1 FFC SUBMISSION: MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK 2004-2007 ________________________ Presentation to Portfolio & Select Committees on Finance 27 May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UTILISING STATISTICS IN DETERMINING ALLOCATIONS SOUTH AFRICA’S EQUITABLE SHARE FORMULA SELLO MORE FS TREASURY.
Advertisements

Division of Revenue Bill 2007 [B3-2007] Select Committee on Finance NCOP Lungisa Fuzile and Jo-Ann Ferreira 28 October 2007.
1 Department of Education Presentation to Select Committee of Finance FFC Submission for the Division of Revenue: 2009/10 11 June 2008.
Inaugural Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Accra - Ghana, 10th - 12th March 2009 Equitable Financing of Primary.
DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) Projects and.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
1 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE ON THE PROVINCIAL BUDGETS & EXPENDITURE REVIEW 14 NOVEMBER 2006.
EXPANDED PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMMES INCENTIVE GRANT.
2001 MTBPS Division of Revenue 2001 MTBPS Division of Revenue 6 November 2001 Presentation to Budget Committee.
1 NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PRESENTATION ON THE FFC RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE DIVISION OF REVENUE 2011/12 17 AUGUST 2010.
 Local government is a constitutional sphere of government. The legal framework for local government is contained in Chapter 7 of the Constitution of.
1 Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Finance, National Assembly 20 February 2004 SUBMISSION to PARLIAMENT on the DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL 2004 / 05.
1 Outcome of Conditional Grants & Capital Expenditure as at 30 November 2005 [Section 40(4) of PFMA] Select Committee on Finance National Council of Provinces.
GRANTS ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CONDITIONAL GRANTS Financial Management and Quality Enhancement in Education ( pages 2-12); Early Childhood.
DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL VOTE 16: HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING Presentation to Standing Committee on Appropriations 26 February 2010.
1 FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION Submission for the Division of Revenue 2008/09 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Education 16 October 2007.
LG EQUITABLE SHARE Presentation to Portfolio Committee 5 June 2002.
COMMENTS ON THE APPROPRIATION BILL 2011 STANDING COMMITTEE OF APPROPRIATIONS 13 A PRIL 2011 For an Equitable Sharing of National Revenue.
Treasury presentation: financing of social grants Portfolio Committee: Social Development 18 September 2003.
SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE 26 MAY 2006 Hearings on the FFC recommendations DORA 2007/08.
1 2009/10 DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL Presentation to Select Committee on Finance 24 February 2009.
Response to FFC submission for Division of Revenue 2011/12 Dept of Basic Education presentation to Select Committee on Finance 17 August 2010 Dept. of.
1 Presentation to Select Committee on Appropriation regarding sector analysis JULY 2014 BY MONGANA TAU.
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act: Summary by: Mkhethwa MKHIZE Committee Section.
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION COMMENTARY on the 2002 Medium Term Budget Policy Statement
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
HEALTH FINANCING MOH - HPG JAHR UPDATE ON POLICIES Eleventh Party Congress -Increase state investment while simultaneously mobilizing social mobilization.
1 Consolidated Municipal Infrastructure (CMIP) and Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) DPLG PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
Financial and Fiscal Commission Submission on the 2011 Division of Revenue Bill Select Committee on Appropriations 22 March 2011.
By the Director-General of the Department of Provincial and Local Government (the dplg), Ms Lindiwe Msengana-Ndlela Monday, 7 May 2007 Presentation to.
1 Response to Financial and Fiscal Commission Submission for The Division of Revenue 2010/2011 Presentation to Select Committee on Finance 06 August 2009.
1 SUBMISSION ON THE 2003 / 04 DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL Presentation to Portfolio Committee 3 March 2002 Presentation to Portfolio & Select Committees on.
1 Local Government Budgets and Expenditure Review 2001/02 – 2007/08.
1 FFC SUBMISSION ON THE DIVISION OF REVENUE 2007/08 PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE _____________________ 17 MAY 2006.
Presentation to: the Joint Budget Committee on the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement Employment & Social Security November 19, 2003 Dr. Miriam Altman.
FFC Framework for assessing Conditional Grants 16 March 2010 Financial and Fiscal Commission 1.
Estimates of National Expenditure 2003 NATIONAL TREASURY.
Comments on FFC Annual Submission for 2006/07. COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS –Local Government Equitable Share Allocation –Infrastructure Grants –Health.
1 FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION SUBMISSION FOR THE DIVISION OF REVENUE 2008/09 August 2007.
Budget Information Service Response to the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement 2003 “The Budget once again facilitates service delivery to poor people,
1 FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION Submission for the Division of Revenue 2008/09 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Housing 10 October 2007.
Presentation to the Health Portfolio Committee Presentation to Health Portfolio Committee Free State Department of Health 15 APRIL 2003.
Budget Vote/Strategic Plan Presentation
The Standing Committee on Appropriations
FFC SUBMISSION: AN ASSESSMENT OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT FUNDING
Parliament and the National Budget Process
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
Health expenditure outcomes & the ffc’s health recommendations Briefing to the portfolio committee on Health 20 October 2011.
SALGA Comments on LG Grants Division of Revenue Bill, 2011
Financial and Fiscal Commission
Early Childhood Development Delivery – one year later
Division of Revenue Bill 2008 [B4-2008]
Idasa Budget Information Service
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
Division of Revenue Bill 2004 [B4-2004]
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE 18 OCTOBER 2005
Division of Revenue Bill 2004/05
INGONYAMA TRUST BOARD’S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
from a health sector perspective
2003 Intergovernmental Fiscal Review Provincial Budget Trends
FFC SUBMISSION FOR THE DIVISION OF REVENUE 2002/03 Provincial Hearings
4th Economic and Social Rights Report - SAHRC
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL COMMISSION – Budget Analysis Unit
from a health sector perspective
FFC SUBMISSION: DIVISION OF REVENUE 2002/2003
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY
FFC COMMENTS ON THE DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL 2006/07
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SETTLEMENT UPDATE ON ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

