgrounds are (|  | 5 GeV ): qq,gg  ZZ (  )  4l (l=e,m,t) => 56 fb (NLO); qq  Zbb  4l => 810 fb (NLO ); qq  Zbb  3l => 1.3 pb (NLO ); qq,gg  tt => 833 pb (NLO); qq,gg  WZ  3l => 386 fb (NLO); Z  2l+X => 4030 pb (NNLO) Z  ee mass peak is affected electron bremsstrahlung.BACKGROUNDS Background will be estimated in sidebands  low systematic uncertainties Mass M Z  1.8 GeV Look to the Z with first data to understand lepton reconstruction and detectors response. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul12 ATLAS preliminary

ISOLATION  IMPACT PARAMETER Lepton from b-quark decay do not point towards primary vertex Reducible backgrounds have activity around leptons from b-decay Transverse impact parameter significance in signal and reducible background events. Normalized calorimetric and track isolation (  R=0.2) for the signal (m H = 130) and the Zbb and tt backgrounds in the 4  channel. ATLAS preliminary Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul13 ATLAS preliminary Calorimetric isolationTrack isolation H4H4 H  4e

Mass resolution as a function of the Higgs mass. Open circles denote the resolution Z mass constraint improves resolution. Selection efficiency as a function of the Higgs mass, for each of the three decay channels. EFFICIENCY & RESOLUTION Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul14 ATLAS preliminary H4H4 H  4e Z on shellZ off shell

INVARIANT MASS DISTRIBUTIONS Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul15 ATLAS preliminary

SIGNIFICANCE Preliminary ATLAS preliminary Poisson probability Significance estimations with number counting and performing a full range fit are consistent. Other approaches (background only sideband fit, two dimensional fit on M ll and M Z* with Higgs mass floated) are also explored. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul16 ATLAS preliminary

Interesting for 2M W <M H <2M Z where all other decay modes are suppressed. Signature is 2 , 2e, e  + E T miss. Three channels: Measure spin and CP properties possible for heavy H → WW → lvqq H → WW  - H→WW → e v  v (H+0jet) - H → WW → e v  v - H → WW → l v q q (only for M H =300 GeV) VBF (H+2jet) Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul17

High backgrounds: WW, Wt, ttbar, Z  2l, bb,cc,QCD multijet SELECTION AND BACKGROUNDS No mass peak  use transverse mass. Reconstruction: –Trigger : single or double lepton selection 1  20i or 1e25i; –Offline: select events with exactly two isolated (tracking and calorimeter) opposite sign primary leptons and E T miss. –Specific reconstructions for different channels Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul18 The challenge: precise knowledge of the backgrounds.

Fit the transverse mass and the transverse momentum of the candidates in two bins of the dilepton opening angle  in the transverse plane; Account for the ratio of the background in the two regions Extract the signal and background mixture in the signal region. EVENTS SELECTION: H+ 0jets Signal regionControl region preliminary The transverse mass distribution in the region  20 GeV. Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul19 preliminary ATLAS preliminary

Two distinct signatures: 1.Two forward “tag” jets (large  separation with high-p T ) with large M jj 2.No jet activity in the central region (between the two tag jets): jet veto Typical cuts require: Tag jets are assumed to be the highest E T jets in opposite hemispheres, with E T >~40 GeV,  jj >~4, M jj > GeV. Higgs decay products between tag jets in  No additional jet activity in the event: central jet veto. EVENTS SELECTION FOR VBF Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul20

Expected significance from the H→WW+0j, WW→e  channel for an integrated luminosity L= 10 fb -1. Expected significance from the H→WW+2j, WW→e  channel for an integrated luminosity L= 10 fb -1.SIGNIFICANCE preliminary Preliminary Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul21 preliminary

The median p-value for the SM Higgs Boson exclusion as a function of the Higgs mass for the various channels and for their combination. The expected luminosity for the exclusion of a Higgs Boson with mass m 95% CL COMBINATION OF THE CHANNELS Zooming… ATLAS IS WELL READY TO CATCH THE HIGGS! Francesco PolciSUSY08 – Seoul22 ATLAS preliminary