Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAPS IN THE UPPER SNAKE HEADWATERS SUBBASIN Tim Reynolds, Ph.D. TREC, Inc. January 23, 2002.
Advertisements

1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project AQ 3 – Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report – 2008 March 3, 2009.
Middle Fork American River Project AQ 2 – Fish Population Technical Study Report Overview March 3, 2009.
Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
2015 ND COUNTY ENGINEERS & HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENTS CONVENTION.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Tagging  Fish are captured via angling & implanted with a VEMCO acoustic transmitter (V13, V9, or V7) – (Figure 4).  Specific age classes are targeted.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Approach for Developing New.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat). Purpose Create a continental-wide program to monitor bats at local to range-wide scales Provide data to.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 6,
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 – Special-Status Amphibian and Aquatic Reptiles Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting March 6, 2008.
GIS Applications in Forest Resource Management: Wayne National Forest Impact Assessment and Monitoring of the 2003 Ice Storm Nicole I. Stump GIS Specialist.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
Tina Jackson Species Conservation Coordinator Terrestrial Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO
WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Module 02 – Survey Techniques: D03 – Comparison of bird survey techniques WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Module 02 – Survey Techniques:
July Middle Fork Project Additional Information Potential Project Betterments to be evaluated during Relicensing July 2006.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 4: Special-Status Wildlife Preliminary Results.
Terrestrial Resources Working Group June 3, 2008.
Science, consensus, and monitoring strategies : the art of revising a long-term benthic monitoring program Heather Peterson California Department of Water.
2012 Instream Flow Study Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24,
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
An Ecosystem Management Approach to Riparian Zones Joy O’Keefe Clemson University.
Membership Need to clarify members and determine who has authority to vote on group decisions.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting February 19, 2008.
Coral Reef Protected Area Status Report Presentation to the 10 th Meeting of U.S. Coral Reef Task Force Bill Millhouser NOAA’s National Ocean Service October.
Roadmap for Soil Community Metagenomics of DOE’s FACE & OTC Sites
CENSUS OF MARINE LIFE All Program Meeting Mapping & Visualization Pat Halpin November 2007 Auckland, New Zealand.
Northwest Florida Water Management District Wednesday, August 13, 2014.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
TDWG (mostly) thinks about point occurrences But what about other sources of geographic distribution data and info.? SPECIES INVENTORY (and why focus on.
Chuck Seidler California Air Resources Board September 2015.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
Pre-construction baseline monitoring of amphibians for the I-90 Snoqualmie East Project: Distribution, Detection, Tracking Pre-construction baseline monitoring.
Middle Fork Project Potential Project Betterments October 1, 2007.
Summary Euphausiids (krill) are important food items of fish, seabirds and whales: consequently, it is important to understand their seasonal cycles. The.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results End State and Final Closure Jeff A Lerch Manager, Long Term Stewardship June 1 and 2, 2006.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Cultural Technical Working Group Meeting November 18, 2008.
GEOG 596A Identifying Potential Dispersal Corridors for the Common Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) in Hoima District, Uganda Marta Jarzyna.
Iron Ore Holdings Ltd Buckland Project & Northern Quoll: adaptive mine design and management 30 July
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
Ecological Assessment of Symonds Yat Rapids Eric Palmer Cresswell Associates.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
TEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF DATA FROM THE FRENCH SENTINEL NETWORK.
Participatory Mapping 2 October 2014 Seychelles Marine Spatial Planning Initiative 22 October 2014 Technical Working Group Meeting #2.
Site-specific Wild Oat Operation Program (SWOOP) C Fernandez-Quintanilla, J Barroso, D Ruiz Centre for Environmental Studies, CSIC A Ribeiro, B Diaz, MC.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Stephen van Leeuwen Program Leader, Biogeography Partnership Manager, Science Division Department of Environment and Conservation Pilbara Leaf-nose Bat.
1 Occupancy models extension: Species Co-occurrence.
 Harp traps are designed to catch flying bats without damaging their wings.  They consist of a frame that supports two rows of fine thread, and a catching.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
FIELD COURSE MANKWE GAME RESERVE, SOUTH AFRICA Dr. Steve Willis Dr Phil Stephens TBC.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Impact assessment & Management of the Northern Quoll in the Pilbara
Middle Fork Project Project Description and Operations Maps
Middle Fork Project TERR 3 – Noxious Weed Technical Study Report Overview February 17, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Middle Fork Project TERR 6 - Special-Status Bat Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 3, 2008

