Fermilab SUMMARY of DISCUSSION Work packages for EDR Main Linac: QUAD package and Instrumentation N.Solyak/K. Tsuchiya Installation and Alignment F.Asiri/A.Tetsuo/R.Ruland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Feb. 6, 2007 BILCW07 Global Design Effort 1 CF&S EDR Plans Main Linac Parallel Session Tom Lackowski Atsushi Enomoto, Jean Luc Baldy, Vic Kuchler.
Operations and Availability GG3. Key decisions Summary of Key Decisions for the Baseline Design The linac will have two parallel tunnels so that the support.
Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
3/2011 CFS BTR Global Design Effort 1 Americas Region Civil Design Tom Lackowski.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Project X RD&D Plan Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) Russ Alber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
Question 25: Delineate the R&D program remaining before a technical design review (TDR) and full cost estimate can be prepared. What are the major projects.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Positron Source Relocation 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
SLA – Oct. 07 BDS-KOM1 Installation Overview Acknowledgment: F. Peters, M. Munro, J. Kim G. Aarons, C. Corvin, P. Rodriguez Fred Asiri/SLAC.
Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red.
Fred Asiri1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (CFS) SLAC Update November.
Controls & LLRF ILC Controls Telecon August 17, 2006 John Carwardine RDR Report Writing.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Operations, Test facilities, CF&S Tom Himel SLAC.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
Fermilab Feb.5, 2007, Beijing N.Solyak -1- Main Linac Magnet Systems and Instrumentation Work Packages for EDR Nikolay Solyak, John Tompkins, Vladimir.
WBS x.11 Conventional Facilities Americas Region ILC Fermilab ART Meeting1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Americas Region FY.
20 April 2009 AAP Review Global Design Effort 1 The Positron Source Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
Fermilab February 1, 2007 J. Tompkins -1- Comments on the EDR and Magnet Systems JCT for the Magnet Systems Group
The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting March 2012 All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
Global design effort DOE meeting 8/10/06 Global design effort Americas 1 FY07 DOE ILC Budget recommendations G. Dugan ILC-GDE/Cornell University GDE Americas.
BDS: 1 October 13, 2007 BDS KOM EDR planning discussion Andrei Seryi October 13, 2007.
Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
1 Integration and Milestones Elton Smith Hall D Detector Review October 20-22, 2004.
October 25, 2007 A. Brachmann Slide 1 ILC polarized Electron Source EDR Work Packages ALCPG/GDE Meeting Fermilab, October 25, 2007 Axel Brachmann.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC Americas Region February 7, ILC Source Systems Work Packages and EDR Discussions ILC GDE Meeting IHEP, Beijing, China J. C.
February 4, 2007 Global Design Effort 1. February 4, 07 Global Design Effort IR&MDI: 2 Tuesday’s discussion EDR organization Work Package distribution.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Global Design Effort RTML KOM Close-out Ross, Walker.
WBS – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration g-2 Accelerator – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration D. Still Fermilab Muon g-2 IDR, June 5-7.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
CTC Work Packages ver 2.1 HS for CTC. CTC-001SC wigglers Cooling design, hor. or ver. Racetrack coil Nb3Sn or NbTi cable Prototypes construction Experimental.
3/10/2006Marc Ross - SLAC1 RDR Instrumentation – Bangalore ILC-GDE meeting, 3/10/2006 Development and specification process Operations and Beam Dynamics.
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC RTML Meeting EDR Planning for Magnet Power Systems
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe – KICK OFF MEETING
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
LCLS Injector System Overview D. H
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

Fermilab SUMMARY of DISCUSSION Work packages for EDR Main Linac: QUAD package and Instrumentation N.Solyak/K. Tsuchiya Installation and Alignment F.Asiri/A.Tetsuo/R.Ruland CF&S Interface T.Lackowski Reliability, MPS, Operation and Tuning T.Himel/PT/J.Carwardine

