Faculty Information Form Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Goals: 1. To help faculty respond critically to student generated course evaluation; 2. To help faculty improve student learning.  Outcomes: Faculty.
Advertisements

AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: A Diagnostic Guide for Improvement Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: Adjunct Workshop Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott Fall 2009 Semester.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
Using IDEA Reports To improve your teaching. Using IDEA Reports 0 What’s the goal of this session?
2013 Spring Assessment Colloquium Beth Tipton CBPA Associate Dean “CLOSING THE LOOP” AND IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING VIA ONGOING ASSESSMENT.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
TTU Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument.
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
Carleton.ca/edc EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE DEVELOPING A TEACHING DOSSIER Joe Lipsett Nov 12, 2012.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and SACS University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Backward Design Lesson Planning Lyn Steed University of West Georgia.
Your PowerQuest Title A ? PowerQuest for ? Grade By: Insert Your Name and School.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
When the Tail Wags the Dog: Perceptions of Learning and Grade Orientations in, and by, Contemporary College Students and Faculty Howard R. Pollio University.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
The role of course evals in faculty reviews: One perspective John Petraitis CAFE March 25, 2011.
Understanding Your Student Score Report. Let’s start with side one.
MyLearningPlan Professional Development Management System Facilitating excellence and sustainability 1.
HOW DO I USE THINKGATE? Presented By: Mercy Aycart From: South Miami Senior High Data have no meaning…meaning is imposed.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Data-Guided Faculty Development Planning University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Data-Informed Faculty Development Planning Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
IDEA Student Ratings System Loyola University September 9 & 10, 2015 Jake Glover, PhD Senior Education Officer.
Abstract: The definition of effective teaching is fluid and dependent on the teaching environment and its community members (faculty, students and administrators).
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
Presenter: Wan-Ning Chen Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: November 11, 2009 Ramaswamy, S., Harris, I., & Tschirner, U. (2001). Student peer teaching: An.
INNOVATIVE GRADING POLICY Leigh Ann Earnhart CAI 5322: Assessment and Evaluation February 15, 2012.
NIH and IRB Purpose and Method M.Ed Session 2.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Lesson 65 Addition of Radical Expressions Weighted Average.
Using IDEA for Assessment Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
Research Problem The role of the instructor in online courses depends on course design. Traditional instructor responsibilities include class management,
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
Assessment Assessment is the collection, recording and analysis of data about students as they work over a period of time. This should include, teacher,
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
University of Central Florida Theme for Module 4 The Savvy School Leader Understands That a Teacher’s Pedagogy May Impact Their Ability to Integrate Technology.
Course Book Analysis SE. Introduction 3 course books ( English to Go 3, More! 3, smart 3 ) Aspects: General Structure Unit Structure Activities Conclusion.
Understanding the Results Ye Tong, Ph.D. Pearson.
INTERPRETING PSAT 8/9 SCORES AND REPORTS.
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Microsoft Project 2007 What you have said.
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
LEAP 360: Eagle 2.0 Creating a Test
EVAAS Overview.
Standards Based Grading
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
LEAP 360: Accessing K-2 Formative Tasks
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
How to Present a Case Study
This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series
AtD Cooperative Learning Initiative Student and Faculty Survey Results
Course Code / Semester / Year
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Information Form Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham

Student Learning Model: 2 Assumptions Assumption 1: Types of learning must reflect the instructor’s purpose.

Student Diagnostic Form Assumption 2: Effectiveness determined by students’ progress on objectives stressed by instructor

Faculty Information Form (FIF)

FIF: Selecting Objectives 3-5 as “Essential” or “Important” Is it a significant part of the course? Do you do something specific to help students accomplish the objective? Does the student’s progress on the objective influence his or her grade? Be true to your course.

Common Misconception Students are expected to make significant progress on all 12 learning objectives in a given course.

Course Description Items (FIF) Used for research Best answered toward end of term Do NOT influence your results Bottom of Page 1 Top of page 2

Discipline Code

Diagnostic Report Overview  Page 1 – Big Picture  How did I do? Page 3 – Diagnostic  What can I do differently? Page 2 – Learning Details  What did students learn? Page 4 – Statistical Detail  Any additional insights?

Your Average (5-point Scale) RawAdj. A.Progress on Relevant Objectives 1 Four objectives were selected as relevant (Important or Essential—see page 2) If you are comparing Progress on Relevant Objectives from one instructor to another, use the converted average. The Big Picture

Progress On Relevant Objectives

Summary Evaluation: Five-Point Scale Report Page 1 Your Average Score (5-point scale) RawAdj. A.Progress on Relevant Objectives Four objectives were selected as relevant (Important or Essential—see page 2) Overall Ratings B. Excellent Teacher C. Excellent Course D. Average of B & C Summary Evaluation (Average of A & D) % 25%

Questions ?

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.