CE-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Efficacy and Safety in Chronic Constipation Eslie Dennis, MD Senior Medical Director: Gastroenterology Clinical Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBER Isolagen Therapy (IT) BLA FDA Clinical Review Agnes Lim, MD Yao-Yao Zhu, MD, PhD DCEPT/OCTGT/CBER, FDA October 9, 2009 Advisory Committee Meeting.
Advertisements

Clozaril Monitoring Systems, Registry Data and Analyses (United States, United Kingdom, & Australia) Vinod Kumar, MD Executive Director Clinical Development.
Improving Standards of Care in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
Overview of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Bifantis ® (Bifidobacterium infantis 35624) Clinical Data In Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
1 The Chemoprevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Issues Surrounding a Benefit/Risk Analysis in Clinical Trials Mark Avigan MD CM Medical Officer Division.
IBS In The Elderly Monica J. Cox ARNP-BC, MSN, MPH Geriatric Nurse Practitioner G.I. Nurse Practitioner Borland-Groover Clinic Jacksonville, Florida.
1 Lotronex ® (alosetron HCl) Tablets Risk-Benefit Issues Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D. Director, Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
1 ZELMAC (tegaserod) Presentation to GI Advisory Committee June 26, 2000 Raymond E. Joseph MD Medical Officer HFD-180.
Clinical trial 2. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of varenicline for smoking cessation compared with sustained-release bupropion (bupropion.
CM-1 Chronic Constipation: An Unresolved Problem for Many Patients Charlene Prather, MD Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Saint Louis University.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
CB-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Benefit/Risk Philip Schoenfeld, MD, MSEd, MSc (Epi) Division of Gastroenterology University of Michigan School of Medicine.
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
ACAMPROSATE Efficacy Results from Three Pivotal Efficacy Trials Karl F. Mann, M.D. Professor and Chairman Director, Department of Addictive Behavior and.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Copyright © 2011 Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd SERAPHIN: RESULTS FROM A LANDMARK STUDY.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
CI-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 14, 2004 Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July.
1 1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Advisory Committee Presentation Gastrointestinal Drugs July 14, 2004.
CC10-1 ZOMETA ® in Breast Cancer and Multiple Myeloma: Pamidronate-Controlled Trial (010) James Berenson, MD Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California.
The COMBINE Study: Design and Methodology Stephanie S. O’Malley, Ph.D. for The COMBINE Study Research Group JAMA Vol. 295, , 2006 (May 3 rd.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee May 1, 2007 FDA Presentation Advair Diskus 500/50 Carol Bosken, MD, ScM, MPH Medical Officer Division of Pulmonary.
C-BR- 1 Raptiva ™ (efalizumab) Benefit:Risk Assessment Charles Johnson, MB, ChB Senior Director Head of Specialty Biotherapeutics Genentech, Inc.
Clinical trial 2. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of varenicline for smoking cessation compared with sustained-release bupropion (bupropion.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A 2 Alosetron /26 Allen Mangel, M.D., Ph.D. International Director Gastroenterology International Product Development Leader, Alosetron Safety &
CD-1 Rationale for Indication of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Study Design Roger Lane, MD, MPH Disease Area Section Head for Dementia Neuroscience.
CC-1 Benefit-Risk Assessment Murat Emre, MD Professor of Neurology Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Department of Neurology Behavioral Neurology and Movement.
1. What is the most common cause of constipation? A.Pelvic floor dyssynergia B.Slow transit C.Functional D.Mechanical obstruction.
IN 1 NDA Gastrointestinal Advisory Committee Meeting Gaithersburg, Maryland June 26, 2000 Gastrointestinal Advisory Committee Meeting Gaithersburg,
INPULSIS® trial design and baseline characteristics
EF 1 Efficacy and Safety Martin P. Lefkowitz, MD Director, Clinical Research Martin P. Lefkowitz, MD Director, Clinical Research.
STUDY 303 A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, 12 to 14 Month Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Mesalamine Given.
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
Statistical Considerations on NDA Sonia Castillo, Ph.D. Division of Biometrics 2 June 26, 2000.
Oxypurinol for Symptomatic Gout in Allopurinol Intolerant Patients Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting June 2,
GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) second interim analysis in.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Conclusions Sidney Cohen, MD Chairman, Department of Medicine Temple University School of Medicine Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Sidney Cohen, MD Chairman,
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 500 N = 100 W12 Placebo > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen.
Time to initial resolution of rectal bleeding and high stool frequency in patients who achieved clinical and endoscopic remission after up to 8 weeks.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Zelnorm ® (tegaserod) Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Gary Della’Zanna, D.O., M.Sc., F.A.C.O.S.
1 Varenicline for smoking cessation Robert West University College London Logroño, October
Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Effect of RT002, a Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection, to Treat Glabellar Lines: The Phase 2 BELMONT Study Authors:
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Randomized Controlled CTN Trial of OROS-MPH + CBT in Adolescents with ADHD and Substance Use Disorders Paula Riggs, M.D., Theresa Winhusen, PhD., Jeff.
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
Manufacturer: Relypsa Inc. FDA Approval Date: October 21, 2015
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prucalopride for Severe Chronic Constipation Michael Camilleri, M.D., Rene Kerstens, M.Sc., An Rykx, Ph.D., and Lieve Vandeplassche,
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the Serotonin.
A Clinical Overview.
TEGASEROD PROGRAM FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA
Trulance™ - Plecanatide
Maintenance Lapatinib After Chemotherapy in HER1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
Management of Constipation in Adults
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pediatric allergic asthma
Presentation transcript:

CE-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Efficacy and Safety in Chronic Constipation Eslie Dennis, MD Senior Medical Director: Gastroenterology Clinical Development and Medical Affairs Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Eslie Dennis, MD Senior Medical Director: Gastroenterology Clinical Development and Medical Affairs Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation C

CE-2 Outline  Rationale  Study objectives  Study design  Patient population  Efficacy –Primary –Secondary  Safety and tolerability –12-wk double-blind, placebo-controlled –13 months extension, double-blind, uncontrolled  Rationale  Study objectives  Study design  Patient population  Efficacy –Primary –Secondary  Safety and tolerability –12-wk double-blind, placebo-controlled –13 months extension, double-blind, uncontrolled C

CE-3 NH NH 2 OH SerotoninTegaserod C Rationale for Drug Design Similarity to Serotonin (5-HT)  An aminoguanidine indole, designed to act specifically at 5-HT 4 receptors in the GI tract NH N O

CE-4 Rationale for Zelnorm ® in Chronic Constipation Program #Nguyen A, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280: §Weber E, et al. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(Suppl 2):A147-A148. ‡Novick J et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16: #Nguyen A, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;280: §Weber E, et al. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(Suppl 2):A147-A148. ‡Novick J et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16: In IBS-C clinical studies:  Increases stool frequency ‡  Improves stool consistency ‡  Improves straining ‡ In IBS-C clinical studies:  Increases stool frequency ‡  Improves stool consistency ‡  Improves straining ‡ C Mechanism of action:  Enhances gut motility #  Decreases transit time #  Increases chloride and water secretion § Mechanism of action:  Enhances gut motility #  Decreases transit time #  Increases chloride and water secretion §

CE-5 Phase III Chronic Constipation C

CE-6 Study Objectives Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  To evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Zelnorm ® in patients with chronic constipation –2 mg and 6 mg BID vs placebo –12-wk treatment period  To evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Zelnorm ® in patients with chronic constipation –2 mg and 6 mg BID vs placebo –12-wk treatment period 19 CSRs E2301, E2302; Sections 2

CE-7 Study Designs C

CE-8 Study E2301 Study Design Study E Clinical Overview F wk Treatment period Screening Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID Placebo Zelnorm 6 mg BID N = 1264 Europe, Australia, South Africa 2-wk Baseline No study drug