Fermilab Magnet Work Packages 1e - Source Conventional Magnets 2e+ Source Conventional Magnets 3e-, e+ Source, RTML Solenoids 4e+ SC undulators 5DR Conventional Magnets 6DR Wigglers 7RTML Conventional Magnets 8 Main Linac/Cryomodule SC quads & correctors 9BDS Conventional Magnets 10 BDS Final Focus SC Magnets & TF Octupoles 11BDS Magnet Movers 12Pulsed Magnet Systems 13e- Source Magnet Power Systems 14e+ Source Magnet Power Systems 15Damping Rings Magnet Power Systems 16RTML Magnet Power Systems 17Main Linac Magnet Power Systems 18BDS Magnet Power Systems Power System WPs Incl. magnet interfaces to Controls System Does not include Pulsed Magnets Separate special magnets from more ‘routine’ conventional designs A separate WP for ‘pulsed magnets’ Cold magnet test facility design – shared with cryomod’s/SRF test & measurement systems 19Con. Mag. Test & Meas. Facility 20SC Mag. Test & Meas. Facility Magnet Facilities WPs Magnet System Work Packages

Fermilab Main Linac Cryomodule Quadrupole and Corrector BPM SCRF 300 mm pipe Central support SCRF SC Quads /Correctors ~ 620 in Linacs + RTML

Fermilab SC magnets for ML Critical Component of the ML and RTML Tight specification Requirements for center stability ~1um Small fringing fields in the cavity No dipole-corrector coupling effects No proven design yet R&D and prototyping are needed to confirm the specified performance and efficiency Number of magnet types (low/medium/high energy) Combined or stand alone correctors Optimal quadrupole configuration Magnetic center stability during –20% field change Sub-packages with high priorities (Low energy magnet)?

Fermilab ART FY08/09 Budget proposal (2 Years) Target 2 Total: 0.75 FTE*year 0 M&S Total: 4.75 FTE*year 214 k$ M&S Total: 1.8 FTE*year 285 k$ M&S

Fermilab Funding for FY08-FY09 was planned w/o EDR needs EDR SC magnet design and cost estimate cannot be carried out without sufficient funding EDR Magnet Design and Cost Effort Preliminary Staffing Estimate for “100% Design” Feb.07.02

Fermilab SC Magnet development plan at KEK (K. Tsuchiya) Budget and Manpower - dedicated test facility : ~1.5 M$ cooling system field measurement system - ~6 magnets : ~1.5 M$ - magnet installation into cryomodule ~ 0.3 M$ and test operation Manpower magnet design & fabrication : 2.0 FTE/ year cooling system : 1.5 FTE/ year field measurement system : 1.5 FTE/ year (* Preliminary estimations)

Fermilab Instrumentation Overview Beam instrumentation needs in the Main Linacs, as listed in the RDR: InstrumentRequirementsQty R&D WPs M&S (k$)FTE (MY) Cold BPM (L-Band cavity) 0.5…2 µm 2 x Laserwire ~10 % of transverse beam size 2 x Beam current monitor-toroid 0.5…1 % of bunch charge 2 x 3 BLM - PMT -Ion Chamber < 0.01 % of total beam intensity 2 x x 10 Feedback systems Inject / ejection, energy, spread 2 x Further R&D is required on the HOM coupler signal processing for beam orbit, cavity alignment and beam phase measurement! Work package proposal: M&S ~ 200 k$, FTE ~ 3 ManYears.

Fermilab Instrumentation R&D packages desciption L-band cavity BPMs (Linacs, RTML, BDS, both warm and cold ) Cavity BPM Analog and digital read-out electronics Trigger/timing hardware to time-resolve position for individual bunches A system for calibration and self-diagnosis tests. Digital data acquisition and control hard/software, incl. interface. Auxiliary systems (racks, crates, power supplies, cables, etc.) Laserwire : (Linacs, RTML and BDS) Laser (one can feed many IP’s) IP (multi-plane) Distribution e /γ Separation Deflector (scanner) Detector Beam Feedback Systems stabilize beam trajectories/emittance/dispersion in the Linacs. Trajectory Feedback (several cascaded loops) - 5Hz Dispersion measurement and control Beam energy (several cascaded sections) (5Hz) End of linac trajectory control (bunch-by-bunch)

Fermilab Working days per year ContractYears3Cryomodule underground installation Lab/ Contract Years 4 Cryomodule handling & shipping LabYears 6 Project engineering LabYears 8 Project management Installation rate: Three Cryomodules per day * Installation time frame: Contract 250 Number of Main Linac Cryomodules 1668 * 556 max rate of Cryomodule installation, plus learning curve and interrupts. Methodology- Assumption ML installation ~ hrs F.Asiri

Fermilab FUTURE PLANNING There are a series of long lead items that must be addressed, before the installation can commence. These are: –Warehousing capacity –Tunnel transportation for equipment & personnel –Materials handling requirements for the tunnel –Utility requirements & locations including cryo box locations in the tunnel. –Data processing, including inventory control & scheduling.