1 Study Objectives Document special-status bats and roosts at existing Project facilities, features, and recreation features Document special-status bats and roosts at existing Project facilities, features, and recreation features Document special-status bats and roosts at potential Project betterments Document special-status bats and roosts at potential Project betterments Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii )

2 TERR 6 – Special-Status Bats Study Objectives and Related Conduct Facility AssessmentDevelop Preliminary Map of Known Occurrences Visual Roost Surveys Handheld Acoustic Sampling Infrared Video Conduct Reproductive Surveys Identify Facilities Not Providing Bat Access or Potential Habitat Conduct Seasonal Habitat Use Surveys Stationary Acoustic Sampling Mist Net Sampling Select Survey Locations and Methods Document Special-Status Bat Seasonal Habitat Use in the Study Area Document Special-Status Bat Occurrences in the Study Area Identify Facilities Supporting Bats Identify Facilities Potentially Supporting Bats Document Special-Status Bats and Roosts Develop Final Map of Known Occurrences TERR 6 – Special-Status Bats Technical Study Report – 2008 Study Elements and Reports

3 Conducted Facility Assessment Supporting bats Supporting bats Potentially supporting bats Potentially supporting bats Not providing bat access or potential habitat Not providing bat access or potential habitat French Meadows Powerhouse – Sign of extensive roosting activity in alcoves Identified Project Facilities or Features:

4 Selected Focused Survey Locations and Site-Specific Methods During Terrestrial TWG Conference Call (August 13, 2007) Reviewed Facility Assessment Results Reviewed Facility Assessment Results Refined Scope of TSP Refined Scope of TSP Selected Survey Locations and Site-Specific Methods for: Selected Survey Locations and Site-Specific Methods for:  Reproductive Surveys  Seasonal Habitat Use Surveys Western Red Bat (Lasiurus blossevillii ) Twelve Reproductive Survey Locations Nine Seasonal Habitat Use Survey Locations

5 Reproductive Surveys Conducted at: Conducted at:  Facilities where bat roosts or sign were identified  Facilities determined to be suitable for bat use, but presence was not determined during Facility Assessment Implemented August and September 2007 Implemented August and September 2007 Consisted of one or more of the following site- specific methods: Consisted of one or more of the following site- specific methods:  Visual Roost  Handheld Acoustic  Infrared Video

6 Seasonal Habitat Use Surveys Spatially distributed across elevation range of study area at reservoirs, diversion pools, and potential Project betterments Spatially distributed across elevation range of study area at reservoirs, diversion pools, and potential Project betterments Focused in potential flight paths near foraging habitat or commuting corridors Focused in potential flight paths near foraging habitat or commuting corridors Implemented August through October 2007 Implemented August through October 2007 Consisted of one or more of the following site- specific methods: Consisted of one or more of the following site- specific methods:  Mist netting  Stationary Acoustic –5-Night –Long-Term

7 Survey Results No special-status bat roosts identified in Project facilities or features No special-status bat roosts identified in Project facilities or features Three special-status bats detected during acoustic sampling : Three special-status bats detected during acoustic sampling :  Pallid bat  Townsend’s big-eared bat  Western red bat Special-status bat activity was concentrated in August Special-status bat activity was concentrated in August

8 Bat Roosts Identified In Study Area Reproductive Surveys

9 Five-Night Acoustic Seasonal Habitat Use Survey Results Five-Night Acoustic Seasonal Habitat Use Survey Results

10 Five-Night Acoustic Seasonal Habitat Use Survey Results (cont.)

11 Surveys were conducted at 4 Project facilities Surveys were conducted at 4 Project facilities Peak detections in August Peak detections in August Between 9 and 15 bat species were detected at each sampling location Between 9 and 15 bat species were detected at each sampling location Of these, 3 were special-status species: Of these, 3 were special-status species:  Pallid bat  Townsend’s big-eared bat  Western red bat Total common bat passes: 44,029 Total special-status bat species passes: 74 Long-Term Acoustic Surveys Pallid Bat (Antrozous pallidus) 0.17% of passes were special-status bats

12 Special-Status Bat Detections