CE-9 Studies E2301, E2301E Study Design Studies E2301, E2301E Clinical Overview F wk Treatment period Screening No study drug Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID Placebo Zelnorm 6 mg BID N = 1264 Europe, Australia, South Africa n = 842 Zelnorm 2 mg BID Zelnorm 6 mg BID 13-mo Extension period E2301E1 2-wk Baseline Zelnorm 6 mg BID

CE-10 Study E2302 Study Design Study E Clinical Overview F wk Treatment period Screening Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID Placebo Zelnorm 6 mg BID N = 1348 North and South America 4-wk Withdrawal No study drug 2-wk Baseline No study drug

CE-11 CSBM Is the Basis for Patient Inclusion and Endpoints  BM: Bowel Movement  SBM: Spontaneous Bowel Movement –Spontaneous: non–laxative-induced stool; no laxative or enema in 24 hr preceding BM  CSBM: Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement –Complete: BM that results in sensation of complete evacuation –Measure of quality and frequency  BM: Bowel Movement  SBM: Spontaneous Bowel Movement –Spontaneous: non–laxative-induced stool; no laxative or enema in 24 hr preceding BM  CSBM: Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement –Complete: BM that results in sensation of complete evacuation –Measure of quality and frequency C Protocol CSR E2301, E2302, Sections 2, Pages 8 -9

CE-12 Current Concepts: Chronic Constipation Lembo, Camilleri N Engl J Med 2003; 349: “An epidemiologic study of constipation in the United States identified it as an inability to evacuate stool completely and spontaneously three or more times per week” ‡ ‡ Stewart et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94;

CE-13 Main Inclusion Criteria Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  Male or female, ≥ 18 yr of age  Chronic constipation # –Chronic: ≥ 6 months of constipation symptoms –Constipation: < 3 CSBM/wk and ≥ 1 of the following (≥ 25% of occurrences): Hard/very hard stools Sensation of incomplete evacuation Straining  Normal endoscopic/radiologic bowel evaluation within past 5 yr and after onset of symptoms –No alarm features  Male or female, ≥ 18 yr of age  Chronic constipation # –Chronic: ≥ 6 months of constipation symptoms –Constipation: < 3 CSBM/wk and ≥ 1 of the following (≥ 25% of occurrences): Hard/very hard stools Sensation of incomplete evacuation Straining  Normal endoscopic/radiologic bowel evaluation within past 5 yr and after onset of symptoms –No alarm features 19 CSRs E2301, E2302; Sections 3.3.2; 2.5 Clinical Overview, Section 4.3 CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. #Modified Rome II criteria.

CE-14 Main Exclusion Criteria Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  Constipation due to: –Organic disease of the colon –Known mechanical outlet dysfunction –Bowel or gynecologic surgery –Metabolic disturbances –Neurologic disturbances  Concomitant medications  Fecal impaction requiring surgical or manual intervention  Significant medical disorder that could interfere with completion of study  Constipation due to: –Organic disease of the colon –Known mechanical outlet dysfunction –Bowel or gynecologic surgery –Metabolic disturbances –Neurologic disturbances  Concomitant medications  Fecal impaction requiring surgical or manual intervention  Significant medical disorder that could interfere with completion of study 19 CSRs E2301, E2302; Section 3.3.2

CE-15 Exclusion Criteria at Randomization Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 Patients excluded if  During the 14-day baseline period –Constipation not confirmed by diary data –Loose or watery stools > 3 days –Laxatives > 2 days outside of guidelines –Noncompliant with completion of diary (< 11 days) Patients excluded if  During the 14-day baseline period –Constipation not confirmed by diary data –Loose or watery stools > 3 days –Laxatives > 2 days outside of guidelines –Noncompliant with completion of diary (< 11 days) C Protocol E2301, E2302; Sections 3.3.2

CE-16 Data Collected Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  Daily per bowel movement –Straining –Stool frequency –Stool form –Complete/incomplete evacuation  Weekly –Satisfaction with bowel habits –Bothersomeness of Constipation Distension/bloating Abdominal discomfort/pain  Daily per bowel movement –Straining –Stool frequency –Stool form –Complete/incomplete evacuation  Weekly –Satisfaction with bowel habits –Bothersomeness of Constipation Distension/bloating Abdominal discomfort/pain C

