Additional elements: structure Goal/standard/audit Feedback Action plans Characteristics of recipients General/external aspects Mechanism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C4EO Support for Regional Developments Gill Taylor Regional Associate 1.
Advertisements

Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
Challenging thinking and making a difference… Dawn Lewinson Employers Network for Equality & Inclusion (ENEI)
Strengthening Church and Government Partnerships for Primary Health Care Delivery in Papua New Guinea: Lessons from the International Experience HPHF Hub.
School leadership development and learning-centred educational policies EdLead TEMPUS Halász Gábor ELTE University, Budapest Click on pictures.
Session 4: Frameworks used in Clinical Settings, Part 2 Janet Myers, PhD, MPH Session 2 ● September 27, 2012.
Workplace Health A Model of Worklife Michael P. Leiter, PhD COR&D Acadia University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ILM Level 3 Award or Certificate in Leadership and Management A three or five day programme 15 Ensign, Westwood Way, Coventry, CV4 8JA.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Triple C Competency-based Curriculum: Implications for Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Out of Office: A Toolkit for an Agile Future. The Research Survey 13 organisations in public and private sectors 1219 team members: 55% female and 45%
Mental Skills Project LTA Senior Coach Course. Mental skills project consists of a presentation that has to be delivered during module 6 of the course.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Presented by: Susan Walker Communication Alignment Evaluation Solutions e mail:
Strategic Commissioning
Applying theory to designing A&F interventions and evaluations in head to head trials Susan Michie Department of Psychology, UCL Ottawa December 2012.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Effective Pedagogy It’s Just A Matter of Time Graeme Aitken School of Education The University of Auckland Based on material originally.
S7: Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Multimedia CALL: Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Instructed SLA Carol A. Chapelle Presenters: Thorunn April.
Performance Management. Concept Performance management can be defined as a strategic and integrated approach to sustained success to organizations by.
Evidence-Based Management Leading an EBMgt Culture Change Denise M. Rousseau H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior Carnegie Mellon.
Wgnho Management for Performance Department of Conservation Management for Performance Project.
The Impact of Health Coaching
Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning process To finalise the audit approach.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Paddie Blaney Chief Executive NIPEC. NIPEC supports nursing and midwifery in Northern Ireland by promoting the best standards of practice, education &
1 Managers and Transfer Barriers Organisational politics Short term targets Lack of managerial support Lack of time for planning Enablers Authority to.
Proving Our Worth Monitoring and Evaluation Panel.
100 ways to support recovery A guide for mental health professionals Rethink recovery.
+ Evidence Based Practice University of Utah Evidence-Based Treatment and Practice: New Opportunities to Bridge Clinical Research and Practice, Enhance.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Social Marketing Social Marketing’s Distinguishing Features Case Studies: Food Thermometer Education Evaluating a Social Marketing Intervention: Cardiff.
Improving Purchasing of Clinical Services* 21 st October 2005 *connectedthinking 
ILM Level 3 Award or Certificate in Leadership and Management
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
VISIBLE LEARNING VISIBLE LEARNING St Mary’s RC High School.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Jamie Hayes. Clinical Trial Patient ? Real Patient ?
School improvement and teacher development
What is Supervision? “ A working alliance between a supervisor and a worker in which the worker can reflect on herself and her working situation…the object.
Delivering outstanding professional development for teaching
PISA 2009 – New Approaches to Assessing Reading Literacy
Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing
Developing Sustainable Behaviour Change Training
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Otto Rohwedder Thanks to Paul Lord for this one…
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Management and Leadership
Evaluating and Institutionalizing OD Interventions
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
HMS Academy Fellowship in Medical Education Research June 2, 2016
Summit on Field Education 2014
H676 Week 5 - Plan for Today Review your project and coding to date
Presentation transcript:

Additional elements: structure Goal/standard/audit Feedback Action plans Characteristics of recipients General/external aspects Mechanism

Additional elements – Goal/Standard/Audit Visibility of required behaviour Modifiability of behaviour e.g. co-morbidity of patients, extent to which it is automated, habit strength Engagement with setting the goal Number of goals Quality of goal SMART goals

Feedback Competence of deliverer e.g. how to give feedback Seriousness of outcome Profile/importance of outcome in society Salience/vividness/emotional connotations of feedback Behaviour Recipient seeks feedback rather than passively receiving it Multiple behaviours Framing – positive vs negative/ gain vs loss Complexity of target (different types, draw on theory) Credibility of source Goal orientation (motivation, mastery vs learning) of recipients Intrusiveness of intervention vs part of daily routine Visibility of feedback Timeliness

Feedback ctd –Interpretation, time to review, –Opportunity to reflect and discuss (e.g on causes of behaviour, instances of successful performance) –Support from management/ leaders for feedback –Graded feedback, starting positively –Multi-modality –Format re. new media –Linked to key messages –Feedback to teams –Longitudinal feedback – to tell a story

Action plan Involvement with creating action plans Nature of action plans e.g. if-then plans

Characteristics of recipients Past experience of audit and feedback as more or less useful Alignment with goals/values etc of recipient re. receiving feedback and changing behaviour Knowledge of goals and why they are there Allegiance of goal Perceived social comparison with group and individuals/ social norm Trust in organisation Autonomy of recipient Intuitive vs reflective orientation Learning style Authority of recipient Organisation/ self-regulation of recipient Educational level/ reflectiveness Responsibility for practice Union membership

General/External aspects Combine with other interventions e.g. –Financial or other consequences of A&F –Whether A&F evaluated Automation of practice Preparation/anticipation for intervention e.g. present audit details and that you will be assessed Time spent on intervention Engagement in designing A&F Alignment with goals/values etc of recipient

Mechanism Relationship between components and outcome e.g. curvilinear

What is “intrinsic” to A&F? Prototypical - Components of audit & feedback Discretionary – action plans, modes of delivery Assumptions –that being used for a group that are motivated to change their practice –interactions between co-interventions and how intrinsic factors work –minimal standard for feedback - comparison data, feedback of recent performance, include written/visual feedback

Criteria for selecting/prioritising Empirical findings Theory/principles from relevant literature/disciplines Dominant beliefs/Frequent current practice Practitioner experience

Testable hypotheses 1.Level of aggregation of feedback data should be aligned to performance to be changed – individual vs practice/team 2.Complexity/nature of feedback re. number of indicators reported on number of behaviours; bundles; order/priority of indicators; tailoring 3.Format of feedback 4.Mode of delivery of feedback – eg. Paper, electronic, social 5.Frequency of feedback 6.Time to reflect/act on feedback 7.Engagement in design and delivery of feedback vs top down 8.Role for intermediate outcomes/process measures 9.Providing information/commentary alongside the feedback to add to /interpret the feedback 10.Including action plans – type e.g. if-then 11.Training of recipients of feedback

Constraints/ considerations – criteria to use to select what to study 1.Cost 2.Current priorities and policies 3.Current practice and possibilities e.g. re. quality of data, measures 4.Feasibility and screening work 5.Designs to 1.translate activity into evidence 2.maximise number of components to test within resources 6.Sample size – collaborations across groups