1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
SASD DATA RETREAT Agenda Welcome Purpose and Outcomes of Day School Learning Objectives (SLO) Overview & Connection to Educator Effectiveness SLO.
1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.
C HARLOTTE D ANIELSON ’ S F RAMEWORK FOR T EACHING Overview for Arkansas TESS Teacher Training.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Cinnaminson Township Public Schools November 6, 2012 INTRODUCTION TO THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR TEACHERS.
Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Quote The whole art of teaching is only the art of awakening the natural curiosity of young minds for the purpose of satisfying it afterwards. Anatole.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
QUALITY TEACHING & EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Presented By Dr. PERUMAL UMA, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Computer Science Academic Campus for Girls
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student/School Learning Objectives
Continuous Improvement of Evaluation: Fifth Year With the Framework for Teaching Laura Dancer, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Using LDC to Support Student Growth SREB College-and Career- Readiness Standards Networking Conference JULY 13-15, 2015 Tweet about this session at #CCRS15.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
A Summary of Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System for West De Pere.
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/21/14 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must be.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
James P. B. Duffy School #12 State of the School Address November, 2012.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
The Effective Teacher Chapter 1 James M. Cooper. Do Now In your notes answer the following question: –What makes a teacher effective?
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
Teacher Evaluation Overview
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
1 Teacher Performance Assessment Lynn Sawyer Director of Professional Development P.O. Box Reno, NV December.
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/26/2015 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives How to Create an SLO.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives Teamwork in Motion.
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Introduction to Core Professionalism
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

2 Outcomes Develop a deeper understanding of the process involved in developing quality SLOs. Consider the unique contexts of the work in your areas, and identify quality components of an SLO. Know where to go for resources and answers as it applies to SLOs

3 State Model Performance on rubrics aligned with professional standards, InTASC (teachers) and ISLLC (principals) Measured by Multiple observations Review of student artifacts Includes formative feedback Summative scores Performance in improving student outcomes Measured by Approved standardized tests Student Learning Objectives School-wide reading Graduation rate District choice

4 Domain 3 Instruction Domain 2 Classroom Environment Domain 3 Instruction 3aCommunicating with Students 3bUsing Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3cEngaging Students in Learning 3dUsing Assessment in Instruction 3eDemonstrating Flexibility & Responsiveness Domain 2 Classroom Environment 2aCreating an Environment of Respect & Rapport 2bCreating a Culture of Learning 2cManaging Classroom Procedures 2dManaging Student Behavior 2eManaging Physical Space Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Domain 1 Planning and Preparation Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities 4aReflecting on Teaching 4bMaintaining Accurate Records 4cCommunicating with Families 4dParticipating in a Professional Community 4eGrowing and Developing Professionally 4fShowing Professionalism Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 1aDemonstrating Knowledge of Content & Pedagogy 1bDemonstrating Knowledge of Students 1cSetting Instructional Outcomes 1dDemonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1eDesigning Coherent Instruction 1fDesigning Student Assessment

5 Award-winning education technology tool Efficient and customized evaluations to promote sustained improvement hosts a comprehensive evaluator certification training and test management of the actual evaluation process hosts a deep and comprehensive repository of professional growth resources aligned with the educator's individual results

6 Logic Model/From Teacher Learning to Impact on Student Engagement and Learning Teacher Learning Changes to: Teacher Knowledge and/or Attitudes/Beliefs Changes in Teacher Practices (Domains 1-4) Improved Student Engagement And Learning

7 Logic Model/From Teacher Learning to Impact on Student Engagement and Learning Teacher Learning Professional Development, Department Collaboration, Peer Observation, Peer Coaching, Teacher Evaluation Changes to: Teacher Knowledge, Attitudes/Beliefs Practicing New Skills Changes /Improved: Teacher Decision- making and Planning, Classroom Environment, Instruction, Curriculum and/or Assessment Practices Improved Student Engagement And Learning

8 Table Discussion: What would these domains/components look like in your area? Educators may have to discuss “look fors” as they relate to their area with their evaluator.

9 What are SLOs? Dual Meaning in the EE system SMART goals focused on student academic growth Need to be developed in a way that a teacher can directly link growth to instructional strategies in the classroom

10 Dual Meaning of the SLO Acronym

11 Student/School Learning Objectives to be achieved in a specific period of time (typically an academic year), based on prior student learning data (baseline assessment), developed collaboratively by educators and their supervisors.