CE-17 Patient Disposition

CE-18 Patient Disposition—ITT Population Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Patients, % Placebo n = 863 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 867 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 882 Completed Discontinued Reason for discontinuation Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect Adverse event(s) Withdrew consent Other Summary of Clinical Efficacy T 3-8 C

CE-19 Results C

CE-20 Demographic Information Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 CSR E2301, PTT 7.3-1, 7.6-5; CSR E2302, PTT 7.3-1, E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = 1348 Female86%90% Age (mean, yr)4647 Range, yr ≥ 65 yr14%12% Postmenopausal # 43%48% Caucasians98%85% C #Female population (E2301, n = 1091; E2302, n = 1213).

CE-21 Constipation Symptoms Prior to Start of Treatment E2301 (N = 1264)E2302 (N = 1348) Mean History Duration of symptoms, yr Hard/very hard stools73.9%77.0% Average SBM/wk, n1.4 Diary data (14-day baseline) CSBM/wk, n SBM/wk, n SBM with straining/wk, n Stool form C CRS E2301,E2302 PTTS 7.5-1, 7.6-5

CE-22 Constipation Symptoms Prior to Start of Treatment E2301 (N = 1264)E2302 (N = 1348) MeanMedianMeanMedian History Duration of symptoms, yr Hard/very hard stools73.9%90%77.0%90% Average SBM/wk, n Diary data (14-day baseline) CSBM/wk, n SBM/wk, n SBM with straining/wk, n Stool form C CRS E2301,E2302 PTTS 7.5-1, 7.6-5

CE-23 Primary Efficacy Variable

CE-24 Primary Efficacy Variable Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 Wk Wk Wk wk drug-free baseline 12-wk treatment Responder –Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during the first 4 wk of treatment compared with baseline –≥ 7 days of treatment Responder –Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during the first 4 wk of treatment compared with baseline –≥ 7 days of treatment CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. 19 CSR E2301, F 3-1; E2302 pages 22-23

CE-25 Primary Efficacy Variable Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 *P <.05, ***P <.0001 Responder = Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during Wk 1- 4 and ≥ 7 days of treatment. CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. C E2301 * *** CSRs E2301, E2302 PTT n = 416 E2302 *** n = 450n = 447n = 451 n = 417n = 431

CE-26 Secondary Efficacy Variable: Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk During Wk Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 Responder –Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during the entire 12-wk treatment period compared with baseline # Responder –Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during the entire 12-wk treatment period compared with baseline # 18 CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. # ≥ 7 days of treatment. Protocol E2301 Amendment 3, Sections 1, 2 Wk Wk Wk wk drug-free baseline 12-wk treatment

CE-27 Secondary Efficacy Variable: Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk During Wk Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 ***P <.0001 Responder = Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk during Wk and ≥ 7 days of treatment. CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. C E2301E2302 *** CSRs E2301, E2302 PTT n = 416n = 450n = 447n = 451n = 417n = 431

CE-28 Weekly Responder Rate Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 CSR E2301, PTT 9.1-4; CSR E2302, PTT E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = P <.05, Zelnorm 2 mg BID vs placebo; P <.05, Zelnorm 6 mg BID vs placebo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Responder = Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk and ≥ 7 days of treatment. EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. PlaceboZelnorm® 2 mg BIDZelnorm 6 mg BID

CE-29 Weekly Responder Rate Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 CSR E2301, PTT 9.1-4; CSR E2302, PTT E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = P <.05 vs placebo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Responder = Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk and ≥ 7 days of treatment. EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. PlaceboZelnorm 6 mg BID

CE-30 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = P <.05, Zelnorm 2 mg BID vs placebo; P <.05, Zelnorm 6 mg BID vs placebo, van Elteren test. Mean data. CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement; EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. PlaceboZelnorm® 2 mg BIDZelnorm 6 mg BID CSR E2301, E2302, PTTs 9.2-2

