INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Curriculum Leaders Meeting Kansas State Department of Education Movement Towards Institutes  New Name  Division of Learning Services.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Name of Facilitator Instructional Leadership:. Welcome ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved. Name of Superintendent.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Teacher Mentoring for Teacher Leaders August 19, 2011 Office of Professional and Organizational Development Howard County Public Schools 1.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
Ladder of Inference Instructional Leadership:. © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Instructional Leadership Planning an Accountability System Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Supporting Ethical Decision Making Laura Kent, Valerie Cervantez, Velma Kitcheyan Workshop Facilitators.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
ISLLC Standard #4 Planning Collaboration with Families Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Citywide Expectations for
Instructional Leadership: Instructional Quality. Welcome Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name of Facilitator –Overview / Agenda –Enduring.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
ISLLC Standard #6 The Education System Name Workshop Facilitator.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Instructional Leadership.
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
Instructional Leadership:
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Instructional Leadership
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Presentation transcript:

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.

WELCOME

 Facilitator / Introductions  Overview  Review norms and expectations  Review key processes focused on SUPPORTING  Review rigor / quality common assessments  Consider research-based critical behaviors of instructional leaders  Focus on the guiding question  Develop strategies to provide time for rigorous common assessments  Develop action plan of support OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTIONS

Stay focused and fully engaged no competing conversations please Participate to grow share openly and monitor your listening Be a learner create your own meaning and application Get your needs met ask questions that benefit the group personal questions on breaks Housekeeping silence cell phones handle business later share ONE point …then next person

Student Achievement Teacher Quality Instructional Leadership ImplementingMonitoring Supporting CommunicatingAdvocatingPlanning INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Core Component is Managed through Key Processes

Rigorous Curriculum: ambitious academic content provided to all students in all core academic subjects Rigorous Assessments: content, cognitive, & context Common Assessments: collaboratively developed, implemented, and interpreted RIGOR

QUALITY COMMON ASSESSMENTS Starts with Alignment Handout: Alignment

Supports participation in professional development that deepens teachers’ understanding of a rigorous curriculum. Secures the teaching materials necessary for a rigorous curriculum. Provides teachers with time to work on developing and strengthening the curricular program. Supports teachers to teach a curriculum consistent with state and national content standards. RESEARCH-BASED CRITICAL BEHAVIORS OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS

By the end of this workshop… you will develop an ACTION PLAN focused on providing time for teachers to create rigorous Common Assessments aligned with Research-Based Critical Behaviors for Instructional Leaders. ACTION PLAN

How do instructional leaders provide time for teachers to create rigorous common assessments? TIME FOR COMMON ASSESSMENTS Guiding Question

 STEP ONE – Understand that YOU have to say… “YES” to some things and “NO” to other things It is about CHOICES!

 For any initiative/choice, you must consider how it may impact multiple areas…  using a systems thinking approach, each row represents an aspect or area within the system  Also, you must consider others’ perspectives and the effect on student achievement. Handout Consider the Impact

 For each aspect or area consider…  Impact - intended & unintended  Perspective – various positions  Would the impact be perceived as positive or negative? by …  Teachers, Students, Parents, Building Admin, Central Office  Why would people see the same impact results differently?  Effect on student achievement  Think critically about how student achievement will be effected. Are there any losses that could outweigh the intended gains? Handout Considering The Impact

Once you’ve considered the impact of each aspect or area, what you are willing to… Reorganize – what will you do differently? Reallocate – what will you point in a different direction? Delete – what will you stop doing? Handout Considering The Impact

Handout: “Finding Time” How will we provide time for common assessments? Idea# 6: Provide an extended lunch time for each team once per week Handout Finding Time

What do you think the possible impacts would be if you enacted this idea to create time for common assessments? Brainstorm at least three (3) impact ideas for Intended and Unintended for two (2) more aspects/areas, such as curriculum, instruction, etc. Share one idea with the table group

What do you think the possible perspectives for this idea to create time for common assessments? Brainstorm at least three (3) perspectives and their reaction… teacher, student, administrator, parent, etc. for two (2) more aspects/areas, such as curriculum, instruction, etc. Share one idea with the table group

What do you think the possible effects on student achievement would be if you enacted this idea to create time for common assessments? Brainstorm at least three (3) effects for student achievement for two (2) more aspects/areas, such as curriculum, instruction, etc. Share one idea with the table group

What are you willing to … Reorganize - Do differently? Reallocate - Point in a different direction? Delete - Stop doing all together? …in order to implement this idea? By table, brainstorm at least three (3) ideas for each: reorganize, reallocate, delete Select ONE idea to share with whole group

Now, as a Table Group… Choose ANOTHER idea from “Finding Time.” Start with Common Assessments on the “Considering the Impact” handout. Fill in each column, Impact, Perspective, and Effect List at least three (3) ideas for each consideration. When you are finished with Common Assessments, choose three more aspects or areas and fill in the columns for Impact, Perspective, and Effect. With ALL the evidence you have listed for your providing time idea, work through Reorganize, Reallocate and Delete. “Finding Time” Activity

As a Table Group, reflect on your “Considering the Impact” chart: Discuss what you think was the most significant aspect or area and why? From that aspect/area, what do you think was the most significant column? (Impact, Perspective, or Effect) and why? What do you think was the most significant strategy for implementation of your idea and why? Reorganize? Reallocate? Or Delete?

As a Table Group, reflecting on your discussions and “Considering the Impact” chart, be ready to share:  “Finding Time” idea chosen AND the most significant area/aspect (row)  Most significant column (impact, perspective or effect)  Most significant strategy (reorganize, reallocate, or delete)

 Look at Action Plan Handout  Research-Based Critical Behaviors  Focus on “Provides teachers with time to work on developing and strengthening the curricular program” :  What is the Current Reality?  What Ideas/Strategies will you apply? (Use Consider the Impact handout)  What are your Next Steps?  What additional data do you need?  Who will you involve in process?  What resources do you need? DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACTION PLAN Handout Action Plan

 Reviewing information in Current Reality, Ideas/Strategies and Next Steps…  Complete My Action Plan  Do WHAT?  By WHEN? DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACTION PLAN Handout Action Plan

 Looking at your ACTION PLAN  Consider the Guiding Question: How do instructional leaders provide time for teachers to create rigorous common assessment?  Pair / Share ONE strategy you learned today and how you plan to use it at your school. GUIDING QUESTION WITH FINAL REFLECTION 25

 Thank you for your engaged participation  Please complete “Participant Feedback” WORKSHOP CLOSURE