Project Overview Purpose: to partner with 9 th grade math teachers as they implemented a proficiency- based learning & grading system in their Algebra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Advertisements

West Virginia Schools 21 st Century Learning. WV Content Standards and Objectives.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Creating Coherence Work Session: Part 1 Copyright © 2013 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Connecting Teacher Evaluation and Support.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
Lesson Study Races to the Top in Florida A Report on Lesson Study Initiatives In The Sunshine State Collaborate Plan Align Learn Motivate Share.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Keystone Instructional Specialist. Keystone Exams Offered three times each year – winter, spring and summer. Offered in Algebra I, Biology and Literature.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
YOUR LOGO January 13, 2014 ALL Site Coaching Session.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Elementary Teaching & Learning Moving Forward with Literacy Plymouth Church.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
LEARNING GOAL: Teachers will have an overall understanding of Common Core State Standards, understand the timeline for implementation and understand the.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
California Reading First Superintendents’ Summit III Ready, Set, Go: Successful Leadership in a Reading First School Michael Romero, Director District.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
PDE Literacy Design Collaborative Grant February 16, 2011.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
CaMSP Science Assessment Webinar Public Works, Inc. Sharing Lessons Learned in the Development and Use of Science Assessments for CaMSP Teachers and Students.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
PART 2 CREATING a CULTURE of LEARNING MOVING TOWARDS STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
STEM Connect A STEM Initiative funded by Golden Leaf.
Introduction to Pearson Forward
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Reflective Problem Solving Collaborative Problem Solving
Presentation transcript:

Project Overview Purpose: to partner with 9 th grade math teachers as they implemented a proficiency- based learning & grading system in their Algebra I/Geometry classes, & to provide them with professional development that guided & supported their efforts. Alignment: Consistent with the SDP’s Anchor Goal 1, 100% of students will graduate, ready for college & career, PARLO emphasizes accumulating knowledge rather than averaging grades. Students who are not yet proficient persist & reassess for Proficient (P) or High Performance (HP) on Learning Outcomes, as defined by teachers & aligned to Keystone Algebra 1/Geometry eligible content. Duration: March 2010 – February 2016 Participants: 16 (urban, suburban, rural) districts in Pennsylvania, 32 schools (including 10 SDP Schools), 85 teachers (including 16 SDP Teachers), over 4,000 students. Contributors/Stakeholders Funder: National Science Foundation ($2.4mil, DRL # ) Stakeholders: school districts & 9 th grade Algebra 1 & Geometry teachers committed to improving math teaching & learning; 9 th grade students & their parents/guardians. Resources: buy-in from admin & teachers; research team with experience teaching HS math, implementing PARLO, & studying formative assessment; consultants (current & former math teachers/coaches); software to monitor student progress. Activities Summer PD: Teachers reviewed PA math standards, eligible content, curricular materials, & Webb’s Depth of Knowledge, & collaborated to develop Learning Outcomes; teachers learned how to incorporate formative assessment & provide meaningful feedback with the shared expectation that students would act on it. PLCs: During the school year teachers participated in monthly 2-hour PLCs at individual schools that were facilitated by PARLO experts. Implementation In ways both big & small, the enacted PARLO study was clarified & strengthened in response to participants’ needs, concerns, & requests. PARLO in practice became vibrant as participants infused it with meaning, made it their own, & made it work for them inside the existing structures of individual classrooms & schools. Adaptation: In response to teachers’ feedback, after the first year, we asked the PARLO Experts who facilitated the PLCs to visit teachers’ classrooms monthly to observe their implementation & offer strategies that addressed their challenges (instructional, managerial, & logistical). This adaptation contributed to fidelity of implementation. Teacher Outcomes 1. 89% adopted new practices/routines to make PARLO work % changed their feedback process to help students focus on their errors/misconceptions & develop strategies to correct them. 3. During exit interviews, all teachers reported that going forward they would continue to implement all or some components of PARLO. Contact Information Nancy Lawrence & Kathleen Krier 21 st Century Partnership for STEM Education Michael Posner, Villanova University Sukey Blanc – External Evaluator Collaborating with 9 th Grade Math Teachers to Implement a Proficiency-based Assessment & Reassessment of Learning Outcomes (PARLO) System