CE-31 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = PlaceboZelnorm ® 6 mg BID P <.05 vs placebo, van Elteren test. Mean data. CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement; EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. CSR E2301, E2302, PTTs 9.2-2

CE-32 Further a priori Secondary Variables

CE-33 Satisfaction With Bowel Habits Wk Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 *P <.05; **P <.001 Responder = Mean decrease of ≥ 1 point on a 5-point scale compared with baseline, Wk Scale 0 - 4, 0 = a very great deal satisfied, 4 = not at all satisfied. * * ** 48 n = SCE T 3-18

CE-34 Stool Form Change From Baseline Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 P <.05, Zelnorm 2 mg BID vs placebo; P <.05, Zelnorm 6 mg BID vs placebo. Mean data. EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. Scale 1- 7, 1 = hard, 7 = watery. CSRs E2301, E2302 PTTs Placebo Zelnorm® 2 mg BID Zelnorm 6 mg BID E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = 1348

CE-35 Straining Score of Spontaneous Bowel Movements—Change From Baseline Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 P <.05, Zelnorm 2 mg BID vs placebo; P <.05, Zelnorm 6 mg BID vs placebo. Mean data. EOT = End of treatment; W = Withdrawal. Scale 0 - 2, 0 = no straining, 1 = acceptable straining, 2 = too much straining. CSRs E2301, E2302 PTTs 9.2-6IMPROVEMENT 32 Placebo Zelnorm® 2 mg BID Zelnorm 6 mg BID E2301 N = 1264 E2302 N = 1348

CE-36 Response Rates by Reduction of Bothersomeness - Wk Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 Patients, % Study E2301Study E2302 Placebo n = 416 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 417 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 431 Placebo n = 447 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 450 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 451 Constipation * 40.9*** * 37.5** Abdominal Distension/ bloating * 35.4* Abdominal discomfort/pain ** 30.5* *P <.05; **P <.001; ***P <.0001; Responder = Mean decrease of ≥ 1 point on a 5-point scale compared with baseline. Scale 0 to 4, where a lower score indicates less bother and greater satisfaction. Summary of Clinical Efficacy T 3-18 C

CE-37 Association of CSBM and Improvement of Symptoms (Wk 1 - 4) Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Median % change from baseline VariableResponderNon-responder P value Stool form of SBM <.0001 Satisfaction with bowel habit–40.0–6.7<.0001 Constipation score–37.5–8.3<.0001 Straining score–37.6–9.4<.0001 Days with too much straining–50.0–25.0<.0001 Abdominal pain score–33.30<.0001 Bloating score–33.3–8.3<.0001 C No DV

CE-38 Additional Analyses

CE-39 Responder –≥ 3 CSBM/wk during the first 4 wk of treatment ‡ –No comparison with baseline Responder –≥ 3 CSBM/wk during the first 4 wk of treatment ‡ –No comparison with baseline CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. #FDA responder definition #1. ‡ ≥ 7 days of treatment. Protocol E2301 Amendment 3, Sections 1, 2 18 Wk Wk Wk wk drug-free baseline 12-wk treatment ≥ 3 CSBM/wk Secondary Efficacy Variable: ≥ 3 CSBM/wk During Wk # Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302

CE-40 Secondary Efficacy Variable: ≥ 3 CSBM/wk During Wk # Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 C ** * E2301E2302 *** *P <.05; **P <.001; ***P < #FDA responder definition #1. CSRs E2301, E2302 PTT n = 412n = 444n = 442n = 449n = 410n = 428

CE-41 Secondary Efficacy Variable: ≥ 3 CSBM/wk During Wk # Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302 *** ***P <.0001 #FDA responder definition #2. E2301E2302 C CSRs E2301, E2302 PTT

CE-42 Responders by Baseline Bowel Movements/Wk C

CE-43 Responders by Baseline Bowel Movements/wk Primary Efficacy Variable Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled *P <.05; **P <.01; ***P <.0001 Responder = increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk, Wk 1 - 4, and ≥ 7 days of treatment. BM = Bowel movement; CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. n = 890 (34.4%)n = 1695 (65.6%) SCE PTT 9.1-1c *** ** *** 20