1 FFC SUBMISSION: MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK ________________________ Presentation to Portfolio & Select Committees on Finance 27 May 2003

2 Introduction Appropriate to review intergovernmental fiscal relations system since 1994 –FFC review builds on previous submissions and responds to stakeholder comments –Emphasis is on underlying principles of the system and primacy of the Constitution Submission also addresses issues relating to Division of Revenue 2004/05 Consistent theme: provision of constitutionally mandated basic services

3 Part A: FFC Review of the Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations System Proposals applicable to: –Expenditure assignment –Performance measurement –Poverty targeting –Norms and standards –Collection of data –Co-operative governance

4 Part A: Key issues The pace at which constitutionally mandated basic services are being progressively realised Ensuring equity and efficiency through the appropriate assignment of functions intergovernmental fiscal arrangements Sustainability of the intergovernmental system: future role and capacity of provinces and district and local municipalities

5 Part A: Key issues cont’d Maintaining the balance between progressive realisation and Section 214(2)(a-j) Ensuring provinces are able to respond to preferences for public services and have incentives for efficiency Establishing and maintaining the vertical balance in the equitable division of revenue The appropriate methodology for determining the equitable division of revenue horizontally among provinces and municipalities

6 Part A: Key issues cont’d Ensuring effective participation of each sphere in intergovernmental fiscal arrangements Developing required capacity in all spheres of government

7 Part A Proposals: Expenditure Assignment The social security grant & social insurance system should be aligned with provision of free basic services National Social Security Agency should be jointly accountable to national and provincial government Assignment of water and housing provision should be clarified

8 Part A Proposals: Performance Measurement National policy objectives should be expressed as delivery & funding programmes Indicators of inputs, outputs, and outcomes should be used to evaluate programmes Government should clarify progressive realisation of constitutionally mandated basic services (CMBS)