12 Flexibility of Approaches to the SLO Process StructuredMore Flexible Assessments Growth Targets Scoring Rubric Implementation New York D.C. Georgia Austin Rhode Island Wisconsin Indiana Denver

13 Linking Practice to Outcomes SLOs must be meaningful to the individual SLOs must be relevant to the subject area, context of the job. Examples, not exemplars

14 SMART Goals Specific Manageable Attainable Results based Time Bound

15 Goals focused on growth: Capture student learning over time. Allows the educator to directly link academic achievement to the instructional strategies they’ve employed.

16 How often? How many? Educators set SLO goals annually The number of SLOs required is dependent on the other outcome measures available to the educator Most educators will complete more than one

17 Key Characteristics of SLOs Baseline Data and Rationale Learning Content Population Interval Evidence Sources Targeted Growth Strategies and Support

18 CTE Considerations: What should your students know and be able to do? What assessment might capture their baseline skills? What might you use to track growth over time (evidence)?

19 Let’s Take A Break! Be back in 15 minutes!

20 SLO Process Step 1: Prepare SLO Step 2: Submit SLO for Approval Step 3: Collect Evidence Step 4: Review and Score Approved Not Approved Fall Mid year check: Goal adjustment appropriate if evidence warrants an adjustment. Spring

21 Step 1 – Prepare SLOs Analyze Data, Set Targets and Select Assessments Critical Step Readiness Considerations Rigorous, yet attainable Appropriate assessment needed to track growth

22 EXAMPLE : Mrs. Timm is a marketing teacher at the HS. Marketing is a year long course. At the end of the course, students need to present (orally, and in writing) the potential risks and benefits of their business plan. Mrs. Timm will develop an SLO to address this skill….

23 Is it SMART? Specific? Manageable? Attainable? Results Based? Time Bound? During the course of the school year, students will improve on their ability to identify potential risks and benefits of a business plan.

24 Is it SMART? Aspect of the Goal Statement Yes or No Recommendations? SpecificNo- the goal is very broad MeasurableNo- the goal does not state how it will be measured AttainableNo- because there is no specific area identified or measurement tool, it is difficult to say if it is attainable Results-basedNo- what will be the indicator of student growth? Time-boundYes- identified the current school year as the time interval

25 Better? During the course of the school year, students scoring below proficiency on the cost/benefit analysis writing prompt will improve in their ability to identify potential risks and benefits of a business plan.

26 Is it SMART? Aspect of the Goal Statement Yes or No Recommendations? SpecificGetting better, but could be more specific in both students, and amount of growth. MeasurableNo- no indication of assessment tool AttainableCould be, but improvement is very general, and it doesn’t indicate the amount of improvement Results-basedWeak indication of type of growth desired Time-boundYes- identified the current school year as the time interval

27 There? 85% (6 of 7) of students scoring minimal on the writing rubric will make two rubric level gains (proficient) by semester end. 85% (9 of 10) of the students scoring basic on the writing rubric will make one rubric level gain(proficient) by semester end.

28 Mrs. Timm’s SLO example Table Time: Look at the finished example of the SLO that Mrs. Timm will submit for approval. Using the Guiding Questions, has Mrs. Timm completed a quality SLO?

29 STEP 2- Submit for Approval Approval is a collaborative meeting where teacher and principal review data, target population and goals. Only a licensed administrator can approve SLO goals.

30 STEP 3- Monitor Progress/ Collect Evidence Throughout the school year, educators collect evidence and data toward meeting SLOs. Examples of Evidence: Purchased assessments, district or regionally produced assessments, common assessments designed by schools or teacher teams, assessments designed by individual teachers

31 Mrs. Timm’s Evidence SEPT DECAPRIL Rubric Level Minimal7 students3 students Proficient 4 students Basic (42%) 6 students Proficient 1 student Basic (85%) Basic10 students 5 students Proficient 5 students Basic (50%) 10 Students Proficient (100%) MET EXCEEDED

32 STEP 3- Review and Score Scoring typically occurs at the end of the year. Rubric based scoring Important to start with solid SLO, engage in entire process. No surprises at the end of the year.

33 STEP 3- Review and Score

34 EE System Readiness Familiarize yourself with the Danielson 2013 FFT. Consider artifacts/evidence of practice as it applies to your unique area. Consider sources of baseline evidence, and SLO assessment evidence as it applies to your unique area.

35 RESOURCES EE Website: EE Help Desk: Teachscape (Webinars, Research, Awards, and Information):

36 QUESTIONS