Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice 1 1 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emissions in GEMS Data on emissions are needed for the 4 sub-systems GHG, GRG, AER and RAQ GEMS Project has dedicated tasks for emissions and surface fluxes.
Advertisements

Allan Spessa 1,2, Kirsten Thonicke 3, Colin Prentice 3 Simulating Climate-Vegetation-Fire Interactions & Emissions: Regional Applications of the LPJ-SPITFIRE.
Savanna fire impacts on regional and global climate 4 February 2008 William Sea Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University CSIRO Marine.
KATIE IRELAND, ANDY HANSEN, AND BEN POULTER Modeling Vegetation Dynamics with LPJ-GUESS.
BUSHFIRES IN AUSTRALIA
Evaluating landscape flammability through simulation modeling Marc Parisien 1, Victor Kafka 2, Bernie Todd 1, Kelvin Hirsch 1, and Suzanne Lavoie 1 1 Canadian.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS Variation of land surface albedo and its simulation Shusen Wang Andrew Davidson Canada Centre for.
Introducing a Fire Danger Rating System for South Africa
The paper deals with the reconstruction of the forest fire in The Slovensky Raj National Park in the year Program system FARSITE has been used for.
1 An Improved Fire Model in LPJ-SPITFIRE By Leilei Dong University of Bristol 14/10/2008.
Interannual variability in terrestrial carbon exchange using an ecosystem-fire model and inverse model results Sergey Venevsky (1), Prabir K. Patra (2),
Daniel Metcalfe Oxford University Centre for the Environment Comprehensive monitoring of carbon allocation and cycling across.
Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Uncertainty in Ecosystem Production and Biomass of Amazonia Caused by Vegetation Characteristics Christopher Potter.
Summary Terrestrial ECV’s Alexander Loew, Silvia Kloster Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology.
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
Fire regimes and the World’s biomes 23 September 2010.
Wildland Fire Today and in the Coming Decades: What Might We Expect? Scott Stephens ESPM - Division of Forest Science University of California, Berkeley.
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Climate change, fires, and carbon aerosol over N. America with preliminary detour to discuss GCAP model development (GCAP= Global change and air pollution)
RISICO a system for wide-nation wildfire risk assessment and management Paolo Fiorucci, Francesco Gaetani, Riccardo Minciardi.
Carbon sequestration in China’s ecosystems, Jingyun Fang Department of Ecology Peking University Feb. 14, 2008.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
METR112-Climate Modeling Basic concepts of climate Modeling Components and parameterization in the model sensitivity of the model.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
Global Ozone Project Curriculum Rev 13 Lesson 3: Carbon Sources - Carbon Monoxide.
Oct-03FOFEM 5 Overview An Overview of FOFEM 5 Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
Forest Fire Simulation - Principles, Models and Application
Fires and the Contemporary Global Carbon Cycle Guido van der Werf (Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands) In collaboration with: Jim Randerson (UCI,
Fire in the Tropics October 21, Fire in the tropics: natural or human tool? Natural disturbance in some tropical and subtropical ecosystems, but…
Surface-Atmosphere Fluxes Part II Christine Wiedinmyer
Global estimates of emissions from fires, Part 1: Emission estimates from fires in the Tropics and Subtropics, Guido R. van der Werf 1, James.
1 Fire Weather Science Fire Weather System Project EcoConnect-Fire Implementation, June 2013 April 2011.
Fire regimes in the fynbos biome: Is there cause for concern? Brian van Wilgen CSIR Natural Resources and Centre for Invasion Biology.
FAO Committee on Forestry 2009 Special Event Climate Change and Fire 18 March 2009 Vegetation Fires and Climate Change Interactions Global Fire Monitoring.
Development of the Temperate Shrub Submodel for the Community Land Model-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM) Xubin Zeng Xiaodong Zeng Mike Barlage.
Carbon cycle assessment Patricia Cadule Jean-Louis Dufresne Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Paris. CCI-CMUG, 27 May 2015.
Estimates of Biomass Burning Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Emissions from the GOES Imager Xiaoyang Zhang 1,2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Chris Schmidt 3 1 NOAA/NESDIS/Center.
Drivers of Global Wildfires — Statistical analyses Master Thesis Seminar, 2010 Hongxiao Jin Supervisor: Dr. Veiko Lehsten Division of Physical Geography.
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada Sunling Gong Scientific Team: Tianliang Zhao, David Lavoue, Richard Leaitch,
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
Fire-climate-vegetation- topography-land use What drives and determines fire patterns across time and space? What are the implications of global climate.
Simulated Interactions of Soil Moisture, Drought Stress, and Regional Climate in the Amazon Basin Scott Denning 1, Jun Liu 1, Ian Baker 1, Maria Assun.
Future climate change drives increases in forest fires and summertime Organic Carbon Aerosol concentrations in the Western U.S. Dominick Spracklen, Jennifer.
Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Future Wildfire Activity over the Southeast U.S. using Dynamical Downscaling Jared H. Bowden Kevin D. Talgo Uma.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
300 Years of NEP Caused By Land Use, CO 2 Fertilization and Climate Change According to LM3 Shevliakova, Malyshev, Hurtt and Pacala.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES IN CENTRAL SIBERIA D.J. McRae 1, S.G. Conard 2, G.A. Ivanova 3, S.P. Baker 4, A.I. Sukhinin.
Seasonal Emissions of N 2 O, NO, CO and CO 2 in Brazilian Savannas Subjected to Prescribed Fires Alexandre Pinto, Mercedes Bustamante, Laura Viana, Universidade.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Climate Change, Uncertainty and Forecasts of Global to Landscape Ecosystem Dynamics Ron Neilson Leader, MAPSS Team USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
Assessment and optimisation of SPITFIRE using EO data, and Bayesian probability and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques FireMAFS project: Gomez-Dans,
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
CMUG meeting – March 2016 Fire_cci phase 2 progress. Interactions with other ECVs Phase 2 of the Climate Change Initiative Fire_cci project Emilio.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Response of the mean global vegetation distribution to interannual climate variability Michael Notaro Associate Scientist Center for Climatic Research.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Using TEMPO to Evaluate the Impact of Ozone on Agriculture
Achievements in Wildland Fire Risk Mapping
Western Mensurationists Meeting 2016
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Can global models reproduce the current increase in western US wildfires and project a reliable future trend? Dominique Bachelet, Conservation Biology.
Models of emissions from savannas
NOVELTIS/Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse (France)
Wildfires Burn baby, burn.
Presentation transcript:

Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice 1 1 2

Challenges to estimate global fire emissions: Wildfire emission models E x = Area burnt*Fuel load*Combustion Efficiency*EF x to simulate vegetation - fire interactions: Mechanistic fire models in DGVMs –Vegetation dynamics & composition on fuel characteristics –Burning conditions (fire behaviour & intensity) determine biomass burnt, thus trace gas emissions –Actual vs. potential vegetation (Human impact) Reduce uncertainties Inventory & satellite data  Inter- annual variability  Different climate conditions Burning conditions Affected vegetation

Vegetation-fire model: Our approach

SPread and IntensiTy of FIRE (SPITFIRE) Embedded in Lund-Potsdam-Jena DGVM –litter carbon pool (leaves, sapwood, heartwood) reclassified into dead fuel classes (1, 10, 100, 1000-hr) –live grass (higher moisture content than dry fuel)  fire spread –Tree architecture  fire behaviour & post-fire mortality –Post-fire mortality  Vegetation composition & fuel availability –More fire processes = more PFT parameters  fuel characteristics & fire traits Resolution: –0.5° x 0.5° grid cell –Daily: fire processes –Monthly: calculating trace gas emissions –Annual: update of vegetation dynamics

Distribution of precipitation according to no. wet days (Gerten et al. J.Hydr. 2004)  daily estimation of fire danger Fire danger index FDI = Probability that an ignition leads to a spreading fire Litter moisture per fuel class = f(NI) Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions (Nesterov 1949)

“Frame” for potential fires  Fuel availability (as simulated by LPJ)  Climate Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Expected number of fires E[n f ]=E[N ig ]*FDI with E[n ig ]=E[n l,ig ]+E[n h,ig ] –Lightning –Human-caused ignitions (after Venevsky et al. 2002) Depending on human population density Population growth : RIVM Database (NL) Spatial: rural vs. urban lifestyle Temporal: average no. ignitions per grid cell or region (intentional & negligence) Minimum intensity to sustain a fire Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

a)Human-caused ignitions per region: - Intentional > negligence Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

b) Estimated for case study regions (grid cell) Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions Canada: LFDB + small fires + grassland fires Siberia Northern Australia

Conditions of an average fire Fire spread after Rothermel –Potential fuel load –Fuel characteristics Litter moisture Surface-area-to-volume ratio Fuel bulk density –Wind speed (NCEP re-analysis data) Fuel consumption after rate of spread –Litter moisture Assume elliptical fire shape Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions Per PFT Fuel class

Human-dominated fire regimes (regional estimate) & constant wind speed Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Surface fire intensity I surface =H*ROS*  (fuel consumed) Scorch height per PFT Crown scorch (CK) per PFT SH of fire vs. tree height & crown length Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Low intensities in savannahs High intensities in forest ecosystems Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Post-fire mortality P m = P m (CK) & P m (cambial damage) –Mortality from crown scorch = r(CK)*CK 3 –Cambial damage = residence time of fire  l / critical time for cambial damage  c  c = 2.9 * BT 2 with BT- Bark thickness –Biomass of killed trees to litter pool  available for burning in the following year Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Carbon release to atmosphere –Surface fire –Crown scorch Plant material from killed plants to respective dead fuel classes Emission factor (Andreae & Merlet 2001, Andreae pers. comm. 2003) –CO 2, CO, CH 4, VOC, NO x, Total Particulate Matter Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Carbon release to atmosphere –Surface fire –Crown scorch Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Emission factor (Andreae & Merlet 2001, Andreae pers. Comm. 2003) –CO2, CO, CH4, VOC, NOx, Total Particulate Matter Fire Danger Index No. ignitions Spread Effects Emissions

Next steps Evaluation of interannual variability & seasonality Variability in area burnt, fire intensity in relation to biomass burning Comparison of biomass burning estimates –Methods –Uncertainties