Today’s agenda Analysis vs Advocacy Bardach’s 8 step review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Best Practice Regulation Best Practice Regulation Regulatory Impact Analysis Darrell Porter Office of Best Practice Regulation.
Advertisements

Evidence-based Policy in DEFRA
© 2009 Berman Group. Evidence-based evaluation RNDr. Jan Vozáb, PhD partner, principal consultant Berman Group.
7 July SPA508 Policy Analysis & Design Overview of course Policy Analysis & Policy Analysts Components of policy process Defining policy problems.
Refutation China Debate Education Network:. Definition of Refutation Refutation involves one debater directly responding to an argument of an opposing.
TACKLING POVERTY TOGETHER Youth Contributing to Poverty Reduction.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Formal Analytical Reports Ch 24. Analytical reports To answer questions: 1. What are the issues? 2. What are the conclusions we have? 3. What should we.
Chapter Eleven: Effective Communication in Task Groups and Teams.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy- Making Process Lecture 3b – Components of a Policy Paper.
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis
Final Exam Review PUB/POS 140 May 6, 2008.
Part I. Introduction. Comparative and International Education. Part II. The Process of Policy Analysis The Making of Education Policy.
Policy making and policy- capacity building Prof. Tatiana Tomova
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
Assessment In Mathematics Math 412 January 22, 2007.
October 15,  You are only responsible for readings, lectures, and themes up through last week (through October 10)  Theme list for midterms will.
 Simulation overview  Policy analysis  Analysis vs Advocacy  Talking: stakeholder engagement  Tutorial on Problem Definition Rod Charlesworth
POLICY ANALYSIS WHAT IS IT? HOW DO WE DO IT? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?
Learning Outcomes from Report-Writing Unit
Higher Physical Education
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : How to construct.
Dealing with Policy Change in Education Common borders. Common Solutions. Grant Contract No , MIS-ETC 2674 MANAGE.EDU: Efficient Education.
2013 Policy Development. Career Pathways Policy Committee – Chairs: Mo Amundson and Laura Beeth Youth Experiential Learning Policy Committee – Chairs:
Evaluating the Options Analyst’s job is to: gather the best evidence possible in the time allowed to compare the potential impacts of policies.
Advocacy CAMS Gathering November 2010 Fiona Caniglia.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
Policy Rules and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in Canada Pierre Duguay Deputy Governor.
Pristina, February  unidisciplinary  issue exploring  comprehensive  neutral  time uncritical  substantiated  as long as possible 
1.  Policy Cycle  Government actors - incentives  Interest Groups  Interests  Resources  Strategies 2.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Stacey M. Kesten EPS 654: Program Evaluation December 10, 2011.
To compare/evaluate offers and proposals quickly and accurately Understand own strengths and weaknesses and compare to other parties’ strengths & weaknesses.
1.  Policy Cycle  Government actors - incentives  Interest Groups  Interests  Resources  Strategies 2.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Historical Thinking Why Historical Thinking Matters.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Learn More, Earn More, Live More with CT. Welcome Students! Aiken Technical College’s Quality Enhancement Plan.
MAFF Workshop on INTERNATIONAL BEST Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) PRACTICES 24 August 2010.
Objectives and Criteria: What are they and how do we use them? Where do they come from? What are the “must-have” criteria? How are market and government.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Introduction to policy briefs What is a policy brief? What should be included in a policy brief? How can policy briefs be used? Getting started.
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION. The URBEM Framework.
Agenda-setting; Policy Formulation I: the foundations of policy analysis October 14, 2014.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
VALUES AND MONITORING Performance Monitoring and Evaluation College of Public and Community Service University of Massachusetts at Boston ©2006, William.
PA 8081 Engaging the Public in Policy and Planning 4:30 p.m. Passion, Professionalism, & the Capstone 4:45 p.m.Scopes of Work: Progress & Lessons Learned.
EU policy measures for food waste prevention through social innovation Silvia Gaiani (UNIBO) FUSIONS RPM in Budapest Budapest, June 3rd.
Selecting Evaluation Criteria and Evaluating Policy
Presented by The Solutions Group Decision Making Tools.
Developing an Evaluation Strategy George Selvanera Senior Consultant Cordis Bright Ltd
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Professional Communication: The Corporate Insider’s Approach Chapter Five Reasoning: Framing the Sound Business Argument.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Integration into the decision making process Session.
Planning health policy Health/finance dialogue (1) 6 April 2011 Nairobi.
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
CEEN 525 Policy Analysis Framework
Which type of claim does this represent?
Which type of claim does this represent?
After School Programs: What Works and What Doesn’t
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
Basic Management Functions
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
An Integrated Governance Approach towards Inclusive Development
Assessment In Mathematics
THE ENVIRONMENT THAT INFLUENCES NURSING CARE
Searching and Organizing
Stakeholder Engagement
Presentation transcript:

Policy Analysis in a political context: Northern Gateway Pipeline case study

Today’s agenda Analysis vs Advocacy Bardach’s 8 step review Better list? Applications to NGP

Policy Cycle Model Agenda-Setting Policy Formulation Decisionmaking Policy Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation

Policy Formulation Thinking Talking Policy analysis of alternatives Consultation with stakeholders

Analysis vs. Advocacy Analysis advocacy Neutral stance on Solutions, Problem framing Careful, balanced use of evidence Position based on group’s interest Strategic framing More selective use of evidence Does effective analysis ignore other side’s argument, or engage it? The best argument explicitly addresses an opponents strongest claim and discredits it with evidence and reason

8-fold path September 23, 2008 FRST 415/POLI 333

Bardach 8-fold path define the problem assemble some evidence construct the alternatives select the criteria project the outcomes confront the trade-offs decide! tell your story September 23, 2008 FRST 415/POLI 333

6-step Patton and Sawieki – Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning Verify, define and detail the problem Establish evaluation criteria Identify alternative policies Assess alternative policies Display and distinguish among alternatives Implement, monitor, and evaluate the policy

Essential Steps Define problem Criteria for evaluation Identify multiple alternatives Outcomes/consequences of alternatives Compare/tradeoff Recommended decision

1. Problem definition don’t confuse with solutions quantify if possible be skeptical about common causal claims

2. Criteria for evaluation apply to outcomes, not alternatives build on problem definition common: Effectiveness Efficiency (cost-effectiveness) equity political acceptability robustness and improvability

3. Identify multiple alternatives start comprehensive, end up focused

4. Project Outcomes/Consequences projection = model + evidence attach magnitude estimates breakeven estimates avoid excessive optimism scenario-writing other person’s shoes

5. Compare/Tradeoff Commensurability Confront the tradeoffs

5. Compare/Tradeoff Alternatives/ criteria

Next week: Policy instruments Which combination of instruments should be used to alter the energy system to reach climate targets?