9 Example of CMBS Performance Indicators CMBS functions e.g. housing, health, food, water, social security, education Delivery & funding programmes e.g. ECD, child support, reproductive health care  Cross functional & functional policy outcomes e.g. poverty, numeracy, mortality rates  Delivery outputs e.g. take-up rates & quality ratios (beneficiary : unit of personnel, capital)  Financial inputs e.g. real growth rate of spending

10 Part A Proposals: Poverty targeting Costs of poverty targeting should be weighed against costs of universal coverage of free basic service provision Impact of education and health user fees should be considered Impact of tariffs for basic municipal services should be considered

11 Part A Proposals: Norms and standards Norms and standards should take account of resource constraints and the need for policy flexibility Norms and standards should be based on current averages or minimum international standards

12 Part A Proposals: Fiscal capacity Potential revenue base of provinces and municipalities should be measured Socio-demographic and economic data should be disaggregated to the lowest level possible

13 Part A Proposals: Co-operative governance Role of Budget Forum and Budget Council should be reviewed to co- ordinate integrated development planning and budgeting

14 Part A Proposals: Collection of data Provincial and municipal treasuries should publicise budgets, financial statements, and development plans All official and recognised data sources should be identified and audited Data collection and release cycles should be co-ordinated with planning cycles Time lag between collection and release of national statistics should be reduced

15 Part A Proposals: Collection of data cont’d National departments should verify and publish data on beneficiaries receiving constitutionally mandated basic services Data should identify population eligible for receipt of social services and household infrastructure StatsSA should collate measures of the extent, cause, and alleviation of poverty The value, level, and rate of depreciation of public sector capital stock should be measured

16 Part A Proposals: Funding instruments Design of conditional grants should be negotiated between transferring and recipient authorities Role of conditional grants should be circumscribed to avoid distortions in equitable share distribution Capital grants should be designed to eradicate infrastructure backlogs and link with progressive realisation of CMBS Capital grant funds should be equitably allocated using FFC capital grants model

17 Part B: FFC Submission for the Division of Revenue 2004/05 Proposals applicable to: –National government –Provincial government –Local government

18 Financing HIV/AIDS Impact of the condition is uncertain Different data sources on infection rates –ANC (annual), HSRC (2002), ASSA (2000) –Cost implications are not clear Serious long-term implications for social security grants system –Disability grants beneficiaries at advanced AIDS stages –Foster care grants for orphans between being orphaned and adoption

19 Financing HIV/AIDS cont’d Enhanced response programme –Increased funding to NDoH for procurement Condoms, media campaigns working well –Increased funding through HIV/AIDS conditional grants: DSD, Health,Education Criteria differ from one grant to another and provinces apply different weights to the grants Conditions are cumbersome and too stringent –Increased funding through the equitable share Allocation is not tied to any specific programmes

20 Proposals: Financing HIV/AIDS Current national programmes should be retained and strengthened Existing conditional grants should be evaluated in terms of their efficiency –Clear and coordinated policy framework needed at the national level Changes in social spending resulting from increases in the equitable share should be evaluated

21 Health conditional grants National Tertiary Services (recurrent) Health professional training and development (recurrent) Hospital revitalisation (once-off project specific) Pretoria academic hospital (once-off grant) HIV/AIDS (recurrent) Integrated nutrition programme (recurrent) Hospital management and quality improvement (once-off project specific grant)

22 Provincial government Review of the provincial equitable share formula with respect to the social sector –Education ECD, ABET, LSM, “Out of Age” enrolment, performance indicators –Social Development Grant types, take-up rates, beneficiaries, provincial needs, problems with current formula –Health Base population growth rates, medical aid population, age and gender, fixed shares, crowding-out

23 PES: Education Component Current formula as applied by Treasury –Weighting for inappropriate age learners Allocates equal amounts per-capita Biased against provinces with a large number of inappropriate age learners (poorer provinces) –ECD currently provided via a conditional grant but to be folded into the ES formula FFC proposals for DoR 2003/04 Not enough information on the number of learners currently in formal system, especially in rural areas –Policy requires phasing in over 10 years

