Prof Philippos Pouyioutas 1,2,3, Dr Harald Gjermundrod 2,4 and Dr Ioanna Dionysiou 2,4 1 University of Nicosia Research Foundation, Cyprus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Outcomes and student workload in Higher Education Gerard Madill Policy Adviser, Universities Scotland.
Advertisements

Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
Council of Europe ~ Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Republic of Moldova ~ Rectors Council of the Republic of Moldova ~ The Institute for.
PROF PHILIPPOS POUYIOUTAS 1,2,3, DR HARALD GJERMUNDROD 1,4, DR IOANNA DIONYSIOU 1,4, AND MR MICHALIS MICHAEL 1 1 UNIVERSITY OF NICOSIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION,
Professor Philippos Pouyioutas Vice Rector Professor of Computer Science University of Nicosia Agricultural University of Athens Seminar - Accreditation.
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Lene Oftedal, Ruard Wallis de Vries European Commission Oslo Bologna experts – challenges and expectations.
00 Calculating and measuring student workload …..and a method to allocate workload (StOEHn) Workshop “Elaboration of educational programmes according to.
IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM Developments along subject lines and their impact on Recognition December 3rd, University of Latvia, Riga Dr. Julia González,
Units 3-4 Mobility, Course Description, Modules, Division Of Credits, Workload, Outcomes, BA, MA, Diploma Supplement.
ECTS-A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR RECOGNITION Gayane Harutyunayn, Head of Bologna Secretariat, Armenia 4 December 2014, Yerevan, Armenia Baghdad, Iraq Online.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
1 Development of National Qualification Frameworks Gerald Burke Monash University – ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training (CEET) Regional.
Learning Outcomes & the European Qualifications Framework in Higher Education Iceberg, plague or opportunity? Opinions from European countries M a Begoña.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
ECTS – The European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System Michael Hörig European University Association Moscow, 12 December 2007.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ Developing Web-Based Tools and Support Model for Lifelong Learning and Learning Evaluation Processes in Higher Education ICT- Framework.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction to LOLA methodology Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
The UK Credit Framework and the Bologna Process Tim Cobbett Director of Quality and Governance.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
Higher Education as a Generator of Strategic Competencies Kick-off meeting: Maastricht, November 12-13, 2007 ANALYSIS OF THE EUROPEAN, NATIONAL AND UNIVERSITIES.
Promoting the EQF Learning Outcomes Approach within European Universities The Learning Outcomes approach: a gateway to integrate open and informal learning.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
Promoting the EQF Learning Outcomes Approach within European Universities UK Teleconference about Learning Outcomes in European Universities 16:00, 18.
Language Teacher Education: from diversity to common threads.
REPROTOOL Version 1.0 Support for Learning Outcomes Philippos Pouyioutas*, Harald Gjermundrod and Ioanna Dionysiou Department of Computer Science University.
Introduction to the ECVET Project - VET Credit Conversion System - - VET Credit Conversion System - Presented by: Louisa Pace Kiomall.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
Romanian VET following ECVET recommendation National Centre for TVET Development Romania.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY e: Kotnikova 38, 1000 Ljubljana p:
ECTS New developments Professor Luc François Director of Educational Affairs.
EU-Mexico Policy Dialogue and Seminar in Higher Education International credit mobility: objectives, challenges and tools in Erasmus+ Maria Sticchi Damiani.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) More details in the site: Dr Michalis Glampedakis Professor Technological Institution (University)
Promoting the EQF Learning Outcomes Approach within European Universities A European project supported by the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Promoting the EQF Learning Outcomes Approach within European Universities A European Project supporting the “Learning Outcomes Revolution” in the EHEA.
The TUNING Russia project outcomes Maria Seninets DSTU Tuning Centre.
ECTS and the Recognition of Qualifications Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 27 May 2008.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Determining course credit. What is a credit system? Systematic way of describing an educational program by attaching credits to components Can be based.
- ANALYSIS OF QUALITY DATA USING SPSS FOR THE EDUCATION PROCESS OF PUAS - MEASUREMENT OF STUDENTS SATISFACTION THROUGH SPPS AND MODIP IN PIRAEUS UNIVERSITY.
EXPERIENCE OF AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM: WORKLOAD OF STUDENT AND TEACHER IN THE.
CRELLA ECTS European Credit Transfer (and Accumulation) System MOBILITY, COURSE DESCRIPTION, MODULES, DIVISION OF CREDITS,
Quality Assurance in Education - Independence - Responsibility - Transparency - Openness - Regularity (Periodic Review)
Recognition of credits: The University of Ferrara case International Mobility and Education Office dr. Gianluca Zucconelli.
National Qualifications Framework Silesian University of Technology Faculty of Transport Ph.D. Rafał Burdzik.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Mobility, Recognition, ECTS Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Office of Planning & Development
ways to promote quality students mobility
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Presentation transcript:

Prof Philippos Pouyioutas 1,2,3, Dr Harald Gjermundrod 2,4 and Dr Ioanna Dionysiou 2,4 1 University of Nicosia Research Foundation, Cyprus 2 Participating in: the UNILO project 3 Co-ordinating/ 4 Participating in: the ReProTool Project ReProTool and UNILO Information Day/Workshop March 2, 2012, Nicosia, Cyprus

Presentation Structure  The Bologna Process  Re-engineering Academic Programmes (designing a new programme, Delivering and Quality Assurance Auditing)  ReProTool ◦ Motivation for the Tool ◦ Architecture of the Tool ◦ Examples of use of the Tool  Conclusion 2

The Bologna Process  The Bologna process aims at developing a European Educational Framework of standards/definitions/concepts so as to provide the basis for European countries to transform their educational system according to this framework.  This will result in comparability/compatibility of the various European educational systems which will enable collaborations amongst educational institutions, exchanges of students and teachers within Europe and transparency and transferability of qualifications.