CE Overall < 65 yr ≥ 65 yr Male Female Caucasian Black No baseline laxatives Baseline laxatives Responders by Subgroup Primary Efficacy Variable Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Patients, n Zelnorm 6 mg BID Placebo Odds ratio Zelnorm ® 6 mg BID versus placebo, Wk Responder = Increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk; CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement C SCE Ts , , , , ,

CE-45 Patients With IBS-Like Features Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Addendum to SCE T 3-1, ED June 8, 2004 Patients, n (%) Criteria Placebo n = 863 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 867 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 882 a. History of diagnosis of IBS 21 (2)29 (3)39 (4) b.Abdominal discomfort/pain as main complaint 102 (12)108 (12)109 (12) c. Abdominal discomfort/ pain > 0 and diarrhea # 82 (10) 89 (10) 78 (9) d. Meets any of the above criteria 185 (21)201 (23)197 (22) #Patients with ≥ 25% of SBM loose or watery (stool form 6 or 7) or > 3 SBM/day for ≥ 25% of days. SBM = Spontaneous bowel movement. 54-1

CE-46 Responders Without IBS-Like Features Primary Efficacy Variable Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled *P <.05; ***P <.0001 Responder = increase of ≥ 1 CSBM/wk, Wk 1 - 4, and ≥ 7 days of treatment. CSBM = Complete spontaneous bowel movement. Addendum to Summary of Clinical Efficacy T 3-3 C PlaceboZelnorm® 2 mg BIDZelnorm 6 mg BID CC patients without IBS-like features n = 666 n = 651 n = Patients, % ***

CE-47 Efficacy Summary  Efficacy demonstrated in patients who were chronically constipated –Early onset of relief –Sustained –No rebound  Efficacy demonstrated for the treatment of the multiple symptoms of chronic constipation  Zelnorm ® 6 mg BID consistently more efficacious than Zelnorm 2 mg BID  Efficacy demonstrated in patients who were chronically constipated –Early onset of relief –Sustained –No rebound  Efficacy demonstrated for the treatment of the multiple symptoms of chronic constipation  Zelnorm ® 6 mg BID consistently more efficacious than Zelnorm 2 mg BID C

CE-48 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Safety in Chronic Constipation C

CE-49 Overview  12-wk safety profile –Exposure –Adverse events profile –Serious adverse events –Laboratory evaluations  Long-term safety profile (16 months)  12-wk safety profile –Exposure –Adverse events profile –Serious adverse events –Laboratory evaluations  Long-term safety profile (16 months) C

CE-50 Overall Exposure Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Summary of Clinical Safety PTT Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 Mean duration, days ± SD 79 ± 2381 ± 2180 ± 23 ≥ 77 days, n ≥ 85 days, n

CE-51 Most Frequent Adverse Events Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Clinical Overview T5-2 C

CE-52 Most Frequent Adverse Events # Leading to Discontinuation Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled SCS Table Patients, % Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 Any AE Abdominal pain NOS Diarrhea NOS Abdominal distension Nausea Headache NOS NOS = Not otherwise specified. #≥ 5 patients treated with Zelnorm ® any dose.

CE-53 Diarrhea Evaluation Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 Patients with diarrhea, n (%)26 (3.0)36 (4.2)58 (6.6) Diarrhea episodes per patient 1 episode, n (% of patients with diarrhea) 22 (84.6)29 (80.6)48 (82.8) Duration of first episode, days (median) Stool characteristics, first day of diarrhea (median) Bowel movements Stool form score # SCS Table 8-1 C E2301&E2301 Diarrhea data.xls #Bristol stool form scale.