Fermilab Application of Virtual Design & Construction Technologies 3D model (AutoCAD) 4D model / interference check (NavisWorks) Scheduling (Primavera) Integrated Central 4D Database (Enterprixe) Mobile Server Fabricator Job Site Mobile Technology Operation Optimization Discrete event simulation (Strobscope) Database Technology Transporter 4D Technology (3D CAD + schedule)

Fermilab FUTURE PLANNING Installation G.S. –Goal: to produce an integrated Installation process for the ILC Baseline in full cooperation with other regions  Set-up and manage an installation data base in FY 07 that can be expanded in a full pledged program thru FY 08 and FY 09 Estimate: FY 07;1.5 FTE and ~ $100K M&S (contract) FY 08; 2 FTE and ~ $200K M&S (contract) FY 09; 2 FTE and ~ $200K M&S (contract)

Fermilab CF&S Effort Levels (before EDR) The CF&S effort will need to ramp up sharply over the next three years in order to complete what we perceive is required for the EDR. A parallel effort to develop regional selection documents will add to the EDR effort. Regional support and funding is under discussion, but not firm enough to make financial commitments. All regions have limited available in- house engineers. Will need to through expanding A&E consultants. 4M$ - 7M$ - 19M$ T.Lackowski

Fermilab Firm #1 – General Architect/ Engineering Firm ($1,000K to $2,500K) This firm will provide professional architectural and engineering services to support the ILC mission. The general scope of this work may include: Condition Assessments; Surface Building Programming: Site Planning; Building design; Conceptual Design Studies and reports Value Management Analysis Firm # 2 – Underground Engineering Expertise (at least three firms anticipated to be selected) ($5,000K to ($10,000K) Design, cost estimating, and scheduling of hard rock tunnels, caverns and halls. Design, cost estimating, and scheduling of soft rock tunnels, caverns and halls. Design, cost estimating, and scheduling of open cut enclosures. Conceptual Design Studies and reports Presentation Drawings: Value Engineering Analysis Soil borings, and the associated field and laboratory analysis. Geotechnical Reports Geotechnical baseline reports

Fermilab Firm # 3 – Site Civil Expertise ($500K to $1,000K) Firm # 4 Electrical Expertise ($300K to ($900K) Firm # 5 Process Cooling and Mechanical Engineering ($600K to $1,200K) Firm # 6 – Life Safety Engineer ($300K to $700K) Firm #7 – Configuration Controls and Project Controls Systems ($400K to $1,200K) Firm # 8 – Environmental, Safety and Health ($300K to $600K) Firm # 9 – Land Acquisition Support ($200K to $500K)

Fermilab Availability Description: –Monitor progress of other groups in meeting reliability goals. Aid them with simulations or calculations as requested. –Adjust reliability goals to minimize risk and cost as development continues –Keep availability model updated to changes in design. Add in more detail as necessary. –Should we set up a FMEA plan and get all systems to use it in the design of their parts? (not included in FTE estimate below) –What should we do about systems like water instrumentation, collimators, and coupler interlocks that need major MTBF improvements that don’t have ongoing R&D projects? Resources: –1 FTE level of effort through 2 nd year of construction T.Himel

Fermilab MPS system: –33 FTE level of effort through 5 th year of construction –2 FTE years for fault scenario simulations. Should be done in first 1.5 years of EDR as results could effect beam-line layouts PPS +BCS: –0.5 FTE level of effort through 2 nd year of construction –2 FTE-years of rad-physics calculations guided by above LOE person. Should take place in first 1.5 years of EDR as shielding may effect layout. Refine alignment and vibration tolerances –2 FTE years. MUST be done in 1 st year of EDR so detailed magnet and support designs can be done based on the tolerances.

Fermilab Tuning and feedbacks: –12 FTE years if it is done 3 times so people are checking each other. Considerable computing resources will be needed hopefully these exist at the lab already and hence don’t count as M&S. This effort can start slow and can extend to the beginning of construction Commissioning: –0.2 FTE level of effort through end of the EDR –Then.5 FTE level of effort through 4th year of construction. –Some beam operations start in 3 rd year of construction –6 FTE years if everything is done once.