24 PES: Education Component cont’d Adult Basic Education and Training (ABET) –Currently about 200,000 adults receive ABET in ALCs –Difficulty in designing a formula-based grant due to definitional problems –No norms and standards –Data on demand sketchy

25 PES: Education Component cont’d Learner Support Materials –Study needed to identify the nature of the problem –Report to the Minister of Education FFC made its submission separately Performance indicators –Necessary to support government efforts in developing service delivery indicators –Also necessary for generating data for taking costed norms approach forward

26 Proposals: Education Component The formula for the education component should end the double weighting of “school age learners” The FFC reiterates the proposal that the formula should be adjusted to incorporate Grade R –The allocation should be based on a poverty-weighted count of children aged five and six in each province Government should establish a conditional grant programme for financing education programmes for increasing/improving adult literacy and numeracy

27 PES: Health Care Component Base population –Not sensitive to population growth rates between census periods Age and gender utilisation rates –Differential service utilisation rates not accounted for Medical scheme population –Data that is currently utilised not appropriate Fixed share components –Not related to policy guidelines and minimum norms and standards but more to past aggregate expenditure trends Crowding out –Increasing take-up rates in different social security grants result in crowding out of other social sector programmes and health is the most vulnerable

28 Proposals: Health Component Provincial population growth rates should be incorporated into health care component of the PES formula Age and gender variation in the population be taken into account in determining the relative need for health services –An acceptable index should be constructed making use of international and domestic data The data used for the medical scheme population should be based on the best available annual estimate and the weighting should be reviewed

29 PES: Social Development Component Nature of Social Development component –Transfers –Means-testing –Progressive realisation and take-up rates Problems with formula as currently applied: –Allocations to categories –Allocation to sub-categories –Number of grant categories –Take-up rates –Means testing –Incentives

30 Proposals: Social Development Component Populations of grant recipients in the formula should be revised to reflect take-up rates more closely Overall allocation to social development should be revised to reflect provincial aggregate spending on social development programmes Allocation to social development should distinguish between social security grants and welfare services and allocate an amount for each Current top-down methodology should be reviewed to ensure that the relative needs of provinces are reflected more closely

31 Overall PES formula Formula has indicative weights that reflect historical proportions of expenditure need –Eg health’s indicative allocation is 19%, yet actual expenditure was 18% in 2002/03 and 17.9% in 2004/05 Social security is highly demand driven, but the indicative weight is not related to this demand –Results in a crowding out of other social services as provinces are under pressure to pay grants for fear of litigation

32 Proposals: Overall PES Formula Shares in the formula should be determined according to explicit policy guidelines on minimum norms and standards FFC reiterates the proposal that social security grants should be budgeted for and funded from the national level –This would minimise the crowding out of other social service delivery mandates through the pressures from social security grant payments

33 Local government On-going research into the basic services and fiscal capacity components of the equitable share formula Funding of institutional capacity Funding of urban and rural development nodes Development of a differentiated approach to municipalities

34 Local government: Funding of institutional capacity Poor service delivery owing to lack of lack of administrative capacity –Different kinds of capacity needed: management, technical, and administrative skills Current institutional funding: –I grant of equitable share –Capacity-building grants Need to identify core capacity and ensure funds are well-targeted

35 Local government: Urban and rural development nodes 13 rural and 8 urban nodes From 2002/03, some nodal funding channelled through the equitable share allocation. FFC concerns: –Equitable share should be distributed according to criteria that apply to all munis Criteria should be objective and beyond direct political control –Implies different standards of “basic service provision” –National priorities best funded through national grants

36 Local government: Differentiated approach to munis Previous FFC recommendation: apply to municipal borrowing Over-arching classification inappropriate Classification could be appropriate for: –Municipal borrowing –Revenue sources –Municipal service partnerships

37 Local government proposals Institutional funding (equitable share and conditional grants) should be assessed to ensure it reflects capacity needs of munis Funding of the development nodes should not come from the local government equitable share allocation Government should consider developing a differentiated approach to such areas as municipal borrowing, revenue sources, and service partnerships