CE-54 Diarrhea Management Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Patients, n Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 Diarrhea, n (%)26 (3.0)36 (4.2)58 (6.6) No action taken Concomitant medication taken Dose adjusted/interrupted Dose permanently discontinued Each AE occurrence counted. C SCS T8-1 and SCS PTT

CE-55 Diarrhea—No Clinically Significant Consequences Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  No clinically significant consequences of diarrhea  None required IV hydration or electrolyte replacement  No clinically significant consequences of diarrhea  None required IV hydration or electrolyte replacement C

CE-56 Serious Adverse Events Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Patients, n (%) Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 SAEs # 14 (1.6)11 (1.3)12 (1.4) Discontinuations due to SAEs 3 (0.3) 4 (0.5) 3 (0.3) Deaths ‡ 0 1 (0.1)0 Clinical Overview T5-3; SCS P13 #Excluding deaths. ‡Patient : 85-yr-old male with mesothelioma; died 67 days after last dose of Zelnorm 2 mg. C

CE-57 Laboratory Evaluations Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302  Low frequency of notable abnormalities –Hematology –Chemistry –Liver function –Renal function  Similar between Zelnorm ® and placebo  Low frequency of notable abnormalities –Hematology –Chemistry –Liver function –Renal function  Similar between Zelnorm ® and placebo C Summary of Clinical Safety T 6-1

CE-58 Abdominal and Pelvic Surgeries Pivotal Studies E2301, E2302—Pooled Placebo n = 861 Zelnorm ® 2 mg BID n = 861 Zelnorm 6 mg BID n = 881 All abdominal and pelvic surgeries, n (%) 8 (0.9)3 (0.3)6 (0.7) Cholecystectomies, n001 Other, n835 C Clinical overview T 5-4, p 23

CE-59 Long-term Safety Studies E2301, E2301E1 (Long-term Safety Population)  842 patients entered the extension trial  Exposure –518 patients (61.7%) exposed to Zelnorm ® ≥ 12 months  Discontinuation –46% of patients discontinued 19% Unsatisfactory therapeutic response 11% Withdrew consent 10% Other (lost to follow-up, administrative reasons, etc.) 6% AE  842 patients entered the extension trial  Exposure –518 patients (61.7%) exposed to Zelnorm ® ≥ 12 months  Discontinuation –46% of patients discontinued 19% Unsatisfactory therapeutic response 11% Withdrew consent 10% Other (lost to follow-up, administrative reasons, etc.) 6% AE C CSR E2301E1 T 7-1, 8-1

CE-60 Adverse Events ≥ 5% Study E2301E1 (Long-term Safety Population) Patients, % Placebo - Zelnorm ® 6 mg BID n = 274 Zelnorm 2 mg BID - 2 mg BID n = 283 Zelnorm 6 mg BID - 6 mg BID n = 283 Headache Abdominal pain NOS Diarrhea NOS Nasopharyngitis Nausea Influenza Back pain Abdominal distension Abdominal pain upper Constipation Dyspepsia Flatulence Sinusitis NOS C Summary of Clinical Safety T 4-5

CE-61 Conclusions—Safety  Incidence of AEs on Zelnorm ® similar to placebo –Except diarrhea  Low discontinuation rate due to AEs  Long-term safety similar to pivotal studies  Zelnorm is safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic constipation  Incidence of AEs on Zelnorm ® similar to placebo –Except diarrhea  Low discontinuation rate due to AEs  Long-term safety similar to pivotal studies  Zelnorm is safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic constipation C

CE-62 Final Conclusions Chronic Constipation  Zelnorm ® is effective in the treatment of multiple symptoms of chronic constipation –6 mg BID consistently more efficacious than 2 mg BID  Zelnorm improves –Satisfaction with bowel habits –Straining –Stool form –Stool frequency  Zelnorm has a favorable safety profile  Zelnorm ® is effective in the treatment of multiple symptoms of chronic constipation –6 mg BID consistently more efficacious than 2 mg BID  Zelnorm improves –Satisfaction with bowel habits –Straining –Stool form –Stool frequency  Zelnorm has a favorable safety profile C

CE-63 Proposed Indication Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) is indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic constipation and relief of associated symptoms of straining, hard or lumpy stools, and infrequent defecation. C Proposed Package Insert, 1 Oct 2003, p 8