Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment types and activities
Advertisements

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Standardized Tests: What Are They? Why Use Them?
Mini Project II Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Dani Ladwig.
Evaluation of the Iowa Algebra Aptitude Test Terri Martin Doug Glasshoff Mini-project 1 June 17, 2002.
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know?
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
2015 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know? Paramount Unified School District Parent Presentation, Grades Great Things Are.
Chapter 9 Instructional Assessment © Taylor & Francis 2015.
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Lynn Thompson Center for Applied Linguistics Startalk Network for Program Excellence Chicago, Illinois October 16-18, 2009 Formative and Summative Assessment.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
The World of Assessment Consider the options! Scores based on developmental levels of academic achievement Age-Equivalent scores.
2014 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio Screencast Training on How to Administer the Portfolio Assessment January 2014
Administering ELDA K & ELDA 1-2 English Language Development Assessment Assessing ELL Students in the Primary Grades Developed by the Limited English Proficient.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
General Information Iowa Writing Assessment The Riverside Publishing Company, 1994 $39.00: 25 test booklets, 25 response sheets 40 minutes to plan, write.
Week 5 Lecture 4. Lecture’s objectives  Understand the principles of language assessment.  Use language assessment principles to evaluate existing tests.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
1 NYSESLAT Training Copyright 2005 by Harcourt Assessment, Inc. NYSESLAT CONTENTS OF THIS OVERVIEW  Test features  Materials  Administration.
ARD Forms – A Guide for CTE Teachers Click on each link to the featured ARD form examples. Click on each Icon to listen to the accompanying narrative.
Alabama Extended Standards & Body of Evidence Marla Davis Holbrook & Susan Skipper Fall Leadership Conference August 17, 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
8th Grade Criterion-Referenced Math Test By Becky Brandl, Shirley Mills and Deb Romanek.
1 New England Common Assessment Program Guide to Using the 2005 NECAP Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation March/April 2006.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
PARCC Spring,  Testing Window for ELA and Math: 4/24-5/27  MCAS Grade 8 Science Testing Window: 5/10-5/24  TMMS Testing Dates: TBD PARCC OVERVIEW.
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
Assessment Update Wood Acres Elementary February 7, 2006 KPJ 2006.
GATE Informational Meeting GATE Testing  Grade 2: Universal – all enrolled 2nd grade students are tested.  Grades 3-5: New to the district students.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Parent Academy September 17, 2016
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
Paulding County School District 2017 Baggett Elementary
Assessment.
2012 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
2017 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Standards Based Grading
Learning About Language Assessment. Albany: Heinle & Heinle
Hope College December 2, 2013 Laurie.
Bursting the assessment mythology: A discussion of key concepts
Kentucky Alternate Assessment-Alternate K-PREP
Making Sense of Assessment
Getting Students Ready to ACE the
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
Georgia Department of Education
2011 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
Georgia Milestones Online Testing Program
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
2013 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
March 2019 GA Milestones 3rd, 4th, and 5th.
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Doug Glasshoff Greg Gaden Darin Kelberlau
Presentation transcript:

Mini-Project #2 Quality Criteria Review of an Assessment Rhonda Martin

Standard Listening: By the end of fourth grade, students will gain information or complete tasks by listening

Assessment Total Listening score from the Stanford 9 norm-reference assessment: Advanced percentile score Proficient percentile score Progressing percentile score Beginning percentile score

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion One: The assessments reflect the state or local standards. Evidence of Match to Standards  The Language Arts Committee matched Elkhorn objectives to the Nebraska LEARNS Standards in A Listening Rubric was developed by the committee for teachers to use as an assessment tool in the classroom.  There are 40 items on the Listening subtest. Students listen to the test administrator (teacher) read passages and questions. Students answer multiple choice questions on an answer sheet. The student test booklet only shows the answer choices. Passages and questions are not included in the student booklet.

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion Two: Students have an opportunity to learn the content. Evidence of Match to Standards  District Curriculum Guides include listening objectives in grades 2-4.  Grade level teachers meet on several in-service days during school year to determine how standards are taught and assessed in classrooms.  Language Arts standards are recorded in daily lesson plans.

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion Three: The assessments are free from bias. STARS participants were trained in writing assessments that were free from bias. Stanford 9 assessments have rigorous guidelines regarding bias. No time limit given for assessment

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion Four: The level is appropriate for students. Language Arts objectives have been evaluated by the Language Arts Committee for developmental appropriateness. The fourth grade take the fourth grade Stanford 9 assessment. Students who need extended time or alternative tests have appropriate accommodations recorded on their IEP’s.

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion Five: There is consistency in scoring. The Stanford 9 assessment is electronically scored and tests meet rigorous reliability criteria. Scores are normed. Students, teachers and administration all receive consistent and reliable test data.

Nebraska Quality Criteria Quality Criterion Six: Mastery Levels are Appropriate Mastery levels concerning norm- referenced tests have been determined by the Nebraska Department of Education. National Percentile Ranks are used for determining cut scores.

Conclusion & Plans for Future Is the Stanford 9 Listening test the best way to measure listening achievement for fourth grade students?