Bologna Process Concepts  European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) - provides the framework for measuring the student workload in courses/programmes and thus calculating the credits of these courses/programmes.  Learning Outcomes (LOs) - allow courses and programmes to be expressed in terms of what a learner is expected to know by the end of the course/programme.  European Qualifications Framework - for mapping the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) of each European country to this framework, thus transitively, mapping each country’s educational system to another country’s system.

 critically compare and evaluate database models and database systems  design and develop database applications using commercially available database systems  enhance and fine-tune database applications with regards to security, authorization and optimization  develop web-based database applications at an intermediate level  critically assess post-relational database models and especially the object-relational database model, standards and languages  develop advanced queries using the SQL language  research in state-of-the art areas in databases systems. Example Example - After Completing the Course Students are Expected to be Able to: Example

Usefulness of LOs  Provide a common platform for Transparency, Comparability, Transferability and Recognition of Programmes  Students become aware of what they will be able to do after completion of the courses and the programme  Faculty are forced to rethink of the curriculum and make sure that each LO is assessed  Employers know what graduates are able to do  Careers Officers can match employers requirements to graduates knowledge, skills and competences (L0s)  Erasmus co-ordinators and Academic Departments are facilitated when developing exchange agreements for students and faculty  Professional Associations can map Programmes to their requirements  Quality Assurance Agencies are facilitated when conducting audits of programmes and when evaluating European awards (through the EQF-NQF mapping)

 QAA are in the process of modifying their accreditation/validation rules and procedures to incorporate L0s. Most probably QAA audits will be looking at evidence that ◦ all stakeholders were involved in the formulation of a programme’s LOs ◦ there is consistency of LOs according to their level (e.g. 1st Cycle LOs match EQF and NQF corresponding level) ◦ there is consistency of a programme’s LOs with the LOs specified in European Standards/Sector frameworks, benchmarks, etc.) ◦ a programme’s LOs comply with technical qualifications frameworks at National Level ◦ there is consistency and comparability among LOs across the institution and its programmes ◦ the institution provides all resources so that LOs are SMART, are assessed and are met by students Quality Assurance agencies and LOs

 Provides support and (ECTS Label) templates for the introduction, delivery and quality assurance of programmes  Allows one to build a programme and courses by selecting LOs from a pool of such resources and then modify and add new ones accordingly  Provides Matrices that verify that the programme's LOs are met by at least one course of the programme.  Allows searching for LOs achieved by a course or the courses that achieve a particular LO.  Automates the completion of the student forms which are used to calculate the student workload and thus the number of the ECTS of the course.

 Allows what-if analysis and performs workload and ECTS recalculations very fast and error- free.  Checks the semester breakdown of the programme in terms of the 30/60 ECTS requirements per semester/year.  Allows the fast processing of all student forms and produces average workloads for each course and each LO of a course, and the average ECTS of the course, as estimated by the students.

 For managing (creating/editing) the end- users of the system.  For assigning users authorization privileges.  For maintaining data pertaining to programmes, courses, faculty members, programme co-ordinators, students  For exporting/importing data to/from management information systems of various institutions.

 Allow flexibility and customization  Provide facility for creating academic years, semesters, trimesters etc. to cater different requirements at national and institutional level

 For setting up programme's LOs  For creating/editing LOs, assigning LOs to the programme and associating LOs with the programme's courses  For generating reports including amongst others ◦ LOs of a course ◦ LOs of a programme vs. the programme's courses ◦ LOs of a programme not covered by any course ◦ Programme's total ECTS and Semester's total ECTS.

 Allow a flexible definition of Learning Outcomes (taking into consideration National Qualification Frameworks and University regulations and practices)

Faculty member Area  For completing the Course ECTS Calculation Teacher form, which lists the course’s LOs, the associated educational activities (teaching/learning methods), the assessment methods and the estimated student workload (number of hours) that students are expected to spend on each LO.  Calculating the total student workload in hours and thus the total ECTS of the courses  For comparing with the student estimated workload and ECTS and hence for making any amendments if needed.

 Matching Course LOs to Programme LOs  Generating the above matrix  From the above matrix then the Course vs. LOs matrix explained in the Programme Co- ordinator area can be generated automatically  Allow (alternatively -for comparison purposes) the Course vs. LOs matrix to be created independently and then compare it with the one generated from the Course LOs vs. Programme LOs matrix

 For recording the number of hours students spend every week in a course.  For calculating the total number of hours spend by each student in each course  For calculating the average total number of hours spent by all students in the course and thus calculating the average student workload that is translated into the course ECTS as estimated by the students.

 Will allow lecturers to record student absences; thus calculating in-class attendance work load  Student will provide on a weekly basis their out-of-class workload  System will produce statistics and charts ◦ (weekly and cumulative weekly) student workload (in-class, out- of-class, total) for a course and comparison with the class average student workload and the expected workload set by the faculty – bar chart ◦ (weekly and cumulative weekly) student workload (in-class, out- of-class, total) for all courses taken by student and comparison with the class average workload and the expected workload set by the faculty – bar chart ◦ Percentage of student workload (in-class, out-of-class, total) devoted for each course (weekly and cumulative weekly) and comparison with the expected workload percentages – pie chart ◦ Facility to allow students to provide feedback to their lecturers ◦ E-portfolio facilities allowing the student to reflect on his/her work and future plans for studying

Thank you. Questions?